1
|
Joshi B, Singh VK, Vishwakarma DK, Ghorbani MA, Kim S, Gupta S, Chandola VK, Rajput J, Chung IM, Yadav KK, Mirzania E, Al-Ansari N, Mattar MA. A comparative survey between cascade correlation neural network (CCNN) and feedforward neural network (FFNN) machine learning models for forecasting suspended sediment concentration. Sci Rep 2024; 14:10638. [PMID: 38724562 PMCID: PMC11082234 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61339-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Suspended sediment concentration prediction is critical for the design of reservoirs, dams, rivers ecosystems, various operations of aquatic resource structure, environmental safety, and water management. In this study, two different machine models, namely the cascade correlation neural network (CCNN) and feedforward neural network (FFNN) were applied to predict daily-suspended sediment concentration (SSC) at Simga and Jondhara stations in Sheonath basin, India. Daily-suspended sediment concentration and discharge data from 2010 to 2015 were collected and used to develop the model to predict suspended sediment concentration. The developed models were evaluated using statistical indices like Nash and Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NES), root mean square error (RMSE), Willmott's index of agreement (WI), and Legates-McCabe's index (LM), supplemented by a scatter plot, density plots, histograms and Taylor diagram for graphical representation. The developed model was evaluated and compared with CCNN and FFNN. Nine input combinations were explored using different lag-times for discharge (Qt-n) and suspended sediment concentration (St-n) as input variables, with the current suspended sediment concentration as the desired output, to develop CCNN and FFNN models. The CCNN4 model with 4 lagged inputs (St-1, St-2, St-3, St-4) outperformed the other developed models with the lowest RMSE = 95.02 mg/l and the highest NES = 0.0.662, WI = 0.890 and LM = 0.668 for the Jondhara Station while the same CCNN4 model secure as the best with the lowest RMSE = 53.71 mg/l and the highest NES = 0.785, WI = 0.936 and LM = 0.788 for the Simga Station. The result shows the CCNN model was better than the FFNN model for predicting daily-suspended sediment at both stations in the Sheonath basin, India. Overall, CCNN showed better forecasting potential for suspended sediment concentration compared to FFNN at both stations, demonstrating their applicability for hydrological forecasting with complex relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhupendra Joshi
- Department of Agricultural Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221005, India
| | - Vijay Kumar Singh
- Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, 224229, India
| | - Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma
- Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, 263145, India.
| | - Mohammad Ali Ghorbani
- Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, 5166616471, Iran
| | - Sungwon Kim
- Department of Railroad Construction and Safety Engineering, Dongyang University, 36040, Yeongju, South Korea
| | - Shivam Gupta
- Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, 224229, India
| | - V K Chandola
- Department of Agricultural Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221005, India
| | - Jitendra Rajput
- Division of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India
| | - Il-Moon Chung
- Department of Water Resources and River Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang-si, 10223, Republic of Korea
| | - Krishna Kumar Yadav
- Faculty of Science and Technology, Madhyanchal Professional University, Ratibad, Bhopal, 462044, India
- Environmental and Atmospheric Sciences Research Group, Scientific Research Center, Al-Ayen University, Thi-Qar, Nasiriyah, 64001, Iraq
| | - Ehsan Mirzania
- Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, 5166616471, Iran
| | - Nadhir Al-Ansari
- Department of Civil, Environmental, and Natural Resources Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 97187, Luleå, Sweden.
| | - Mohamed A Mattar
- Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li W, Zhao Y, Zhu Y, Dong Z, Wang F, Huang F. Research progress in water quality prediction based on deep learning technology: a review. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2024; 31:26415-26431. [PMID: 38538994 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-33058-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
Water, an invaluable and non-renewable resource, plays an indispensable role in human survival and societal development. Accurate forecasting of water quality involves early identification of future pollutant concentrations and water quality indices, enabling evidence-based decision-making and targeted environmental interventions. The emergence of advanced computational technologies, particularly deep learning, has garnered considerable interest among researchers for applications in water quality prediction because of its robust data analytics capabilities. This article comprehensively reviews the deployment of deep learning methodologies in water quality forecasting, encompassing single-model and mixed-model approaches. Additionally, we delineate optimization strategies, data fusion techniques, and other factors influencing the efficacy of deep learning-based water quality prediction models, because understanding and mastering these factors are crucial for accurate water quality prediction. Although challenges such as data scarcity, long-term prediction accuracy, and limited deployments of large-scale models persist, future research aims to address these limitations by refining prediction algorithms, leveraging high-dimensional datasets, evaluating model performance, and broadening large-scale model application. These efforts contribute to precise water resource management and environmental conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenhao Li
- School of Electrical and Automation Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Environmental Risk Prevention and Emergency Response Technology, School of Environment, Nanjing, 210023, China
| | - Yin Zhao
- School of Electrical and Automation Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yining Zhu
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Environmental Risk Prevention and Emergency Response Technology, School of Environment, Nanjing, 210023, China
- Key Laboratory for Soft Chemistry and Functional Materials of Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zhongtian Dong
- Key Laboratory for Soft Chemistry and Functional Materials of Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, Jiangsu, China
| | - Fenghe Wang
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Environmental Risk Prevention and Emergency Response Technology, School of Environment, Nanjing, 210023, China
- Key Laboratory for Soft Chemistry and Functional Materials of Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, Jiangsu, China
| | - Fengliang Huang
- School of Electrical and Automation Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China.
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Environmental Risk Prevention and Emergency Response Technology, School of Environment, Nanjing, 210023, China.
| |
Collapse
|