1
|
van Nassau SC, Voogdt-Pruis HR, de Jong VM, Otten HM, Valkenburg-van Iersel LB, Swarte BJ, Buffart TE, Pruijt HJ, Mekenkamp LJ, Koopman M, May AM. Improving sustainability of a patient decision aid for systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A qualitative study. PEC INNOVATION 2024; 4:100300. [PMID: 38974934 PMCID: PMC11225887 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024]
Abstract
Objective To improve sustainability of a patient decision aid for systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, we evaluated real-world experiences and identified ways to optimize decision aid content and future implementation. Methods Semi-structured interviews with patients and medical oncologists addressed two main subjects: user experience and decision aid content. Content analysis was applied. Fifteen experts discussed the results and devised improvements based on experience and literature review. Results Thirteen users were interviewed. They confirmed the relevance of the decision aid for shared decision making. Areas for improvement of content concerned; 1) outdated and missing information, 2) an imbalance in presentation of treatment benefits and harms, and 3) medical oncologists' expressed preference for a more center-specific or patient individualized decision aid, presenting a selection of the guideline recommended treatment options. Key points for improvement of implementation were better alignment within the care pathway, and clear instruction to users. Conclusion We identified relevant opportunities for improvement of an existing decision aid and developed an updated version and accompanying implementation strategy accordingly. Innovation This paper outlines an approach for continued decision aid and implementation strategy development which will add to sustainability. Implementation success of the improved decision aid is currently being studied in a multi-center mixed-methods implementation study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sietske C.M.W. van Nassau
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Helene R. Voogdt-Pruis
- Department of Global Public Health and Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent M.W. de Jong
- Dutch patient federation for colorectal cancer (Stichting Darmkanker), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hans-Martin Otten
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meander Medical Center Amersfoort, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Liselot B. Valkenburg-van Iersel
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Bas J. Swarte
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tineke E. Buffart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hans J. Pruijt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Leonie J. Mekenkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M. May
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wesselink E, Boshuizen HC, van Lanen AS, Kok DE, Derksen JWG, Smit KC, de Wilt JHW, Koopman M, May AM, Kampman E, van Duijnhoven FJB. Dietary and lifestyle inflammation scores in relation to colorectal cancer recurrence and all-cause mortality: A longitudinal analysis. Clin Nutr 2024; 43:2092-2101. [PMID: 39094474 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to longitudinally investigate dietary and lifestyle inflammation scores and their interaction in relation to risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence and all-cause mortality. METHODS Data of two prospective cohort studies among CRC survivors was used. Information about diet and/or lifestyle was available for 2739 individuals for at least one of the following time points: at diagnosis, six months after diagnosis and two years after diagnosis. The dietary and lifestyle inflammation scores (DIS and LIS) were used to evaluate the inflammatory potential of diet and lifestyle. Joint modelling, combining mixed models and Cox proportional hazards regression, were used to assess associations between DIS and LIS over time and CRC recurrence and all-cause mortality. Interactions between DIS and LIS were assessed using time-dependent Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 4.8 (IQR 2.9-6.9) years for recurrence and 5.7 (IQR 3.5-8.5) years for all-cause mortality, with 363 and 453 events, respectively. A higher DIS as well as LIS was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HRDIScontinuous 1.09 95%CI 1.02; 1.15; HRLIScontinuous 1.24 95%CI 1.05; 1.46). Individuals who were in the upper tertile of both DIS and LIS had the highest all-cause mortality risk (HR 1.62 95%CI 1.16; 2.28), compared to the individuals in the lowest tertile of both DIS and LIS. No consistent associations with recurrence were observed. CONCLUSION A more pro-inflammatory diet and lifestyle was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality, but not recurrence, in CRC survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evertine Wesselink
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Hendriek C Boshuizen
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Anne-Sophie van Lanen
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Dieuwertje E Kok
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen W G Derksen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Karel C Smit
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kampman
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Schaik LF, Engelhardt EG, Wilthagen EA, Steeghs N, Fernández Coves A, Joore MA, van Harten WH, Retèl VP. Factors for a broad technology assessment of comprehensive genomic profiling in advanced cancer, a systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 202:104441. [PMID: 39002790 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) allows for the identification of many targets. Reimbursement decision-making is, however, challenging because besides the health benefits of on-label treatments and costs, other factors related to diagnostic and treatment pathways may also play a role. The aim of this study was to identify which other factors are relevant for the technology assessment of CGP and to summarize the available evidence for these factors. After a scoping search and two expert sessions, five factors were identified: feasibility, test journey, wider implications of diagnostic results, organisation of laboratories, and "scientific spillover". Subsequently, a systematic search identified 83 studies collecting mainly evidence for the factors "test journey" and "wider implications of diagnostic results". Its nature was, however, of limited value for decision-making. We recommend the use of comparative strategies, uniformity in outcome definitions, and the inclusion of a comprehensive set of factors in future evidence generation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L F van Schaik
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90103, Amsterdam 1006 BE, the Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - E G Engelhardt
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90103, Amsterdam 1006 BE, the Netherlands.
| | - E A Wilthagen
- Scientific Information Service, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam CX 1066, the Netherlands.
| | - N Steeghs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam CX 1066, the Netherlands.
