A Chinese multicenter retrospective study of isolated increased nuchal translucency associated chromosome anomaly and prenatal diagnostic suggestions

Diagnostic yield of copy number variation sequencing in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) and karyotyping for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency.

METHODS

Amniotic fluid samples were extracted from 205 fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT ≥ 2.5 mm), diagnosed by ultrasound between gestational ages of 11 and 13 + 6 weeks. Karyotyping and CNV-seq were performed for detecting chromosomal abnormalities.

RESULTS

There are 40 fetuses (19.51%) showing increased NT detected with chromosomal abnormalities in karyotyping, and trisomy 21 was found to be the most common abnormalities. There are 50 fetuses (24.39%) identified with chromosomal abnormalities by CNV-seq. The detection of the applied techniques indicated that CNV-seq revealed higher chromosomal aberrations. The risk of chromosomal abnormalities was significantly increased with NT thickening, from 13.64% in the NT group of 2.5-3.4 mm, 38.64% in the NT group of 3.5-4.4 mm, and to 51.72% in the NT group of over 4.5 mm (P < 0.05). The investigated cases with increased NT with presence of soft markers in ultrasound or high risk in non-invasive prenatal testing presented chromosomal abnormalities in higher rates, comparing with those with isolated NT or low risk (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that the risk of chromosomal abnormalities was associated with the NT thickness, detected by karyotype or CNV-seq. The combination application of two analysis was efficient to reveal the possible genetic defects in prenatal diagnosis. The finding suggested that the detection should be considered with ultrasonographic soft markers, and the NT thickness of 2.5-3.4 mm could be a critical value for detecting chromosomal abnormalities to prevent the occurrence of missed diagnosis.

Sequential application of copy number variation sequencing and quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction in genetic analysis of miscarriage and stillbirth

BACKGROUND

Copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) could detect most chromosomal abnormalities except polyploidy, and quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) is a supplementary method to CNV-seq in triploid detection. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of sequential application of CNV-seq and QF-PCR in genetic analysis of miscarriage and stillbirth.

METHODS

A total of 261 fetal specimens were analyzed by CNV-seq, and QF-PCR was only further performed for samples with normal female karyotype identified by CNV-seq. Cost and turnaround time (TAT) was analyzed for sequential detection strategy. Subgroup analysis and logistic regression were carried out to evaluate the relationship between clinical characteristics (maternal age, gestational age, and number of pregnancy losses) and the occurrence of chromosomal abnormalities.

RESULTS

Abnormal results were obtained in 120 of 261 (45.98%) cases. Aneuploidy was the most common abnormality (37.55%), followed by triploidy (4.98%) and pathogenic copy number variations (pCNVs) (3.45%). CNV-seq could detect the triploidy with male karyotype, and QF-PCR could further identify the remaining triploidy with female karyotype. In this study, we found more male triploidies than female triploidies. With the same ability in chromosomal abnormalities detection, the cost of sequential strategy decreased by 17.35% compared with combined strategy. In subgroup analysis, significant difference was found in the frequency of total chromosomal abnormalities between early abortion group and late abortion group. Results of logistic regression showed a trend that pregnant women with advanced age, first-time abortion, and abortion earlier than 12 weeks were more likely to detect chromosomal aberrations in their products of conception.

CONCLUSION

Sequential application of CNV-seq and QF-PCR is an economic and practical strategy to identify chromosomal abnormalities in fetal tissue.

Prenatal diagnosis of Noonan syndrome in a set of monozygotic twins- a case report

BACKGROUND

We report a pair of dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twin pregnancy affected by Noonan syndrome (NS) with a novel mutation of LZTR1 determined by genetic analysis.

CASE PRESENTATION

A pregnant woman with monozygotic twins (DCDA) at 12 + 2 weeks gestation was referred to our center. This was her second pregnancy following a previous delivery of a healthy infant. Nuchal translucency of two fetuses was 11.2 mm (CRL 62.0 mm) and 6.9 mm (CRL 62.1 mm) respectively. Ultrasound examination indicated cystic hygroma and hypoplastic ear. The couple was not consanguineous, and both had normal phenotype. Familial hereditary disease was also excluded. Under ultrasound guidance, 30 mg of chorionic villi was obtained for karyotyping, quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR), chromosomal microarray analysis(CMA), and Trio-whole-exome sequencing(WES) examination. We used the "target region capture and sequencing" for WES, and the BWA (Burrows Wheeler Aligner) Multi-Vision software package for the data analysis. The results of all these tests were normal except WES detected a c.427 A > G mutation in the exonic region of the LZTR1 gene and a p. Asn143Asp novel heterozygous mutation associated with NS in this pair of twins. In addition, WES suggested that the mutation in the twin fetuses originated from the mother. When the mother got the genetic test report, she came to our fetal medicine department for genetic counseling and she declined the appointment with a clinical geneticist. The couple opted to terminate the pregnancy. Because the patient did not choose to terminate the pregnancy at our hospital, we were unable to take further examination. With the help of colleagues in another hospital, photos of the fetuses were taken. Compared with the prenatal ultrasound results, the appearance of the "cystic hygroma" and "hypoplastic ear" was consistent with the ultrasound. The couple were depressed after knowing this pathogenic result and although we advised the mother to take further investigation, they refused.

