The transbasal approach to the anterior skull base: surgical outcome of a single-centre case series

Anatomical Step-by-Step Dissection of Complex Skull Base Approaches for Trainees: Surgical Anatomy of the Bifrontal Transbasal Approach, Surgical Principles, and Illustrative Cases

Introduction  The transbasal approach traditionally uses a bicoronal scalp incision with bifrontal craniotomy to establish an extradural midline skull base working corridor. Depending on additional craniofacial osteotomies, this approach can expand its reach to the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses and may be employed for the resection of particularly complex sinonasal and midline skull base tumors. Given its discrepancy in nomenclature and differences in interoperator technique, we propose a practical, operatively oriented guide for trainees performing this approach. Methods  Three formalin-fixed, latex-injected specimens were dissected under microscopic magnification and endoscopic-assisted visualization. Stepwise dissections of the transcranial-transbasal approach with common modifications were performed, documented with three-dimensional photography, and supplemented with representative case applications. Results  The traditional transbasal approach via bifrontal craniotomy affords wide extradural access to the anterior cranial fossa and central skull base. The addition of craniofacial osteotomies further expands access into the sinonasal cavities, clivus, and craniocervical junction. Key steps described include patient positioning, bicoronal skin incision, pericranial graft harvest, bifrontal craniotomy, orbital rim osteotomy, sphenoidotomy, bilateral ethmoidectomies, and microsurgical dissection of the sellar region. Basal superior sagittal sinus ligation and durotomy allow for intradural exposure. Reconstruction techniques are also discussed. Conclusion  While the transbasal approach is rich with historical descriptions, illustrations, and modifications, its stepwise performance may be relatively unknown and unclear to younger generations of trainees. We present a comprehensive guide to optimize familiarity with the transbasal approach and its indications in the surgical anatomy laboratory, mastery of the relevant microsurgical anatomy, and simultaneous preparation for learning and participation in the operating room.

Anterior Skull Base Meningioma: Surgical Approach and Complication Avoidance

Introduction  Endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) and keyhole transcranial approaches (TCAs) are being increasingly used in anterior skull base meningioma (ASBM) surgery. Objective  We compare tumor resection rates and complication profiles of EEA and supraorbital keyhole approach (SOKHA) with conventional TCAs. Methods  Fifty-four patients with ASBM (olfactory groove meningioma [OGM], n  = 19 and planum sphenoidale/tuberculum sellae meningioma [PSM/TSM], n  = 35) operated at a single center over 7 years were retrospectively analyzed. Results  The overall rate of gross total resection (GTR) was higher in OGM (15/19, 78.9%) than PSM-TSM group (23/35, 65.7%, p  = 0.37). GTR rate with OGM was 90% and 75% with TCA and EEA. Death ( n  = 1) following medical complication (TCA) and cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring re-exploration ( n  = 2, one each in TCA and EEA) accounted for the major complications in OGM. For the PSM/TSM group, the GTR rates were 73.3% ( n  = 11/15), 53.8% ( n  = 7/13), and 71.4% ( n  = 5/7) with TCA, EEA, and SOKHA, respectively. Seven patients (20%) of PSM-TSM developed major postoperative complications including four deaths (one each in TCA and SOKHA, and two in EEA groups) and three visual deteriorations. Direct and indirect vascular complications were common in lesser invasive approaches to PSM-TSM especially if the tumor has encased intracranial arteries. Conclusion  No single approach is applicable to all ASBMs. TCA is still the best approach to obtain GTR but has tissue trauma-related problems. SOKHA may be a good alternative to TCA in selected PSM-TSMs, while EEA may be an alternate option in some OGMs. A meticulous patient selection is needed to derive reported results of EEA for PSM-TSM.