| | - A Fernández Coves
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), P. Debyelaan 25, Oxford Building, P.O. Box 5800a, Maastricht, Limburg, the Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - M A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), P. Debyelaan 25, Oxford Building, P.O. Box 5800a, Maastricht, Limburg, the Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - W H van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90103, Amsterdam 1006 BE, the Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
| | - V P Retèl
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90103, Amsterdam 1006 BE, the Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zwart K, van Nassau SCMW, van der Baan FH, Koopman M, Snaebjornsson P, van Gestel AJ, Vink GR, Roodhart JML. Efficacy-effectiveness analysis on survival in a population-based real-world study of BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with encorafenib-cetuximab. Br J Cancer 2024; 131:110-116. [PMID: 38769450 PMCID: PMC11231318 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02711-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Encorafenib-cetuximab has been approved for pretreated BRAFV600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients based on efficacy demonstrated in the randomized phase III BEACON trial. The aim of this real-world effectiveness study is to improve knowledge on the generalizability of trial results. METHODS This population-based real-world study includes all mCRC patients in the Netherlands treated with encorafenib-cetuximab since approval. Individual patient data and pathology reports were collected. Overall survival (OS) was compared to BEACON and subgroup analyses were conducted for patients who would have been eligible and ineligible for BEACON. RESULTS 166 patients were included with a median follow-up time of 14.5 months. Median OS was 6.7 months (95% CI:6.0-8.3) and differed from BEACON (9.3 months; 95% CI:8.0-11.3, p-value 0.002). Thirty-six percent of real-world patients would have been ineligible for the BEACON trial. Trial ineligible subgroups with symptomatic brain metastases and WHO performance status ≥2 had the poorest median OS of 5.0 months (95% CI:4.0-NR) and 3.9 months (95% CI:2.4-NR). CONCLUSION This real-world cohort of mCRC patients treated with encorafenib-cetuximab showed a clinically relevant efficacy-effectiveness gap for OS. The chance of survival benefit from encorafenib-cetuximab in patients with brain metastases and/or WHO performance status ≥2 is negligible as neither efficacy nor effectiveness has been demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen Zwart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sietske C M W van Nassau
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frederieke H van der Baan
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna J van Gestel
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Geraldine R Vink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanine M L Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Berger ML, Ganz PA, Zou KH, Greenfield S. When Will Real-World Data Fulfill Its Promise to Provide Timely Insights in Oncology? JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2024; 8:e2400039. [PMID: 38950323 DOI: 10.1200/cci.24.00039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Randomized trials provide high-quality, internally consistent data on selected clinical questions, but lack generalizability for the aging population who are most often diagnosed with cancer and have comorbid conditions that may affect the interpretation of treatment benefit. The need for high-quality, relevant, and timely data is greater than ever. Promising solutions lie in the collection and analysis of real-world data (RWD), which can potentially provide timely insights about the patient's course during and after initial treatment and the outcomes of important subgroups such as the elderly, rural populations, children, and patients with greater social health needs. However, to inform practice and policy, real-world evidence must be created from trustworthy and comprehensive sources of RWD; these may include pragmatic clinical trials, registries, prospective observational studies, electronic health records (EHRs), administrative claims, and digital technologies. There are unique challenges in oncology since key parameters (eg, cancer stage, biomarker status, genomic assays, imaging response, side effects, quality of life) are not recorded, siloed in inaccessible documents, or available only as free text or unstructured reports in the EHR. Advances in analytics, such as artificial intelligence, may greatly enhance the ability to obtain more granular information from EHRs and support integrated diagnostics; however, they will need to be validated purpose by purpose. We recommend a commitment to standardizing data across sources and building infrastructures that can produce fit-for-purpose RWD that will provide timely understanding of the effectiveness of individual interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patricia A Ganz
- UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Kelly H Zou
- Global Medical Analytics, Real World Evidence, and Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Viatris Inc, Canonsburg, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cañellas-Socias A, Sancho E, Batlle E. Mechanisms of metastatic colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:10.1038/s41575-024-00934-z. [PMID: 38806657 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-024-00934-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
Despite extensive research and improvements in understanding colorectal cancer (CRC), its metastatic form continues to pose a substantial challenge, primarily owing to limited therapeutic options and a poor prognosis. This Review addresses the emerging focus on metastatic CRC (mCRC), which has historically been under-studied compared with primary CRC despite its lethality. We delve into two crucial aspects: the molecular and cellular determinants facilitating CRC metastasis and the principles guiding the evolution of metastatic disease. Initially, we examine the genetic alterations integral to CRC metastasis, connecting them to clinically marked characteristics of advanced CRC. Subsequently, we scrutinize the role of cellular heterogeneity and plasticity in metastatic spread and therapy resistance. Finally, we explore how the tumour microenvironment influences metastatic disease, emphasizing the effect of stromal gene programmes and the immune context. The ongoing research in these fields holds immense importance, as its future implications are projected to revolutionize the treatment of patients with mCRC, hopefully offering a promising outlook for their survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrià Cañellas-Socias
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain.
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Barcelona, Spain.
- Center for Cancer Cell Therapy, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Elena Sancho
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Batlle
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain.
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Barcelona, Spain.
