1
|
Liu WKT, Yuet Siu KH, Cheung JPY, Shea GKH. Radiographic characterization of OPLL progression in patients receiving laminoplasty with a minimum of two-years follow-up. Neurosurg Rev 2024; 47:505. [PMID: 39207586 PMCID: PMC11362203 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02735-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2024] [Revised: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is a common cause of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) in Asian populations. Characterization of OPLL progression following laminoplasty remains limited in the literature. 29 patients with OPLL received cervical laminoplasty and a minimum of 2-years follow-up. Clinical and radiological surveillance occurred at 3-months, 6-months, 12-months post-op and then at yearly intervals. Transverse (anteroposterior) diameter and sagittal length of OPLL in relation to their cervical vertebral level of localisation was assessed upon immediate post-op radiographs compared to those obtained at subsequent follow-up. OPLL progression was defined as an increase in transverse dimensions and/or length by ≥ 2 mm. The average period of clinical follow-up was 6.7 ± 3.3 years. Upon latest follow-up, 79% of patients demonstrated at least 2 mm of transverse or longitudinal progression of OPLL. This corresponded to 2-years and 5-year progression rates of 54% and 71% respectively. OPLL located over C5 demonstrated the greatest transverse progression rate at (0.24 ± 0.34 mm / year). The mean overall longitudinal progression rate was 1.61 ± 2.06 mm / year. No patients experienced neurological decline resulting from OPLL progression requiring revision decompression during the period of post-operative observation. Characterizing transverse and longitudinal progression by cervical level via radiographs has implications in surgical planning for OPLL and should be consolidated upon post-operative CT/MRI scans as well as larger sample sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wai Kiu Thomas Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, China
| | - Keira Ho Yuet Siu
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, China
| | - Jason Pui-Yin Cheung
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, China
| | - Graham Ka-Hon Shea
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jentzsch T, Wetzel OT, Malhotra AK, Lozano CS, Massicotte EM, Spirig JM, Fehlings MG, Farshad M. Cervical kyphosis after posterior cervical laminectomy with and without fusion. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024; 33:3109-3116. [PMID: 38825607 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08260-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical posterior instrumentation and fusion is often performed to avoid post-laminectomy kyphosis. However, larger comparative analyses of cervical laminectomy with or without fusion are sparse. METHODS A retrospective, two-center, comparative cohort study included patients after stand-alone dorsal laminectomy with (n = 91) or without (n = 46) additional fusion for degenerative cervical myelopathy with a median follow-up of 59 (interquartile range (IQR) 52) months. The primary outcome was the C2-7 Cobb angle and secondary outcomes were Neck Disability Index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale, revision rates, T1 slope and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA) at final follow-up. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders (i.e. age, operated levels, and follow-up). RESULTS Preoperative C2-7 Cobb angle and T1 slope were higher in the laminectomy group, while the C2-7 SVA was similar. The decrease in C2-7 Cobb angle from pre- to postoperatively was more pronounced in the laminectomy group (- 6° (IQR 20) versus -1° (IQR 7), p = 0.002). When adjusting for confounders, the decrease in C2-7 Cobb angle remained higher in the laminectomy group (coefficient - 12 (95% confidence interval (CI) -18 to -5), p = 0.001). However, there were no adjusted differences for postoperative NDI (- 11 (- 23 to 2), p = 0.10), mJOA, revision rates, T1 slope and C2-7 SVA. CONCLUSION Posterior cervical laminectomy without fusion is associated with mild loss of cervical lordosis of around 6° in the mid-term after approximately five years, however without any clinical relevance regarding NDI or mJOA in well-selected patients (particularly in shorter segment laminectomies of < 3 levels).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thorsten Jentzsch
- Department of Orthopedics, University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Oliver T Wetzel
- Department of Orthopedics, University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Armaan K Malhotra
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Christopher S Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Eric M Massicotte
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - José M Spirig
- Department of Orthopedics, University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mazda Farshad
