Proposal of accurate cup placement procedure during total hip arthroplasty based on pelvic tilt discrepancies in the lateral position

Accelerometer-based portable navigation system shows no superior accuracy over pelvic alignment guide for acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty in lateral decubitus position

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a portable navigation system (PNS) incurs costs per procedure. However, it does not require a large console. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of acetabular cup placement using a pelvic alignment guide (PAG) attached to the pelvis and an accelerometer-based PNS in THA performed in the lateral decubitus position.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 100 hips that underwent primary THA in the lateral decubitus position between July 2018 and January 2021. The PAG was used in 50 hips, whereas the PNS was used in the other 50. Cup placement accuracy was measured using postoperative computed tomography scans, comparing errors in inclination and anteversion angles. The surgical time, blood loss, and complications were recorded. The follow-up period was at least 2 years in all cases.

RESULTS

The mean absolute error of the inclination angle was similar between the groups (the PAG group: 3.7° ± 2.3° [range, 0.0-9.0]; the PNS group: 3.7° ± 2.3° [range, 0.2-10.5], p = 0.705). The mean absolute error of the anteversion angle was significantly smaller in the PAG group than in the PNS group (3.0° ± 2.4° [range, 0.0-9.7] vs. 6.5° ± 4.8° [range, 0.3-17.3], p < 0.001). The PAG group had a higher proportion of hips within 5° and 10° of the target angle (64 vs. 42%, P = 0.028, and 100 vs. 74%, p < 0.001, respectively). The PNS group had six hips with anteversion errors of 15° or more. Surgical time and blood loss were lower in the PAG group. The PNS group had one dislocation, whereas the PAG group did not.

CONCLUSION

The accelerometer-based PNS did not demonstrate superior cup alignment accuracy compared to the PAG in THA performed in the lateral decubitus position. This finding informs surgeons that computer-assisted surgery is not necessarily superior to conventional THA using a PAG.

Validity and application of Doiguchi's pelvic tilt measurement method

BACKGROUND

The validity of Doiguchi's pelvic tilt measurement method has not been proven. The objective in our study was to validate the method.

METHODS

Our investigation included 73 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed using our cup placement procedure from July 2020 to November 2021. Pelvic tilt formed by the pubic symphysis and sacral promontory (PTPS) in supine and lateral positions was calculated by two methods (the Doiguchi method and the digital reconstructed radiograph (DRR) method using a 3D computer templating system) based on the transverse and longitudinal diameters of the pelvic ring measured immediately before THA.

RESULTS

There was a strong/moderate correlation in the values of PTPS between the Doiguchi and DRR methods. However, the value of PTPS calculated by the Doiguchi method was significantly lower than that calculated by DRR, and there was a partially direct match. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the value of PT change from supine to lateral position between the Doiguchi and DRR methods. The PT changes based on both methods were strongly correlated, and the PT change calculated by the Doiguchi method was almost identical to that calculated by the DRR method.

CONCLUSIONS

Doiguchi's pelvic tilt measurement method was validated for the first time. These results demonstrated that the ratio of the transverse and longitudinal diameters of the pelvic ring was an important factor defining the change in pelvic tilt. The slope in the linear function of the Doiguchi method was found to be almost the correct value, although the intercept of the linear function exhibited individual differences.

Retrospective study comparing the accuracies of handheld infrared stereo camera and augmented reality-based navigation systems for total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The use of portable navigation systems (PNS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become increasingly prevalent, with second-generation PNS (sPNS) demonstrating superior accuracy in the lateral decubitus position compared to first-generation PNS. However, few studies have compared different types of sPNS. This study retrospectively compares the accuracy and clinical outcomes of two different types of sPNS instruments in patients undergoing THA.

METHODS

A total of 158 eligible patients who underwent THA at a single institution between 2019 and 2022 were enrolled in the study, including 89 who used an accelerometer-based PNS with handheld infrared stereo cameras in the Naviswiss group (group N) and 69 who used an augmented reality (AR)-based PNS in the AR-Hip group (group A). Accuracy error, navigation error, clinical outcomes, and preparation time were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Accuracy errors for Inclination were comparable between group N (3.5° ± 3.0°) and group A (3.5° ± 3.1°) (p = 0.92). Accuracy errors for anteversion were comparable between group N (4.1° ± 3.1°) and group A (4.5° ± 4.0°) (p = 0.57). The navigation errors for inclination (group N: 2.9° ± 2.7°, group A: 3.0° ± 3.2°) and anteversion (group N: 4.3° ± 3.5°, group A: 4.3° ± 4.1°) were comparable between the groups (p = 0.86 and 0.94, respectively). The preparation time was shorter in group A than in group N (p = 0.036). There were no significant differences in operative time (p = 0.255), intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.387), or complications (p = 0.248) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

An Accelerometer-based PNS using handheld infrared stereo cameras and AR-based PNS provide similar accuracy during THA in the lateral decubitus position, with a mean error of 3°-4° for both inclination and anteversion, though the AR-based PNS required a shorter preparation time.