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Polack M, Smit MA, van Pelt GW, Roodvoets AGH, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Putter H, Gelderblom H, Crobach ASLP, Terpstra V, Petrushevska G, Gašljević G, Kjær-Frifeldt S, de Cuba EMV, Bulkmans NWJ, Vink GR, Al Dieri R, Tollenaar RAEM, van Krieken JHJM, Mesker WE. Results from the UNITED study: a multicenter study validating the prognostic effect of the tumor-stroma ratio in colon cancer. ESMO Open 2024; 9:102988. [PMID: 38613913 PMCID: PMC11033069 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The TNM (tumor-node-metastasis) Evaluation Committee of Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and College of American Pathologists (CAP) recommended to prospectively validate the cost-effective and robust tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) as an independent prognostic parameter, since high intratumor stromal percentages have previously predicted poor patient-related outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS The 'Uniform Noting for International application of Tumor-stroma ratio as Easy Diagnostic tool' (UNITED) study enrolled patients in 27 participating centers in 12 countries worldwide. The TSR, categorized as stroma-high (>50%) or stroma-low (≤50%), was scored through standardized microscopic assessment by certified pathologists, and effect on disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated with 3-year median follow-up. Secondary endpoints were benefit assessment of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 1537 patients were included, with 1388 eligible stage II/III patients curatively operated between 2015 and 2021. DFS was significantly shorter in stroma-high (n = 428) than in stroma-low patients (n = 960) (3-year rates 70% versus 83%; P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, TSR remained an independent prognosticator for DFS (P < 0.001, hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.17-1.90). As secondary outcome, DFS was also worse in stage II and III stroma-high patients despite adjuvant treatment (3-year rates stage II 73% versus 92% and stage III 66% versus 80%; P = 0.008 and P = 0.011, respectively). In stage II patients not receiving ACT (n = 322), the TSR outperformed the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) criteria in identifying patients at risk of events (event rate 21% versus 9%), with a higher discriminatory 3-year DFS rate (stroma-high 80% versus ASCO high risk 91%). A trend toward worse 5-year OS in stroma-high was noticeable (74% versus 83% stroma-low; P = 0.102). CONCLUSION The multicenter UNITED study unequivocally validates the TSR as an independent prognosticator, confirming worse outcomes in stroma-high patients. The TSR improved current selection criteria for patients at risk of events, and stroma-high patients potentially experienced chemotherapy resistance. TSR implementation in pathology diagnostics and international guidelines is highly recommended as aid in personalized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Polack
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - M A Smit
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - G W van Pelt
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - A G H Roodvoets
- Clinical Research Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | | | - H Putter
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden
| | | | - A S L P Crobach
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - V Terpstra
- Department of Pathology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - G Petrushevska
- Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty of Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
| | - G Gašljević
- Department of Pathology, Onkološki inštitut-Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - S Kjær-Frifeldt
- Department of Pathology, Vejle Sygehus-Sygehus Lillebælt, Vejle, Denmark
| | | | | | - G R Vink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Al Dieri
- European Society of Pathology, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - J H J M van Krieken
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - W E Mesker
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Verkerk K, Voest EE. Generating and using real-world data: A worthwhile uphill battle. Cell 2024; 187:1636-1650. [PMID: 38552611 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
The precision oncology paradigm challenges the feasibility and data generalizability of traditional clinical trials. Consequently, an unmet need exists for practical approaches to test many subgroups, evaluate real-world drug value, and gather comprehensive, accessible datasets to validate novel biomarkers. Real-world data (RWD) are increasingly recognized to have the potential to fill this gap in research methodology. Established applications of RWD include informing disease epidemiology, pharmacovigilance, and healthcare quality assessment. Currently, concerns regarding RWD quality and comprehensiveness, privacy, and biases hamper their broader application. Nonetheless, RWD may play a pivotal role in supplementing clinical trials, enabling conditional reimbursement and accelerated drug access, and innovating trial conduct. Moreover, purpose-built RWD repositories may support the extension or refinement of drug indications and facilitate the discovery and validation of new biomarkers. This perspective explores the potential of leveraging RWD to advance oncology, highlights its benefits and challenges, and suggests a path forward in this evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Verkerk
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - E E Voest
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hamers PAH, Vink GR, Elferink MAG, Moons LMG, Punt CJA, May AM, Koopman M. Impact of colorectal cancer screening on survival after metachronous metastasis. Eur J Cancer 2024; 196:113429. [PMID: 38006758 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases in Europe are detected by screening with faecal immunochemical testing (FIT). Previous studies showed that population screening with FIT leads to a decrease in CRC incidence and to detection at an earlier stage. However, approximately twenty percent of patients with CRC without metastases at initial diagnosis still develop metachronous metastases. We investigated the association between detection mode of the primary tumor and overall survival (OS) after metachronous metastasis in patients with CRC. METHODS Nationwide registry-based data was obtained of 794 patients who developed metachronous metastases after being diagnosed with stage I-III CRC between January and June 2015. With multivariable Cox PH regression modelling, we analyzed the (causal) association between detection mode of the primary tumor (FIT screen-detected versus non-screen-detected) and OS after metachronous metastasis while adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS Median OS and five-year OS after metachronous metastasis were significantly higher for patients with screen-detected (n = 152) vs. non-screen-detected primary tumors (n = 642): 38.3 vs. 19.2 months, and 35.4% vs. 18.