Decompression of the suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular notch under combined arthroscopic and ultrasound guidance

Shoulder and Knee Arthroscopy Access Point: Prospective Comparison of Sonographic and Palpatory Detection - Which Method is Better for Novices?

Purpose  Arthroscopy is one of the most common interventions in orthopedics. Hence it is important to train users early in order to ensure the safest possible identification of access portals (AP). This prospective study aimed to compare a palpatory (PalpMethod) with a sonographic (SonoMethod) method for AP location in the shoulder and knee joints. Materials and Methods  The study included trainee doctors (n=68) attending workshops (lasting approx. 90 minutes). In these workshops a teaching video initially demonstrated the PalpMethod and SonoMethod of AP identification. An experienced operator first marked the access portals on the test subject with a UV pen (determined ideal point [DIP]). Adhesive film was then affixed to the puncture regions. Subsequently participants marked on shoulders and knees first the point determined by palpation, then the point determined by sonography. Analysis involved DIP visualization with a UV lamp and employed a coordinate system around the central DIP. In addition, participants completed an evaluation before and after the workshop. Results  The analysis included 324 measurements (n=163 shoulders and n= 161 knees). The majority of participants had not previously attended any courses on manual examination (87.9%) or musculoskeletal ultrasound (93.9%). Overall, the markings participants made on the shoulder using the SonoMethod were significantly closer to the DIP than those made by the PalpMethod (Palp 18.8mm ± 14.5mm vs. Sono 11.2mm ± 7.2mm; p<0.001). On the knee, however, the markings made by the PalpMethod were significantly closer to the DIP overall (Palp 8.0mm ± 3.2mm vs. Sono 12.8mm ± 5.2mm; p<0.001). Conclusion The results show that the SonoMethod produces more accurate markings on the shoulder, while the PalpMethod is superior for the knee.

Suprascapular nerve entrapment caused by a large hematoma of the scapula: a case report

BACKGROUND

Suprascapular nerve entrapment is a rare disorder that is frequently misdiagnosed as another disease. The suprascapular nerve is commonly entrapped at the following two sites: the suprascapular and spinoglenoid notches. Nerve entrapment at the spinoglenoid notch causes infraspinatus muscle weakness and atrophy. Patients present with posterior shoulder pain and weakness. Magnetic resonance imaging is used to confirm the diagnosis of a spinoglenoid cyst and nerve compression. Open or arthroscopic aspiration or decompression is indicated for patients with cysts in whom conservative treatment has failed and those with cysts associated with suprascapular nerve compression.

CASE PRESENTATION

Herein, we describe the case of a 49-year-old man with suprascapular nerve entrapment caused by a large cyst, namely, a hematoma, in the superior scapular and spinoglenoid notches. Open surgical decompression of the suprascapular nerve was performed owing to an intact rotator cuff and glenoid labrum.

CONCLUSION

Posterior shoulder pain promptly resolved without complications.

Novel Diagnostic and Treatment Techniques for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is a challenging condition to diagnose and treat, often precipitated by the triad of repetitive overhead activity, pectoralis minor contracture, and scapular dyskinesia. The resultant protracted scapular posture creates gradual repetitive traction injury of the suprascapular nerve via tethering at the suprascapular notch and decreases the volume of the brachial plexus cords and axillary vessels in the retropectoralis minor space. A stepwise and exhaustive diagnostic protocol is essential to exclude alternate pathologies and confirm the diagnosis of this dynamic pathologic process. Ultrasound-guided injections of local anesthetic or botulinum toxin are a key factor in confirming the diagnosis and prognosticating potential response from surgical release. In patients who fail over 6 months of supervised physical therapy aimed at correcting scapular posture and stretching of the pectoralis minor, arthroscopic surgical release is indicated. We present our diagnostic algorithm and technique for arthroscopic suprascapular neurolysis, pectoralis minor release, brachial plexus neurolysis, and infraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression.

Suprascapular nerve release does not provide additional benefits in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of suprascapular nerve release in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs that compared the outcomes of patients who did and did not receive suprascapular nerve release (SSNR) during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies. Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used for cohort study assessment. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool (version 1.0) was used to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials. The primary outcomes were pain and shoulder function. The secondary outcome was the re-tear rate.

RESULTS

Two RCTs and three non-RCTs with a total of 187 patients (90 patients received SSNR and 97 patients did not receive SSNR) were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis revealed that the SSNR group did not had a more pain reduction, assessed by visual analogue scale, compared to the non-SSNR group. Also, the SSNR group did not have a significantly more improvement in the UCLA score, compared to the non-SSNR group. In addition, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of Constant score and re-tear rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The result of this study showed that additional suprascapular nerve release did not provide additional benefit in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Routine arthroscopic SSNR is not recommended when treating patients with rotator cuff tear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Eхperience of endoscopic decompression of the suprascapular nerve

Background: Suprascapular nerve neuropathy is a commonly spread pathology, caused by a traction force trauma or compression in the scapular notch area. In the case of a conservative treatment failure, a standard surgical procedure is neurolysis (decompression) of the suprascapular nerve in the scapular notch. This procedure can be done in an open manner or endoscopically. Aims: to evaluate the results of endoscopic decompression of the suprascapular nerve in the scapular notch area at a 6 months follow-up. Methods: We operated 10 patients with the clinical picture of posttraumatic suprascapular nerve neuropathy in the period from 2015 to 2021. The mean age of patients was 52.311.8. All the patients underwent the shoulder joint and subacromial space arthroscopy, and decompression of the suprascapular nerve in the scapular notch area. Results: According to the VAS-scale, the severity of pain syndrome before the surgery was 6 cm, while in 6 months after the surgery it decreased to 2 cm. According to the DASH scale, the dysfunction of the of shoulder joint before the surgery was 70 points, in 6 months after the surgery it decreased to 10 points. The range of motion in the shoulder joint before the surgery was: flexion 15514,4, abduction 14042, external rotation 125,6; 6 months after the surgery we observed: flexion 17415,6, abduction 17514,4, external rotation 489. Conclusion: The obtained results let us characterize the method of endoscopic decompression of the suprascapular nerve as a low-traumatic and effective technique, which promotes restoration of the function of the suprascapular nerve and shoulder joint, and elimination of pain syndrome from the shoulder area.