1
|
Mo C, Zhang L, Song Y, Liu W. Safety and effectiveness of endotracheal intubation in critically ill emergency patients with videolaryngoscopy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e35692. [PMID: 37933038 PMCID: PMC10627691 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000035692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
To investigate the safety and efficacy of video laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients. A total of 106 critically ill emergency patients treated at our hospital between January 2021 and June 2022 were randomly divided into 2 groups, the visual and direct groups, with 53 patients in each group. Both groups were treated with endotracheal intubation; the visual group was treated with video laryngoscopy, and the direct group was treated with conventional direct laryngoscopy. The Cormack-Lehane grade, percentage of glottic opening score, success rate of one intubation, intubation time, number of intubation attempts, hemodynamic values, and complications were compared between the 2 groups. The success rates of glottis exposure and one-time intubation were significantly higher while the intubation time and number of intubation attempts significantly lower in the visual group than in the direct group. The heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), or blood oxygen saturation did not differ significantly between the 2 groups 10 minutes after entering the room (T0) or after anesthesia induction (T1). MAP was significantly lower in the visual group than in the direct group during immediate intubation (T2). The heart rate and MAP were significantly lower in the visual group than in the direct group 1 minute (T3) and 5 minutes (T4) after intubation. The incidences of intubation-related complications in the visual and direct groups were 7.55% and 22.60%, showing a significant difference. Endotracheal intubation under videolaryngoscopy is safer and more effective for critically ill emergency patients than conventional direct laryngoscopy. This can improve the success rate of intubation, reduce the intubation time, and reduce its effect on hemodynamics. Therefore, it is worthy of further clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenghang Mo
- Department of Emergency, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Liang Zhang
- Department of Emergency, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Yingjiang Song
- Department of Emergency, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Weifeng Liu
- Department of Emergency, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Godet T, De Jong A, Garin C, Guérin R, Rieu B, Borao L, Pereira B, Molinari N, Bazin JE, Jabaudon M, Chanques G, Futier E, Jaber S. Impact of Macintosh blade size on endotracheal intubation success in intensive care units: a retrospective multicenter observational MacSize-ICU study. Intensive Care Med 2022; 48:1176-1184. [PMID: 35974189 PMCID: PMC9463307 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06832-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the impact of Macintosh blade size used during direct laryngoscopy (DL) on first-attempt intubation success of orotracheal intubation in French intensive care units (ICUs). We hypothesized that success rate would be higher with Macintosh blade size No3 than with No4. Methods Multicenter retrospective observational study based on data from prospective trials conducted in 48 French ICUs of university, and general and private hospitals. After each intubation using Macintosh DL, patients’ and operators’ characteristics, Macintosh blade size, results of first DL and alternative techniques used, as well as the need of a second operator were collected. Complications rates associated with intubation were investigated. Primary outcome was success rate of first DL using Macintosh blade. Results A total of 2139 intubations were collected, 629 with a Macintosh blade No3 and 1510 with a No4. Incidence of first-pass intubation after first DL was significantly higher with Macintosh blade No3 (79.5 vs 73.3%, p = 0.0025), despite equivalent Cormack–Lehane scores (p = 0.48). Complications rates were equivalent between groups. Multivariate analysis concluded to a significant impact of Macintosh blade size on first DL success in favor of blade No3 (OR 1.44 [95% CI 1.14–1.84]; p = 0.0025) without any significant center effect on the primary outcome (p = 0.18). Propensity scores and adjustment analyses concluded to equivalent results. Conclusion In the present study, Macintosh blade No3 was associated with improved first-passed DL in French ICUs. However, study design requires the conduct of a nationwide prospective multicenter randomized trial in different settings to confirm these results. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00134-022-06832-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Godet
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France. .,Département Anesthésie Réanimation B (DAR B), Hôpital Saint-Eloi, and Inserm U-1046, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Montpellier, 34295, Montpellier, France. .,Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Pôle de Médecine Périopératoire (MPO), Hôpital Estaing, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Clermont-Ferrand, 1 place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, 63001, Clermont-Ferrand cedex 1, France.
| | - Audrey De Jong
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation B (DAR B), Hôpital Saint-Eloi, and Inserm U-1046, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Montpellier, 34295, Montpellier, France
| | - Côme Garin
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Renaud Guérin
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Benjamin Rieu
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Lucile Borao
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Bruno Pereira
- Délégation à la Recherche Clinique et à l'Innovation (DRCI), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Nicolas Molinari
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Montpellier, 34295, Montpellier, France
| | - Jean-Etienne Bazin
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Matthieu Jabaudon
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,iGReD, Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, INSERM, 63003, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Gérald Chanques
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation B (DAR B), Hôpital Saint-Eloi, and Inserm U-1046, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Montpellier, 34295, Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuel Futier
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,iGReD, Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, INSERM, 63003, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Samir Jaber
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation B (DAR B), Hôpital Saint-Eloi, and Inserm U-1046, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Montpellier, 34295, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|