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). After adjustment for potential confounders, the association between detection mode and OS after metachronous metastasis remained significant (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.56-0.89]). CONCLUSIONS Screen-detection of the primary tumor was independently associated with longer OS after metachronous metastasis. This may support the clinical utility of the population screening program and it shows the prognostic value of detection mode of the primary tumor once metachronous metastasis is diagnosed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia A H Hamers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Geraldine R Vink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marloes A G Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kramer A, Rubio-Alarcón C, van den Broek D, Vessies DCL, Van't Erve I, Meijer GA, Vink GR, Schuuring E, Fijneman RJA, Coupé VMH, Retèl VP. A scenario-drafting study to explore potential future implementation pathways of circulating tumor DNA testing in oncology. Mol Oncol 2023. [PMID: 38060377 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection has multiple promising applications in oncology, but the road toward implementation in clinical practice is unclear. We aimed to support the implementation process by exploring potential future pathways of ctDNA testing. To do so, we studied four ctDNA-testing applications in two cancer types and elicited opinions from 30 ctDNA experts in the Netherlands. Our results showed that the current available evidence differed per application and cancer type. Tumor profiling and monitoring treatment response were found most likely to be implemented in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) within 5 years. For colorectal cancer, applications of ctDNA testing were found to be at an early stage in the implementation process. Demonstrating clinical utility was found a key aspect for successful implementation, but there was no consensus regarding the evidence requirements. The next step toward implementation is to define how clinical utility of biomarkers should be evaluated. Finally, these data indicate that specific challenges for each clinical application and tumor type should be appropriately addressed in a deliberative process involving all stakeholders to ensure implementation of ctDNA testing and timely access for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Kramer
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
| | - Carmen Rubio-Alarcón
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daan van den Broek
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daan C L Vessies
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Van't Erve
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geraldine R Vink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, IKNL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ed Schuuring
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Remond J A Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kuijper SC, Besseling J, Klausch T, Slingerland M, van der Zijden CJ, Kouwenhoven EA, Beerepoot LV, Mohammad NH, Klarenbeek BR, Verhoeven RHA, van Laarhoven HWM. Assessing real-world representativeness of prospective registry cohorts in oncology: insights from patients with esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 2023; 164:65-75. [PMID: 37871837 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore the real-world representativeness of a prospective registry cohort with active accrual in oncology, applying a representativeness metric that is novel to health care. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We used data from the Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Esophageal-Gastric Cancer Patients (POCOP) registry and from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). We used Representativeness-indicators (R-indicators) and overall survival to investigate the degree to which the POCOP cohort and clinically relevant subgroups were a representative sample compared to the NCR database. Calibration using inverse propensity score weighting was applied to correct differences between POCOP and NCR. RESULTS The R-indicator of the entire POCOP registry was 0.72 95% confidence interval [0.71, 0.73]. Representativeness of palliative patients was higher than that of potentially curable patients (R-indicator 0.88 [0.85, 0.90] and 0.70 [0.68, 0.71], respectively). Stratification to clinically relevant subgroups based on treatment resulted in higher R-indicators of the respective subgroups. Both after stratification and calibration weighting survival estimates in the POCOP registry were more similar to that in the NCR population. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the assessment of real-world representativeness of patients who participated in a prospective registry cohort and showed that real-world representativeness improved when the variability in treatment was accounted for.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven C Kuijper
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Besseling
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Klausch
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Laurens V Beerepoot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Elisabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis and EMBRAZE Cancer Network, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shkurti J, van den Berg K, van Erning FN, Lahaye MJ, Beets-Tan RGH, Nederend J. Diagnostic accuracy of CT for local staging of colon cancer: A nationwide study in the Netherlands. Eur J Cancer 2023; 193:113314. [PMID: 37729742 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the accuracy of computed tomography (CT)-based staging in selecting high-risk colon cancer patients who would benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy while avoiding overtreatment. METHODS Data of adult patients diagnosed with non-metastatic primary colon cancer in 2005-2020, who underwent surgical resection without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, were retrospectively collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Agreement between clinical and pathological evaluation for each T and N stage was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were conducted to predict T3-T4 and N1-N2 stages, with histopathology as the reference standard. RESULTS Data from 44,471 patients (median age, 71 years, 50% female) were evaluated. We included 38,915 patients with complete T stage and 39,565 patients with complete N stage for analyses. The overall clinical-pathological agreement for T stage was 59% and for N stage 57%. The sensitivity and specificity of CT to detect T3-T4 tumours were 80% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79, 0.80) and 76% (95% CI: 0.75, 0.77), respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 92% (95% CI: 0.92, 0.92). The sensitivity and specificity of CT to detect N1-N2 category were 62% (95% CI: 0.61, 0.63) and 70% (95% CI: 0.69, 0.71), respectively, with PPV 60% (95% CI: 0.59, 0.60). CONCLUSION CT-based staging shows limited accuracy in selecting colon cancer patients who would benefit from neoadjuvant therapy without risking overtreatment. Detection of lymph node metastases with CT remains unreliable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jona Shkurti
- Department of Diagnostic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Kim van den Berg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Felice N van Erning
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Diagnostic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Diagnostic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløwsvej 19,3, DK-5000, Odense, Denmark
| | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Swartjes H, Qaderi SM, Teerenstra S, Custers JAE, Elferink MAG, van Wely BJ, Burger JWA, van Grevenstein WMU, van Duijvendijk P, Verdaasdonk EGG, de Roos MAJ, Coupé VMH, Vink GR, Verhoef C, de Wilt JHW. Towards patient-led follow-up after curative surgical resection of stage I, II and III colorectal cancer (DISTANCE-trial): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:838. [PMID: 37679735 PMCID: PMC10483744 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11297-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most frequently diagnosed cancers. Approximately 20-30% of stage I-III CRC patients develop a recurrent tumour or metastases after curative surgical resection. Post-operative follow-up is indicated for the first five years after curative surgical resection. As intensified follow-up after curative surgical resection has shown no effect on survival, patient organisations and policy makers have advocated for a more patient-centred approach to follow-up. The objective of this study is to successfully implement patient-led, home-based follow-up (PHFU) in six hospitals in The Netherlands, with as ultimate aim to come to a recommendation for a patient-centred follow-up schedule for stage I-III CRC patients treated with surgical resection with curative intent. METHODS This study is designed as a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial (SW-CRT) in six participating centres. During the trial, three centres will implement PHFU after six months; the other three centres will implement PHFU after 12 months of inclusion in the control group. Eligible patients are those with pT2-4N0M0 or pT1-4N1-2M0 CRC, who are 18 years or older and have been free of disease for 12 months after curative surgical resection. The studied intervention is PHFU, starting 12 months after curative resection. The in-hospital, standard-of-care follow-up currently implemented in the participating centres functions as the comparator. The proportion of patients who had contact with the hospital regarding CRC follow-up between 12-24 months after curative surgical resection is the primary endpoint of this study. Quality of life, fear of cancer recurrence, patient satisfaction, cost-effectiveness and survival are the secondary endpoints. DISCUSSION The results of this study will provide evidence on whether nationwide implementation of PHFU for CRC in The Netherlands will be successful in reducing contact between patient and health care provider. Comparison of PROMs between in-hospital follow-up and PHFU will be provided. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of PHFU will be assessed. TRIAL REGISTRATION Dutch Trail Register (NTR): NL9266 (Registered on January 1st, 2021).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidde Swartjes
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, 6500, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Seyed M Qaderi
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, 6500, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Steven Teerenstra
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jose A E Custers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes A G Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bob J van Wely
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuis Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Marnix A J de Roos
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geraldine R Vink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, 6500, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hanevelt J, Huisman JF, Leicher LW, Lacle MM, Richir MC, Didden P, Geesing JMJ, Smakman N, Droste JSTS, Ter Borg F, Talsma AK, Schrauwen RWM, van Wely BJ, Schot I, Vermaas M, Bos P, Sietses C, Hazen WL, Wasowicz DK, van der Ploeg DE, Ramsoekh D, Tuynman JB, Alderlieste YA, Renger RJ, Schreuder RM, Bloemen JG, van Lijnschoten I, Consten ECJ, Sikkenk DJ, Schwartz MP, Vos A, Burger JPW, Spanier BWM, Knijn N, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Moons LMG, van Westreenen HL. Limited wedge resection for T1 colon cancer (LIMERIC-II trial) - rationale and study protocol of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:214. [PMID: 37337197 PMCID: PMC10278298 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02854-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The sole presence of deep submucosal invasion is shown to be associated with a limited risk of lymph node metastasis. This justifies a local excision of suspected deep submucosal invasive colon carcinomas (T1 CCs) as a first step treatment strategy. Recently Colonoscopy-Assisted Laparoscopic Wedge Resection (CAL-WR) has been shown to be able to resect pT1 CRCs with a high R0 resection rate, but the long term outcomes are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and long-term oncological outcomes of CAL-WR as primary treatment for patients with suspected superficial and also deeply-invasive T1 CCs. METHODS In this prospective multicenter clinical trial, patients with a macroscopic and/or histologically suspected T1 CCs will receive CAL-WR as primary treatment in order to prevent unnecessary major surgery for low-risk T1 CCs. To make a CAL-WR technically feasible, the tumor may not include > 50% of the circumference and has to be localized at least 25 cm proximal from the anus. Also, there should be sufficient distance to the ileocecal valve to place a linear stapler. Before inclusion, all eligible patients will be assessed by an expert panel to confirm suspicion of T1 CC, estimate invasion depth and subsequent advise which local resection techniques are possible for removal of the lesion. The primary outcome of this study is the proportion of patients with pT1 CC that is curatively treated with CAL-WR only and in whom thus organ-preservation could be achieved. Secondary outcomes are 1) CAL-WR's technical success and R0 resection rate for T1 CC, 2) procedure-related morbidity and mortality, 3) 5-year overall and disease free survival, 4) 3-year metastasis free survival, 5) procedure-related costs and 6) impact on quality of life. A sample size of 143 patients was calculated. DISCUSSION CAL-WR is a full-thickness local resection technique that could also be effective in removing pT1 colon cancer. With the lack of current endoscopic local resection techniques for > 15 mm pT1 CCs with deep submucosal invasion, CAL-WR could fill the gap between endoscopy and major oncologic surgery. The present study is the first to provide insight in the long-term oncological outcomes of CAL-WR. TRIAL REGISTRATION CCMO register (ToetsingOnline), NL81497.075.22, protocol version 2.3 (October 2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Hanevelt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, 28025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
| | - Jelle F Huisman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, 28025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Laura W Leicher
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, 28025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Milan C Richir
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Didden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Niels Smakman
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - A Koen Talsma
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud W M Schrauwen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Bob J van Wely
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuis Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid Schot
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle a/d Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capellle a/d Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Bos
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Colin Sietses
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Dareczka K Wasowicz
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | - Dewkoemar Ramsoekh
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yasser A Alderlieste
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Beatrixziekenhuis - Rivas, Gorinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Renger
- Department of Surgery, Beatrixziekenhuis - Rivas, Gorinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Ramon-Michel Schreuder
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Johanne G Bloemen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Esther C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Daan J Sikkenk
