Homological scaffold via minimal homology bases

Simple topological task-based functional connectivity features predict longitudinal behavioral change of fluid reasoning in the RANN cohort

Recent attention has been given to topological data analysis (TDA), and more specifically persistent homology (PH), to identify the underlying shape of brain network connectivity beyond simple edge pairings by computing connective components across different connectivity thresholds (see Sizemore et al., 2019). In the present study, we applied PH to task-based functional connectivity, computing 0-dimension Betti (B0) curves and calculating the area under these curves (AUC); AUC indicates how quickly a single connected component is formed across correlation filtration thresholds, with lower values interpreted as potentially analogous to lower whole-brain system segregation (e.g., Gracia-Tabuenca et al., 2020). One hundred sixty-three participants from the Reference Ability Neural Network (RANN) longitudinal lifespan cohort (age 20-80 years) were tested in-scanner at baseline and five-year follow-up on a battery of tests comprising four domains of cognition (i.e., Stern et al., 2014). We tested for 1.) age-related change in the AUC of the B0 curve over time, 2.) the predictive utility of AUC in accounting for longitudinal change in behavioral performance and 3.) compared system segregation to the PH approach. Results demonstrated longitudinal age-related decreases in AUC for Fluid Reasoning, with these decreases predicting longitudinal declines in cognition, even after controlling for demographic and brain integrity factors; moreover, change in AUC partially mediated the effect of age on change in cognitive performance. System segregation also significantly decreased with age in three of the four cognitive domains but did not predict change in cognition. These results argue for greater application of TDA to the study of aging.

Spectral detection of simplicial communities via Hodge Laplacians

While the study of graphs has been very popular, simplicial complexes are relatively new in the network science community. Despite being a source of rich information, graphs are limited to pairwise interactions. However, several real-world networks such as social networks, neuronal networks, etc., involve interactions between more than two nodes. Simplicial complexes provide a powerful mathematical framework to model such higher-order interactions. It is well known that the spectrum of the graph Laplacian is indicative of community structure, and this relation is exploited by spectral clustering algorithms. Here we propose that the spectrum of the Hodge Laplacian, a higher-order Laplacian defined on simplicial complexes, encodes simplicial communities. We formulate an algorithm to extract simplicial communities (of arbitrary dimension). We apply this algorithm to simplicial complex benchmarks and to real higher-order network data including social networks and networks extracted using language or text processing tools. However, datasets of simplicial complexes are scarce, and for the vast majority of datasets that may involve higher-order interactions, only the set of pairwise interactions are available. Hence, we use known properties of the data to infer the most likely higher-order interactions. In other words, we introduce an inference method to predict the most likely simplicial complex given the community structure of its network skeleton. This method identifies as most likely the higher-order interactions inducing simplicial communities that maximize the adjusted mutual information measured with respect to ground-truth community structure. Finally, we consider higher-order networks constructed through thresholding the edge weights of collaboration networks (encoding only pairwise interactions) and provide an example of persistent simplicial communities that are sustained over a wide range of the threshold.

Simplicial and topological descriptions of human brain dynamics

While brain imaging tools like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) afford measurements of whole-brain activity, it remains unclear how best to interpret patterns found amid the data’s apparent self-organization. To clarify how patterns of brain activity support brain function, one might identify metric spaces that optimally distinguish brain states across experimentally defined conditions. Therefore, the present study considers the relative capacities of several metric spaces to disambiguate experimentally defined brain states. One fundamental metric space interprets fMRI data topographically, that is, as the vector of amplitudes of a multivariate signal, changing with time. Another perspective compares the brain’s functional connectivity, that is, the similarity matrix computed between signals from different brain regions. More recently, metric spaces that consider the data’s topology have become available. Such methods treat data as a sample drawn from an abstract geometric object. To recover the structure of that object, topological data analysis detects features that are invariant under continuous deformations (such as coordinate rotation and nodal misalignment). Moreover, the methods explicitly consider features that persist across multiple geometric scales. While, certainly, there are strengths and weaknesses of each brain dynamics metric space, wefind that those that track topological features optimally distinguish experimentally defined brain states.

Time-varying functional connectivity interprets brain function as time-varying patterns of coordinated brain activity. While many questions remain regarding how brain function emerges from multiregional interactions, advances in the mathematics of topological data analysis (TDA) may provide new insights. One tool from TDA, “persistent homology,” observes the occurrence and persistence of n-dimensional holes in a sequence of simplicial complexes extracted from a weighted graph. In the present study, we compare the use of persistent homology versus more traditional metrics at the task of segmenting brain states that differ across experimental conditions. We find that the structures identified by persistent homology more accurately segment the stimuli, more accurately segment high versus low performance levels under common stimuli, and generalize better across volunteers.