Primary aldosteronism is associated with risk of urinary bladder stones in a nationwide cohort study

Type 4 renal tubular acidosis and uric acid nephrolithiasis: two faces of the same coin?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review summarizes findings of recent studies examining the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of type 4 renal tubular acidosis (RTA) and uric acid nephrolithiasis, two conditions characterized by an abnormally acidic urine.

RECENT FINDINGS

Both type 4 RTA and uric acid nephrolithiasis disproportionately occur in patients with type 2 diabetes and/or chronic kidney disease. Biochemically, both conditions are associated with reduced renal ammonium excretion resulting in impaired urinary buffering and low urine pH. Reduced ammoniagenesis is postulated to result from hyperkalemia in type 4 RTA and from insulin resistance and fat accumulation in the renal proximal tubule in uric acid nephrolithiasis. The typical biochemical findings of hyperkalemia and systemic acidosis of type 4 RTA are rarely reported in uric acid stone formers. Additional clinical differences between the two conditions include findings of higher urinary uric acid excretion and consequent urinary uric acid supersaturation in uric acid stone formers but not in type 4 RTA.

SUMMARY

Type 4 RTA and uric acid nephrolithiasis share several epidemiological, clinical, and biochemical features. Although both conditions may be manifestations of diabetes mellitus and thus have a large at-risk population, the means to the shared biochemical finding of overly acidic urine are different. This difference in pathophysiology may explain the dissimilarity in the prevalence of kidney stone formation.

The Relationship Between Renal Stones and Primary Aldosteronism

INTRODUCTION

The association between primary aldosteronism (PA) and nephrolithiasis is still unclear. The hypercalciuria and hypocitraturia of PA patients might be the reason leading to recurrent calcium nephrolithiasis. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between PA and renal stones, including stone size and density.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From February 2010 to March 2021, we retrospectively collected 610 patients who presented to our medical center with hypertension history, and all these patients, suspicious of PA, had PA data survey. In total, 147 patients had kidney stone and were divided into 44 patients with essential hypertension as group 1 and 103 patients with PA as group 2. Pearson χ² test and independent Student's t-test were performed to examine the differences among variables.

RESULTS

The mean age was 54.4 ± 12.0 years in group 1 and 53.0 ± 11.1 years in group 2. The incidence rate of renal stones in the PA group was around 24%. No significant differences between the two groups were found for gender, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, duration of hypertension, diabetes mellitus history, and laterality of kidney stone; however, mean stone size was 4.0 ± 3.3 mm in group 1 and 6.5 ± 7.2 mm in group 2, with a significantly larger renal stone size noted in the PA group than that in the essential hypertension group (p = 0.004). Hounsfield unit (HU) density was higher in the PA group vis-à-vis the essential hypertension cohort, although this did not reach a significant difference (p = 0.204).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that PA patients had a higher incidence rate of renal stones compared to that of the general population. Besides, the PA-related renal stones also presented as larger and harder than those of the essential hypertension group. Further investigation concerning the association between PA and renal stones is warranted.