- Department of Orthopedics, University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Miranda SP, Whitmore RG, Kanter A, Mummaneni PV, Bisson EF, Barker FG, Harrop J, Magge SN, Heary RF, Fehlings MG, Albert TJ, Arnold PM, Riew KD, Steinmetz MP, Wang MC, Heller JG, Benzel EC, Ghogawala Z. Patients May Return to Work Sooner After Laminoplasty: Occupational Outcomes of the Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Surgical Trial. Neurosurgery 2024:00006123-990000000-01229. [PMID: 38912784 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Return-to-work (RTW) is an important outcome for employed patients considering surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). We conducted a post hoc analysis of patients as-treated in the Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Surgical Trial, a prospective, randomized trial comparing surgical approaches for CSM to evaluate factors associated with RTW. METHODS In the trial, patients were randomized (2:3) to either anterior surgery (anterior cervical decompression/fusion [ACDF]) or posterior surgery (laminoplasty [LP], or posterior cervical decompression/fusion [PCDF], at surgeon's discretion). Work status was recorded at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. For patients working full-time or part-time on enrollment, time to RTW was compared across as-treated surgical groups using discrete-time survival analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess predictors of RTW. Clinical outcomes were compared using a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS A total of 68 (42%) of 163 patients were working preoperatively and were analyzed. In total, 27 patients underwent ACDF, 29 underwent PCDF, and 12 underwent LP. 45 (66%) of 68 patients returned to work by 12 months. Median time to RTW differed by surgical approach (LP = 1 month, ACDF = 3 months, PCDF = 6 months; P = .02). Patients with longer length-of-stay were less likely to be working at 1 month (odds ratio 0.51; 95% CI, 0.29-0.91; P = .022) and 3 months (odds ratio 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.96; P = .04). At 3 months, PCDF was associated with lower Short-Form 36 physical component summary scores than ACDF (estimated mean difference [EMD]: 6.42; 95% CI, 1.4-11.4; P = .007) and LP (EMD: 7.98; 95% CI, 2.7-13.3; P = .003), and higher Neck Disability Index scores than ACDF (EMD: 12.48; 95% CI, 2.3-22.7; P = .01) and LP (EMD: 15.22; 95% CI, 2.3-28.1; P = .014), indicating worse perceived physical functioning and greater disability, respectively. CONCLUSION Most employed patients returned to work within 1 year. LP patients resumed employment earliest, while PCDF patients returned to work latest, with greater disability at follow-up, suggesting that choice of surgical intervention may influence occupational outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen P Miranda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert G Whitmore
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Adam Kanter
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Pickup Family Neurosciences Institute, Hoag Specialty Clinic, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Praveen V Mummaneni
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Erica F Bisson
- Department of Neurosurgery Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Fred G Barker
- Brain Tumor Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James Harrop
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Subu N Magge
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert F Heary
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, New Jersey, USA
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Krembil Neuroscience Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Todd J Albert
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Paul M Arnold
- Carle Neuroscience Institute, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - K Daniel Riew
- Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Marjorie C Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - John G Heller
- The Emory Orthopaedics & Spine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Edward C Benzel
- Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Zoher Ghogawala
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jang HJ, Moon BJ, Kim KH, Park JY, Chin DK, Kim KS, Cho YE. Factors Associated With Repeat Surgery in Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligaments: Minimum 8-year Follow-up Study. Clin Spine Surg 2024; 37:131-137. [PMID: 38637933 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Single-center retrospective study. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to identify the factors leading to repeat surgery in patients with cervical ossification of the longitudinal ligament (OPLL) during a minimal 8-year follow-up after the initial surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The long-term effects of cervical OPLL are well known, but it's not always clear how many patients need to have surgery again because their neurological symptoms get worse. METHODS This study is included 117 patients who underwent surgery for cervical OPLL and had a follow-up of at least 8 years. OPLL type, surgical extent, surgical method, and sagittal radiological parameters were measured, and OPLL characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS The average age of patients at the time of surgery was 53.2 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 78:39. The median follow-up