Differential effects of heat-not-burn and conventional cigarettes on coronary flow, myocardial and vascular function

A scoping review of the toxicity and health impact of IQOS

This work aims to summarize the current evidence on the toxicity and health impact of IQOS, taking into consideration the data source. On 1 June 2022, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases using the terms: 'heated tobacco product', 'heat-not-burn', 'IQOS', and 'tobacco heating system'. The search was time-restricted to update a previous search conducted on 8 November 2021, on IQOS data from 2010-2021. The data source [independent, Philip Morris International (PMI), or other manufacturers] was retrieved from relevant sections of each publication. Publications were categorized into two general categories: 1) Toxicity assessments included in vitro, in vivo, and systems toxicology studies; and 2) The impact on human health included clinical studies assessing biomarkers of exposure and biomarkers of health effects. Generally, independent studies used classical in vitro and in vivo approaches, but PMI studies combined these with modeling of gene expression (i.e. systems toxicology). Toxicity assessment and health impact studies covered pulmonary, cardiovascular, and other systemic toxicity. PMI studies overall showed reduced toxicity and health risks of IQOS compared to cigarettes, but independent data did not always conform with this conclusion. This review highlights some discrepancies in IQOS risk assessment regarding methods, depth, and breadth of data collection, as well as conclusions based on the data source.

Critical appraisal of interventional clinical trials assessing heated tobacco products: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To critically assess the methodological characteristics and quality of interventional clinical trials investigating the effects of heated tobacco products (HTPs).

DATA SOURCES

Web of Science (Core collection and MEDLINE), Scopus, MedRxiv, ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP trial databases and transnational HTP manufacturer online publication libraries were searched for clinical trials on HTPs published between January 2010 and April 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Interventional clinical trials of any design, in which at least one group of adult participants used a currently marketed HTP, were selected by two reviewers with good or very good agreement.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data relating to trial characteristics and effects of intervention on primary outcomes were extracted using a predesigned form. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool v1.

DATA SYNTHESIS

40 trials were included, 29 of which were tobacco industry affiliated. Methodological characteristics, such as registration, design, setting, comparator interventions, participants, outcomes and analyses, varied between trials, though there were few significant differences between industry-affiliated and independent trials. Of the 40 trials, 33 were judged to be at high risk of bias and 6 at unclear risk of bias. Trial findings were not significantly associated with either affiliation or risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The conduct and reporting of HTP interventional clinical trials were poor in many respects and limited to investigating effects of short-term exposure. These trials fall short of what is needed to determine whether HTPs are beneficial to public health, meaning they may not be a sound basis for tobacco control policy decisions.

What Can Current Biomarker Data Tell Us About the Risks of Lung Cancer Posed by Heated Tobacco Products?

INTRODUCTION

Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are marketed as less harmful alternatives to cigarettes, but the lung cancer risk of HTPs is unknown. In the absence of epidemiological data, assessing the risks of HTPs relies on biomarker data from clinical trials. This study examined existing biomarker data to determine what it tells us about the lung cancer risk posed by HTPs.

AIMS AND METHODS

We identified all biomarkers of exposure and potential harm measured in HTP trials and evaluated their appropriateness based on ideal characteristics for measuring lung cancer risk and tobacco use. The effects of HTPs on the most appropriate biomarkers within cigarette smokers switched to HTPs and compared to continued cigarette smoking or cessation were synthesized.

RESULTS

Sixteen out of eighty-two biomarkers (7 exposure and 9 potential harm) measured in HTP trials have been associated with tobacco use and lung cancer, dose-dependently correlated with smoking, modifiable upon cessation, measured within an appropriate timeframe, and had results published. Three of the exposure biomarkers significantly improved in smokers who switched to HTPs and were not significantly different from cessation. The remaining 13 biomarkers did not improve-in some instances worsening upon switching to HTPs-or were inconsistently affected across studies. There were no appropriate data to estimate the lung cancer risk of HTPs in non-smokers.

CONCLUSIONS

The appropriateness of existing biomarker data in assessing lung cancer risk of HTPs, both relative to cigarettes and their absolute risk, is limited. Furthermore, findings on the most appropriate biomarkers were conflicting across studies and largely showed no improvement following a switch to HTPs.

