Therapeutic effectiveness and safety of sintilimab-dominated triple therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Clinical predictive factors of the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and kinase inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular cancer

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly aggressive tumor associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and kinase inhibitors has emerged as a promising strategy for liver cancer treatment in recent years. However, the clinical factors predicting the outcomes of combination therapy in patients with advanced liver cancer remain uncertain. Therefore, this study investigated the relationships between clinical predictors and the efficacy of ICI plus kinase inhibitor therapy to personalize treatment plans.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 98 patients who received combination treatment with ICIs and kinase inhibitors for advanced HCC. Based on blood lipid levels and other clinical factors prior to treatment, we investigated potential biomarkers that could predict treatment responses in this patient population.

RESULTS

Mean progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in this cohort were 10.1 and 17.2 months, respectively. Via multivariate analysis, the absence of extrahepatic metastasis, the absence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 3.225, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) < 140.75, and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) ≥ 37.25 were identified as independent predictors of improved PFS. Factors associated with better OS included PLR < 140.75 and total cholesterol (TC) < 3.46 mmol/L. Univariate analysis identified significant associations of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels, Child-Pugh classification, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), TC, and the receipt of regorafenib with PFS. Additionally, ECOG PS, Child-Pugh classification, AFP, PVT, NLR, PNI, and the receipt of regorafenib were significantly associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

PLR and TC were potential clinical predictive factors for survival outcomes in patients with advanced HCC who received ICI/kinase inhibitor combination therapy. It is important to know the clinical characteristics of patients prior to treatment initiation to optimize outcomes.

Progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Among primary liver cancers, hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common pathological type. Its onset is insidious, and most patients have no obvious discomfort in the early stage, so it is found late, and the opportunity for surgical radical treatment is lost, resulting in a poor prognosis. With the introduction of molecular-targeted drugs represented by sorafenib, patients with middle- and late-stage liver cancer have regained the light of day. However, their therapeutic efficacy is relatively low due to the limited target of drug action, toxic side effects, and other reasons. At this time, the emergence of immunotherapy represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) well breaks this embarrassing situation, which mainly achieves the anti-tumor purpose by improving the tumor immune microenvironment. Currently, ICI monotherapy, as well as combination therapy, has been widely used in the clinic, further prolonging the survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This article reviews the development of monotherapy and combination therapy for ICIs in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and the latest research progress.

Immune-targeted therapy with transarterial chemo(embolization) for unresectable HCC: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Transarterial chemo(embolization) is preferred for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC); however, because of emerging immune-targeted therapies, its efficacy is at stake. This systematic review pioneers to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transarterial chemo(embolization) combined with immune-targeted therapy for uHCC patients.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing immune-targeted therapy with or without transarterial chemo(embolization) until 31 May 2024. The complete response (CR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were considered to be the primary outcomes calculated for the clinical outcomes of transarterial chemo(embolization) combined with immune-targeted therapy, along with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The incidence of treatment-related severe adverse events was set as the major measure for the safety outcome.

Results

Sixteen studies, encompassing 1,789 patients receiving transarterial chemo(embolization) plus immune-targeted therapy and 1,215 patients receiving immune-targeted therapy alone, were considered eligible. The combination of transarterial chemo(embolization) and immune-targeted therapy demonstrated enhanced outcomes in CR (OR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.35-3.31), ORR (OR = 2.78, 95% CI = 2.15-3.61), DCR (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.72-3.52), PFS (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.50-0.70), and OS (HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.44-0.59), albeit accompanied by a surge in ALT (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.28-3.68) and AST (OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.42-3.65). The advantages of additional transarterial chemo(embolization) to immune-targeted therapy were also verified in subgroups of first-line treatment, intervention techniques, with or without extrahepatic metastasis, Child-Pugh grade A or B, and with or without tumor thrombus.

Conclusion

The combination of transarterial chemo(embolization) and immune-targeted therapy seems to bolster local control and long-term efficacy in uHCC, albeit at the expense of hepatic complications.

Systematic review registration

http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier 474669.

