Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of milvexian in healthy Japanese participants

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of milvexian with aspirin and/or clopidogrel in healthy participants

Milvexian, an oral activated Factor XI (FXIa) inhibitor, is in clinical studies where it may be combined with antiplatelet agents, including aspirin and/or clopidogrel, to prevent thromboembolic diseases. This phase I trial assessed safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of milvexian coadministration with aspirin and/or clopidogrel in healthy participants through 3 drug-drug interaction studies using a 3-period, 3-treatment, crossover design. A total of 113 participants were randomized to receive milvexian (200 mg; twice daily for 5 days) or matched placebo coadministered with once-daily aspirin (325 mg for 5 days) and/or clopidogrel (Day 1: 300 mg; Days 2-5: 75 mg). Milvexian was safe and well tolerated, with and without aspirin and/or clopidogrel. Eight mild bleeding adverse events (AEs) were reported in 5 of 113 participants across various treatment arms. Peak and total exposures of milvexian were similar with or without clopidogrel and/or aspirin. Exposure-dependent prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time and reduction of FXI clotting activity by milvexian were similar with coadministration of aspirin and/or clopidogrel. Milvexian, with or without coadministration of aspirin and/or clopidogrel, did not affect bleeding time or platelet aggregation. Administration of milvexian alone or with aspirin and/or clopidogrel was safe and well tolerated without increased incidence of AEs, including bleeding. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of milvexian, including bleeding time, were similar with or without aspirin and/or clopidogrel.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03698513.

Milvexian: A Focus on a New Oral Anticoagulant that Targets Factor XIa for Thromboembolism Prophylaxis

Drugs that target factor XI and/or XIa have been evaluated as alternatives to existing anticoagulants, in light of studies that indicate that a decrease in Factor XI/XIa levels or activity may result in a lower risk of thrombosis without a significant increase in bleeding risk. Milvexian is an investigational small-molecule factor XIa inhibitor that has recently completed phase 2 clinical trials. Preclinical studies were suggestive of its potential to prevent arterial and venous thrombosis. It was well-tolerated in healthy participants, as well as in participants with mild or moderate hepatic impairment and moderate or severe renal impairment. Notably, patients who received milvexian after knee arthroplasty had a dose-proportional lower incidence of venous thromboembolism compared to patients who received postoperative enoxaparin, and they had a lower incidence of clinically relevant bleeding. A separate phase 2 trial was conducted that assessed the use of milvexian for secondary stroke prevention in patients who had ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. It failed its primary objective of establishing a dose-response relationship between milvexian and a composite endpoint of symptomatic ischemic stroke or covert brain infarction. The trial did, however, show a reduction in the relative risk of symptomatic ischemic stroke across most of the treatment groups receiving various dosages of milvexian compared to placebo. The efficacy of milvexian in secondary stroke prevention will be further assessed in an upcoming phase 3 trial. Additional upcoming phase 3 trials will also assess its efficacy in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation as well as in event reduction in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Factor XI inhibitors for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: A new therapeutic approach on the horizon?

Anticoagulant drugs that are currently used to prevent and/or treat thrombosis have some limitations that hinder their ability to meet specific clinical requirements. While these drugs effectively reduce the rates of thrombotic events, they simultaneously increase the risk of bleeding. Moreover, their risk-to-benefit balance is problematic in some patients, such as those with severe chronic kidney disease or those at high bleeding risk. A novel anticoagulation method, FXI inhibition has emerged as a promising alternative. It demonstrates a strong rationale for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and the potential fulfillment of unmet clinical needs in the cardiovascular field. A number of FXI inhibitors are currently undergoing clinical investigation. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of early results of research on FXI inhibitors in the cardiovascular setting, offering valuable insights into their potential role in shaping the future of anticoagulation.

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Factor XIa Inhibitors in Stroke Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Despite preventive measures, stroke rates remain high in the primary and secondary prevention settings. Factor XIa inhibition may offer a novel, safe and effective antithrombotic option for stroke prevention.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis including all available randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy and safety of factor XIa inhibitors versus controls in primary or secondary stroke prevention. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes of interest were symptomatic ischemic stroke (IS) and the composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding.

RESULTS

Four phase II dose-finding RCTs were included, comprising a total of 4732 patients treated with factor XIa inhibitors versus 1798 controls. Treatment with factor XIa inhibitors did not reduce the risk of IS compared to controls (RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.67-1.17). The composite of symptomatic IS and covert infarcts on brain MRI (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.87-1.18), the composite of symptomatic IS and transient ischemic attack (TIA; RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.61-1.01), and the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.87-1.31) did not differ between the treatment groups. Treatment with factor XIa inhibitors did not increase the risk of the composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.65-2.16), major bleeding alone (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.64-2.22), intracranial bleeding (RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.26-3.19) or all-cause mortality (RR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.77-1.90).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provides reassuring evidence regarding the safety of factor XIa inhibitors. These findings, coupled with potential signals of efficacy in reducing IS (and TIA), underscore the importance of ongoing phase III RCTs for providing definitive data regarding the effect of factor XIa inhibition on stroke prevention.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Major Orthopedic Surgeries and Factor XIa Inhibitors

