Shifting and reducing breathing disturbance in patients with very severe obstructive sleep apnea by modified Z-palatoplasty with one-layer closure in one-stage multilevel surgery

Efficacy of Oral Appliance for Mild, Moderate, and Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Oral appliances (OA) are the recommended first-line option for mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)-hypopnea. However, there is a lack of evidence to compare the effectiveness of OA in different severities of OSA. The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effects of preferred OA (tongue retention devices [TRD] and mandibular advancement device [MAD]) in different severities of OSA.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

Concentrating on the efficacy of OA, 2 authors searched 3 databases up to November 10, 2022, independently and systematically, following the requirements and steps of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 42 studies with 2265 patients met the criteria for inclusion in OA. Overall, the apnea-hypopnea index improved by 48% (5.6), 67% (14.92), and 62% (32.1) in mild, moderate, and severe OSA, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference between MAD and TRD efficacy in mild OSA (58% vs 21%). However, no significant difference was seen between MAD and TRD efficacy in moderate (67% vs 66%) and severe OSA (66% vs 51%). There was no significant difference across groups in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and lowest oxygen saturation (LSAT).

CONCLUSION

Overall, both TRD and MAD are effective treatments for moderate and severe OSA. MAD is efficacious in mild OSA, while TRD requires further validation. Furthermore, mild-moderate and severe OSA received similar improvements in sleepiness, ODI, and LSAT. This study complements the evidence for the efficacy of OA.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Case Report

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by repeated episodes of upper airway blockage and collapse during sleep accompanied by awakenings with or without oxygen desaturations. During obstructive sleep apnea events, the oropharynx in the back of the throat compresses, causing arousal, oxygen desaturation, or both, leading to fragmented sleep. The hyperplastic uvula is a common clinical finding in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The various diagnostic and treatment modalities of obstructive sleep apnea are discussed in this article.

Negative impact of the hypopnea index or duration increase after a non-frame work surgery in patients with very severe obstructive sleep apnea

A non-framework surgery could change the postoperative components of breathing disturbances and increase the frequency or duration of hypopnea in patients with very severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Either an increase of hypopnea index, which increases apnea–hypopnea index (AHI), or an increase of its duration raises the concern of worsening the oxygen desaturation and so morbidity and mortality associated with OSA. It is unclear how the oxygen saturation would change in those having increased frequency or duration of hypopneas after the surgery. Here in 17 patients with AHI ≥ 60 events/h, having increased frequency or duration of hypopneas after the non-framework surgery, the results show that the surgery improved oxygen saturation by reducing obstructive-apnea index (36.1 events/h) and duration (8.6 s/event), despite it increased hypopnea index (16.8 events/h) and duration (9.8 s/event). The surgery improved the average of the mean oxyhemoglobin saturation of pulse oximetry (SpO2) by 2.8% (toward a ceiling mean of 94.3%), mean minimal SpO2 by 7.5%, and mean desaturation by 5%. The results suggest sufficient apnea reduction and shift from apnea to hypopnea may mask the negative impact of the increase of hypopnea index or duration and improve postoperative mean SpO2, minimal SpO2, and mean desaturation.