Risk factors for the development of bronchiectasis in patients with asthma

Increased TGFβ1, VEGF and IFN-γ in the Sputum of Severe Asthma Patients With Bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis is one of the most common comorbidities in severe asthma. However, the mechanisms by which asthma promotes the development and progress of this condition are not well defined. This study aimed to analyze the inflammatory phenotypes and quantify the expression of proinflammatory and remodeling cytokines in asthma patients with and without bronchiectasis.

METHODS

The study sample comprised individuals with severe asthma and bronchiectasis (group AB, n=55) and a control population of individuals with severe asthma without bronchiectasis (group AC, n=45). Induced sputum samples were obtained and cell types determined by differential cell count. Proinflammatory and bronchial remodeling cytokines (IL-8, neutrophilic elastase, TGFβ1, VEGF, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and GM-CSF) were analyzed by immunoassay in sputum supernatant.

RESULTS

Neutrophilic inflammation was the primary phenotype in both asthma groups. Higher levels of TGFβ1, VEGF and IFN-γ were observed in asthma patients with bronchiectasis (group AB) than in controls (group AC) (15 vs 24pg/ml, p=0.014; 183 vs 272pg/ml, p=0.048; 0.85 vs 19pg/ml, p<0.001, respectively). Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) levels were significantly lower in the AB group than in the AC group (1.2 vs 4.4pg/ml, p<0.001). IL-8, neutrophil elastase and TNF-α did not present significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Raised levels of TGFβ1 and VEGF cytokines may indicate airway remodeling activation in asthma patients with bronchiectasis. The type of inflammation in asthma patients did not differ according to the presence or absence of bronchiectasis.

Correlating Reiff scores with clinical, functional, and prognostic factors: characterizing noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis severity: validation from a nationwide multicenter study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Our study aimed to confirm a simplified radiological scoring system, derived from a modified Reiff score, to evaluate its relationship with clinical symptoms and predictive outcomes in Taiwanese patients with noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB).

METHODS

This extensive multicenter retrospective study, performed in Taiwan, concentrated on patients diagnosed with NCFB verified through high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans. We not only compared the clinical features of various types of bronchiectasis (cylindrical, varicose, and cystic). Furthermore, we established relationships between the severity of clinical factors, including symptom scores, pulmonary function, pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization, exacerbation and admission rates, and HRCT parameters using modified Reiff scores.

RESULTS

Data from 2,753 patients were classified based on HRCT patterns (cylindrical, varicose, and cystic) and severity, assessed by modified Reiff scores (mild, moderate, and severe). With increasing HRCT severity, a significant correlation was found with decreased forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) (p < 0.001), heightened clinical symptoms (p < 0.001), elevated pathogen colonization (pseudomonas aeruginosa) (p < 0.001), and an increased annual hospitalization rate (p < 0.001). In the following multivariate analysis, elderly age, pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia, and hospitalizations per year emerged as the only independent predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSION

Based on our large cohort study, the simplified CT scoring system (Reiff score) can serve as a useful adjunct to clinical factors in predicting disease severity and prognosis among Taiwanese patients with NCFB.

The Impact of Bronchiectasis on the Clinical Characteristics of Non-Severe Asthma

