Newborn screening of duchenne muscular dystrophy specifically targeting deletions amenable to exon-skipping therapy

Antisense oligonucleotides: a novel Frontier in pharmacological strategy

Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are short single stranded synthetic RNA or DNA molecules, whereas double-stranded RNA nucleotide sequences are called small interfering RNA (siRNA). ASOs bind to complementary nucleic acid sequences impacting the associated functions of the targeted nucleic acids. They represent an emerging class of drugs that, through a revolutionary mechanism of action, aim to directly regulate disease-causing genes and their variants, providing an alternative tool to traditional "protein-specific" therapies. The majority of the ASOs are designed to treat orphan genetic disorders that in most of the cases are seriously disabling and still lacking an adequate therapy. In order to translate ASOs into clinical success, constant technological advances have been instrumental in overcoming several pharmacological, toxicological and formulation limitations. Accordingly, chemical structures have been recently implemented and new bio-conjugation and nanocarriers formulation strategies explored. The aim of this work is to offer an overview of the antisense technology with a comparative analysis of the oligonucleotides approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

Parental Preferences for Expanded Newborn Screening: What Are the Limits?

The use of next-generation sequencing technologies such as genomic sequencing in newborn screening (NBS) could enable the detection of a broader range of conditions. We explored parental preferences and attitudes towards screening for conditions for which varying types of treatment exist with a cross-sectional survey completed by 100 parents of newborns who received NBS in Ontario, Canada. The survey included four vignettes illustrative of hypothetical screening targets, followed by questions assessing parental attitudes. Chi-square tests were used to compare frequency distributions of preferences. Results show that most parents supported NBS for conditions for which only supportive interventions are available, but to a significantly lesser degree than those with disease-specific treatments (99% vs. 82-87%, p ≤ 0.01). For conditions without an effective treatment, the type of supportive care and age of onset of the condition did not significantly alter parent perceptions of risks and benefits. Parents are interested in expanded NBS for conditions with only supportive interventions in childhood, despite lower levels of perceived benefit for the child and greater anticipated anxiety from screen-positive results. These preferences suggest that the expansion of NBS may require ongoing deliberation of perceived benefits and risks and enhanced approaches to education, consent, and support.

Estimated costs for Duchenne muscular dystrophy care in Brazil

BACKGROUND

The economic burden of rare diseases on health systems is still not widely measured, with the generation of accurate information about the costs with medical care for subjects with rare diseases being crucial when defining health policies. Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is the most common form of muscular dystrophy, with new technologies recently being studied for its management. Information about the costs related to the disease in Latin America is scarce, and the objective of this study is to evaluate the annual hospital, home care and transportation costs per patient with DMD treatment in Brazil.

RESULTS

Data from 27 patients were included, the median annual cost per patient was R$ 17,121 (IQR R$ 6,786; 25,621). Home care expenditures accounted for 92% of the total costs, followed by hospital costs (6%) and transportation costs (2%). Medications and loss of family, and patient's productivity are among the most representative consumption items. When disease worsening due to loss of the ability to walk was incorporated to the analysis, it was shown that wheelchair users account for an incremental cost of 23% compared with non-wheelchair users.

CONCLUSIONS

This is an original study in Latin America to measure DMD costs using the micro-costing technique. Generating accurate information about costs is crucial to provide health managers with information that could help establish more sustainable policies when deciding upon rare diseases in emerging countries.

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of eteplirsen in young boys aged 6–48 months with Duchenne muscular dystrophy amenable to exon 51 skipping

Eteplirsen is FDA-approved for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) in exon 51 skip-amenable patients. Previous studies in boys > 4 years of age indicate eteplirsen is well tolerated and attenuates pulmonary and ambulatory decline compared with matched natural history cohorts. Here the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of eteplirsen in boys aged 6-48 months is evaluated. In this open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation study (NCT03218995), boys with a confirmed mutation of the DMD gene amenable to exon 51 skipping (Cohort 1: aged 24-48 months, n = 9; Cohort 2: aged 6 to < 24 months, n = 6) received ascending doses (2, 4, 10, 20, 30 mg/kg) of once-weekly eteplirsen intravenously over 10 weeks, continuing at 30 mg/kg up to 96 weeks. Endpoints included safety (primary) and pharmacokinetics (secondary). All 15 participants completed the study. Eteplirsen was well tolerated with no treatment-related discontinuations, deaths or evidence of kidney toxicity. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild; most common were pyrexia, cough, nasopharyngitis, vomiting, and diarrhea. Eteplirsen pharmacokinetics were consistent between both cohorts and with previous clinical experience in boys with DMD > 4 years of age. These data support the safety and tolerability of eteplirsen at the approved 30-mg/kg dose in boys as young as 6 months old.

