Evaluation of the BD Phoenix CPO detect panel for prediction of Ambler class carbapenemases

Comparison of ERIC carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae test, BD Phoenix CPO detect panel, and NG-test CARBA 5 for the detection of main carbapenemase types of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the performance of three commercial panels, the ERIC Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Test (ERIC CRE test), the NG-Test CARBA 5 (NG CARBA 5), and the BD Phoenix CPO Detect Panel (CPO panel), for the detection of main types of carbapenemases among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE).

METHODS

We collected 502 isolates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) demonstrating intermediate or resistant profiles to at least one carbapenem antibiotic (ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, or doripenem). Carbapenemase genes and their specific types were identified through multiplex PCR and sequencing methods. Subsequently, the ERIC CRE test, CPO panel, and NG CARBA 5 assay were conducted on these isolates, and the results were compared with those obtained from multiplex PCR.

RESULTS

The results indicated that the ERIC CRE test exhibited an overall sensitivity and specificity of 98.1% and 93.6%, respectively, which were comparable to 99.1% and 90.6% for the NG CARBA 5. However, the CPO panel demonstrated a sensitivity of only 56.2% in identifying Ambler classes, exhibiting the poorest sensitivity for class A. Moreover, while the ERIC CRE test outperformed the NG CARBA 5 in identifying multi-gene isolates with multiple carbapenemase-encoding genes, the CPO panel failed to accurately classify these isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the utilization of the ERIC CRE test as one of the methods for detecting carbapenemases in clinical laboratories. Nonetheless, further optimization is imperative for the CPO panel to enhance its accuracy in determining carbapenemase classification and address limitations in detecting multi-gene isolates.

Performance comparison of BD Phoenix CPO detect panel with Cepheid Xpert Carba-R assay for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the performance of carbapenemase classification in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) obtained using the BD Phoenix CPO Detect panel (CPO panel) and Cepheid Xpert Carba-R assays. We analyzed 55 CRKP strains from clinical specimens collected between November 2020 and November 2022. The CPO panel was used to detect both antibiotic susceptibility and phenotypic carbapenemase classes, while Xpert Carba-R was employed to identify KPC, NDM, VIM, OXA-48, and IMP genes. Due to the limited availability of molecular kits, we arbitrarily selected 55 isolates, identified as carbapenemase-producing according to the CPO panel and with meropenem minimum inhibitory concentration values > 8 mg/L.

RESULTS

According to the Xpert Carba-R assay, 16 of the 55 isolates (29.1%) were categorised as Ambler Class A (11 of which matched CPO panel Class A identification); three isolates (5.5%) were identified as Class B and 27 isolates (49.1%) as Class D (in both cases consistent with CPO panel B and D classifications). A further eight isolates (14.5%) exhibited multiple carbapenemase enzymes and were designated as dual-carbapenemase producers, while one isolate (1.8%) was identified as a non-carbapenemase-producer. The CPO panel demonstrated positive and negative percent agreements of 100% and 85.7% for Ambler Class A, 100% and 100% for Class B, and 96.4% and 100% for Class D carbapenemase detection, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While the CPO panel's phenotypic performance was satisfactory in detecting Class B and D carbapenemases, additional confirmatory testing may be necessary for Class A carbapenemases as part of routine laboratory procedures.

Evaluation of the BD Phoenix CPO Detect Panel for Detection and Classification of Carbapenemase Producing Enterobacterales

