Prognostic signature based on m6A-related lncRNAs to predict overall survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Methyltransferase-like 3 modifications of RNAs: Implications for the pathology in the endocrine system

Methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) is the most well-known element of N6-methyladenosine modification on RNAs. METTL3 deposits a methyl group onto target RNAs to modify their expression, ultimately regulating various physiological and pathological events. Numerous studies have suggested the significant role of METTL3 in endocrine dysfunction and related disorders. However, reviews that summarize and interpret these studies are lacking. In this review, we systematically analyze such studies, including obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), T2DM-induced diseases, pancreatic cancer, and thyroid carcinoma. This review indicates that METTL3 contributes remarkably to the endocrine dysfunction and progression of obesity, T2DM, T2DM-induced diseases, pancreatic cancer, and thyroid carcinoma. In conclusion, this review provides a comprehensive interpretation of the mechanism via which METTL3 functions on RNAs and regulates various endocrine dysfunction events and suggest potential associated correlations. Our review, thus, provides a valuable reference for further fundamental studies and clinical applications.

Identification of a novel m6A-related lncRNAs signature and immunotherapeutic drug sensitivity in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) ranks as the fourth leading cause for cancer-related deaths worldwide. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are closely related with poor prognosis and immunotherapeutic effect in PDAC. The aim of this study is to construct and validate a m6A-related lncRNAs signature and assess immunotherapeutic drug sensitivity in PDAC.

METHODS

RNA-seq data for 178 cases of PDAC patients and 167 cases of normal pancreatic tissue were obtained from TCGA and GTEx databases, respectively. A set of 21 m6A-related genes were downloaded based on the previous report. Co-expression network was conducted to identify m6A-related lncRNAs in PDAC. Cox analyses and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression model were used to construct a risk prognosis model. The relationship between signature genes and immune function was explored by single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA). The tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) score and tumor mutation burden (TMB) were utilized to evaluate the response to immunotherapy. Furthermore, the expression levels of 4 m6A-related lncRNAs on PDAC cell lines were measured by the quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). The drug sensitivity between the high- and low-risk groups was validated using PDAC cell lines by Cell-Counting Kit 8 (CCK8).

RESULTS

The risk prognosis model was successfully constructed based on 4 m6A-related lncRNAs, and PDAC patients were divided into the high- and low-risk groups. The overall survival (OS) of the high-risk groups was more unfavorable compared with the low-risk groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated that the risk prognosis model reasonably predicted the 2-, 3- and 5-year OS of PDAC patients. qPCR analysis confirmed the decreased expression levels of 4 m6A-related lncRNAs in PDAC cells compared to the normal pancreatic cells. Furthermore, CCK8 assay revealed that Phenformin exhibited higher sensitivity in the high-risk groups, while Pyrimethamine exhibited higher sensitivity in the low-risk groups.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of patients with PDAC were well predicted in the risk prognosis model based on m6A-related lncRNAs, and selected immunotherapy drugs have potential values for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Regulatory role of RNA modifications in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an extremely life-threatening malignancy with a relatively unfavorable prognosis. The early occurrence of metastasis and local recurrence subsequent to surgery contribute to the poor survival rates of PDAC patients, thereby limiting the effectiveness of surgical intervention. Additionally, the desmoplastic and immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment of PDAC diminishes its responsiveness to conventional treatment modalities such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Therefore, it is imperative to identify novel therapeutic targets for PDAC treatment. Chemical modifications are prevalent in various types of RNA and exert significant influence on their structure and functions. RNA modifications, exemplified by m6A, m5C, m1A, and Ψ, have been identified as general regulators of cellular functions. The abundance of specific modifications, such as m6A, has been correlated with cell proliferation, invasion, migration, and patient prognosis in PDAC. Pre-clinical data has indicated that manipulating RNA modification regulators could enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Therefore, targeting RNA modifications in conjunction with current adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy holds promise. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of RNA modifications in PDAC treatment, encompassing their behaviors, mechanisms, and potential treatment targets. Therefore, it aims to stimulate the development of novel therapeutic approaches and future clinical trials.

