1
|
Ruiz-Lozano RE, Quiroga-Garza ME, Ramos-Dávila EM, Pantaleón-García J, Khodor A, Komai S, Rodriguez-Gutierrez LA, Ma S, Mousa HM, Mattes R, Stinnett SS, Sabater AL, Perez VL. Comparative Evaluation of the Corneal Sensitivity Thresholds between the Novel Non-Contact and Cochet-Bonnet Esthesiometers. Am J Ophthalmol 2025; 271:407-416. [PMID: 39701509 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2024] [Revised: 12/13/2024] [Accepted: 12/13/2024] [Indexed: 12/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Primarily, to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the new noncontact esthesiometer (NCE) in healthy subjects. Secondarily, the corneal sensitivity threshold measurements of the NCE were compared with those of the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (CBE). DESIGN Assessment reliability study. METHODS Two examiners measured bilateral corneal sensitivity thresholds by NCE and CBE. Triple NCE measurements were performed per eye at all 5 levels, whereas single CBE measurements were performed per eye. When appropriate, NCE (mBar) and CBE (mm) measurements were converted to millinewtons (mN) for direct comparison between devices. The NCE measurement variations were calculated with the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for the primary objective. For the secondary objective, Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (95%-LoA) and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the level of agreement and linear relationship between the corneal sensitivity thresholds obtained with both devices. Generalized estimating equation models were used to account for the inter-eye correlation of the same study participant. RESULTS Fifty subjects (100 eyes) aged 29 years (median) were included. There were no statistically significant differences in the pressure measured by both observers at each NCE level (all P > .05). There was a high intra-observer and inter-observer repeatability of the NCE measurements (ICC > 0.90) and a strong linear correlation (rho > 0.7) at each NCE level. The difference between the mean corneal sensitivity thresholds (mN) measured with the NCE (0.052 ± 0.021 mN) and CBE (0.046 ± 0.005 mN) was statistically significant (P = .001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a differential bias of +0.00578 mN (95%-LoA -0.03677 - +0.04833 mN) between threshold measurements. CONCLUSIONS The NCE provides reliable user-independent corneal sensitivity measurements. The NCE and CBE do not yield similar values. Thus, both devices cannot be used interchangeably.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raul E Ruiz-Lozano
- From the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA; Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico
| | | | - Eugenia M Ramos-Dávila
- Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Jezreel Pantaleón-García
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ali Khodor
- From the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Seitaro Komai
- From the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Symon Ma
- From the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Hazem M Mousa
- Department of Ophthalmology, Foster Center for Ocular Immunology at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Robby Mattes
- From the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Sandra S Stinnett
- Associate Professor of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alfonso L Sabater
- From the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Victor L Perez
- From the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Przybek-Skrzypecka J, Samelska K, Ordon AJ, Skrzypecki J, Izdebska J, Kołątaj M, Szaflik JP. Post-Keratoplasty Microbial Keratitis in the Era of Lamellar Transplants-A Comprehensive Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2326. [PMID: 38673599 PMCID: PMC11051457 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Microbial keratitis in a post-transplant cornea should be considered a distinct entity from microbial keratitis in a non-transplant cornea. Firstly, the use of immunosuppressive treatments and sutures in corneal transplants changes the etiology of keratitis. Secondly, corneal transplant has an impact on corneal biomechanics and structure, which facilitates the spread of infection. Finally, the emergence of lamellar transplants has introduced a new form of keratitis known as interface keratitis. Given these factors, there is a clear need to update our understanding of and management strategies for microbial keratitis following corneal transplantation, especially in the era of lamellar transplants. To address this, a comprehensive review is provided, covering the incidence, risk factors, causes, and timing of microbial keratitis, as well as both clinical and surgical management approaches for its treatment in cases of penetrating and lamellar corneal transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Przybek-Skrzypecka
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Marszałkowska 24/26, 00-576 Warsaw, Poland; (K.S.); (J.I.); (J.P.S.)
- SPKSO Ophthalmic University Hospital in Warsaw, 00-576 Warsaw, Poland; (A.J.O.); (M.K.)
| | - Katarzyna Samelska
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Marszałkowska 24/26, 00-576 Warsaw, Poland; (K.S.); (J.I.); (J.P.S.)
- SPKSO Ophthalmic University Hospital in Warsaw, 00-576 Warsaw, Poland; (A.J.O.); (M.K.)
| | - Agata Joanna Ordon
- SPKSO Ophthalmic University Hospital in Warsaw, 00-576 Warsaw, Poland; (A.J.O.); (M.K.)
- Department of Binocular Vision Pathophysiology and Strabismus, Medical University of Lodz, 90-647 Lodz, Poland
| | - Janusz Skrzypecki
- Department of Experimental Physiology and Pathophysiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 00-576 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Justyna Izdebska
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Marszałkowska 24/26, 00-576 Warsaw, Poland; (K.S.); (J.I.); (J.P.S.)
- SPKSO Ophthalmic University Hospital in Warsaw, 00-576 Warsaw, Poland; (A.J.O.); (M.K.)
| | - Marta Kołątaj
- SPKSO Ophthalmic University Hospital in Warsaw, 00-576 Warsaw, Poland; (A.J.O.); (M.K.)
| | - Jacek P. Szaflik
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Marszałkowska 24/26, 00-576 Warsaw, Poland; (K.S.); (J.I.); (J.P.S.)