Comparison of tumor response and outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after multimodal treatment including immune checkpoint inhibitors - a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and radiotherapy to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been well-defined. We performed a meta-analysis to characterize tumor response and survival associated with multimodal treatment of HCC.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched (1990-2022). Random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to compare efficacy of treatment modalities. Odds ratios (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were reported.

RESULTS

Thirty studies (4170 patients) met inclusion criteria. Triple therapy regimen (ICI + TKI + TACE) had the highest overall disease control rate (DCR) (87%, 95% CI 83-91), while ICI + radiotherapy had the highest objective response rate (ORR) (72%, 95% CI 54%-89%). Triple therapy had a higher DCR than ICI + TACE (OR 4.49, 95% CI 2.09-9.63), ICI + TKI (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.63-5.82), and TKI + TACE (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.61-5.20). Triple therapy demonstrated improved overall survival versus ICI + TKI (SMD 0.72, 95% CI 0.37-1.07) and TKI + TACE (SMD 1.13, 95% CI 0.70-1.48) (both p < 0.05). Triple therapy had a greater incidence of adverse events (AEs) compared with ICI + TKI (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.29-0.91; p = 0.02), but no difference in AEs versus ICI + TACE or TKI + TACE (both p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of ICIs, TKIs and TACE demonstrated superior tumor response and survival and should be considered for select patients with advanced HCC.

Liver Injury and Its Impact on Prognosis in Patients with HBV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Plus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Purpose

Recently, the triple therapy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has become a new treatment option for advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We aimed to explore the liver injury and its effect on overall survival (OS) in patients treated with this combination therapy.

Patients and Methods

Patients with HBV-related HCC who were treated with TACE-TKIs-ICIs from January 2020 to December 2021 were enrolled. Liver injury and survival time were the main endpoints of the study. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the factors associated with liver injury. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to determine prognostic factors for OS.

Results

As of March 2022, 52 of the 119 enrolled patients developed any grade hepatotoxicity: 15 cases with grade 1, 19 cases with grade 2, 16 cases with grade 3 and 2 cases with grade 4. Our analysis indicated that lack of antiviral prevention was a risk factor for liver injury (OR = 0.149; 95% CI: 0.050-0.442; P = 0.001). The findings suggested that liver injury events (HR = 1.912; 95% CI: 1.031-3.546; P = 0.040) was associated with patient death. The median OS of patients without liver injury, grade 1-2 and grade 3-4 liver injury were undefined, 13.7 months and 11.1 months, respectively (log-rank P = 0.034).

Conclusion

Liver injury adverse events are common in HBV-related HCC patients treated with TACE-TKIs-ICIs. Patients who developed liver injury had a poor prognosis. For HBV-related HCC patients, effective prophylactic antiviral therapy and regular liver function testing are required before and during this triple therapy.

Target immune components to circumvent sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma

Sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, has been approved for cancer treatment for decades, especially hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although sorafenib produced substantial clinical benefits in the initial stage, a large proportion of cancer patients acquired drug resistance in subsequent treatment, which always disturbs clinical physicians. Cumulative evidence unraveled the underlying mechanism of sorafenib, but few reports focused on the role of immune subpopulations, since the immunological rationale of sorafenib resistance has not yet been defined. Here, we reviewed the immunoregulatory effects of sorafenib on the tumor microenvironment and emphasized the potential immunological mechanisms of therapeutic resistance to sorafenib. Moreover, we also summarized the clinical outcomes and ongoing trials in combination of sorafenib with immunotherapy, highlighted the immunotherapeutic strategies to improve sorafenib efficacy, and put forward several prospective questions aimed at guiding future research in overcoming sorafenib resistance in HCC.

Phase 1b/2 trial of fruquintinib plus sintilimab in treating advanced solid tumours: The dose-escalation and metastatic colorectal cancer cohort in the dose-expansion phases

BACKGROUND

Fruquintinib (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor 1/2/3) plus sintilimab (anti-programmed death-1) demonstrated enhanced anti-tumour effects versus monotherapy in a preclinical study. We investigated the combination in patients with advanced solid tumours, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

In this phase 1b/2, open-label, multi-centre, multi-cohort dose-escalation and dose-expansion study, patients with advanced solid tumours (dose-escalation) or mCRC (one cohort in dose-expansion) received different doses of fruquintinib plus a fixed dose of sintilimab once every 4 weeks (Q4W) or 3 weeks (Q3W). Primary objectives were safety, tolerability, and the preliminary efficacy. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03903705.