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Annelotte Vos
- Department of Pathology, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Jordy P W Burger
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bernhard W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Nikki Knijn
- Pathology DNA, Location Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kessels R, May AM, Koopman M, Roes KCB. The Trial within Cohorts (TwiCs) study design in oncology: experience and methodological reflections. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:117. [PMID: 37179306 PMCID: PMC10183126 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-01941-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
A Trial within Cohorts (TwiCs) study design is a trial design that uses the infrastructure of an observational cohort study to initiate a randomized trial. Upon cohort enrollment, the participants provide consent for being randomized in future studies without being informed. Once a new treatment is available, eligible cohort participants are randomly assigned to the treatment or standard of care. Patients randomized to the treatment arm are offered the new treatment, which they can choose to refuse. Patients who refuse will receive standard of care instead. Patients randomized to the standard of care arm receive no information about the trial and continue receiving standard of care as part of the cohort study. Standard cohort measures are used for outcome comparisons. The TwiCs study design aims to overcome some issues encountered in standard Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). An example of an issue in standard RCTs is the slow patient accrual. A TwiCs study aims to improve this by selecting patients using a cohort and only offering the intervention to patients in the intervention arm. In oncology, the TwiCs study design has gained increasing interest during the last decade. Despite its potential advantages over RCTs, the TwiCs study design has several methodological challenges that need careful consideration when planning a TwiCs study. In this article, we focus on these challenges and reflect on them using experiences from TwiCs studies initiated in oncology. Important methodological challenges that are discussed are the timing of randomization, the issue of non-compliance (refusal) after randomization in the intervention arm, and the definition of the intention-to-treat effect in a TwiCs study and how this effect is related to its counterpart in standard RCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Kessels
- Dutch Oncology Research Platform, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131 , P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Kit C B Roes
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Section Biostatistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Verweij LPE, van Iersel TP, van Deurzen DFP, van den Bekerom MPJ, Floor S. "Nearly off-track lesions" or a short distance from the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion to the medial edge of the glenoid track does not seem to be accurate in predicting recurrence after an arthroscopic Bankart repair in a military population: a case-control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:e145-e152. [PMID: 36368476 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND On-track lesions with a short distance from the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion to the medial edge of the glenoid track (nearly off-track) may predispose recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) in the general population. The aim of this study was to determine if a shorter distance between the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion and the medial edge of the glenoid track could accurately predict recurrence after an ABR in a high-demand military population. It was hypothesized that a shorter distance would not accurately predict recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective monocenter case-control study was performed at the Dutch Central Military Hospital. Patients with an on-track Hill-Sachs lesion who underwent a primary ABR between 2014 and 2019 with a minimal follow-up of 2 years and a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment received a questionnaire. The primary outcome was recurrence, defined as a complete dislocation or subluxation. Glenoid bone loss was assessed using a linear-based method on MRI. The distance from the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion to the medial edge of the glenoid track was defined as the distance to dislocation (DTD). A receiver operating characteristic curve was created to determine the predictive value of the DTD for recurrence. Logistic regression was used to determine preoperative risk factors that predispose recurrence. Covariates were selected based on univariable analysis and included gender, body mass index, age at surgery and first dislocation, laterality, smoking habits, overhead shoulder activity during work, preoperative dislocations, sports type and level, bony or labral lesions on MRI, and DTD. RESULTS In total, 80 patients with an average follow-up of 4.8 ± 1.9 years completed the questionnaire and were included in the analyses. Seventeen patients (21%) experienced recurrence at the final follow-up. No difference in DTD was observed among patients who experienced recurrence (9 ± 4 mm) compared with patients who did not (9 ± 5 mm; P = .81). The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated no predictive power of DTD for recurrence (area under the curve = 0.49). Smoking at the time of surgery (odds ratio: 3.9; confidence interval: 1.2-12.7; P = .02) and overhead shoulder movement during work (odds ratio: 9.3; confidence interval: 1.1-78.0; P = .04) were associated with recurrence according to the logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION A shorter DTD demonstrated no accuracy in predicting recurrence in a military population. Smoking at the time of surgery and overhead shoulder activity during work were associated with recurrence; however, these analyses were underpowered to draw valid conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas P E Verweij
- Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Musculoskeletal Health Program, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Shoulder and Elbow Centre of Expertise (ASECE), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Theodore P van Iersel
- Amsterdam Shoulder and Elbow Centre of Expertise (ASECE), Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Derek F P van Deurzen
- Amsterdam Shoulder and Elbow Centre of Expertise (ASECE), Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michel P J van den Bekerom
- Amsterdam Shoulder and Elbow Centre of Expertise (ASECE), Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Floor
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Central Military Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Real-world-Daten in der Arzneimittelregulation – aktuelle Entwicklungen und Ausblick. PRÄVENTION UND GESUNDHEITSFÖRDERUNG 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s11553-022-01010-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Real-world-Daten (RWD) und die aus ihnen durch statistisch-epidemiologische Analysen abgeleitete Real-world-Evidenz (RWE) spielen eine vielversprechende und zunehmend relevante Rolle bei regulatorischen Entscheidungsfindungen entlang des Produktlebenszyklus von Arzneimitteln.
Ziel der Arbeit
Es wird ein Überblick über den aktuellen Stand, die Entwicklungspotenziale und Initiativen zur verstärkten Nutzung von RWE in der europäischen und internationalen Arzneimittelregulation gegeben.