- SPKSO Ophthalmic University Hospital in Warsaw, 00-576 Warsaw, Poland; (A.J.O.); (M.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Niazi S, del Barrio JA, Doroodgar F, Javadi MA, Alió JL. Main issues in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: A systematic narrative review. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 2024; 14:34-43. [PMID: 38654987 PMCID: PMC11034680 DOI: 10.4103/tjo.tjo-d-23-00175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) has emerged as a transformative approach in managing corneal pathologies, notably keratoconus (KC), providing a viable alternative to penetrating keratoplasty (PK). This systematic review explores the intricacies of DALK, comparing its preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations with PK. Extensive literature searches revealed a wealth of data regarding DALK's advantages and challenges, with an emphasis on graft survival, visual outcomes, and complications. In the preoperative phase, DALK showcases its versatility, catering to a wide spectrum of patients, including those with KC and ocular surface disorders. Intraoperatively, it offers innovative techniques to address emphysema, bubble formation, and Descemet's membrane perforation, all while maintaining a strong focus on patient-centered outcomes. Postoperatively, DALK's lower rejection rates and decreased complications underscore its potential superiority over PK, although unique challenges such as graft failure from nonimmunologic factors demand vigilant management. This comprehensive review not only serves as a valuable resource for ophthalmic surgeons but also sheds light on the evolving landscape of corneal transplantation, highlighting DALK's role as a transformative force in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sana Niazi
- Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Negah Aref Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jorge Alió del Barrio
- Department of Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Vissum Corporación, Alicante, Spain
| | - Farideh Doroodgar
- Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Negah Aref Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Ali Javadi
- Ophthalmic Research Center, Labbafinezhad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jorge L. Alió
- Division of Ophthalmology, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Alicante, Spain
- Vissum Miranza, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen S, Zhang J, Tian J, Zhao C, Liu C, Sun X, Gao X, Zhang Y, Wang J, Li N, Liu H, Gao Y, Ma X, Li J, Deng A, Wang T, Yuan G. A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of a New Corneal Wetting Agent During Ophthalmologic Surgery. Ophthalmol Ther 2023; 12:3211-3218. [PMID: 37768528 PMCID: PMC10640533 DOI: 10.1007/s40123-023-00818-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A multicenter prospective randomized controlled study was used to investigate the effect and safety of a new corneal wetting agent called the Corneal Surface Viscoelastic Protector (CsVisc, Success Bio-Tech Co., Ltd, China), on the corneal epithelium during ophthalmic surgery by comparison with the commercially available Cornea Protect (CP, Valeant Med Sp. zo. o. Leobendorf, Austria). METHODS This multicenter prospective randomized controlled study comprised patients scheduled for cataract surgery and pars plana vitrectomy. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either a new corneal wetting agent (CsVisc) or Cornea Protect (CP, Valeant Med Sp. zo. o. Leobendorf, Austria). Optical clarity during surgery, application frequency, duration of effect, diffusion time of corneal wetting agents, fluorescein staining, intraocular pressure (IOP), tear-film break-up time (TBUT), and Schirmer I test (SIT) were assessed. Adverse events were noted on the designated patient case report forms. RESULTS A total of 149 eyes (149 patients, mean age 62 years; range 25-80 years) were included in the study. There were 74 eyes in the control group and 75 eyes in the study group. In patients who underwent vitrectomy, the frequency of application was 1.62 ± 1.03 in the study group and 1.39 ± 0.66 in the control group, with no significant difference (P = 0.399), and the duration of effect was 19.16 ± 6.94 min in the study group and 19.06 ± 7.22 min in the control group, with no significant difference (P = 0.835). The optical clarity of the study group was not significantly different from that of the control group (P = 0.485). In patients who underwent cataract surgery, the frequency of application was 1.10 ± 0.38 in the study group and 1.07 ± 0.26 in the control group, and the difference was not significant (P = 0.950). The difference between the duration of effect in the study group (8.32 ± 2.50 min) and the control group (7.63 ± 2.52 min) was not significant (P = 0.310). The difference in optical clarity scores between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.600). Among all patients in this study, the diffusion time of the corneal wetting agent was 14.97 ± 10.07 s in the control group and 11.23 ± 8.41 s in the study group, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.008). The frequency of adverse events was 20.00% (15/75) in the study group and 14.86% (11/74) in the control group, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.409). There were no serious adverse events related to the test medical device or causing patients to withdraw from the study. CONCLUSIONS The CsVisc is safe and effective in preventing intraoperative corneal epithelial damage due to corneal dryness and can be comparable to the CP. In addition, the CsVisc has a shorter diffusion time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shijiu Chen
- Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Jingjing Zhang
- Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Jingyi Tian
- Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Can Zhao
- Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Chunli Liu
- Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaolei Sun
- Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Xiang Gao
- Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, School of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, 261000, Shandong, China
| | - Na Li
- Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, School of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, 261000, Shandong, China
| | - Hong Liu
- Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, School of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, 261000, Shandong, China
| | - Yan Gao
- Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 5 Yanerdao Road, Qingdao, 266073, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Xiubin Ma
- Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 5 Yanerdao Road, Qingdao, 266073, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Jun Li
- Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 5 Yanerdao Road, Qingdao, 266073, Shandong, China.
- State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
- School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
| | - Aijun Deng
- Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, School of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, 261000, Shandong, China.
| | - Ting Wang
- Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
- Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China.
- State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
- School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
| | - Gongqiang Yuan
- Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
- Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China.
- State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
- School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|