Upregulation of CD22 by Chidamide promotes CAR T cells functionality

Efficacy of programmed cell death 1 inhibitor maintenance after chimeric antigen receptor T cells in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin-lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells obtained long-term durability in about 30% to 40% of relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Maintenance therapy after CAR-T is necessary, and PD1 inhibitor is one of the important maintenance therapy options.

METHODS

A total of 173 r/r B-NHL patients treated with PD1 inhibitor maintenance following CD19/22 CAR-T therapy alone or combined with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) from March 2019 to July 2022 were assessed for eligibility for two trials. There were 81 patients on PD1 inhibitor maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

In the CD19/22 CAR-T therapy trial, the PD1 inhibitor maintenance group indicated superior objective response rate (ORR) (82.9% vs 60%; P = 0.04) and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) (59.8% vs 21.3%; P = 0.001) than the non-maintenance group. The estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) was comparable in the two groups (60.1% vs 45.1%; P = 0.112). No difference was observed in the peak expansion levels of CD19 CAR-T and CD22 CAR-T between the two groups. The persistence time of CD19 and CD22 CAR-T in the PD1 inhibitor maintenance group was longer than that in the non-maintenance group. In the CD19/22 CAR-T therapy combined with ASCT trial, no significant differences in ORR (81.4% vs 84.8%; P = 0.67), 2-year PFS (72.3% vs 74.9%; P = 0.73), and 2-year OS (84.1% vs 80.7%; P = 0.79) were observed between non-maintenance and PD1 inhibitor maintenance therapy groups. The peak expansion levels and duration of CD19 and CD22 CAR-T were not statistically different between the two groups. During maintenance treatment with PD1 inhibitor, all adverse events were manageable. In the multivariable analyses, type and R3m were independent predictive factors influencing the OS of r/r B-NHL with PD1 inhibitor maintenance after CAR-T therapy.

CONCLUSION

PD1 inhibitor maintenance following CD19/22 CAR-T therapy obtained superior response and survival in r/r B-NHL, but not in the trial of CD19/22 CAR-T cell therapy combined with ASCT.

Overcoming the challenges of primary resistance and relapse after CAR-T cell therapy

INTRODUCTION

While CAR T-cell therapy has led to remarkable responses in relapsed B-cell hematologic malignancies, only 50% of patients ultimately have a complete, sustained response. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance and relapse after CAR T-cell therapy is crucial to future development and improving outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

We review reasons for both primary resistance and relapse after CAR T-cell therapies. Reasons for primary failure include CAR T-cell manufacturing problems, suboptimal fitness of autologous T-cells themselves, and intrinsic features of the underlying cancer and tumor microenvironment. Relapse after initial response to CAR T-cell therapy may be antigen-positive, due to CAR T-cell exhaustion or limited persistence, or antigen-negative, due to antigen-modulation on the target cells. Finally, we discuss ongoing efforts to overcome resistance to CAR T-cell therapy with enhanced CAR constructs, manufacturing methods, alternate cell types, combinatorial strategies, and optimization of both pre-infusion conditioning regimens and post-infusion consolidative strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

There is a continued need for novel approaches to CAR T-cell therapy for both hematologic and solid malignancies to obtain sustained remissions. Opportunities for improvement include development of new targets, optimally combining existing CAR T-cell therapies, and defining the role for adjunctive immune modulators and stem cell transplant in enhancing long-term survival.

Combination of chidamide and PD-1 blockade in Refractory/Relapsed aggressive large B-cell lymphomas with high risk of failing CAR-T therapy

BACKGROUND

Refractoriness and relapse after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy have emerged as major challenges for immunotherapy of aggressive large B-cell lymphoma. Thus far, there is no consensus on how to address treatment failure and whether to administer maintenance therapy following CAR-T cell therapy.

METHODS

From August 2017 through November 2022, 52 patients with refractory/relapsed aggressive LBCL who had a high risk of resistance to CAR-T cell therapy were given chidamide in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor as maintenance therapy following either CAR19/22 T-cell cocktail therapy or CAR19/22 T-cell cocktail therapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Another 52 aggressive LBCL patients who had comparable baseline characteristics and received similar therapeutic regimens but did not receive any interventions following CAR-T cell therapy or CAR-T cell therapy plus ASCT were regarded as the control group to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of chidamide and a PD-1 inhibitor.

RESULTS

Among the 52 patients who received chidamide and a PD-1 inhibitor as maintenance therapy, with a median follow-up of 26.5 months (range: 1.1-53.8), neither the median progression-free survival (PFS) nor overall survival (OS) was reached, and the expected 2-year OS and PFS rates were 89 % and 77 %, respectively, which were superior to those of the control group (p < 0.001). Long-term chidamide administration and a specific genetic subtype of EZB were strongly associated with a better response after chidamide plus PD-1 blockade therapy. Additionally, long-term chidamide administration was significantly associated with prolonged persistence and reactivation of CD19-directed CAR-T cells in the peripheral blood. Adverse effects (AEs) were moderate and reversible, and no treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the combination of chidamide and PD-1 blockade as maintenance therapy could improve the outcomes of aggressive LBCL patients at high risk of failing CAR-T cell therapy.