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), poses a significant risk during and after hospitalization, particularly for surgical patients. Among various patient groups, those undergoing major orthopedic surgeries are considered to have a higher susceptibility to PE and DVT. Major lower-extremity orthopedic procedures carry a higher risk of symptomatic VTE compared to most other surgeries, with an estimated incidence of ~4%. The greatest risk period occurs within the first 7-14 days following surgery. Major bleeding is also more prevalent in these surgeries compared to others, with rates estimated between 2% and 4%. For patients undergoing major lower-extremity orthopedic surgery who have a low bleeding risk, it is recommended to use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with or without mechanical devices. The choice of the initial agent depends on the specific surgery and patient comorbidities. First-line options include low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), direct oral anticoagulants, and aspirin. Second-line options consist of unfractionated heparin (UFH), fondaparinux, and warfarin. For most patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty, the initial agents recommended for the early perioperative period are LMWHs (enoxaparin or dalteparin) or direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban or apixaban). In the case of hip fracture surgery, LMWH is recommended as the preferred agent for the entire duration of prophylaxis. However, emerging factor XI(a) inhibitors, as revealed by a recent meta-analysis, have shown a substantial decrease in the occurrence of VTE and bleeding events among patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. This discovery poses a challenge to the existing paradigm of anticoagulant therapy in this specific patient population and indicates that factor XI(a) inhibitors hold great promise as a potential strategy to be taken into serious consideration.

Factor XIa Inhibitors as a Novel Anticoagulation Target: Recent Clinical Research Advances

BACKGROUND

While current clinically administered anticoagulant medications have demonstrated effectiveness, they have also precipitated significant risks: severe bleeding complications including, but not limited to, gastrointestinal hemorrhaging and intracranial and other life-threatening major bleedings. An ongoing effort is being made to identify the best targets for anticoagulant-targeted drugs. Coagulation factor XIa (FXIa) is emerging as an important target of current anticoagulant treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This review will summarize the development of anticoagulants and recent advances in clinical trials of experimental factor XI inhibitors from a clinical application perspective.

RESULTS

As of 1 January 2023, our search screening included 33 clinical trials. We summarized the research progress of FXIa inhibitors from seven clinical trials that evaluated their efficacy and safety. The results showed no statistically meaningful distinction in the primary efficacy between patients receiving FXIa inhibitors compared to controls (RR = 0.796; 95% CI: 0.606-1.046; I² = 68%). The outcomes did not indicate a statistical difference in the occurrence of any bleeding between patients receiving FXIa inhibitors compared to controls (RR = 0.717; 95% CI: 0.502-1.023; I² = 60%). A subgroup analysis found significant differences in severe bleeding and clinically relevant hemorrhaging in subjects receiving FXIa inhibitors compared to Enoxaparin (RR = 0.457; 95% CI: 0.256-0.816; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trials to date have indicated that factor XIa is a potential anticoagulation target, and factor XIa inhibitors may play an important role in the development of anticoagulants.

Factor XI, a potential target for anticoagulation therapy for venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of mortality and disability in hospitalized patients, and anticoagulation is an essential therapeutic option. Despite the increasing use of direct oral anticoagulants, complications and adverse drug reactions still occur in patients with VTE. Within 5 years, 20% of patients with VTE experience recurrence, and 50% of patients with deep vein thrombosis develop post-thrombotic syndrome. Furthermore, bleeding due to anticoagulants is a side effect that must be addressed. Therefore, safer and more effective anticoagulant strategies with higher patient compliance are urgently needed. Available epidemiological evidence and animal studies have shown that factor XI (FXI) inhibitors can reduce thrombus size and loosen the thrombus structure with a relatively low risk of bleeding, suggesting that FXI has an important role in thrombus stabilization and is a safer target for anticoagulation. Recent clinical trial data have also shown that FXI inhibitors are as effective as enoxaparin and apixaban in preventing VTE, but with a significantly lower incidence of bleeding. Furthermore, FXI inhibitors can be administered daily or monthly; therefore, the monitoring interval can be longer. Additionally, FXI inhibitors can prolong the activated partial thromboplastin time without affecting prothrombin time, which is an easy and common test used in clinical testing, providing a cost-effective monitoring routine for patients. Consequently, the inhibition of FXI may be an effective strategy for the prevention and treatment of VTE. Enormous progress has been made in the research strategies for FXI inhibitors, with abelacimab already in phase III clinical trials and most other inhibitors in phase I or II trials. In this review, we discuss the challenges of VTE therapy, briefly describe the structure and function of FXI, summarize the latest FXI/activated FXI (FXIa) inhibitor strategies, and summarize the latest developments in clinical trials of FXI/FXIa inhibitors.