Ruxolitinib early administration reduces acute GVHD after alternative donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute leukemia

Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in the management of chronic GVHD

OBJECTIVES

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a potentially curative treatment for hematological diseases, with success rates improving due to advancements in conditioning regimens and new anti-graft versus host disease (GVHD) drugs. Ruxolitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and 2 inhibitor has been used to mitigate the effects of various inflammatory and myeloproliferative syndromes, given the JAK kinase pathway's central role in cytokine signaling during inflammatory and immune processes. In this study we aimed to assess ruxolitinib's efficacy in patients with chronic GVHD (cGVHD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective observational multi-center study involved 50 patients diagnosed with cGVHD after allo-HSCT in Turkey, who were treated with ruxolitinib between April 2018 and March 2024.

RESULTS

At the time of initiation of ruxolitinib treatment, most patients had severe cGVHD (n = 29, 58 %). The overall response rate at 6 months of ruxolitinib treatment was observed in 34 patients (68 %), including 6 patients (12 %) with complete responses and 28 patients (56 %) with partial responses, while 7 patients (14 %) experienced treatment failure. ECOG (2-4) performance status was established as an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes [p = 0.029, HR 3.492 (95 % CI: 1.139-10.705)]. At the two-year follow-up, the estimated survival rate was 52 %.

CONCLUSION

Ruxolitinib is safe and effective in the real-world setting for treating cGVHD, showing remission rates comparable to clinical trials. Further research with extended follow-up is necessary to confirm these findings, optimize dosing, and establish the best tapering strategies for responders.

Addition of ruxolitinib to standard graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in aplastic anemia patients

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) offers rapid hematopoietic and immune reconstitution for aplastic anemia (AA). As a non-malignant disorder, attenuation of GVHD remains a clinical priority in AA patients. Our study sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of the prophylactic use of ruxolitinib in allogeneic HSCT. A total of 35 AA patients were retrospectively consecutively treated with allo-HSCT whereby ruxolitinib was added to the standard GVHD prophylaxis regimen (rux group). The addition of peri-transplant ruxolitinib did not impact the engraftment and graft function, while better recovery of CD4+ Tregs in the rux group was observed. Interestingly, the rux group demonstrated significantly lower incidence of bacterial/fungal infections (17.14% vs 45.71%). Compared to the control group, the rux group exhibited significantly lower incidence of moderate to severe aGVHD (17.1% vs 48.6%) with a trend toward lower severe aGVHD (8.6% vs 20%) and cGVHD (26.2 vs 38.3). The rux group also demonstrated a trend toward higher GVHD and failure-free survival (GFFS: 85.7% vs 68.6%) and lower TRM (2.9% vs 14.3%). Addition of ruxolitinib to standard GVHD prophylaxis regimen, thus, represents a safe and highly efficient method for the attenuation of GVHD with better outcome of allo-HSCT.

Tailoring Therapy in Older Adults With Hematologic Malignancies

Hematologic malignancies most often present in the sixth or seventh decade of life. Even so, many older adults may be unable to tolerate standard chemotherapy or require supplementary care or dose adjustments to do so. Both in community and academic centers, geriatric assessment (GA) can be used to improve the care of older adults with blood cancers. For example, hematologic oncologists can use GA to guide treatment selection, adjusting for patient frailty and goals, as well as prompt initiation of enhanced supportive care. After initial therapy, GA can improve the identification of older adults with aggressive myeloid malignancies who would benefit from hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), inform shared decision making, as well as allow transplanters to tailor conditioning regimen, donor selection, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, and pre- and post-HCT treatments. As in HCT, GA can improve the care of older patients with relapsed lymphoma or multiple myeloma eligible for chimeric antigen receptor-T therapy, identifying patients at higher risk for toxicity and providing a baseline for subsequent neurocognitive testing. Here, we review the data supporting GA for the care of older adults with blood cancers, from the community to the academic center. In addition, we explore future directions to optimize outcomes for older adults with hematologic malignancies.

