Distinct spatio-temporal and spectral brain patterns for different thermal stimuli perception

Effective brain connectivity related to non-painful thermal stimuli using EEG

Understanding the brain response to thermal stimuli is crucial in the sensory experience. This study focuses on non-painful thermal stimuli, which are sensations induced by temperature changes without causing discomfort. These stimuli are transmitted to the central nervous system through specific nerve fibers and are processed in various regions of the brain, including the insular cortex, the prefrontal cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex. Despite the prevalence of studies on painful stimuli, non-painful thermal stimuli have been less explored. This research aims to bridge this gap by investigating brain functional connectivity during the perception of non-painful warm and cold stimuli using electroencephalography (EEG) and the partial directed coherence technique (PDC). Our results demonstrate a clear contrast in the direction of information flow between warm and cold stimuli, particularly in the theta and alpha frequency bands, mainly in frontal and temporal regions. The use of PDC highlights the complexity of brain connectivity during these stimuli and reinforces the existence of different pathways in the brain to process different types of non-painful warm and cold stimuli.

Neural correlates of thermal stimulation during active touch

Introduction

Thermal feedback technologies have been explored in human-computer interaction to provide secondary information and enhance the overall user experience. Unlike fast-response haptic modalities such as vibration and force feedback, the human brain's processes associated with thermal feedback are not fully understood.

Methods

In this study, we utilize electroencephalography (EEG) brain imaging to systematically examine the neural correlates associated with a wide range of thermal stimuli, including 9, 15, 32, and 42°C, during active touch at the fingertip. A custom experimental setup is developed to provide thermal stimulation at the desirable temperature levels. A total of 30 participants are recruited to experience the four levels of thermal stimulation by actively touching a thermal stimulation unit with the index finger while recording brain activities via EEG. Time-frequency analysis and power spectral density (PSD) of the EEG data are utilized to analyze the delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands.

Results

The results show that the delta, theta, and alpha PSDs of 9 and 15°C stimuli are significantly higher than the PSDs of 32 and 42°C in the right frontal area during the early stage of the stimulation, from 282 ms up to 1,108 ms (One-way ANOVA test, Holm-Bonferroni correction, p < 0.05). No significant differences in PSDs are found between 9 and 15°C thermal stimuli or between 32 and 42°C thermal stimuli.

Discussion

The findings of this study inform the development of thermal feedback system in human-computer interaction.

Pain Classification using Evoked EEG Induced by Thermal Grill Illusion - Deep Neural Network Approach

As the quantification of pain has emerged in biomedical engineering today, studies have been developing biomarkers associated with pain actively by measuring bio-signals such as electroencephalogram (EEG). Recently, some EEG studies of cold and hot pain have been reported. However, they used one type of stimulus condition for each trial and a relatively long stimulation time to collect EEG features. In this study, EEG signals during Cool (20 °C), Warm (40 °C), and Thermal Grill Illusion (TGI, 20-40 °C) stimuli were collected from 43 subjects, and were classified by a deep convolutional neural network referred to as EEGNet. Three binary classifications for the three conditions (TGI, Cool, Warm) were conducted for each subject individually. Classification accuracies for TGI-Cool, TGI-Warm, and Warm-Cool were 0.74±0.01, 0.71±0.01, and 0.74±0.01, respectively. For subjects who rated the TGI significantly hotter than the Warm stimulus, the classification accuracy for TGI-Cool (0.74±0.01) was significantly higher than for TGI-Warm (0.71±0.01). In contrast, the classification accuracy for TGI-Cool (0.72±0.03) did not differ statistically from TGI-Warm (0.73±0.01) in subjects without illusion. We found that the TGI and Cool stimuli were classified better than the TGI and Warm stimuli, implying that objective EEG features are consistent with subjective behavioral results. Further, we observed that most discriminative features between the TGI and the Cool or Warm conditions appeared in the parietal area for subjects who perceived the illusion. We postulate that the somato-sensory cortex may be activated when TGI is perceived to be hot pain.