ADCT-602, a Novel PBD Dimer-containing Antibody-Drug Conjugate for Treating CD22-positive Hematologic Malignancies

Relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) and lymphomas have poor patient outcomes; novel therapies are needed. CD22 is an attractive target for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), being highly expressed in R/R B-ALL with rapid internalization kinetics. ADCT-602 is a novel CD22-targeting ADC, consisting of humanized mAb hLL2-C220, site specifically conjugated to the pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer-based payload tesirine. In preclinical studies, ADCT-602 demonstrated potent, specific cytotoxicity in CD22-positive lymphomas and leukemias. ADCT-602 was specifically bound, internalized, and trafficked to lysosomes in CD22-positive tumor cells; after cytotoxin release, DNA interstrand crosslink formation persisted for 48 hours. In the presence of CD22-positive tumor cells, ADCT-602 caused bystander killing of CD22-negative tumor cells. A single ADCT-602 dose led to potent, dose-dependent, in vivo antitumor activity in subcutaneous and disseminated human lymphoma/leukemia models. Pharmacokinetic analyses (rat and cynomolgus monkey) showed excellent stability and tolerability of ADCT-602. Cynomolgus monkey B cells were efficiently depleted from circulation after one dose. Gene signature association analysis revealed IRAK1 as a potential marker for ADCT-602 resistance. Combining ADCT-602 + pacritinib was beneficial in ADCT-602-resistant cells. Chidamide increased CD22 expression on B-cell tumor surfaces, increasing ADCT-602 activity. These data support clinical testing of ADCT-602 in R/R B-ALL (NCT03698552) and CD22-positive hematologic cancers.

Current treatment strategies targeting histone deacetylase inhibitors in acute lymphocytic leukemia: a systematic review

Acute lymphocytic leukemia is a hematological malignancy that primarily affects children. Long-term chemotherapy is effective, but always causes different toxic side effects. With the application of a chemotherapy-free treatment strategy, we intend to demonstrate the most recent results of using one type of epigenetic drug, histone deacetylase inhibitors, in ALL and to provide preclinical evidence for further clinical trials. In this review, we found that panobinostat (LBH589) showed positive outcomes as a monotherapy, whereas vorinostat (SAHA) was a better choice for combinatorial use. Preclinical research has identified chidamide as a potential agent for investigation in more clinical trials in the future. In conclusion, histone deacetylase inhibitors play a significant role in the chemotherapy-free landscape in cancer treatment, particularly in acute lymphocytic leukemia.

The role of chidamide in the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: An updated systematic review

B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) is a lymphoid malignancy derived from B-cells that remains difficult to treat. Moreover, relapses and refractory cases are common. Abnormalities in epigenetic mechanisms, such as imbalanced histone acetylation affecting certain genes, contribute to relapses and refractory cases. Chidamide (tucidinostat) is a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor that can reverse this epigenetic imbalance and has been approved for the treatment of T-cell malignancies. However, the use of chidamide for B-NHL remains limited, and the lack of relevant literature exacerbates this limitation. We conducted this review to summarize the anticancer activity of chidamide against B-NHL and its clinical applications to overcome drug resistance. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, using some keyword combinations from MEDLINE and EBSCO. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were also defined. Of the 131 records retrieved from databases, 16 were included in the review. Nine articles revealed that chidamide limited tumor progression by modifying the tumor microenvironment, stopping the cell cycle, inducing apoptosis and autophagy, and enhancing complement-dependent and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicities.According to seven other studies, administering chidamide in combination with another existing therapeutic regimen may benefit not only patients with relapsed/refractory B-NHL, but also those with newly diagnosed B-NHL. Chidamide plays many important roles in limiting B-NHL progression through epigenetic modifications. Thus, combining chidamide with other anticancer drugs may be more beneficial for patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory B-NHL.

Small-Molecule Compounds Boost CAR-T Cell Therapy in Hematological Malignancies

OPINION STATEMENT

Although chimeric antigen receptor T cell immunotherapy has been successfully applied in patients with hematological malignancies, several obstacles still need to be overcome, such as high relapse rates and side effects. Overcoming the limitations of CAR-T cell therapy and boosting the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy are urgent issues that must be addressed. The exploration of small-molecule compounds in combination with CAR-T cell therapies has achieved promising success in pre-clinical and clinical studies in recent years. Protein kinase inhibitors, demethylating drugs, HDAC inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, Akt inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, and Bcl-2 inhibitors exhibited potential synergy in combination with CAR-T cell therapy. In this review, we will discuss the recent application of these combination therapies for improved outcomes of CAR-T cell therapy.

Challenges and optimal strategies of CAR T therapy for hematological malignancies

ABSTRACT

Remarkable improvement relative to traditional approaches in the treatment of hematological malignancies by chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has promoted sequential approvals of eight commercial CAR T products within last 5 years. Although CAR T cells' productization is now rapidly boosting their extensive clinical application in real-world patients, the limitation of their clinical efficacy and related toxicities inspire further optimization of CAR structure and substantial development of innovative trials in various scenarios. Herein, we first summarized the current status and major progress in CAR T therapy for hematological malignancies, then described crucial factors which possibly compromise the clinical efficacies of CAR T cells, such as CAR T cell exhaustion and loss of antigen, and finally, we discussed the potential optimization strategies to tackle the challenges in the field of CAR T therapy.