The Accuracy of Cup Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Using an Augmented Reality-Based Navigation System

Background AR HIP Navigation System® (AR-navi; Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, IN) is a portable navigation system employing augmented reality via a smartphone app, which was developed in Japan. We retrospectively analyzed the accuracy of cup placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using AR-navi, to investigate whether obesity is associated with an absolute value error in cup placement angle. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 45 hips in 43 patients who underwent THA using AR-navi (AR-navi group) and compared them with 45 hips in 45 patients who underwent THA using alignment rods (conventional group). Results The mean absolute error of cup placement (AR-navi group vs. conventional group) was found to be 2.60° (±2.11) in radiographic inclination (RI) for the AR-navi group and 4.61° (±3.28) for the conventional group, which indicates significant difference in the AR-navi group compared to that in the conventional group (p = 0.0036). The mean absolute error of radiographic anteversion (RA) was 3.57° (±3.36) for the AR-navi group and 3.87° (±2.97) for the conventional group (p = 0.4732). The mean absolute error of RI was 2.36° (±2.24) in the obese group and 3.16° (±2.03) in the nonobese group, and the mean absolute error of RA was 4.08° (±4.51) and 3.16° (±2.05) in the obese and nonobese groups, respectively. Conclusions Cup placement accuracy for THA using AR-navi was 2.60 ± 2.11° for RI and 3.87 ± 2.97° for RA. Compared to THA using the conventional method, the RI installation error was significantly improved with AR Navi. There was no significant difference in the mean absolute error of RI and RA among the obese and nonobese groups.

Does a Commercially Available Augmented Reality-based Portable Hip Navigation System Improve Cup Positioning During THA Compared With the Conventional Technique? A Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Portable hip navigation systems have been developed to combine the accuracy of cup positioning by large console navigation systems with the ease of use and convenience of conventional surgical techniques. Although a novel augmented reality-based portable hip navigation system using a smartphone (AR navigation) has become available recently, no studies, to our knowledge, have compared commercially available AR navigation with the conventional technique. Additionally, no studies, except for those from designer-surgeon series, have demonstrated the results of AR navigation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Does intraoperative use of commercially available AR navigation improve cup positioning compared with the conventional technique? (2) Are operative factors, clinical scores, and postoperative course different between the two groups?

METHODS

In this randomized trial, 72 patients undergoing THA were randomly assigned to undergo either commercially available AR navigation or a conventional technique for cup placement. All patients received the same cementless acetabular cups through a posterior approach in the lateral decubitus position. The primary outcome of the present study was cup positioning, including the absolute differences between the intended target and angle achieved, as well as the number of cups inside the Lewinnek safe zone. Our target cup position was 40° abduction and 20° anteversion. Secondary outcomes were operative factors, between-group difference in improvement in the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and the postoperative course, including the operative time (between the start of the surgical approach and skin closure), procedure time (between the first incision and skin closure, including the time to insert pins, registration, and transfer and redrape patients in the navigation group), time taken to insert pins and complete registration in the navigation group, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and reoperations. The minimum follow-up period was 6 months, because data regarding the primary outcome-cup positioning-were collected within 1 week after surgery. The between-group difference in improvement in HOOS, which was the secondary outcome, was much lower than the minimum clinically important difference for the HOOS. No patients in either group were lost to follow-up, and there was no crossover (the randomized treatment was performed in all patients, so there was no difference between an intention-to-treat and a per-protocol analysis).

