WHO grade I meningiomas that show regrowth after gamma knife radiosurgery often show 1p36 loss

SNAP25 as a prognostic marker in transcriptome analysis of meningioma

BACKGROUND

Meningiomas are the most common intracranial tumors and their diagnosis relies mostly on neuroimaging and histology. However, the histology grades cannot predict the outcome exactly and some meningiomas tend to recur after resection of even benign tumors. Therefore, it is necessary to explore prognostic and diagnostic molecular targets.

METHODS

Differential expression analysis between meningiomas and meninges was performed based on the merged data of GSE43290 and GSE84263. Next, we performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), immune cell infiltration analysis, protein-protein interaction analysis, and survival analysis using public data. The expression level of Synaptosome-associated-protein-25kDa (SNAP25) was verified by reverse transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and Western blotting in meningioma tissues.

RESULTS

There were 263 upregulated and 592 downregulated genes identified in meningiomas by differential expression analysis. GSEA results revealed that meningiomas were negatively related to the pathway of soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor interactions in vascular transport and chemokine signaling. SNAP25 was characterized as a hub gene and downregulated in meningiomas. The Kaplan-Meier plot indicated that high expression of SNAP25 is a favorable factor.

CONCLUSION

SNAP25 was downregulated and identified as a potential prognostic marker in meningioma.

Insights into brain tumor diagnosis: exploring in situ hybridization techniques

Objectives

Diagnosing brain tumors is critical due to their complex nature. This review explores the potential of in situ hybridization for diagnosing brain neoplasms, examining their attributes and applications in neurology and oncology.

Methods

The review surveys literature and cross-references findings with the OMIM database, examining 513 records. It pinpoints mutations suitable for in situ hybridization and identifies common chromosomal and gene anomalies in brain tumors. Emphasis is placed on mutations' clinical implications, including prognosis and drug sensitivity.

Results

Amplifications in EGFR, MDM2, and MDM4, along with Y chromosome loss, chromosome 7 polysomy, and deletions of PTEN, CDKN2/p16, TP53, and DMBT1, correlate with poor prognosis in glioma patients. Protective genetic changes in glioma include increased expression of ADGRB3/1, IL12B, DYRKA1, VEGFC, LRRC4, and BMP4. Elevated MMP24 expression worsens prognosis in glioma, oligodendroglioma, and meningioma patients. Meningioma exhibits common chromosomal anomalies like loss of chromosomes 1, 9, 17, and 22, with specific genes implicated in their development. Main occurrences in medulloblastoma include the formation of isochromosome 17q and SHH signaling pathway disruption. Increased expression of BARHL1 is associated with prolonged survival. Adenomas mutations were reviewed with a focus on adenoma-carcinoma transition and different subtypes, with MMP9 identified as the main metalloprotease implicated in tumor progression.

Discussion

Molecular-genetic diagnostics for common brain tumors involve diverse genetic anomalies. In situ hybridization shows promise for diagnosing and prognosticating tumors. Detecting tumor-specific alterations is vital for prognosis and treatment. However, many mutations require other methods, hindering in situ hybridization from becoming the primary diagnostic method.