Liquid biopsy techniques and pancreatic cancer: diagnosis, monitoring, and evaluation

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most common malignancies. Surgical resection is a potential curative approach for PC, but most patients are unsuitable for operations when at the time of diagnosis. Even with surgery, some patients may still experience tumour metastasis during the operation or shortly after surgery, as precise prognosis evaluation is not always possible. If patients miss the opportunity for surgery and resort to chemotherapy, they may face the challenging issue of chemotherapy resistance. In recent years, liquid biopsy has shown promising prospects in disease diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and prognosis assessment. As a noninvasive detection method, liquid biopsy offers advantages over traditional diagnostic procedures, such as tissue biopsy, in terms of both cost-effectiveness and convenience. The information provided by liquid biopsy helps clinical practitioners understand the molecular mechanisms underlying tumour occurrence and development, enabling the formulation of more precise and personalized treatment decisions for each patient. This review introduces molecular biomarkers and detection methods in liquid biopsy for PC, including circulating tumour cells (CTCs), circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), and extracellular vesicles (EVs) or exosomes. Additionally, we summarize the applications of liquid biopsy in the early diagnosis, treatment response, resistance assessment, and prognostic evaluation of PC.

The lncRNA epigenetics: The significance of m6A and m5C lncRNA modifications in cancer

Most of our transcribed RNAs are represented by non-coding sequences. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are transcripts with no or very limited protein coding ability and a length >200nt. They can be epigenetically modified. N6-methyladenosine (m6A), N1-methyladenosine (m1A), 5-methylcytosine (m5C), 7-methylguanosine (m7G) and 2’-O-methylation (Nm) are some of the lncRNAs epigenetic modifications. The epigenetic modifications of RNA are controlled by three classes of enzymes, each playing a role in a specific phase of the modification. These enzymes are defined as “writers”, “readers” and “erasers”. m6A and m5C are the most studied epigenetic modifications in RNA. These modifications alter the structure and properties, thus modulating the functions and interactions of lncRNAs. The aberrant expression of several lncRNAs is linked to the development of a variety of cancers and the epigenetic signatures of m6A- or m5C-related lncRNAs are increasingly recognized as potential biomarkers of prognosis, predictors of disease stage and overall survival. In the present manuscript, the most up to date literature is reviewed with the focus on m6A and m5C modifications of lncRNAs and their significance in cancer.

Construction and comprehensive analysis of a novel prognostic signature associated with pyroptosis molecular subtypes in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Background

Treatment of cancer with pyroptosis is an emerging strategy. Molecular subtypes based on pyroptosis-related genes(PRGs) seem to be considered more conducive to individualized therapy. It is meaningful to construct a pyroptosis molecular subtypes-related prognostic signature (PMSRPS) to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma(PAAD) and guide treatment.

Methods

Based on the transcriptome data of 23 PRGs, consensus clustering was applied to divide the TCGA and GSE102238 combined cohort into three PRGclusters. Prognosis-related differentially expressed genes(DEGs) among PRGclusters were subjected to LASSO Cox regression analysis to determine a PMSRPS. External cohort and in vitro experiments were conducted to verify this PMSRPS. The CIBERSORT algorithm, the ESTIMATE algorithm and the Immunophenoscore (IPS) were used to analyze the infiltrating abundance of immune cells, the tumor microenvironment (TME), and the response to immunotherapy, respectively. Wilcoxon analysis was used to compare tumor mutational burden (TMB) and RNA stemness scores (RNAss) between groups. RT-qPCR and in vitro functional experiments were used for evaluating the expression and function of SFTA2.

Results

Based on three PRGclusters, 828 DEGs were obtained and a PMSRPS was subsequently constructed. In internal and external validation, patients in the high-risk group had significantly lower OS than those in the low-risk group and PMSRPS was confirmed to be an independent prognostic risk factor for patients with PAAD with good predictive performance. Immune cell infiltration abundance and TME scores indicate patients in the high-risk group have typical immunosuppressive microenvironment characteristics. Analysis of IPS suggests patients in the high-risk group responded better to novel immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) than PD1/CTLA4. The high-risk group had higher TMB and RNAss. In addition, 10 potential small-molecule compounds were screened out. Finally, we found that the mRNA expression of SFTA2 gene with the highest risk coefficient in PMSRPS was significantly higher in PAAD than in paracancerous tissues, and knockdown of it significantly delayed the progression of PAAD.

Conclusions

PMSRPS can well predict the prognosis, TME and immunotherapy response of patients with PAAD, identify potential drugs, and provide treatment guidance based on individual needs.