RESULTS

The use of the commercially available AR navigation slightly improved cup positioning compared with the conventional technique in terms of the absolute difference between the desired and achieved amounts of cup abduction and anteversion (which we defined as "absolute differences"; median 1° [IQR 0° to 4.0°] versus median 5° [IQR 3.0° to 7.5°], difference of medians 4°; p < 0.001 and median 2° [IQR 1.9° to 3.7°] versus median 5° [IQR 3.2° to 9.7°], difference of medians 2°; p = 0.001). A higher proportion of cups were placed inside the Lewinnek safe zone in the navigation group than in the control group (94% [34 of 36] compared with 64% [23 of 36]; p < 0.001). Median operative times were not different between the two groups (58 minutes [IQR 49 to 72 minutes] versus 57 minutes [IQR 49 to 69 minutes], difference of medians 1 minute; p = 0.99). The median procedure time was longer in the navigation group (95 minutes [IQR 84 to 109 minutes] versus 57 minutes [IQR 49 to 69 minutes], difference of medians 38 minutes; p < 0.001). There were no differences between the two groups in improvement in HOOS (27 ± 17 versus 28 ± 19, mean difference -1 [95% CI -9.5 to 7.4]; p = 0.81). In the navigation group, no complications occurred in the pin sites; however, one anterior dislocation occurred. In the conventional group, one hip underwent reoperation because of a deep infection.

CONCLUSION

Although the use of commercially available AR navigation improved cup positioning in THA, the improvement in clinical scores and postoperative complication rates were not different between the two groups, and the overall magnitude of the difference in accuracy was small. Future studies will need to determine whether the improvement in the percentage of hips inside the Lewinnek safe zone results in differences in late dislocation or polyethylene wear, and whether such benefits-if any-justify the added costs and surgical time. Until or unless more compelling evidence in favor of the new system emerges, we recommend against widespread use of the system in clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level Ⅱ, therapeutic study.

A new accelerometer-based portable navigation system provides high accuracy of acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty in both the lateral decubitus and supine positions

INTRODUCTION

No studies have compared the accuracy of acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the supine and lateral decubitus positions using the same portable navigation system. Thus, this study aimed to compare the accuracy of acetabular cup placement using a new accelerometer-based portable navigation system combined with an infrared stereo camera and inertial measurement unit between the supine and lateral decubitus positions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study compared 45 THAs performed in the supine position (supine group) and 44 THAs performed in the lateral decubitus position (lateral group) using the same portable navigation system. The primary outcome was the absolute errors of cup placement angles, defined as the absolute values of the differences between cup radiographic inclination and anteversion angles displayed on the navigation system and those measured on postoperative computed tomography images.

RESULTS

No significant difference in the median absolute error of the cup inclination angle (supine group 1.7° [interquartile range 0.8°-3.1°] vs. lateral group 2.1° [interquartile range 1.0°-3.7°]; p = 0.07) was found between the two groups. Similarly, no significant difference in the median absolute error of the anteversion angle (supine group 1.9° [interquartile range 0.8°-3.4°] vs. lateral group 2.1° [interquartile range 0.9°-3.1°]; p = 0.42) was found.

CONCLUSION

This new accelerometer-based portable navigation system may provide high accuracy of the cup placement in THA in the lateral decubitus and supine positions.

Accuracy of a novel accelerometer-based navigation (Naviswiss) for total hip arthroplasty in the supine position

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the accuracy of acetabular cup insertion using a novel accelerometer-based navigation system in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

A single-surgeon study was conducted in which 62 prospective patients with navigation and 42 retrospective patients without navigation in a supine position were compared. Absolute values for errors of radiographic inclination and anteversion were calculated. Navigation error was also calculated. Factors that affected absolute value of navigation error in cup alignment were determined.

RESULTS

In the navigation group, mean absolute errors for radiographic inclination and anteversion were 4.1° and 4.3°, respectively. In the control group, mean absolute errors were 6.6° in inclination (p < 0.01) and 5.9° in anteversion (p = 0.04). Mean absolute values of navigation error were 2.8° in inclination and 2.8°in anteversion. Factors affecting navigation errors were not found.

CONCLUSION

This novel accelerometer-based navigation system significantly increased the accuracy of cup placement during THA in the supine position.

Accurate cup placement using a portable navigation system during total hip arthroplasty based on pelvic orientation in the lateral decubitus position

BACKGROUND

We previously proposed an accurate cup placement procedure using a portable navigation system (PNS) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the lateral decubitus position; however, as the accuracy of our proposed procedure has not been shown, the aim of this study was to demonstrate the accuracy.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 79 hips treated with primary THA; 40 hips treated until June 2020 were included in the conventional procedure (CP) group, and 39 hips treated from July 2020 were included in the modified procedure (MP) group. In the MP, pelvic orientation is considered to the set coordinate axes in addition to the CP using the PNS. The accuracy was based on the difference between the navigation record (NR) and postoperative computed tomography measurement.