Material und Methoden
Die Grundlagen für die Übersichtsarbeit sind Originalarbeiten und Reviews aus der aktuellen internationalen Literatur (inklusive eigener Forschungsergebnisse), aktuelle Beispiele aus der regulatorischen Praxis sowie die Einbindung in europäische und internationale Initiativen zur verstärkten Nutzung von RWD/RWE in regulatorischen Entscheidungsprozessen.
Ergebnisse
Aktuell primär zur supportiven Evidenz bei regulatorischen Entscheidungsfindungen wird RWE aus RWD eingesetzt. Neben dem etablierten Einsatz in Phasen nach der Zulassung (z. B. Überwachung der Arzneimittelsicherheit), werden RWD zunehmend auch in der Phase vor der Zulassung und in der Evaluation eingesetzt. Aktuell wird durch verstärkte Vernetzung der Datenquellen auf nationaler und internationaler Ebene eine Gesundheitsdateninfrastruktur aufgebaut, um neue Möglichkeiten zur RWD-Nutzung zu schaffen.
Schlussfolgerung
Neben einer wachsenden Bedeutung von RWD/RWE in der europäischen und internationalen Arzneimittelregulation ergeben sich auch neue Herausforderungen zum Zugang zu und zur Analyse von RWD. Die Variabilität und Heterogenität der RWD-Quellen machen die Entwicklung neuer und optimierter Methoden für RWD-Analysen unerlässlich. Auch neue Leitfaden- und Schulungskonzepte für die beteiligten Stakeholder sind essenziell.
Collapse
|
18
|
van 't Erve I, Punt CJA, Meijer GA, Fijneman RJA. Reply to R. Pham et al. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2200053. [PMID: 35344447 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Iris van 't Erve
- Iris van 't Erve, MSc, Department of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cornelis J.A. Punt, MD, PhD, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Gerrit A. Meijer, MD, PhD, and Remond J.A. Fijneman, PhD, Department of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Iris van 't Erve, MSc, Department of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cornelis J.A. Punt, MD, PhD, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Gerrit A. Meijer, MD, PhD, and Remond J.A. Fijneman, PhD, Department of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Iris van 't Erve, MSc, Department of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cornelis J.A. Punt, MD, PhD, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Gerrit A. Meijer, MD, PhD, and Remond J.A. Fijneman, PhD, Department of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Remond J A Fijneman
- Iris van 't Erve, MSc, Department of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cornelis J.A. Punt, MD, PhD, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Gerrit A. Meijer, MD, PhD, and Remond J.A. Fijneman, PhD, Department of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Smit KC, Derksen JWG, Beets GLO, Belt EJT, Berbée M, Coene PPLO, van Cruijsen H, Davidis MA, Dekker JWT, van Dodewaard-de Jong JM, Haringhuizen AW, Helgason HH, Hendriks MP, Hoekstra R, de Hingh IHJT, IJzermans JNM, Janssen JJB, Konsten JLM, Los M, Mekenkamp LJM, Nieboer P, Peeters KCMJ, Peters NAJB, Pruijt HJFM, Quarles van Ufford-Mannesse P, Rietbroek RC, Schiphorst AHW, Schouten van der Velden A, Schrauwen RWM, Sie MPS, Sommeijer DW, Sonneveld DJA, Stockmann HBAC, Tent M, Terheggen F, Tjin-A-Ton MLR, Valkenburg-van Iersel L, van der Velden AMT, Vles WJ, van Voorthuizen T, Wegdam JA, de Wilt JHW, Koopman M, May AM. Physical Activity Is Associated with Improved Overall Survival among Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041001. [PMID: 35205748 PMCID: PMC8870120 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Physical activity is linked to longer survival among non-metastasized colorectal cancer patients. It is unclear if physical activity is also beneficial for survival among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. We researched this question in our study of 293 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. We found that participants who reported higher levels of physical activity at diagnosis lived longer compared to patients who reported low activity levels. Furthermore, adherence to the physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors was related to prolonged survival. Our findings suggest that patients with metastatic colorectal cancer also benefit from being physically active. Future studies are needed to investigate whether improving exercise levels after diagnosis of metastasis is also beneficial and what kind of exercise interventions are most optimal for possibly improving survival time of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Abstract Regular physical activity (PA) is associated with improved overall survival (OS) in stage I–III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This association is less defined in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). We therefore conducted a study in mCRC patients participating in the Prospective Dutch Colorectal Cancer cohort. PA was assessed with the validated SQUASH questionnaire, filled-in within a maximum of 60 days after diagnosis of mCRC. PA was quantified by calculating Metabolic Equivalent Task (MET) hours per week. American College of Sports and Medicine (ACSM) PA guideline adherence, tertiles of moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA), and sport and leisure time MVPA (MVPA-SL) were assessed as well. Vital status was obtained from the municipal population registry. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to study the association between PA determinants and all-cause mortality adjusted for prognostic patient and treatment-related factors. In total, 293 mCRC patients (mean age 62.9 ± 10.6 years, 67% male) were included in the analysis. Compared to low levels, moderate and high levels of MET-hours were significantly associated with longer OS (fully adjusted hazard ratios: 0.491, (95% CI 0.299–0.807, p value = 0.005) and 0.485 (95% CI 0.303–0.778, p value = 0.003), respectively), as were high levels of MVPA (0.476 (95% CI 0.278–0.816, p value = 0.007)) and MVPA-SL (0.389 (95% CI 0.224–0.677, p value < 0.001)), and adherence to ACSM PA guidelines compared to non-adherence (0.629 (95% CI 0.412–0.961, p value = 0.032)). The present study provides evidence that higher PA levels at diagnosis of mCRC are associated with longer OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karel C. Smit
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (K.C.S.); (J.W.G.D.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Jeroen W. G. Derksen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (K.C.S.); (J.W.G.D.)