Current literature primarily delves into the relationship between bronchiectasis and severe asthma, and only a few studies have evaluated the impact of bronchiectasis in patients with non-severe asthma. Therefore, this study investigated the clinical impact of bronchiectasis in patients with non-severe asthma. A prospective observational study of 140 non-severe asthmatic patients with (bronchiectasis group) and without bronchiectasis (control group) was conducted between September 2012 and February 2022. The bronchiectasis and control groups were compared in terms of demographics, lung function, asthma control test (ACT) results, exacerbation history, and respiratory medications. Among 140 non-severe asthmatic subjects, approximately 15.7% (n = 22) had bronchiectasis. The most common type of bronchiectasis was cylindrical type (90.7%). The left lingular division was the most frequently involved lung lobe (20.4%). There were no significant differences in the demographics (age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, and comorbidities) or ACT results between the 2 groups. The bronchiectasis group used inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists (P = 0.074) and mucolytics (P < 0.001) more frequently than the control group. Compared to the control group, the bronchiectasis group had lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (L) (1.9 ± 0.7 L vs. 2.3 ± 0.9 L, P = 0.039) and FEV1%predicted (67.2 ± 22.2%predicted vs. 77.1 ± 20.0%predicted, P = 0.038). The rate of hospital admission to a general ward in the preceding year was significantly higher in the bronchiectasis group compared to those of the control group (23.8% vs. 3.5%, P = 0.005) with an adjusted odds ratio of 6.308 (95% confidence interval, 1.401-28.392). Patients with non-severe asthma and bronchiectasis had lower lung function and more frequent exacerbations requiring hospitalization than those without bronchiectasis. More attention is needed for asthmatic patients with bronchiectasis, even if the asthma is not severe.

Association between Clinical Characteristics and Microbiota in Bronchiectasis Patients Based on Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Technology

This study aimed to investigate the disparities between metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and conventional culture results in patients with bronchiectasis. Additionally, we sought to investigate the correlation between the clinical characteristics of patients and their microbiome profiles. The overarching goal was to enhance the effective management and treatment of bronchiectasis patients, providing a theoretical foundation for healthcare professionals. A retrospective survey was conducted on 67 bronchiectasis patients admitted to The First Hospital of Jiaxing from October 2019 to March 2023. Clinical baseline information, inflammatory indicators, and pathogen detection reports, including mNGS, conventional blood culture, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) culture, and sputum culture results, were collected. By comparing the results of mNGS and conventional culture, the differences in pathogen detection rate and pathogen types were explored, and the diagnostic performance of mNGS compared to conventional culture was evaluated. Based on the various pathogens detected by mNGS, the association between clinical characteristics of bronchiectasis patients and mNGS microbiota results was analyzed. The number and types of pathogens detected by mNGS were significantly larger than those detected by conventional culture. The diagnostic efficacy of mNGS was significantly superior to conventional culture for all types of pathogens, particularly in viral detection (p < 0.01). Regarding pathogen detection rate, the bacteria with the highest detection rate were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17/58) and Haemophilus influenzae (11/58); the fungus with the highest detection rate was Aspergillus fumigatus (10/21), and the virus with the highest detection rate was human herpes virus 4 (4/11). Differences were observed between the positive and negative groups for P. aeruginosa in terms of common scoring systems for bronchiectasis and whether the main symptom of bronchiectasis manifested as thick sputum (p < 0.05). Significant distinctions were also noted between the positive and negative groups for A. fumigatus regarding Reiff score, neutrophil percentage, bronchiectasis etiology, and alterations in treatment plans following mNGS results reporting (p < 0.05). Notably, 70% of patients with positive A. fumigatus infection opted to change their treatment plans. The correlation study between clinical characteristics of bronchiectasis patients and mNGS microbiological results revealed that bacteria, such as P. aeruginosa, and fungi, such as A. fumigatus, were associated with specific clinical features of patients. This underscored the significance of mNGS in guiding personalized treatment approaches. mNGS could identify multiple pathogens in different types of bronchiectasis samples and was a rapid and effective diagnostic tool for pathogen identification. Its use was recommended for diagnosing the causes of infections in bronchiectasis patients.

Treatable traits in asthma during pregnancy: a call for a shift towards a precision-based management approach

Asthma is the most common chronic medical condition in pregnancy. Asthma exacerbations in pregnancy are unpredictable, and are associated with adverse maternal and fetal perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth and low birthweight. Goals of asthma management in pregnancy are to establish effective asthma control and prevent exacerbations. Optimising the management of asthma in pregnancy is an important goal of practice and future research.Treatable traits is a precision medicine paradigm proposed for the management of airways diseases, which holistically addresses the complexity and heterogeneity of airways disease. It is an individualised treatment approach that aims to improve outcomes. This makes treatable traits well suited for pregnant women with asthma, who have a high prevalence of obesity, mental health conditions, poor symptom perception and suboptimal asthma management skills including low treatment adherence. These traits are measurable and treatable. In this review, we explore current knowledge on the burden of asthma, maternal and perinatal consequences of asthma during pregnancy, the treatable traits paradigm, the prevalence of treatable traits in pregnant women with asthma, and consider how the treatable traits paradigm can be integrated into the management of asthma in pregnancy.

