Therapeutic response to leflunomide in combo therapy and monotherapy is associated to serum teriflunomide (A77 1726) levels

Serum teriflunomide concentrations in routine multiple sclerosis therapy: A cross-sectional pilot study

BACKGROUND

Teriflunomide is administered orally to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. In this prospective pilot study, the free and total serum concentrations of teriflunomide obtained during routine health care were measured and their relationship with disease activity was evaluated.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients were included in this study. Blood samples were collected from April 2021 to February 2022, and free and total teriflunomide serum concentrations were measured. Patient assessment involved monitoring of blood counts and potential adverse effects of teriflunomide.

RESULTS

In the steady-state group, total teriflunomide concentrations ranged from 14.7 to 144.2 mg/L, while free concentrations from 31.1 to 389.7 μg/L. In the non-steady-state group, the total concentration ranged from 2.2 to 59.3 mg/L, with free concentrations ranging from 6.8 to 143.5 μg/L. In the steady-state group, a significant inverse correlation was found between absolute peripheral blood lymphocyte count and both total and free teriflunomide serum concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Although all patients were treated with the same dose, up to a 10-fold difference in total and free teriflunomide serum concentrations, and up to a 5-fold difference in steady-state trough concentrations were observed. This vast interindividual variability can potentially lead to toxicity or, conversely, to suboptimal therapeutic concentrations of teriflunomide, with the risk of further worsening of multiple sclerosis compensation.

Clinical Pharmacology in Sarcoidosis: How to Use and Monitor Sarcoidosis Medications

When sarcoidosis needs treatment, pharmacotherapy is usually required. Although glucocorticoids work reliably and relatively quickly for sarcoidosis, these drugs are associated with numerous significant side effects. Such side effects are common in sarcoidosis patients, as the disease frequently has a chronic course and glucocorticoid treatment courses are often prolonged. For these reasons, corticosteroid-sparing and corticosteroid-replacing therapies are often required for sarcoidosis. Unfortunately, many healthcare providers who care for sarcoidosis patients are not familiar with the use of these agents. In this manuscript, we provide a review of the pharmacotherapy of sarcoidosis. We discuss the mechanism of action, dosing, side-effect profile, approach to monitoring and patient counselling concerning glucocorticoids, and the common alternative drugs recommended for use in the recent European Respiratory Society (Lausanne, Switzerland) Sarcoidosis Treatment Guidelines. We also discuss the use of these agents in special situations including hepatic insufficiency, renal insufficiency, pregnancy, breastfeeding, vaccination, and drug-drug interactions. It is hoped that this manuscript will provide valuable practical guidance to clinicians who care for sarcoidosis patients.

Inappropriate treatment response to DMARDs: A pathway to difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis

In recent years, difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) has attracted significant attention from rheumatologists due to its poor treatment response and the persistent symptoms or signs experienced by patients. The therapeutic demands of patients with D2T RA are not properly met due to unclear pathogenic causes and a lack of high-quality data for current treatment options, creating considerable management difficulties with this patient population. This review describes the clinical challenges associated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and explores contributing factors associated with inappropriate response to DMARDs that may lead to D2T RA and related immunological dysregulation. It is now understood that D2T RA is a highly heterogeneous pathological status that involves multiple factors. These factors include but are not limited to genetics, environment, immunogenicity, comorbidities, adverse drug reactions, inappropriate drug application, poor adherence, and socioeconomic status. Besides, these factors may manifest in the selection and utilization of specific DMARDs, either individually or in combination, thereby contributing to inadequate treatment response. Finding these variables may offer hints for enhancing DMARD therapy plans and bettering the condition of D2T RA patients.

Development of a population pharmacokinetic model and optimal dosing regimen of leflunomide in Korean population

PURPOSE

Leflunomide is an immunosuppressive drug indicated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). While the pharmacokinetics (PK) of its active metabolite A771726 reportedly show large interindividual variability, no efficient dose individualization strategy is currently available. The goal of this work was to develop a population PK model for A771726 and propose an optimal individualized dosing strategy.

METHODS

A771726 plasma concentration data were collected from 50 healthy male volunteers participating in two leflunomide PK studies given a single oral dose of 40 mg. Concentrations were elevated in low body weight (WT) subjects and showed multiple peaks. Thus, A771726 PK modeling was conducted incorporating allometry scaling and enterohepatic circulation (EHC). For dose optimization, simulating a set of 1000 virtual subjects from the developed model and dividing the subjects into 5 groups with WT of 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 kg, respectively, the optimal dose was explored that achieves the drug concentration most similar to the target, which was defined as the concentration for the 70 kg subject treated with the current standard dosage regimen (the loading dose of 100 mg QD for 3 days, followed by the maintenance dose of 20 mg QD).

RESULTS

The data were best described by a two compartment model with first order absorption incorporating EHC with the bile released into the intestine. None of the covariates tested was found to be significant other than WT used in allometry. Simulation showed that the optimal loading dose increased by 15 mg for every 10 kg increment in WT while the optimal maintenance dose was 15 and 25 mg for 50 and 90 kg groups, respectively, and the same (= 20 mg) for the others. Large concentration differences from the target observed in low and high WT groups disappeared when optimal doses were given.

CONCLUSIONS

This work demonstrates the importance of a population PK model-based dose optimization approach in maintaining drug therapeutic concentrations in leflunomide treatment.