Three-year outcomes of vitrectomy combined with intraoperative dexamethasone implantation for non-tractional refractory diabetic macular edema

Current Treatments for Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetic retinopathy is a major retinal disorder and a leading cause of blindness. Diabetic macular edema (DME) is an ocular complication in patients with diabetes, and it can impair vision significantly. DME is a disorder of the neurovascular system, and it causes obstructions of the retinal capillaries, damage of the blood vessels, and hyperpermeability due to the expression and action of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). These changes result in hemorrhages and leakages of the serous components of blood that result in failures of the neurovascular units (NVUs). Persistent edema of the retina around the macula causes damage to the neural cells that constitute the NVUs resulting in diabetic neuropathy of the retina and a reduction in vision quality. The macular edema and NVU disorders can be monitored by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Neuronal cell death and axonal degeneration are irreversible, and their development can result in permanent visual loss. Treating the edema before these changes are detected in the OCT images is necessary for neuroprotection and maintenance of good vision. This review describes the effective treatments for the macular edema that are therefore neuroprotective.

Vitrectomized vs non-vitrectomized eyes in DEX implant treatment for DMO-Is there any difference? the VITDEX study

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare visual and anatomical outcome in vitrectomized and non-vitrectomized eyes treated with dexamethasone (DEX) implant due to diabetic macular oedema (DMO).

DESIGN

Multicenter, retrospective, interventional study.

PARTICIPANTS

236 eyes from 234 patients with DMO with or without previous vitrectomy performed with follow-up of 12 months.

METHODS

Records were reviewed for cases of DMO treated with DEX implant in vitrectomized and not vitrectomized eyes. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfoveal thickness (CST), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded at baseline and 12 months after treatment with DEX implants. Correlations between vitreous status and visual and anatomical outcome, as well as safety profile were analysed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

BCVA and CST over follow-up period.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

cataract rate formation, intraocular pressure increase, number of implants needed.

RESULTS

The non-vitrectomized group included 130 eyes (55.1%), the vitrectomized group included 106 eyes (44.9%). The groups were well balanced for age and gender (p = 0.540, and p = 0.053, respectively). Both groups showed statistically significant improvement in BCVA and CST (for all groups: p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of change in vision (p = 0.89) and anatomy (p = 0.65). The mean number of DEX implants given during follow-up was 3.5 in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.81).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated similar anatomical and functional efficacy of DEX implant in non-vitrectomized and vitrectomized eyes. Its efficacy was not influenced by full vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy complications. Safety profile was well balanced between groups.

Epiretinal Membrane Peeling in Eyes with Retinal Vein Occlusion: Visual and Morphologic Outcomes

Introduction

To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and secondary ERM.

Methods

Retrospective, multicenter study including patients with RVO and ERM who underwent PPV and ERM peeling with or without phacoemulsification. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features were recorded at the time of ERM peeling (baseline). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were longitudinally collected up to 36 months after surgery. Clinical factors associated with BCVA and CMT and disappearance of macular edema during follow-up were investigated.

Results

Twenty-one eyes of 21 patients with a median follow-up of 18 months were included. The BCVA improved significantly after ERM peeling (baseline vs. 24 months, p = 0.01). Absence of the external liming membrane/ellipsoid zone on OCT was associated with worse visual outcomes (regression estimate [95% confidence interval, CI] = 0.93 [0.39–1.48] logMAR, p = 0.004). Eyes with disorganization of the inner retinal layers at baseline had higher CMT values at each visit (regression estimate [95% CI] = 114.1 [78.9–219.4] μm, p = 0.004). Older age at the time of RVO (p = 0.03) and branch RVO (p = 0.04) were risk factors for persistent macular edema after ERM removal.

Conclusion

PPV and ERM removal provided encouraging functional and morphological results in eyes with RVO, with disappearance of macular edema in most eyes. The integrity of the outer retina and preservation of inner retinal segmentation were associated with better visual and anatomical outcomes after ERM removal, respectively.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00461-7.

Infrared reflectance image-guided laser photocoagulation of telangiectatic capillaries in persistent diabetic macular edema

This study aimed to assess detection rate of telangiectatic capillaries (TelCaps) with infrared reflectance (IR) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and to evaluate the clinical efficacy of IR image-guided focal laser photocoagulation of TelCaps in persistent diabetic macular edema (DME). This retrospective case series included 28 eyes of 28 patients with TelCap and persistent DME refractory to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or corticosteroids. The presence of TelCaps was confirmed using IR and OCT images. All patients were followed up for more than 12 months after direct focal laser photocoagulation of the TelCaps. The TelCap closure rate, changes in best-corrected visual acuity, and central subfield thickness were analyzed. On IR imaging, TelCap appeared as a characteristic hyperreflectivity within a hyporeflective spherical lesion in 85.7% of the eyes. After focal laser photocoagulation, the TelCap closure rate was 57.1% at 3 months and 71.4% at 12 months. A significant improvement in visual acuity and reduction in central subfield thickness were observed at three and 12 months after focal laser photocoagulation (all p < 0.05). The characteristic hyperreflectivity within hyporeflective lesions on the IR image in conjunction with OCT helps identify the TelCap. Our results suggest that IR imaging and OCT-guided focal laser photocoagulation of TelCaps can improve functional and anatomical outcomes in persistent DME.