Efficacy and Safety in Early application of Ruxolinitib for high-risk: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia to prevent GVHD and recurrence after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been identified as the potentially curative treatment for high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adult patients. However, relapse of the disease and/or development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remain to be the most common barriers for successful allo-HSCT. Preclinical studies showed that ruxolitinib, a Janus tyrosine kinase (Jak)1 and Jak2 inhibitor, has a selective anti-GVHD effects while preserving a potent graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Our study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety in early application of ruxolitinib for the high-risk ALL patients to prevent GVHD.

METHODS

There were eight patients undergoing allo-HSCT at the Bone Marrow Transplantation Center of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between April 2020 and April 2021. Ruxolitinib (5-10 mg twice daily) was administered early (median time: 45 days) after stem cell infusion.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 14 months (range from 8 to 18 months), the ALL disease relapse occurred in two cases. Among all eight patients, two of them developed grade I/II acute (a) GVHD, while no patient developed grade III/IV aGVHD, and one patient developed chronic (c) GVHD. As for the virus activation, no patient developed EBV activation or EBV related lymphoproliferative disease, and three patients developed CMV activation. Our results suggest that the early application of ruxolitinib could safely and effectively prevent the occurrence of GVHD after allo-HSCT for the high-risk ALL patients. However, it may have a limited effect on preventing the recurrence of high-risk ALL and thus may require additional therapy with other anti-relapse drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary observations suggest that an early application of ruxolitinib can safely and effectively prevent the occurrence of GVHD after allo-HSCT for the high-risk ALL patients. However, ruxolitinib may have a limited effect on preventing the ALL recurrence of high-risk patients.

Ruxolitinib versus basiliximab for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: a retrospective study

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) remains a major limitation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; not all patients respond to standard glucocorticoids treatment. This study retrospectively evaluated the effects of ruxolitinib compared with basiliximab for steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD). One hundred and twenty-nine patients were enrolled, 81 in ruxolitinib and 48 in basiliximab group. The overall response (OR) at day 28 was higher in ruxolitinib group (72.8% vs. 54.2%, P = 0.031), as with complete response (CR) (58.0% vs. 35.4%, P = 0.013). Ruxolitinib led to significantly lower 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (29.6% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.021). Besides, ruxolitinib showed higher 1-year overall survival (OS) and 1-year cumulative incidence of failure-free survival (FFS) (OS: 72.8% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.008; FFS: 58.9% vs. 39.6%, P = 0.014). The 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was lower in ruxolitinib group (16.1% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.005), and the 1-year relapse was not different. The 1-year cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia, CMV-associated diseases and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated diseases was similar between the two groups, but EBV viremia was significantly lower in ruxolitinib group (6.2% vs. 29.2%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that OR and survival were similar in ruxolitinib 5 mg twice daily (bid) and 10 mg bid groups. However, ruxolitinib 10 mg bid treatment markedly reduced 1-year cumulative incidence of cGVHD compared with 5 mg bid (21.1% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.016). Our study demonstrated that ruxolitinib was superior to basiliximab in SR-aGVHD treatment and cGVHD prophylaxis, therefore should be recommended.

Addition of ruxolitinib in Graft-versus-Host disease prophylaxis for pediatric β-Thalassemia major patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effect of addition of ruxolitinib in Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) prophylaxis on pediatric patients with β-thalassemia major after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(HSCT).

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed 49 consecutive β-thalassemia major pediatric patients who underwent HSCT from unrelated or haploidentical donors from February 2018 to October 2022. All transplantation recipients received cyclosporine A (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and short-term methotrexate (MTX) as GVHD prophylaxis; while 27 of them in the ruxolitinib group had added ruxolitinib oral to GVHD prophylaxis regimen at 2.5 mg twice daily once successful engraftment after January 2020.

