Comparative study on clinical efficacy of different methods for the treatment of intramural aortic hematoma

Outcome After Conservative and Endovascular Treatment of Stanford Type B Aortic Intramural Hematomas - A Single-Center Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

Aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) is a rare disease. Thus far, only limited data is available and the indications for conservative and endovascular treatment are not well defined. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical presentation, course, CT imaging features and outcome of patients with type B aortic IMHs.

METHODS

We included all patients with type B IMHs between 2012 and 2021 in this retrospective monocentric study. Clinical data, localization, thickness of IMHs and the presence of ulcer-like projections (ULPs) was evaluated before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty five patients (20 females; 70.3 y ± 11 y) were identified. Almost all IMHs (n = 34) were spontaneous and symptomatic with back pain (n = 34). At the time of diagnosis, TEVAR was deemed indicated in 9 patients, 26 patients were treated primarily conservatively. During the follow-up, in another 16 patients TEVAR was deemed indicated. Endovascularly and conservatively treated patients both showed decrease in thickness after treatment. Patients without ULPs showed more often complete resolution of the IMH than patients with ULPs (endovascularly treated 90.9% (10/11) vs 71.4% (5/7); conservatively treated 71.4% (10/14) vs 33.3% (1/3); P = .207). Complications after TEVAR occurred in 32% and more frequently in patients treated primarily conservatively (37.5% vs 22.2%). No in-hospital mortality was observed during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognosis of IMH seems favourable in both surgically as well as conservatively treated patients. However, it is essential to identify patients at high risk for complications under conservative treatment, who therefore should be treated by TEVAR. In our study, ULPs seem to be an adverse factor for remodeling.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair versus Optimal Medical Treatment in Patients with Type B Intramural Hematoma: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

We intended to study the effect of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and optimal medical treatment (OMT) on type B intramural hematoma (BIMH).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases that compared TEVAR and OMT in patients with BIMH. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The rate ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval were used to calculate the outcome. The primary endpoints were aortic-related death and regression/resolution. Secondary endpoints were all-cause death, progression to dissection, and secondary intervention.

RESULTS

Eight observational studies were included in the analysis. TEVAR reduced aortic-related death (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.08-0.56, P = 0.002, I² = 24%) and promoted hematoma regression/resolution (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.05-2.10, P <0.05, I² = 71%) compared to OMT. Moreover, TEVAR was associated with a reduction in progression to dissection (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.81, P <0.02, I² = 39%) and secondary intervention (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.37, P <0.00001, I² = 38%) compared to OMT. However, all-cause death has no significant difference between the two groups (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.17-1.19, P = 0.11, I² = 58%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis suggested that TEVAR is an effective treatment for BIMH, which can delay the progression of intramural hematoma and promotes regression/resolution. More research about indications of TEVAR is still needed.

Potential biomarkers of aortic dissection based on expression network analysis

Background

Aortic dissection (AD) is a rare disease with severe morbidity and high mortality. Presently, the pathogenesis of aortic dissection is still not completely clear, and studying its pathogenesis will have important clinical significance.

Methods

We downloaded 28 samples from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (Accession numbers: GSE147026 and GSE190635), including 14 aortic dissection samples and 14 healthy controls (HC) samples. The Limma package was used to screen differentially expressed genes. The StarBasev2.0 tool was used to predict the upstream molecular circRNA of the selected miRNAs, and Cytoscape software was used to process the obtained data. STRING database was used to analyze the interacting protein pairs of differentially expressed genes under medium filtration conditions. The R package "org.hs.eg.db" was used for functional enrichment analysis.

Results

Two hundred genes associated with aortic dissection were screened. Functional enrichment analysis was performed based on these 200 genes. At the same time, 2720 paired miRNAs were predicted based on these 200 genes, among which hsa-miR-650, hsa-miR-625-5p, hsa-miR-491-5p and hsa-miR-760 paired mRNAs were the most. Based on these four miRNAs, 7106 pairs of circRNAs were predicted to be paired with them. The genes most related to these four miRNAs were screened from 200 differentially expressed genes (CDH2, AKT1, WNT5A, ADRB2, GNAI1, GNAI2, HGF, MCAM, DKK2, ISL1).

Conclusions

The study demonstrates that miRNA-associated circRNA-mRNA networks are altered in AD, implying that miRNA may play a crucial role in regulating the onset and progression of AD. It may become a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment of AD.

Ascending aortic intramural hematoma: current concepts

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Type A intramural hematoma (TAIMH) is an acute aortic disease characterized by the presence of hematoma in the aortic media and involving the ascending aorta. Open repair seems to be the first treatment approach, although recent evidence highlights that the best management of TAIMH is controversial. This review will focus on the current concept for TAIMH management and factors affecting the decision making.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have evaluated the role of open and endovascular repair, as well as conservative management in patients with TAIMH. More specific imaging findings seem to affect decision making for urgent repair.

SUMMARY

Despite TAIMH's acute nature, conservative management seems to represent a valid option for urgent approach, presenting similar mortality to open and endovascular repair. Comparative data are limited, however, in experienced centers, any approach may be applied with encouraging results. Endovascular management, which is mainly applied to manage retrograde TAIMH, is related to lower mortality and morbidity compared to open repair in this group of patients while aortic remodeling seems beneficial with this approach. Imaging findings, as ulcer-like lesions, hematoma thickness, concomitant dissection and aortic diameter, related to higher complication rate, set the indication for interventional management. Further research, including prospective data and registries, and ideally, randomized data may further clarify the best approach and factors indicating urgent repair.