RESULTS

The radiographic inclination (RI) and anteversion (RA) accuracies were 1.55° and 2.14°, respectively, in the MP group and 3.03° and 6.20°, respectively, in the CP group (p < 0.001). The error was within 5° of the NR for both the RI and RA in 34 in the MP group (87.2%) and 14 in the CP group (35.0%) (p < 0.001). The error was within 5° of the target angle (RI 40°, RA 15°) for both the RI and RA in 29 hips in the MP group (74.7%) and 12 in the CP group (30.0%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our procedure with the consideration of pelvic orientation achieved dramatically improved the accuracy of PNS and was suitable to facilitate accurate cup placement.

Logistic Regression Analysis of Risk Factors and Improvement of Clinical Treatment of Traumatic Arthritis after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) in the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures

Objective

Logistic regression was adopted to analyze the risk factors of traumatic arthritis after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the treatment of acetabular fractures, and the clinical treatment was enhanced.

Methods

A total of 200 patients with acetabular fractures treated in our hospital from February 2019 to April 2021 were enrolled for THA. According to the occurrence of traumatic arthritis after operation, the patients were divided into control group and study group. The control group was patients without traumatic arthritis (n = 165), and the study group was patients with traumatic arthritis after operation (n = 35). The general data were analyzed, the risk factors of traumatic arthritis after THA for acetabular fractures were analyzed by logistic regression, and the clinical treatment methods were promoted.

Results

First of all, there exhibited no significant difference in the general data such as sex, age, medical history, and operation site (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in the general data of whether the patients had a job, rehabilitation exercise, and osteoarthritis before operation (P < 0.05). Secondly, we compared the curative effects between two groups. The effective rate in the study group was higher compared to the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the Harris hip function score of the study group at discharge, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after discharge was higher compared to that of the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was significantly higher compared to that in the control group (P < 0.05). The presence of osteoarthritis, curative effect, poor reduction of fracture, injury of articular cartilage, entry of internal fixation into the joint, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and infection before operation were significantly correlated with traumatic arthritis after THA in the treatment of acetabular fractures (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis indicated that poor reduction, curative effect, articular cartilage injury, entry of internal fixation into the joint, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, infection, and preoperative osteoarthritis were the risk factors of traumatic arthritis after THA in the treatment of acetabular fractures (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Poor fracture reduction, curative effect, articular cartilage injury, internal fixation into the joint, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, infection, and the presence of osteoarthritis before operation are the risk factors of traumatic arthritis after THA in the treatment of acetabular fractures. When performing THA for patients with acetabular fracture, attention should be paid to the presence of osteoarthritis before operation, and for those with poor curative effect, attention should be paid to the occurrence of poor fracture reduction, articular cartilage injury, internal fixation into the joint, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and combined infection, and timely intervention measures should be taken to reduce the risk of traumatic arthritis after operation.

Augmented Reality- vs Accelerometer-Based Portable Navigation System to Improve the Accuracy of Acetabular Cup Placement During Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Lateral Decubitus Position

BACKGROUND

There have been no studies regarding the effectiveness of augmented reality (AR)-based portable navigation systems compared with accelerometer-based portable navigation systems in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

We retrospectively compared THAs performed using an AR-based portable navigation system (n = 45) and those performed using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system (n = 42). All THAs were performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. The primary outcome was the absolute difference between cup placement angles displayed on the navigation screen and those measured on postoperative X-ray.

RESULTS

The mean absolute differences were significantly smaller in the AR-based portable navigation system group than the accelerometer-based portable navigation system group in radiographic inclination (2.5° ± 1.7° vs 4.6° ± 3.1°; 95% confidence interval 1.1°-3.2°, P < .0001). Similarly, the mean absolute differences were significantly better in the AR-based portable navigation system group in radiographic anteversion (2.1° ± 1.8° vs 6.4° ± 4.2°; 95% confidence interval 3.0°-5.7°, P < .0001). Neither hip dislocation, surgical site infection, nor other complications associated with use of the navigation system occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

The AR-based portable navigation system may provide more precise acetabular cup placement compared with the accelerometer-based portable navigation system in THA.