RESULTS

The outcome showed that the ruxolitinib group had a lower cumulative incidence than the control group regardless of acute GVHD (22.2% vs.40.9%; p = .153) or chronic GVHD (18.5% vs.40.9%; p = .072); especially, the incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD was reported significantly less frequently in ruxolitinib group than that of the control group (0 vs. 27.3%, p = .005). No significant difference was detected between the two groups in EBV (Epstein-Barr virus)/CMV (cytomegalovirus) reactivation and BKV (BK virus) infection (p = .703, 1.000, and .436, respectively). Twenty-six patients (96.3%) in the ruxolitinib group were alive, while two patients (9.1%) in the control group died of intestinal acute GVHD. The 2-year overall survival (OS) and thalassemia-free survival (TFS) were both 96.296% in the ruxolitinib group, while both 90.909% in the control group.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that ruxolitinib prophylaxis is a promising option to decrease the incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD in pediatric patients with β-thalassemia major.

How I prevent GVHD in high-risk patients: posttransplant cyclophosphamide and beyond

Advances in conditioning, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and antimicrobial prophylaxis have improved the safety of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), leading to a substantial increase in the number of patients transplanted each year. This influx of patients along with progress in remission-inducing and posttransplant maintenance strategies for hematologic malignancies has led to new GVHD risk factors and high-risk groups: HLA-mismatched related (haplo) and unrelated (MMUD) donors; older recipient age; posttransplant maintenance; prior checkpoint inhibitor and autologous HCT exposure; and patients with benign hematologic disorders. Along with the changing transplant population, the field of HCT has dramatically shifted in the past decade because of the widespread adoption of posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), which has increased the use of HLA-mismatched related donors to levels comparable to HLA-matched related donors. Its success has led investigators to explore PTCy's utility for HLA-matched HCT, where we predict it will be embraced as well. Additionally, combinations of promising new agents for GVHD prophylaxis such as abatacept and JAK inhibitors with PTCy inspire hope for an even safer transplant platform. Using 3 illustrative cases, we review our current approach to transplantation of patients at high risk of GVHD using our modern armamentarium.

Real-world experience with ruxolitinib for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: a single center experience

Steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Ruxolitinib (RUX), an oral JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, has recently been approved for patients with SR-aGVHD. The aim of this study was to evaluate RUX efficacy and toxicity in a real-world setting. Eighteen patients received RUX at 5 mg or 10 mg twice a day after a median 3 lines of prior unsuccessful immunosuppressive therapy. Median time on RUX therapy was 28 days (range 7-129). Five patients (28%) responded to RUX, including 4 complete responses and 1 partial response. Response to RUX was irrespective of aGVHD grade and the number of involved organs. One-year overall survival (OS) was 60% for RUX-responders versus 31% for non-responders (p = ns). Treatment duration greater than 29.5 days was found to have a positive impact on OS (p < 0.007). Major adverse events during RUX treatment were grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (61% of patients) and cytomegalovirus reactivation (50%). After median follow-up of 55 days (range 29-706), 14 patients (78%) died, mainly due to further progression of GVHD. RUX may represent a valuable therapeutic option for some patients with advanced SR-aGVHD, but more studies are warranted.

Challenges and opportunities targeting mechanisms of epithelial injury and recovery in acute intestinal graft-versus-host disease

Despite advances in immunosuppressive prophylaxis and overall supportive care, gastrointestinal (GI) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major, lethal side effect after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). It has become increasingly clear that the intestinal epithelium, in addition to being a target of transplant-related toxicity and GVHD, plays an important role in the onset of GVHD. Over the last two decades, increased understanding of the epithelial constituents and their microenvironment has led to the development of novel prophylactic and therapeutic interventions, with the potential to protect the intestinal epithelium from GVHD-associated damage and promote its recovery following insult. In this review, we will discuss intestinal epithelial injury and the role of the intestinal epithelium in GVHD pathogenesis. In addition, we will highlight possible approaches to protect the GI tract from damage posttransplant and to stimulate epithelial regeneration, in order to promote intestinal recovery. Combined treatment modalities integrating immunomodulation, epithelial protection, and induction of regeneration may hold the key to unlocking mucosal recovery and optimizing therapy for acute intestinal GVHD.