1
|
Sangiorgio A, Previtali D, Oldrini LM, Milev SR, Filardo G, Candrian C. Comparable results of superior vs antero-inferior plating for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. A comparative study. Injury 2024; 55:111449. [PMID: 38422762 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clavicle fractures represent up to 10 % of all fractures, affecting mainly a young population. Open reduction and internal plate fixation provide good results, but evidence on the best plate positioning is still unclear. Aim of this retrospective study was to compare superior and antero-inferior plating positioning in the surgical treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS 104 patients aged > 18 years, treated surgically with plate fixation (51 superior, 53 antero-inferior) for a midshaft clavicle fracture from January 2010 to April 2021 were included. At the time of the visit, mean follow-up time was 6.6 ± 2.6 years. Shoulder function was evaluated with the use of Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Return to sport, aesthetic satisfaction, operative time, radiological outcomes, rate of implant removal, and overall patient satisfaction were documented as well. RESULTS Mean CMS was 94.1 ± 10.0 points in the superior plating group and 93.4 ± 11.6 points in the antero-inferior plating group. DASH score: 4.6 ± 11.0 superior, 5.1 ± 10.5 antero-inferior. Return to sport: 8.2 ± 2.9 superior, 8.2 ± 3.0 antero-inferior. Aesthetic satisfaction: 8.9 ± 1.6 superior, 8.8 ± 2.1 antero-inferior. Overall satisfaction: 9.1 ± 1.5 superior, 8.9 ± 1.7 antero-inferior. The comparison between groups showed no statistically significant differences (p = n.s.) for all outcome measures. Operative time: 101.6 ± 27.3 min superior, 113.0 ± 31.6 min antero-inferior (p = 0.05). Radiological follow-up documented one non-union and one mal-union in the antero-inferior plating group. Overall, 63 patients underwent plate removal: 58.8 % in the superior plating group and 62.3 % in the antero-inferior plating group (p = n.s.). Main reason for plate removal was pain/discomfort. CONCLUSIONS Both superior and antero-inferior plating provided excellent clinical, functional, and radiological results for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, without significant differences between groups. The superior plating group showed a statistically shorter operative time. High rate of re-interventions with implant removal was documented in both groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Sangiorgio
- Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | - Davide Previtali
- Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
| | | | - Stamen Roumenov Milev
- Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Giuseppe Filardo
- Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Christian Candrian
- Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Buenter IR, Kremo V, Beeres FJP, van Veelen NM, Galliker B, Link BC, Babst R, Pape HC, van de Wall BJM. Does plate position influence the outcome in midshaft clavicular fractures? A multicenter analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024:10.1007/s00068-023-02400-y. [PMID: 38231234 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02400-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To date, it remains unclear whether superior or anterior plating is the best option for treating midshaft clavicular fractures. The aim of this study was to compare both techniques with regard to the incidence of implant removal due to implant irritation, risk of complications, time to union, and function. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, all midshaft clavicular fractures treated operatively between 2017 and 2020 in two hospitals in Switzerland were analyzed. The participating hospitals differed with regard to their standard practice; one offered superior plating only, while the other predominantly employed an anterior plate. The primary outcome was the incidence of implant removal for irritation. Secondary outcomes were time to union, complications, re-interventions, and range of motion during the follow-up period of at least 6 months. RESULTS In total, 168 patients were included in the study of which 81 (48%) received anterior plating and 87 (52%) superior plating. The overall mean age was 45 years (SD 16). There was no significant difference between anterior and superior plating with regard to implant removal (58.5% versus 57.1%, p = 0.887), infection (5.7% versus 1.8%, p = 0.071), and time to union (median 48 weeks versus 52 weeks, p = 0.643). Data on range of motion were available in 71 patients. There was no significant difference in anteflexion (median 180 degrees anterior versus 180 degrees superior) and abduction (median 180 degrees anterior versus 180 degrees superior) between the two groups. CONCLUSION This retrospective cohort study did not find sufficient evidence to recommend one implant position over the other for midshaft clavicular fractures with regard to removal due to irritation. Time to union was similar and Infections were equally rare in both groups. Notably, a considerable number of patients in both groups had their implants removed due to irritation. Larger prospective studies are needed to determine how much plate position contributes to the occurrence of irritation and whether other patient or implant-related factors might play a role. Until this is clarified, implant position should be based on surgeons preference and experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Ruth Buenter
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, CH-6000, Lucerne, Switzerland.
- Department of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Valerie Kremo
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, CH-6000, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Frank Johannes Paulus Beeres
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, CH-6000, Lucerne, Switzerland
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Health Science and Medicine University of Lucerne, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, CH-6000, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Nicole Maria van Veelen
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, CH-6000, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Beat Galliker
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne in Sursee, Spitalstrasse 16A, CH-6210, Sursee, Switzerland
| | - Bjoern-Christian Link
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, CH-6000, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Reto Babst
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Health Science and Medicine University of Lucerne, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, CH-6000, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Hans-Christoph Pape
- Department of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bryan Joost Marinus van de Wall
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, CH-6000, Lucerne, Switzerland
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Health Science and Medicine University of Lucerne, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, CH-6000, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tamburini LM, Mayo BC, Edgar C. Dual- Versus Single-Plate Fixation of Clavicle Fractures: Understanding the Rationale Behind both Approaches. Clin Sports Med 2023; 42:677-684. [PMID: 37716730 DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2023.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
Clavicle fractures are a common injury resulting from a high-energy force, such as a fall onto the shoulder, motor vehicle accident, or sporting activity. Although some clavicle fractures may be treated nonoperatively, operative treatment results in higher union rates and faster return to activity. Here we discuss the operative treatment options for plating of clavicle fractures; specifically, a single plate placed either superiorly or anteriorly or two plates placed orthogonally. Because both techniques provide adequate stability, fracture and patient characteristics should guide the surgical decision making regarding single versus dual plating of clavicle fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Tamburini
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, UConn Musculoskeletal Institute, 120 Dowling Way, Farmington, CT 06032, USA
| | - Benjamin C Mayo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, UConn Musculoskeletal Institute, 120 Dowling Way, Farmington, CT 06032, USA
| | - Cory Edgar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, UConn Musculoskeletal Institute, 120 Dowling Way, Farmington, CT 06032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
deMeireles AJ, Czerwonka N, Levine WN. Clavicle Nonunion and Malunion: Surgical Interventions for Functional Improvement. Clin Sports Med 2023; 42:663-675. [PMID: 37716729 DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2023.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
Clavicle nonunion and malunion are relatively uncommon but, when symptomatic, can result in pain and dysfunction that requires surgical intervention. Various reconstructive and grafting techniques are available to achieve stable fixation and union. In the setting of persistent nonunion, vascularized bone grafting may be necessary. A thorough understanding of the patient's type of nonunion and potential for healing is crucial for achieving satisfactory results because is thoughtful preoperative planning and surgical fixation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alirio J deMeireles
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Natalia Czerwonka
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - William N Levine
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|