| | - Geerard L. O. Beets
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Eric J. Th. Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Albert Schweitzerplaats 25, 3318 AT Dordrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Maaike Berbée
- Department of Radiotherapy, Maastro Clinic, 6202 NA Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| | - Peter Paul L. O. Coene
- Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Hester van Cruijsen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antonius Hospital, 8600 BA Sneek, The Netherlands;
| | - Marjan A. Davidis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rivas, Banneweg 57, 4204 AA Gorinchem, The Netherlands;
| | - Jan Willem T. Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Reinier de Graafweg 5, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands;
| | | | | | - Helgi H. Helgason
- Department of Medical Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2501 CK Den Haag, The Netherlands;
| | - Mathijs P. Hendriks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northwest Clinics, 1800 AM Alkmaar, The Netherlands;
| | - Ronald Hoekstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Zilvermeeuw 1, 7609 PP Hengelo, The Netherlands;
| | - Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands;
| | - Jan N. M. IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 AD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Johan J. B. Janssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6500 GS Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Joop L. M. Konsten
- Department of Surgery, Viecuri Hospital, Tegelseweg 210, 5912 BL Venlo, The Netherlands;
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands;
| | - Leonie J. M. Mekenkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, 7500 KA Enschede, The Netherlands;
| | - Peter Nieboer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Wilhelmina Hospital, 9400 RA Assen, The Netherlands;
| | - Koen C. M. J. Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, University of Leiden, Postzone K6-39 Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands;
| | - Natascha A. J. B. Peters
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sint Jans Hospital, Vogelsbleek 5, 6001 BE Weert, The Netherlands;
| | - Hans J. F. M. Pruijt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 5200 ME Den Bosch, The Netherlands;
| | | | - Ron C. Rietbroek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rode Kruis Hospital, Vondellaan 13, 1942 LE Beverwijk, The Netherlands;
| | - Anandi H. W. Schiphorst
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Bosboomstraat 1, 3582 KE Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | | | - Ruud W. M. Schrauwen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bernhoven Hospital, Nistelrodeseweg 10, 5406 PT Uden, The Netherlands;
| | - Mark P. S. Sie
- Department of Medical Oncology, ZorgSaam Hospital, Wielingenlaan 2, 4535 PA Terneuzen, The Netherlands;
| | - Dirkje W. Sommeijer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academisch Medisch Centrum, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Department of Medical Oncology, Flevo Hospital, Hospitaalweg 1, 1315 RA Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J. A. Sonneveld
- Department of Surgery, Dijklander Hospital, Waterlandlaan 250, 1441 RN Purmerend, The Netherlands;
| | | | - Marleen Tent
- Department of Medical Oncology, Treant Hospital, 7800 RA Emmen, The Netherlands;
| | - Frederiek Terheggen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bravis Hospital, Boerhaavelaan 25, 4708 AE Roosendaal, The Netherlands;
| | | | | | - Ankie M. T. van der Velden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tergooi Hospital, Van Riebeeckweg 212, 1213 XZ Hilversum, The Netherlands;
| | - Wouter J. Vles
- Department of Surgery, Ikazia Hospital, Montessoriweg 1, 3083 AN Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Theo van Voorthuizen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rijnstate Hospital, Postus 9555, 6800 TA Arnhem, The Netherlands;
| | - Johannes A. Wegdam
- Department of Surgery, Elkerliek Hospital, Wesselmanlaan 25, 5707 HA Helmond, The Netherlands;
| | - Johannes H. W. de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, University of Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Anne M. May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (K.C.S.); (J.W.G.D.)
- Correspondence:
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Qaderi SM, van der Heijden JAG, Verhoeven RHA, de Wilt JHW, Custers JAE. Trajectories of health-related quality of life and psychological distress in patients with colorectal cancer: A population-based study. Eur J Cancer 2021; 158:144-155. [PMID: 34666216 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this nationwide cohort study was to examine the course of symptoms and trajectories of health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and psychological distress during follow-up and to identify vulnerable patients. METHODS Patients with pathological stage I-III colorectal cancer (CRC) between 2013 and 2018 were included. Baseline characteristics were collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, and patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30/CR29, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) questionnaires at the baseline and subsequently at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Latent class growth and multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed to outline 24-month trajectories in HR-QoL and distress and to identify predictive factors. RESULTS A total of 1535 patients with colon cancer or rectal cancer were included. Trajectory analysis of HR-QoL identified three patient classes: high HR-QoL (62.7%), improving HR-QoL (29.0%) and low HR-QoL (8.3%). The following patient groups were identified with having low distress (64.0%), moderate distress (26.9%) and high distress (9.1%). Around 13% of the total cohort had either persistent low HR-QoL or high psychological distress throughout follow-up. Patients belonging to this vulnerable group were significantly more likely to be female, to be younger aged, to have lower education, to have disease stage II-III or to have major LARS. CONCLUSIONS Although most patients treated for stage I-III CRC fared well, a small but significant proportion of around 13% did not recover during follow-up and reported low HR-QoL and/or high psychological distress levels throughout. This study's findings should be taken into account when organising and selecting patients for tailored follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed M Qaderi
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgical Oncology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Joost A G van der Heijden
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgical Oncology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgical Oncology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgical Oncology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jose A E Custers
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Medical Psychology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|