FINDINGS

By the data cut-off date (30th December 2021), 23 patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation and 37 patients in the mCRC cohort of the dose-expansion; 44 patients with mCRC who received sintilimab Q3W were pooled for analysis. One dose-limiting toxicity event (grade 3 troponin T increased) occurred during the dose escalation. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 43.5% and 47.7% of patients in the dose-escalation phase and pooled mCRC analysis, respectively. Among patients treated with the recommended phase 2 dose (fruquintinib 5 mg once daily, 2 weeks on/1 week off, plus sintilimab 200 mg Q3W) in pooled mCRC analysis, the objective response rate was 23.8% (95% CI 8.2-47.2), median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI 5.4-8.3), and overall survival was 14.8 months (95% CI 8.8-not reached); in patients with mismatch repair-proficient mCRC, these were 20.0% (95% CI 4.3-48.1), 6.9 months (95% CI 4.8-10.1), and 20.0 months (95% CI 8.1-not reached), respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Fruquintinib plus sintilimab was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumours and showed promising efficacy in mCRC.

Efficacy and Safety of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Alone or Combination with Programmed Death-1 Inhibitors in Treating of Hepatitis C-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) combined with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor is a potential treatment modality for patients with HCV-related unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

Methods

The participants of the present work included the patients having HCV-related uHCC who were treated with TKI monotherapy (TKI group) or TKI combined with PD-1 inhibitors therapy (combination group) in our center between June 2018 and June 2021. In addition, the patients were classified into RNA-positive and RNA-negative groups based on whether or not the baseline HCV RNA was detectable. The overall survival (OS) was used as the primary efficacy endpoint, while progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were used as secondary endpoints. The adverse events were recorded and evaluated.

Results

Among the 67 patients contained this work, 43 patients were classified into the TKI group, while 24 patients formed the combination group. In relative to the TKI group, the combination group presented notably better median OS (21 months vs 13 months, p = 0.043) and median PFS (8 months vs 5 months, p = 0.005). No evident differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the DCR (58.1% vs 79.2%, p = 0.080), ORR (13.9% vs 25.0%, p = 0.425) and the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events (34.8% vs 33.3%, p = 1.000). In addition, there existed no obvious difference between the RNA-positive group and RNA-negative group in terms of median OS (14 months vs 19 months, p = 0.578) and median PFS (4 months vs 6 months, p = 0.238).

Conclusion

The patients having HCV-related uHCC after being treated with the TKI and PD-1 inhibitor combination therapy exhibited a better prognosis and manageable toxicity compared to the patients who underwent TKI monotherapy.

Clinical Outcomes Associated with Monotherapy and Combination Therapy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Real-World Practice: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-based therapy has recently been demonstrated to greatly ameliorate survival outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of ICIs-based monotherapy and combination therapy as first-line treatment of adults with advanced HCC in real-world practice by conducting a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to 25 April 2022. Retrospective or prospective real-world studies evaluating progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of patients with advanced HCC receiving first-line ICIs-based therapy were included.

RESULTS

Of 7805 studies retrieved, 38 were deemed eligible for inclusion. For patients receiving first-line ICIs-based therapy in real-world practice, the pooled median PFS and OS were 7.03 (95% CI: 5.55-8.51) and 14.39 (95% CI: 10.91-17.86) months. The ORR and DCR were 0.432 (95% CI: 0.327-0.538) and 0.756 (95% CI: 0.677-0.836), according to mRECIST 1.1, 0.317 (95% CI: 0.218-0.416) and 0.740 (95% CI: 0.644-0.835), judged by RECIST 1.1. The best outcomes of survival and response rate were observed in ICIs-based combination therapy of ICIs, TKIs, plus LRTs. Furthermore, ORR, DCR judged by mRECIST 1.1, and PFS could be potential prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This research revealed diversified first-line ICIs-based therapies for advanced HCC in real-world practice. Future studies are needed to adopt prospective, multicentric and comparative designs to test the ICIs-based combination therapies, especially triple therapies of ICIs, TKIs, plus LRTs.