Does asthma-bronchiectasis overlap syndrome (ABOS) really exist?

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the relationship between asthma and bronchiectasis, as well as the necessary conditions that this connection must meet for this group of patients to be considered a special phenotype.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a PubMed search using the MeSH terms "asthma" and "bronchiectasis." The literature research was limited to clinical trials, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and systematic reviews, involving adult patients, published until November 30th, 2022.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Selected papers were initially evaluated by the Authors, to assess their eligibility in contributing to the statements.

RESULTS

The prevalence of bronchiectasis is higher than expected in patients with asthma, particularly in those with more severe disease, and in some patients, between 1.4% and 7% of them, asthma alone could be the cause of bronchiectasis. Both diseases share etiopathogenic mechanisms, such as neutrophilic and eosinophilic inflammation, altered airway microbiota, mucus hypersecretion, allergen sensitization, immune dysfunction, altered microRNA, dysfunctional neutrophilic activity, and variants of the HLA system. Besides that, they also share comorbidities, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease and psychiatric illnesses. The clinical presentation of asthma is very similar to patients with bronchiectasis, which could cause mistakes with diagnoses and delays in being prescribed the correct treatment. The coexistence of asthma and bronchiectasis also poses difficulties for the therapeutic focus.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence available seems to support that the asthma-bronchiectasis phenotype really exists although longitudinal studies which consistently demonstrate that asthma is the cause of bronchiectasis are still lacking.

The Role of Inflammatory Phenotype in Patients With Exacerbation-prone Asthma and Ongoing Therapy

INTRODUCTION

The risk factors for having frequent exacerbations are not well documented in cohort studies of patients with asthma on existing therapy. The objective of the present study was to compare the clinical and inflammatory characteristics of patients with exacerbation-prone asthma (EPA) with a history of two or more exacerbations in the previous year with those who had presented just one or no exacerbation.

METHODS

An ambispective observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. Patients diagnosed with moderate or severe asthma and ongoing therapy, whose inflammatory profile was determined by means of allergy and atopy status, blood eosinophilia and induced sputum were included. Patients were classified according to the number of asthma exacerbations in EPA (≥2 exacerbations in the previous year) vs. non-exacerbators (≤1 exacerbation in the previous year). Clinical, lung function and inflammatory characteristics of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Three hundred ten patients were visited in the Asthma Unit in 2018 and the combination of atopy and allergy status, blood eosinophilia and induced sputum was obtained in 96 (31%) patients. Of this latter group, 46 patients (47%) presented EPA compared to 50 (53%) non-exacerbators. Airway and blood eosinophilic inflammation did not differ between EPA and non-exacerbators in patients with asthma and ongoing therapy, and it was not a risk factor for EPA in our cohort.

CONCLUSION

Airway or blood type 2 inflammation status is not a valid tool for recognizing EPA or predicting asthma exacerbations in asthma patients following controller therapy.

Management of comorbidities in difficult and severe asthma

Difficult-to-treat and severe asthma are challenging clinical entities. In the face of suboptimal asthma control, the temptation for clinicians is to reflexively escalate asthma-directed therapy, including increasing exposure to corticosteroids and commencement of costly but potent biologic therapies. However, asthma control is objectively and subjectively assessed based on measurable parameters (such as exacerbations or variability in pulmonary physiology), symptoms and patient histories. Crucially, these features can be confounded by common untreated comorbidities, affecting clinicians' assessment of asthma treatment efficacy.