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) pose a serious public health threat due to their resistance to most antibiotics. Rapid and correct detection of carbapenemase producing organisms (CPOs) can help inform clinician decision making on antibiotic therapy. The BD Phoenix™ CPO detect panel, as part of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), detects carbapenemase activity (P/N) and categorizes CPOs according to Ambler classes. We evaluated a CPO detect panel against 109 carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) clinical isolates from Korea. The panel correctly detected carbapenemases production in 98.2% (n = 107/109) isolates and identified 78.8% (n = 26/33) class A, 65.9% (n = 29/44) class B, and 56.3% (n = 18/32) class D carbapenemase producers as harboring their corresponding Ambler classes. Specifically, the panel correctly classified 81.3% (n = 13/16) of K. pneumoniae KPC isolates to class A. However, the panel failed to classify 40.0% (n = 4/10) IMP and 63.6% (n = 7/11) VIM isolates to class B. Despite 27.5% (n = 30/109) CPE not being assigned Ambler classes, all of them tested carbapenemase positive. Our results demonstrate that the CPO detect panel is a sensitive test for detecting CPE and classifying KPC as class A, helping with antibiotics selection, but one-third of CPE remained unclassified for Ambler classes.

Evaluation of the BD Phoenix CPO Detect Test for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the BD Phoenix CPO Detect Test (BD Diagnostic Systems) for the detection and classification of carbapenemase-mediated carbapenem resistance. Methods: A total of 447 Enterobacterales strains were included in the study. All strains were tested with the BD Phoenix CPO Detect Test and the modified carbapenem inactivation method. Results: Carbapenemase production was detected in 157 of 159 carbapenemase producers, including 95.7% of class B and 99.2% of class D isolates using the BD Phoenix CPO Detect Test. BD Phoenix CPO Detect has a sensitivity of 98.7% and a specificity of 95.5% in detecting carbapenemase production. Conclusion: The classification of OXA-48 and class B carbapenemases, the most common carbapenemases circulating in Turkey, was highly accurate.

Evaluation of LAMP assay using phenotypic tests and PCR for detection of blaKPC gene among clinical samples

Background

Carbapenem‐resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infection constitutes a public health threat, which blaKPC was the major carbapenemases concerned in China. Timely and efficient diagnosis is of paramount importance for controlling the spread of drug‐resistant bacteria. Here, we develop an approach based on loop‐mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for rapid confirmation of blaKPC within 60 min from samples collected.

Methods

We designed primers specific to detect blaKPC and evaluated it for its sensitivity and specificity of detection using real‐time monitoring. Five hundred forty‐six clinical specimens were analyzed by the LAMP assay and compared with the phenotypic tests and PCR. The samples with inconsistent results were further verified by Sanger sequencing.

Results

The LAMP assay displayed a detection limit of 1 × 10² CFU/ml, which was 10‐fold more sensitive than the PCR. No cross‐reactivity was observed for strains that produced other types of β‐lactamase. Furthermore, we demonstrated concordant results (Kappa > 0.75) between the genotypic method and phenotypic tests for the 546 clinical samples. The data presented in this study suggested that the genotypic method is a reliable assay for identifying blaKPC‐induced CRE in China. The results of the Sanger sequencing indicate that the developed method not only has high accuracy but also meets the need for rapid diagnosis, while the PCR method is prone to false negatives.

Conclusions

We successfully constructed a LAMP technique that can be used for auxiliary diagnosis of CRE, which is faster, cheaper, and more accurate than the PCR. It may therefore be routinely applied for detection of blaKPC producers in routine clinical laboratories.

Detection of Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacterales-From ESBLs to Carbapenemases

Multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales (MDRE) are an emerging threat to global health, leading to rising health care costs, morbidity and mortality. Multidrug-resistance is commonly caused by different β-lactamases (e.g., ESBLs and carbapenemases), sometimes in combination with other resistance mechanisms (e.g., porin loss, efflux). The continuous spread of MDRE among patients in hospital settings and the healthy population require adjustments in healthcare management and routine diagnostics. Rapid and reliable detection of MDRE infections as well as gastrointestinal colonization is key to guide therapy and infection control measures. However, proper implementation of these strategies requires diagnostic methods with short time-to-result, high sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, research on new techniques and improvement of already established protocols is inevitable. In this review, current methods for detection of MDRE are summarized with focus on culture based and molecular techniques, which are useful for the clinical microbiology laboratory.