Decision theory for precision therapy of breast cancer

A war on many fronts: cross disciplinary approaches for novel cancer treatment strategies

Cancer is a disease characterized by uncontrolled cellular growth where cancer cells take advantage of surrounding cellular populations to obtain resources and promote invasion. Carcinomas are the most common type of cancer accounting for almost 90% of cancer cases. One of the major subtypes of carcinomas are adenocarcinomas, which originate from glandular cells that line certain internal organs. Cancers such as breast, prostate, lung, pancreas, colon, esophageal, kidney are often adenocarcinomas. Current treatment strategies include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, targeted therapy, and more recently immunotherapy. However, patients with adenocarcinomas often develop resistance or recur after the first line of treatment. Understanding how networks of tumor cells interact with each other and the tumor microenvironment is crucial to avoid recurrence, resistance, and high-dose therapy toxicities. In this review, we explore how mathematical modeling tools from different disciplines can aid in the development of effective and personalized cancer treatment strategies. Here, we describe how concepts from the disciplines of ecology and evolution, economics, and control engineering have been applied to mathematically model cancer dynamics and enhance treatment strategies.

Flexible Risk Evidence Combination Rules in Breast Cancer Precision Therapy

Evidence theory by Dempster-Shafer for determination of hormone receptor status in breast cancer samples was introduced in our previous paper. One major topic pointed out here is the link between pieces of evidence found from different origins. In this paper the challenge of selecting appropriate ways of fusing evidence, depending on the type and quality of data involved is addressed. A parameterized family of evidence combination rules, covering the full range of potential needs, from emphasizing discrepancies in the measurements to aspiring accordance, is covered. The consequences for real patient samples are shown by modeling different decision strategies.

Gene network profiling in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Determining meta-analysis of transcriptional profiling of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) through Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets has not been investigated. This study aims to define gene expression profiles in MIBC and to identify potential candidate genes and pathways.

OBJECTIVES

To review and evaluate gene expression studies in MIBC through publicly available RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) and microarray data in order to identify potential prognostic and therapeutic targets for MIBC.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and Wiley Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was performed using the terms "gene," "gene expression," and "bladder cancer" January 1, 1990 through March 2021 focused on populations with MIBC.

RESULTS

In the final analysis, GEO datasets were included. Fixed effect model was employed in the meta-analysis. Gene networking connections and gene-set functional analyses of the identified genes as differentially expressed in MIBC were performed using ImaGEO and GeneMANIA software. A heatmap for the upregulated and downregulated genes was generated along with the correlated pathways.

CONCLUSION

A total of 9 genes were reported in this analysis. Six genes were reported as upregulated (ProTα, SPINT1, UBE2E1, RAB25, KPNB1, HDAC1) and 3 genes as downregulated (NUP188, IPO13, NUP124). Genes were found to be involved in "ubiquitin mediated proteolysis," "protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum," "transcriptional misregulation in cancer," and "RNA transport" pathways.

Decision Theory versus Conventional Statistics for Personalized Therapy of Breast Cancer

Estrogen and progesterone receptors being present or not represents one of the most important biomarkers for therapy selection in breast cancer patients. Conventional measurement by immunohistochemistry (IHC) involves errors, and numerous attempts have been made to increase precision by additional information from gene expression. This raises the question of how to fuse information, in particular, if there is disagreement. It is the primary domain of Dempster–Shafer decision theory (DST) to deal with contradicting evidence on the same item (here: receptor status), obtained through different techniques. DST is widely used in technical settings, such as self-driving cars and aviation, and is also promising to deliver significant advantages in medicine. Using data from breast cancer patients already presented in previous work, we focus on comparing DST with classical statistics in this work, to pave the way for its application in medicine. First, we explain how DST not only considers probabilities (a single number per sample), but also incorporates uncertainty in a concept of ‘evidence’ (two numbers per sample). This allows for very powerful displays of patient data in so-called ternary plots, a novel and crucial advantage for medical interpretation. Results are obtained according to conventional statistics (ODDS) and, in parallel, according to DST. Agreement and differences are evaluated, and the particular merits of DST discussed. The presented application demonstrates how decision theory introduces new levels of confidence in diagnoses derived from medical data.