Newborn Screening for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

A pilot newborn screening (NBS) program for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) study proposes to assess the feasibility of the screening procedure, temporal course of the various steps of screening, and the public acceptability of the program. This is particularly vital to ascertain as DMD is considered a 'non-treatable' disease and thus does not fit the traditional criteria for newborn screening. However, modern perspectives of NBS for DMD are changing and point to possible net benefits for children and their families undertaking NBS for DMD. The aim of this workshop was to establish pathways for the successful implementation and evaluation of a pilot NBS for DMD program in Australia. Consensus was reached as to the rationale for, potential benefits, risks, barriers and facilitators of screening, alongside the establishment of screening protocols and clinical referral pathways.

Gene Therapy for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Unlocking the Opportunities in Countries in the Middle East and Beyond

Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe neuromuscular disorder which leads to progressive muscle degeneration and weakness. Most patients die from cardiac or respiratory failure. Gene transfer therapy offers a promising approach to treating this disorder. Objective: Given the genetic disease burden, family size, and the high consanguinity rates in the Middle East, our objective is to address current practices and challenges of DMD patient care within two countries in this region, namely the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait, and to outline readiness for gene therapy. Methods: An expert panel meeting was held to discuss the DMD patient journey, disease awareness, current management of DMD, challenges faced and recommendations for improvement. Opportunities and challenges for gene therapy in both countries were also deliberated. A pre-meeting survey was conducted, and the results were used to guide the discussion during the meeting. Results: DMD awareness is poor resulting in a delay in referral and diagnosis of patients. Awareness and education initiatives, along with an interconnected referral system could improve early diagnosis. Genetic testing is available in both countries although coverage varies. Corticosteroid therapy is the standard of care however there is often a delay in treatment initiation. Patients with DMD should be diagnosed and managed by a multi-disciplinary team in centers of excellence for neuromuscular disorders. Key success factors to support the introduction of gene therapy include education and training, timely and accessible genetic testing and resolution of reimbursement and cost issues. Conclusion: There are many challenges facing the management of DMD patients in the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait and most likely other countries within the Middle East. Successful introduction of gene therapy to treat DMD will require careful planning, education, capacity building and prioritization of core initiatives.

Duchenne expert physician perspectives on Duchenne newborn screening and early Duchenne care

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive, fatal neuromuscular disorder typically diagnosed between 4 and 5 years of age. DMD currently has five FDA approved therapies, which has led to increased interest in newborn screening (NBS) for DMD. Our objective was to explore the perspectives and predicted practices of physicians (primarily neurologists) who will likely be responsible for the follow-up of infants identified with DMD through NBS. A short survey was developed and distributed to physicians who are responsible for providing care for patients with Duchenne at Certified Duchenne Care Centers across the USA. Twenty-seven physicians responded to statements about benefit and readiness for dystrophinopathy NBS, which care recommendations they would make at initial infant visits, and when they would recommend initiating approved therapies. Most DMD physicians indicated they see benefit in NBS (82%) and believe the DMD care community is ready for NBS in dystrophinopathies (74%). The majority of physicians would recommend multiple interventions, including genetic counseling, maternal carrier testing, referral to early intervention services, screening siblings, discussion of clinical trials, exon skipping therapies, and assessment of social and language development at initial visits. The majority of physicians also indicated they would recommend initiating approved therapies much earlier than the typical age of diagnosis.