An overview: Management of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has constituted a significant health burden worldwide, and patients with advanced HCC, which is stage C as defined by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, have a poor overall survival of 6-8 months. Studies have indicated the significant survival benefit of treatment based on sorafenib, lenvatinib, or atezolizumab-bevacizumab with reliable safety. In addition, the combination of two or more molecularly targeted therapies (first- plus second-line) has become a hot topic recently and is now being extensively investigated in patients with advanced HCC. In addition, a few biomarkers have been investigated and found to predict drug susceptibility and prognosis, which provides an opportunity to evaluate the clinical benefits of current therapies. In addition, many therapies other than tyrosine kinase inhibitors that might have additional survival benefits when combined with other therapeutic modalities, including immunotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, hepatectomy, and chemotherapy, have also been examined. This review provides an overview on the current understanding of disease management and summarizes current challenges with and future perspectives on advanced HCC.

Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization plus antiangiogenic- targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus in the real world

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a triple therapy that comprises transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), antiangiogenic-targeted therapy, and programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in a real-world cohort of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).

Methods

Consecutive patients treated with TACE combined with antiangiogenic therapy and PD-1 inhibitors at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital between June 2019 and May 2021 were enrolled. The baseline characteristics and treatment course of the patients were recorded. The tumor response was evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and HCC-specific modified RECIST (mRECIST). The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

Results

As of the data cutoff on 30 August 2021, the median follow-up time was 10.0 (3.9-28.4) months. A total of 39 eligible patients were included. The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 35.9% and 74.4% according to the RECIST 1.1, and 48.7% and 84.6% according to mRECIST criteria, respectively. The median OS and PFS were 14.0 and 9.2 months, respectively. Moreover, 34 (87.2%) patients experienced at least one treatment-related AE and 8 (20.5%) patients experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs. The most common treatment- and laboratory-related AEs were hypertension (46.2%) and decreased albumin (53.8%), respectively. No treatment-related mortality occurred during the study period.

Conclusions

TACE combined with antiangiogenic-targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors may have promising anticancer activity in unresectable HCC patients with PVTT. AEs were manageable, with no unexpected overlapping toxicities.

Conventional Therapies Do Not Prolong the Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Extrahepatic Metastases under Receiving of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Simple Summary

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including sorafenib and lenvatinib, have been the current standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cases where an immune checkpoint inhibitor cannot be used. The SHARP study showed that sorafenib tended to be less effective for extrahepatic metastases than for vascular invasion. Moreover, lenvatinib showed a response similar to that of sorafenib in such patients. The aforementioned data suggested that the addition of conventional therapies, including chemoembolization and radiation therapy, may improve the prognosis of such patients. Our retrospective study found that TKI promoted a longer overall survival in patients with extrahepatic metastases compared to conventional therapies. TKI plus conventional therapies did not promote a better prognosis compared to TKI alone. Thus, conventional therapies can be an option when events that worsen the quality of life occur in HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases.

Abstract

Background: Conventional therapies, including chemoembolization and radiation therapy, have been expected to prolong the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with extrahepatic metastases, which remains poor. However, little information is available on the efficacy of conventional therapies for such patients under tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Methods: We retrospectively investigated 127 HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases, who were divided into the non-TKI (conventional therapies) and TKI groups and further subdivided into the TKI alone and TKI plus conventional therapies groups. Conventional therapies included transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, cisplatin-based chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, and UFT, an oral chemotherapeutic agent. Results: The median of the overall survival (OS) of the 127 patients with extrahepatic metastases was 7.0 months. Meanwhile, the median OS of the TKI and non-TKI groups was 12.1 and 4.1 months, respectively. Imitating TKI after diagnosing metastases promoted a favorable increase in OS. Among the TKI group, the median OS in the TKI alone group was 8.9 months. TKI plus conventional therapies promoted no improvement in OS after adjusting for the patients’ background data. Conclusion: TKI promoted a better OS in HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases compared to conventional therapies. However, TKI plus conventional therapies promoted no improvement in the prognosis of such patients.