duration was 122 months (96-170 mo). Out of the total, 20 cases (17.1%) necessitated repeat surgery, among which 8 cases required surgery at the same site as the initial operation. The highest rate of repeat surgery was observed in patients who underwent total laminectomy without fusion (TL), where 6 out of 21 patients (29%) needed a second surgery, and 5 of these (23%) involved the same surgical site. Patients who underwent repeat surgery at the same site exhibited a greater range of motion (ROM) one year postsurgery (16.4 ± 8.5° vs. 23.1 ± 12.7°, P =0.041). In addition, the ROM at 1 year was higher in patients who underwent TL compared with those who had laminoplasty. Furthermore, the recurrence rate for hill-shape OPLL was higher at 30.8% compared to 10% for plateau-shape OPLL ( P = 0.05). CONCLUSION Larger cervical ROM 1 year after surgery is related to repeat surgery at the same level as previous surgery, especially in laminectomy without fusion surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Jun Jang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Bong Ju Moon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Kyung Hyun Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Jeong Yoon Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Dong Kyu Chin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Keun Su Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Yong Eun Cho
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Levy HA, Pinter ZW, Pumford A, Salmons HI, Townsley S, Katsos K, Reed R, Chen S, Abode-Iyamah K, Deen HG, Clarke M, Bydon M, Fogelson JL, Elder BD, Currier B, Freedman BA, Nassr AN, Karamian BA, Sebastian AS. The Effect of C2 Muscular Exposure Technique on Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes After C2-T2 Posterior Cervical Fusion. Clin Spine Surg 2024:01933606-990000000-00296. [PMID: 38637921 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort analysis. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the C2 exposure technique was a predictor of change in cervical alignment and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) after posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) for degenerative indications. BACKGROUND In PCDF handling of the C2 posterior paraspinal musculature during the operative approach varies by surgeon technique. To date, no studies have investigated whether maintenance of the upper cervical semispinalis cervicis attachments as compared with complete reflection of upper cervical paraspinal musculature from the posterior bony elements is associated with superior radiographic and clinical outcomes after PCDF. PATIENTS AND METHODS All adult patients who underwent C2-T2 PCDF for myelopathy or myeloradiculopathy at multi-institutional academic centers between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients were dichotomized by the C2 exposure technique into semispinalis preservation or midline muscular reflection groups. Preoperative and short and long-term postoperative radiographic outcomes (upper cervical alignment, global alignment, and fusion status) and PROMs (Visual Analog Scale-Neck, Neck Disability Index, and Short Form-12) were collected. Univariate analysis compared patient factors, radiographic measures, and PROMs across C2 exposure groups. RESULTS A total of 129 patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria (73 muscle preservation and 56 muscle reflection). Patients in the muscular preservation group were on average younger (P= 0.005) and more likely to have bone morphogenic protein (P< 0.001) and C2 pars screws (P= 0.006) used during surgery. Preoperative to postoperative changes in C2 slope, C2 tilt, C2-C3 segmental lordosis, C2-C3 listhesis, C0-C2 Cobb angle, proximal junctional kyphosis, ADI, C1 lamina-occiput distance, C2 sagittal vertical axis, C2-C7 lordosis, and PROMs at all follow-up intervals did not vary significantly by C2 exposure technique. Likewise, there were no significant differences in fusion status, C2-C3 pseudoarthrosis, C2 screw loosening, and complication and revision rates between C2 exposure groups. CONCLUSIONS Preservation of C2 semispinalis attachments versus muscular reflection did not significantly impact cervical alignment, clinical outcomes, or proximal junction complications in long-segment PCDF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Selby Chen
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | - H Gordon Deen
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Michelle Clarke
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Brian A Karamian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Suzuki H, Funaba M, Fujimoto K, Ichihara Y, Nishida N, Sakai T. Current Concepts of Cervical Spine Alignment, Sagittal Deformity, and Cervical Spine Surgery. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1196. [PMID: 38592040 PMCID: PMC10932435 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