Diagnostic experiences of Duchenne families and their preferences for newborn screening: A mixed-methods study

Duchenne muscular dystrophy is the most common form of muscular dystrophy diagnosed in childhood but is not routinely screened for prenatally or at birth in the United States. We sought to characterize the diagnostic experiences of families and describe their preferences for newborn screening (NBS). We conducted a registry-based survey of families with Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy that included open- and closed-ended questions regarding the journey to a diagnosis, preferences for when to learn of a diagnosis, and how knowledge of a diagnosis would impact life decisions. Open-ended responses were analyzed thematically, and closed-ended responses were analyzed descriptively. Sixty-five families completed the survey. The average ages of first concern and diagnosis were 2 and 4 years, respectively. One-third of families (30%) indicated that they would prefer to receive a diagnosis in the newborn period irrespective of treatment options available, and nearly all of the remaining families (93%) indicated that they would want to learn about a diagnosis if there were treatments that worked well during the newborn period. All families (100%) indicated that a diagnosis in the newborn period would impact life decisions. We identified three overarching themes, which described the stages of the diagnostic journey, including having concerns about the child, seeking answers, and receiving the diagnosis. NBS can facilitate improved health outcomes through early access to care, and inform families on major health and nonhealth decisions. The preferences and experiences of families and other stakeholders should be considered when determining the potential value and benefit of expanding NBS programs.

Walking alone milestone combined reading-frame rule improves early prediction of Duchenne muscular dystrophy

OBJECTIVE

To explore the potential of walking alone milestone combined reading-frame rule to improve the early diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).

METHOD

To retrospectively describe the genotype and phenotype of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies (BMD) patients with deletions and duplicates in the dystrophin gene. The sensitivity and specificity of the reading frame rule were calculated and compared to that of the combined reading frame rule and walking alone milestone. The diagnostic coincidence rate of two different methods was analyzed.

RESULT

One hundred sixty-nine male DMD/BMD patients were enrolled, including 17 cases of BMD and 152 cases of DMD. The diagnostic coincidence rate, diagnostic sensitivity, and specificity of the reading-frame rule for DMD/BMD were 85.2, 86.8, and 70.59%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the reading frame principle combined with the walking alone milestone for DMD/BMD were 96.05 and 70.59%, respectively. The diagnostic coincidence rate increased to 93.49%, significantly different from that predicted by reading- frame rule (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The reading-frame rule combined with the walking alone milestone significantly improved the early diagnosis rate of DMD.

Genetic neuromuscular disorders: what is the best that we can do?

The major advances in genetic neuromuscular disorders in the last 30 years have been: (a) identification of the genetic basis for hundreds of these disorders, (b) through knowing the genes, understanding their pathobiology and (c) subsequent implementation of evidence-based treatments for some of the disorders. New genomic technologies are providing precision diagnosis, mode of inheritance and likely prognosis for more patients than ever before. Parents of children with a genetic diagnosis can then use preimplantation or prenatal diagnosis to avoid having further affected children if they wish. But is this the best we can do for genetic neuromuscular disorders? Since the 1980s, it has been argued it would be better to identify Duchenne muscular dystrophy carrier mothers, rather than diagnose their affected sons. Carrier screening for recessive disorders can identify couples with a high chance of having affected children. It allows couples reproductive choice and can prevent infant morbidity and mortality and significant distress for families. Professional bodies in many countries now recommend prospective parents should be informed about carrier screening. Implementing and funding expensive therapies increases the cost-effectiveness of carrier screening, increasing its attractiveness to governments. Best practice for genetic neuromuscular disorders should include equitable access to carrier screening.

Newborn screening of neuromuscular diseases

Neuromuscular diseases represent an heterogenous group of more than 400 diseases, with a very broad phenotypic spectrum. Given their rarity and complexity, neuromuscular diseases are often diagnosed with a very significant delay after which irreversible muscle damage may limit the efficacy of treatments when available. In this context, neonatal screening could constitute a solution for early detection and treatment. A systematic review of the literature in PubMed up to May 1, 2021, was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, including classical neuromuscular diseases and diseases with a clear peripheral nervous system involvement (including central nervous system disease with severe neuropathy). We found seven diseases for which newborn screening data were reported: spinal muscular atrophy (9), Duchenne muscular dystrophy (9), Pompe disease (8), X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (5), Krabbe disease (4), myotonic dystrophy type 1 (1), metachromatic leukodystrophy (1). The future of newborn screening for neuromuscular disorders pass through a global technological switch, from a biochemical to a genetic-based approach. The rapid development of therapy also requires the possibility to quickly adapt the list of treated conditions, to allow innovative therapies to achieve their best efficacy.