IMPLICATIONS

Biomarker data are fundamental to assessing the reduced risk potential of HTPs. Our evaluation suggests much of the existing biomarker data on HTPs is inappropriate for determining the risk of lung cancer posed by HTPs. In particular, there is a paucity of data on the absolute lung cancer risk of HTPs, which could be obtained from comparisons to smokers who quit and never smokers exposed to or using HTPs. There is an urgent need for further exploration of the lung cancer risks posed by HTPs, via clinical trials and, in the long-term, confirmation of these risks via epidemiological studies. However, careful consideration should be given to biomarker selection and study design to ensure both are appropriate and will provide valuable data.

Heat-not-burn tobacco products and cardiovascular risk reduction: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Heat-not-burn (HNB) technology by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has been classified as a modified risk tobacco product, which can be a better option for those populations who cannot give up the habit of smoking. The outlook on the effects of these products is quite controversial in the scientific world.

OBJECTIVE

To present the effect of HNB tobacco products on the cardiovascular system, with reference to the existence of possible benefits of the technology.

METHODS

The literature search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, with reliance on a well-defined guiding research statement. Quality appraisal was performed using the CASP checklist for randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

The search of three databases identified 167 records, and after selection process, 25 randomized controlled trials were eligible for our study's criteria. Twenty studies investigated the effects of HNB products on biomarkers of clinical relevance. Five studies evaluated other functional heart parameters rather than biomarkers.

CONCLUSION

With HNB tobacco products, significant reductions were found in biomarkers of exposure and biological effect related to pathways involved in cardiovascular disease, including inflammation, oxidative stress, lipid metabolism, platelet function, and endothelial dysfunction.

Sex-Related Differences in Oxidative, Platelet, and Vascular Function in Chronic Users of Heat-not-Burn vs. Traditional Combustion Cigarettes

Smoking is still a major cardiovascular risk factor, despite many public awareness campaigns and dedicated interventions. Recently, modified risk products (MRP), e.g., heat-not-burn cigarettes (HNBCs), have been introduced as surrogates of traditional combustion cigarettes (TCCs). Although these products are promoted as healthier than TCCs, few studies have been conducted to assess it. This work is a sex-focused sub-study of a prospective observational study in which apparently healthy chronic TCC smokers were age-matched with regular HNBC users. Blood samples were collected for biochemical assays and blood pressure and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) were measured. Out of 60 subjects, 33 (55%) were women, and 27 (45%) men, with 11 (33%) vs. 9 (33%) non-smokers, respectively, 10 (30%) vs. 10 (37%) TCC smokers, and 12 (36%) vs. 8 (30%) HNBC smokers (p = 0.946). Bivariate and multivariable analyses showed no statistically significant between-sex differences in NO, H2O2, sCD40L, sNox2-dp, sP-selectin, platelet aggregation, cotinine or FMD, overall, in non-smokers, in TCC smokers, or in HNBC smokers (all p > 0.05). HNBCs appeared safer than TCCs when focusing on Nox2-dp (p = 0.026) and sP-selectin (p = 0.050) but had similar levels of the other measured markers. In conclusion, HNBCs have similar detrimental effects on women and men’s oxidative stress (H2O2: p = 0.49; sNox2-dp: p = 0.31) and platelet activation (sP-selectin: p = 0.33; platelet aggregation p = 0.87).

[Addictive inhalants-A challenge for the lungs]

The use of inhaled psychotropic substances is widespread in our society. In addition to the wide variety of tobacco-containing smoking products, e‑cigarettes, cannabis, sniffing substances, cocaine and heroin are consumed by inhalation. While the harmful effects of most tobacco-containing smoking products on the lungs have been sufficiently researched, there is still a lack of scientifically sound evidence for many other substances consumed by inhalation. In particular, for novel products, such as e‑cigarettes and tobacco heaters, there is a lack of independent standardized data demonstrating reduced health risk as a result of lower exposure to harmful substances. Clear conclusions are also currently not possible for the long-term effects of cannabis use on the lungs and respiratory tract. For the inhaled use of cocaine and heroin, on the other hand, considerable damage to the lungs can be documented, especially in the case of extensive and chronic use.