CONCLUSION

The mutant locus might be incompletely dominant, which led to an abnormal fetal phenotype such as cystic hygroma and hypoplastic ear.

A Pain in the Neck: Lessons Learnt from Genetic Testing in Fetuses Detected with Nuchal Fluid Collections, Increased Nuchal Translucency versus Cystic Hygroma-Systematic Review of the Literature, Meta-Analysis and Case Series

Fetal Nuchal fluid collections can manifest with two distinct presentations attributable to the same phenotypic spectrum: increased nuchal translucency (iNT) and cystic hygroma. The prenatal detection of these findings should prompt an accurate assessment through genetic counseling and testing, including karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and multigene RASopathy panel. We performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, to calculate diagnostic yields of genetic testing in fetuses with iNT and cystic hygroma. We compared the results with a cohort of 96 fetuses with these isolated findings. Fetuses with isolated NT ≥ 2.5 mm showed karyotype anomalies in 22.76% of cases and CMA presented an incremental detection rate of 2.35%. Fetuses with isolated NT ≥ 3 mm presented aneuploidies in 14.36% of cases and CMA had an incremental detection rate of 3.89%. When the isolated NT measured at least 3.5 mm the diagnostic yield of karyotyping was 34.35%, the incremental CMA detection rate was 4.1%, the incremental diagnostic rate of the RASopathy panel was 1.44% and it was 2.44% for exome sequencing. Interestingly, CMA presents a considerable diagnostic yield in the group of fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Similarly, exome sequencing appears to show promising results and could be considered after a negative CMA result.

Application of chromosome microarray analysis and karyotyping in diagnostic assessment of abnormal Down syndrome screening results

Background

Down syndrome (DS) is the most common congenital cause of intellectual disability and also leads to numerous metabolic and structural problems. This study aims to explore the application value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis for pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results.

Methods

The study recruited 1452 pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results including 493 with an enlarged nuchal translucency thickness (NT ≥ 2.5 mm) and 959 with an abnormal second-trimester maternal serum biomarker screening results. They underwent amniocentesis to obtain amniotic fluid for CMA and karyotyping.

Results

CMA identified 74/1452 abnormal results, which was more efficient than karyotyping (51/1452, P < 0.05.) CMA is equivalent to traditional karyotyping for identifying aneuploidies. Compared to karyotyping CMA identified 1.90% more copy number variants (CNVs) ranging from 159Kb to 6496Kb. However, 34.4% of them were recurrent pathogenic CNVs associated with risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. CMA identified 13 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) results and 1 maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 7. Karyotyping identified 3 mosaic sex chromosome aneuploidy and 4 balanced translocation which could not be identified by CMA. In enlarged NT group, karyotyping identified 80.9% abnormal results while in serum screening group karyotyping identified 35.7%. However, the incidence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) CNVs was nearly the same in both groups. That was because aneuploidies and gross duplication/deletion were previously screened out by NT scan.

Conclusions

CMA and karyotyping have both advantages and disadvantages in prenatal diagnosis of pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results. However, there was not enough evidence to support routine CMA in pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results.

Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Fetal malformations occur in 2-3% of pregnancies. They require invasive procedures for cytogenetics and molecular testing. "Structural anomalies" include non-transient anatomic alterations. "Soft markers" are often transient minor ultrasound findings. Anomalies not fitting these definitions are categorized as "dynamic". This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic yield and the rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in fetuses undergoing molecular testing (chromosomal microarray (CMA), exome sequencing (ES), genome sequencing (WGS)) due to ultrasound findings. The CMA diagnostic yield was 2.15% in single soft markers (vs. 0.79% baseline risk), 3.44% in multiple soft markers, 3.66% in single structural anomalies and 8.57% in multiple structural anomalies. Rates for specific subcategories vary significantly. ES showed a diagnostic rate of 19.47%, reaching 27.47% in multiple structural anomalies. WGS data did not allow meta-analysis. In fetal structural anomalies, CMA is a first-tier test, but should be integrated with karyotype and parental segregations. In this class of fetuses, ES presents a very high incremental yield, with a significant VUSs burden, so we encourage its use in selected cases. Soft markers present heterogeneous CMA results from each other, some of them with risks comparable to structural anomalies, and would benefit from molecular analysis. The diagnostic rate of multiple soft markers poses a solid indication to CMA.