CARs and Drugs: Pharmacological Ways of Boosting CAR-T-Cell Therapy

The development of chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) has marked a new era in cancer immunotherapy. Based on a multitude of durable complete remissions in patients with hematological malignancies, FDA and EMA approval was issued to several CAR products targeting lymphoid leukemias and lymphomas. Nevertheless, about 50% of patients treated with these approved CAR products experience relapse or refractory disease necessitating salvage strategies. Moreover, in the vast majority of patients suffering from solid tumors, CAR-T-cell infusions could not induce durable complete remissions so far. Crucial obstacles to CAR-T-cell therapy resulting in a priori CAR-T-cell refractory disease or relapse after initially successful CAR-T-cell therapy encompass antigen shutdown and CAR-T-cell dysfunctionality. Antigen shutdown predominately rationalizes disease relapse in hematological malignancies, and CAR-T-cell dysfunctionality is characterized by insufficient CAR-T-cell proliferation and cytotoxicity frequently observed in patients with solid tumors. Thus, strategies to surmount those obstacles are being developed with high urgency. In this review, we want to highlight different approaches to combine CAR-T cells with drugs, such as small molecules and antibodies, to pharmacologically boost CAR-T-cell therapy. In particular, we discuss how certain drugs may help to counteract antigen shutdown and CAR-T-cell dysfunctionality in both hematological malignancies and solid tumors.

Relapse after CAR-T cell therapy in B-cell malignancies: challenges and future approaches

Chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell therapy, as a novel cellular immunotherapy, has dramatically reshaped the landscape of cancer treatment, especially in hematological malignancies. However, relapse is still one of the most troublesome obstacles to achieving broad clinical application. The intrinsic factors and superior adaptability of tumor cells mark a fundamental aspect of relapse. The unique biological function of CAR-T cells governed by their special CAR construction also affects treatment efficacy. Moreover, complex cross-interactions among CAR-T cells, tumor cells, and the tumor microenvironment (TME) profoundly influence clinical outcomes concerning CAR-T cell function and persistence. Therefore, in this review, based on the most recent discoveries, we focus on the challenges of relapse after CAR-T cell therapy in B-cell malignancies from the perspective of tumor cells, CAR-T cells, and the TME. We also discuss the corresponding basic and clinical approaches that may overcome the problem in the future. We aim to provide a comprehensive understanding for scientists and physicians that will help improve research and clinical practice.

Therapeutic potential of tucidinostat, a subtype-selective HDAC inhibitor, in cancer treatment

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) is one of the most characterized epigenetic modifiers, modulating chromatin structure and gene expression, which plays an important role in cell cycle, differentiation and apoptosis. Dysregulation of HDAC promotes cancer progression, thus inhibitors targeting HDACs have evidently shown therapeutic efficacy in multiple cancers. Tucidinostat (formerly known as chidamide), a novel subtype-selective HDAC inhibitor, inhibits Class I HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, as well as Class IIb HDAC10. Tucidinostat is approved in relapsed or refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), advanced breast cancer and R/R adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATLL). Compared with other HDAC inhibitors, tucidinostat shows notable antitumor activity, remarkable synergistic effect with immunotherapy, and manageable toxicity. Here, we comprehensively summarize recent advances in tucidinostat as both monotherapy and a regimen of combination therapy in both hematological and solid malignancies in clinic. Further studies will endeavor to identify more combination strategies with tucidinostat and to identify specific clinical biomarkers to predict the therapeutic effect.

Combination strategies to optimize the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in haematological malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of haematological malignancies. However, resistance and relapse remain prominent limitations, and they are related to the limited persistence and efficacy of CAR T cells, downregulation or loss of tumour antigens, intrinsic resistance of tumours to death signalling, and immune suppressive microenvironment. Rational combined modality treatments are regarded as a promising strategy to further unlock the antitumor potential of CAR T cell therapy, which can be applied before CAR T cell infusion as a conditioning regimen or in ex vivo culture settings as well as concomitant with or after CAR T cell infusion. In this review, we summarize the combinatorial strategies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, targeted therapies and other immunotherapies, in an effort to further enhance the effectiveness of this impressive therapy and benefit more patients.

Strategies to overcome CAR-T cell resistance in clinical work: A single-institute experience

The emergence of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has shifted the paradigm of malignant tumor treatment, especially the advent of CD19-directed CAR-T cell therapy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies. Although CAR-T cell therapy has promising effects, some patients are resistant to this treatment, leaving them with limited options. Therefore, strategies to overcome resistance to CAR-T cell therapy are needed. We retrospectively studied three R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients who were resistant to CAR-T cell therapy and whose disease was controlled after receiving pembrolizumab, 21D4 CAR-T cells, or ibrutinib and venetoclax. Some promising prevention and treatment strategies to overcome treatment resistance are also discussed.