Development and validation of a visual field cluster in retinitis pigmentosa

Relationship between visual acuity and visual field and its reproducibility in patients with retinitis pigmentosa

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between visual acuity (VA) and visual field (VF) and its reproducibility in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP).

SUBJECTS/METHODS

The study cohort comprised 227 eyes of 227 patients with RP. The reproducibility of two Humphrey VF tests (10-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm [SITA] tests) performed within a period of 3 months was calculated using the root mean squared error (RMSE) of each VF test point's sensitivity. The association between the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA and VF sensitivity was investigated. Additionally, the relationship between RMSE and age, fixation loss, false positives, false negatives, and logMAR VA was determined.

RESULTS

The association between visual sensitivity and VA was most tight at the fovea, and it became weak toward the peripheral region in an eccentric manner. VF reproducibility appreciably increased as VA decreased. In particular, reproducibility was significantly decreased when logMAR VA was >0.5 compared with logMAR VA ≤ 0.

CONCLUSION

Reproducibility of VF tests decreases with a decrease in VA. Careful consideration is necessary when a patient's logMAR VA is >0.5.

Experiences of genetic testing among individuals with retinitis pigmentosa

BACKGROUND

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a genetically heterogeneous retinal dystrophy which results in progressive vision loss. There is scant literature on the experiences of genetic testing in patients with RP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with a clinical diagnosis of RP who received genetic testing at the Wills Eye Ocular Genetics clinic between 2016 and 2020 were recruited. Telephone interviews were conducted using a semi-structured guide designed to elicit participant experiences with genetic testing. A thematic analysis was performed to describe patterns in participant responses.

RESULTS

Twelve patients participated. Seven participants identified as female and five as male, with ages ranging from 22 to 70. Ten patients had positive genetic test results, while two had negative genetic testing. Reported motivations for genetic testing included qualification for clinical trials (58% of total participants), determination of etiology or usal gene (50%), reproductive concerns (50%), and prognostic outlook (50%). Most participants (75%) expressed satisfaction about their decision to pursue genetic testing. Participants with both positive and negative genetic testing reported persistent uncertainty regarding their prognosis for visual decline (50%). Genetic confirmation of disease leads to initiation of safety and vision-protecting health behaviors (42%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with RP are generally satisfied with their testing experience, despite approaching testing with a wide range of motivations and expectations. Future research can leverage this methodology to identify targets for improvement in pre- and post-test education and counselling.

Detection Sensitivity of Retinitis Pigmentosa Progression Using Static Perimetry and Optical Coherence Tomography

Purpose

To compare the detection sensitivities of the progression of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) by automated perimetry to obtain the mean deviation (MD) and total point score and by optical coherence tomography (OCT) to determine the residual ellipsoid zone (EZ) length and thickness of retinal layers.

Methods

Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients with RP who underwent annual automated perimetry (Humphrey Field Analyzer 10-2) and OCT examinations during the same period more than four times were included. Disease progression was evaluated using linear regression analysis with the least-squares method. The disease progression speed and interinspection fluctuations for the different examinations were compared using standardized values. The progression detection ability factor, defined as the average of the least squares divided by the square of annual change, was used to compare the sensitivities of the examinations for detecting the progression of RP.

Results

EZ length showed a high correlation with MD (R = 0.87; P = 1.12E-07) at baseline. Disease progression was detected more frequently using EZ length (12/22 eyes) than using MD (3/22 eyes; P = 0.004) or central retinal thickness (1/11 eyes; P = 0.012). Linear regression using standardized values showed that the EZ length had the fastest annual change, with the smallest least absolute values. EZ length was more sensitive for detecting RP progression than MD, total point score, visual acuity, or central retinal thickness.

Conclusions

EZ measurement was sensitive for detecting RP progression, and the results of this study indicate that EZ length is appropriate for end points in clinical trials.

Translational Relevance

The study provides a basis for conducting future clinical trials.