Ghanem M, Ghaith AK, Zamanian C, Bon-Nieves A, Bhandarkar A, Bydon M, Quiñones-Hinojosa A. Deep Learning Approaches for Glioblastoma Prognosis in Resource-Limited Settings: A Study Using Basic Patient Demographic, Clinical, and Surgical Inputs.
World Neurosurg 2023;
175:e1089-e1109. [PMID:
37088416 DOI:
10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.072]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common brain tumor in the United States, with an annual incidence rate of 3.21 per 100,000. It is the most aggressive type of diffuse glioma and has a median survival of months after treatment. This study aims to assess the accuracy of different novel deep learning models trained on a set of simple clinical, demographic, and surgical variables to assist in clinical practice, even in areas with constrained health care infrastructure.
METHODS
Our study included 37,095 patients with GBM from the SEER (Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results) database. All predictors were based on demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment information of the cases. Our outcomes of interest were months of survival and vital status. Concordance index (C-index) and integrated Brier scores (IBS) were used to evaluate the performance of the models.
RESULTS
The patient characteristics and the statistical analyses were consistent with the epidemiologic literature. The models C-index and IBS ranged from 0.6743 to 0.6918 and from 0.0934 to 0.1034, respectively. Probabilistic matrix factorization (0.6918), multitask logistic regression (0.6916), and logistic hazard (0.6916) had the highest C-index scores. The models with the lowest IBS were the probabilistic matrix factorization (0.0934), multitask logistic regression (0.0935), and logistic hazard (0.0936). These models had an accuracy (1-IBS) of 90.66%; 90.65%, and 90.64%, respectively. The deep learning algorithms were deployed on an interactive Web-based tool for practical use available via https://glioblastoma-survanalysis.herokuapp.com/.
CONCLUSIONS
Novel deep learning algorithms can better predict GBM prognosis than do baseline methods and can lead to more personalized patient care regardless of extensive electronic health record availability.
Collapse