There are not many reports on cervical spine alignment, and only a few analyze ideal surgical approaches and optimal amounts of correction needed for the various types of deformity. We comprehensively reviewed the present literature on cervical spinal deformities (with or without myelopathy) and their surgical management to provide a framework for surgical planning. A general assessment of the parameters actually in use and correlations between cervical and thoracolumbar spine alignment are provided. We also analyzed posterior, anterior, and combined cervical surgical approaches and indications for the associated techniques of laminoplasty, laminectomy and fusion, and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Finally, on the basis of the NDI, SF-36, VAS, and mJOA questionnaires, we fully evaluated the outcomes and measures of postoperative health-related quality of life. We found the need for additional prospective studies to further enhance our understanding of the importance of cervical alignment when assessing and treating cervical deformities with or without myelopathy. Future studies need to focus on correlations between cervical alignment parameters, disability scores, and myelopathy outcomes. Through this comprehensive literature review, we offer guidance on practical and important points of surgical technique, cervical alignment, and goals surgeons can meet to improve symptoms in all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidenori Suzuki
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan; (M.F.); (K.F.); (Y.I.); (N.N.); (T.S.)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
An S, Lee JB, Lee S, Oh Y, Park JY, Hur JW. True Continuous Segment of Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament is Protective Against Postoperative Early Kyphosis Progression After Laminoplasty. Neurosurgery 2023:00006123-990000000-00973. [PMID: 37991350 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is a potentially catastrophic disease. Laminoplasty (LP) is a common surgical intervention, but postoperative kyphosis progression is a major complication, for which various risk factors have been identified and used in surgical decision-making. Our focus is on the ability of OPLL with specific morphological traits, designated as the true continuous segment (TCS), to stabilize alignment and prevent postoperative kyphosis after LP. METHODS This retrospective case-control study included patients who underwent cervical LP for OPLL treatment with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Demographic, operative, and radiographic parameters were analyzed. TCS is defined as a continuous segment of OPLL that spans the disk space more than half of the adjacent vertebral body height without crack, or OPLL segment attached to both upper and lower adjacent vertebral bodies by bridging, or obvious interbody autofusion, and is identified from preoperative computed tomography. A subgroup analysis for preoperatively lordotic patients, divided into 2 groups based on cervical alignment at the final follow-up, was conducted to identify risk factors for kyphosis progression. Difference analysis, linear regression analysis for loss of lordosis (LoL), and logistic regression analysis for kyphosis progression were used. RESULTS A total of 84 patients were identified. Among them, 78 patients with preoperatively lordotic alignment were divided into 2 groups: those who maintained lordotic alignment (n = 60) and those who progressed to kyphosis (n = 18). Regression analyses revealed a significant protective effect of TCS count against LoL and postoperative kyphosis, with a TCS count of 3 or more conclusively preventing kyphosis (sensitivity 1.000, specificity 0.283, area under the curve 0.629). CONCLUSION For patients with OPLL, TCS was shown to protect against the LoL after LP. Therefore, TCS should be identified and considered when planning surgical treatment for OPLL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungjae An
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Choice of Surgical Procedure for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11185396. [PMID: 36143041 PMCID: PMC9504869 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11185396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), spinal cord compression causes neurologic symptoms [...]
Collapse
|
9
|
Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:820-830. [PMID: 35587949 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) occurs as heterotopic bone forms in the posterior longitudinal ligament, resulting in neural compression, myelopathy, and radiculopathy. OPLL is most commonly observed in East Asian populations, with prevalence rates of 1.9% to 4.3% reported in Japan. OPLL rates are lower in North American and European patients, with reported prevalence of 0.1% to 1.7%. Patients typically develop symptoms due to OPLL in their cervical spines. The etiology of OPLL is multifactorial, including genetic, metabolic, and anatomic factors. Asymptomatic or symptomatic patients with OPLL can be managed nonsurgically, whereas patients with neurologic symptoms may require surgical decompression from an anterior, posterior, or combined approach. Surgical treatment can provide notable improvement in neurologic function. Surgical decision making accounts for multiple factors, including patient comorbidities, neurologic status, disease morphology, radiographic findings, and procedure complication profiles. In this study, we review OPLL epidemiology and pathophysiology, clinical features, radiographic evaluation, management, and complications.