Biomarkers for prognosis of meningioma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Meningioma is the most common primary brain tumor and many studies have evaluated numerous biomarkers for their prognostic value, often with inconsistent results. Currently, no reliable biomarkers are available to predict the survival, recurrence, and progression of meningioma patients in clinical practice. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of immunohistochemistry-based (IHC) biomarkers of meningioma patients. A systematic literature search was conducted up to November 2023 on PubMed, CENTRAL, CINAHL Plus, and Scopus databases. Two authors independently reviewed the identified relevant studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the studies included. Meta-analyses were performed with the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). The risk of bias in the included studies was evaluated using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. A total of 100 studies with 16,745 patients were included in this review. As the promising markers to predict OS of meningioma patients, Ki-67/MIB-1 (HR = 1.03, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.05) was identified to associate with poor prognosis of the patients. Overexpression of cyclin A (HR = 4.91, 95%CI 1.38 to 17.44), topoisomerase II α (TOP2A) (HR = 4.90, 95%CI 2.96 to 8.12), p53 (HR = 2.40, 95%CI 1.73 to 3.34), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (HR = 1.61, 95%CI 1.36 to 1.90), and Ki-67 (HR = 1.33, 95%CI 1.21 to 1.46), were identified also as unfavorable prognostic biomarkers for poor RFS of meningioma patients. Conversely, positive progesterone receptor (PR) and p21 staining were associated with longer RFS and are considered biomarkers of favorable prognosis of meningioma patients (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.88 and HR = 1.89, 95%CI 1.11 to 3.20). Additionally, high expression of Ki-67 was identified as a prognosis biomarker for poor PFS of meningioma patients (HR = 1.02, 95%CI 1.00 to 1.04). Although only in single studies, KPNA2, CDK6, Cox-2, MCM7 and PCNA are proposed as additional markers with high expression that are related with poor prognosis of meningioma patients. In conclusion, the results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that PR, cyclin A, TOP2A, p21, p53, VEGF and Ki-67 are either positively or negatively associated with survival of meningioma patients and might be useful biomarkers to assess the prognosis.

Use of thyroid transcription factor 1 and napsin A to predict local failure and survival after Gamma Knife radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), combined with contemporary targeted therapies and immunotherapies, has improved the overall survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (ADC). Given that histological subtypes reflect prognosis in patients with primary ADC, it is important to integrate pathological biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes after SRS in patients with brain metastases from lung ADC. Therefore, the authors investigated the prognostic relevance of various biomarkers of primary lung ADC for clinical outcomes after SRS.

METHODS

A total of 95 patients with 136 brain metastases (1-4 oligometastases) who were treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery between January 2017 and December 2020 were included. The Kaplan-Meier method and univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to identify prognostic factors for local control, survival, and distant brain control.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed thyroid transcription factor 1 as an independent prognostic factor for local control (HR 0.098, 95% CI 0.014-0.698, p = 0.0203) and napsin A as a significant predictor of overall survival after SRS (HR 0.080, 95% CI 0.017-0.386, p < 0.01). In a subset analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, patients with EGFR exon 19 mutations showed better distant brain control than those with EGFR exon 21 mutations (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological biomarkers of primary cancer should be considered to predict clinical outcomes after SRS in patients with lung ADC. Use of such biomarkers may help to provide personalized treatment to each patient, improving clinical outcomes after SRS.

Advances in Molecular Biological and Translational Studies in World Health Organization Grades 2 and 3 Meningiomas: A Literature Review

The treatment of World Health Organization (WHO) grades 2 and 3 meningiomas remains difficult and controversial. The pathogenesis of high-grade meningiomas was expected to be elucidated to improve treatment strategies. The molecular biology of meningiomas has been clarified in recent years. High-grade meningiomas have been linked to NF2 mutations and 22q deletion. CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion and TERT promoter mutations are independent prognostic factors for WHO grade 3 meningiomas. In addition to 22q loss, 1p, 14p, and 9q loss have been linked to high-grade meningiomas. Meningiomas enriched in copy number alterations may be biologically invasive. Furthermore, several new comprehensive classifications of meningiomas have been proposed based on these molecular biological features, including DNA methylation status. The new classifications may have implications for treatment strategies for refractory aggressive meningiomas because they provide a more accurate prognosis compared to the conventional WHO classification. Although several systemic therapies, including molecular targeted therapies, may be effective in treating refractory aggressive meningiomas, these drugs are being tested. Systemic drug therapy for meningioma is expected to be developed in the future. Thus, this review aims to discuss the distinct genomic alterations observed in WHO grade 2 and 3 meningiomas, as well as their diagnostic and therapeutic implications and systemic drug therapies for high-grade meningiomas.