Collapse
|
10
|
Nagoshi N, Yoshii T, Egawa S, Sakai K, Kusano K, Tsutsui S, Hirai T, Matsukura Y, Wada K, Katsumi K, Koda M, Kimura A, Furuya T, Maki S, Nishida N, Nagamoto Y, Oshima Y, Ando K, Nakashima H, Takahata M, Mori K, Nakajima H, Murata K, Miyagi M, Kaito T, Yamada K, Banno T, Kato S, Ohba T, Inami S, Fujibayashi S, Katoh H, Kanno H, Watanabe K, Taneichi H, Imagama S, Kawaguchi Y, Takeshita K, Nakamura M, Matsumoto M, Yamazaki M, Okawa A. Clinical Indicators of Surgical Outcomes After Laminoplasty for Patients With Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:1077-1083. [PMID: 35867608 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate patient-reported outcomes using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) and clarify clinical factors that affect the therapeutic effects for patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Although previous studies identified factors that affected the surgical outcomes, their assessment was mainly based on the Japanese Orthopedic Association score, which only includes neurological function. Investigating this pathology through multiple functions and quality of life (QOL) is pivotal to understanding the comprehensive clinical pictures of the cervical OPLL and its therapeutic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was performed by the Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament. A total of 478 patients with myelopathy caused by cervical OPLL from 28 institutions were prospectively registered from 2014 to 2017 and followed up for 2 years. Of the patients, 168 received laminoplasties and fully completed questionnaires. Demographic information, imaging findings, and clinical outcomes were collected. Patients were grouped according to effective or ineffective surgical outcomes as defined by the JOACMEQ using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Laminoplasty resulted in functional improvement in the cervical spine and upper extremity around 40% of the patients, while QOL showed only 21.4% ( P <0.01). Multivariable analyses revealed that younger age and a postoperative decrease in arm or hand pain were correlated with significantly improved function of the upper extremities. A reduction in lower limb pain favorably affected the postoperative lower extremity function. A postoperative reduction in upper extremity pain enhanced the QOL recovery. CONCLUSIONS Surgeons should recognize the diversity of surgical outcomes after laminoplasty and understand the necessity of pain management even after the surgery to enhance bodily functions and QOL in patients with cervical OPLL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narihito Nagoshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
| | - Toshitaka Yoshii
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoru Egawa
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Sakai
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kazuo Kusano
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kudanzaka Hospital, Chiyadaku, Japan
| | - Shunji Tsutsui
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Takashi Hirai
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Matsukura
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kanichiro Wada
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan
| | - Keiichi Katsumi
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Niigata University Medical and Dental General Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Masao Koda
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Atsushi Kimura
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedics, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Takeo Furuya
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Satoshi Maki
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Norihiro Nishida
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Yukitaka Nagamoto
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yasushi Oshima
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kei Ando
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nakashima
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Masahiko Takahata
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kanji Mori
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Tsukinowa-cho, Shiga, Japan
| | - Hideaki Nakajima
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Kazuma Murata
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Miyagi
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kitasato Universiy Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takashi Kaito
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka UniversityOsaka, Japan
| | - Kei Yamada
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Banno
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kato
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Ohba
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Satoshi Inami
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Fujibayashi
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Katoh
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Surgical Science, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Haruo Kanno
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Kota Watanabe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Taneichi
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Shiro Imagama
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yoshiharu Kawaguchi
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Katsushi Takeshita
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedics, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Masaya Nakamura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
| | - Morio Matsumoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
| | - Masashi Yamazaki
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Atsushi Okawa
- Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|