Impact of systemic dexamethasone administration on oral mucositis induced by anthracycline-containing regimens in breast cancer treatment

Association of oral mucositis induced by anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and subsequent docetaxel treatment for perioperative breast cancer

PURPOSE

Anthracycline-cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel-containing chemotherapy is effective for perioperative breast cancer treatment. However, these treatments frequently induce oral mucositis (OM), with an incidence ranging from 20 to 50%. The association of OM development between different chemotherapeutic treatments remains unclear. Consequently, this study aimed to compare OM development during docetaxel-containing chemotherapy between patients with and without OM experience during previous anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatments to assess the association between OM development and treatment regimens.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients with breast cancer receiving anthracycline-cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel-containing chemotherapy as a perioperative treatment were categorized into the control (no prior OM experience with anthracycline-cyclophosphamide) and OM-experience (OM development during previous treatment) groups and retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was the incidence of all-grade OM in the first docetaxel-containing chemotherapy cycle. Additionally, the incidences of OM and dysgeusia during all treatment cycles and factors associated with the incidence of OM were evaluated.

RESULTS

The incidence of all-grade OM in the first cycle was significantly higher in the OM-experience group (54.2%) than in the control group (10.4%; P < 0.0001). Furthermore, its incidence in all treatment cycles was higher in the OM-experience group (66.7%) than in the control group (12.5%, P < 0.0001). However, the incidence of dysgeusia did not differ between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed OM experience during previous anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatment and concomitant pertuzumab use as independent risk factors for OM development in subsequent docetaxel-containing chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that patients experiencing OM with anthracycline-cyclophosphamide during perioperative breast cancer treatment exhibit symptoms following subsequent docetaxel-containing chemotherapy.

Evaluation of the impact of systemic dexamethasone dosage on docetaxel-induced hand-foot syndrome in patients with breast cancer

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a frequently occurring and treatment-requiring adverse effect of docetaxel. We previously reported that systemic dexamethasone (DEX) prevents the other docetaxel-induced adverse inflammatory effects in a dose-dependent manner. This study aimed to evaluate the dose-dependent efficacy of systemic DEX in attenuating HFS in patients with breast cancer receiving docetaxel. Patients with breast cancer receiving docetaxel (75 mg/m2)-containing regimens (n = 111) were divided into 4 and 8 mg/day DEX groups, with each DEX dose administered on days 2-4, and analyzed retrospectively. Development of all-grade HFS in all treatment cycles was significantly lower in the 8 mg group (50.0%) than in the 4 mg group (73.0%, P = 0.03), with primary endpoint accomplishment. Moreover, its development in the first cycle was also lower in the 8 mg group than in the 4 mg group. These results were confirmed in a propensity score-matched population. Logistic regression analysis suggested higher DEX dosage as an independent preventive factor (adjusted odds ratio 0.35; 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.86, P = 0.02 for all cycles; 0.26, 0.11-0.63, P = 0.003 for the first cycle). Our study suggests that systemic DEX prevents the occurrence of docetaxel-induced HFS in patients with breast cancer in a dose-dependent manner in a real-world setting.

Prevalence and risk factors of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis among adult cancer patients at the cancer unit of Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy is a common treatment for cancer, but it is associated with adverse drug reactions like oral mucositis. This condition destroys basal cells in the oral mucosal layer, causing inflammation and ulceration. This can impact the patient's physical, emotional, and psychological well-being, affecting treatment outcomes and quality of life. This study aims to determine the prevalence, severity, and risk factors of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis among adult cancer patients.

METHODS

The study was a cross-sectional study conducted among adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at the cancer unit of Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital in southwestern Uganda. Data was collected through patient interviews, oral examinations, and patient chart reviews.

RESULTS

Out of 268 patients, 115 (42.9%) experienced oral mucositis. Grade 2 oral mucositis was the most common (44.3%) followed by grade 1 (35.7%) and grade 3 (20.0%). Independent risk factors of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis were female gender (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 2.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-3.78; p-value = 0.005), poor oral hygiene (AOR = 3.70, 95% CI: 1.51-9.10; p-value = 0.04), and receiving chemotherapy containing an alkylating agent (AOR = 3.17, 95% CI: 1.63-6.19; p-value < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The study found that two out of five chemotherapy patients developed oral mucositis, with nearly half being grade 2. The risk factors identified in our study were comparable to those reported in previous studies. Therefore, identification and assessment of cancer patients at high risk for chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis should be routinely done for proper and timely management.

Impact of systemic dexamethasone dosage on docetaxel-induced oral mucositis in patients with breast cancer

Oral mucositis (OM) is a common adverse effect of docetaxel-containing treatment. This study aimed to assess whether dexamethasone (DEX) dose-dependently attenuates docetaxel-induced OM and dysgeusia. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients with breast cancer receiving docetaxel-containing regimens at Hokkaido University Hospital between June 2015 and June 2022. The patients were divided into low-dose and high-dose groups (DEX 4 or 8 mg/day on days 2-4, respectively), and incidence of OM and dysgeusia, and risk factor(s) for OM incidence were evaluated. The incidence of all-grade OM in the first cycle was 57.8% in the low-dose group and 19.2% in the high-dose group (P = 0.0002), which met our primary endpoint. The incidence of OM in all treatment cycles was also significantly lowered by DEX-dose increase (P = 0.01). In contrast, the incidence of dysgeusia was similar between the two groups in the first and all cycles (P = 0.50 and P = 0.28, respectively). These results were also confirmed in a propensity score-matched population. Multivariate logistic regression analysis also suggested that lower DEX dosage was a singular risk factor for all-grade OM incidence. In conclusion, our study suggests that DEX dose-dependently reduces the incidence of OM in docetaxel-containing regimens for breast cancer treatment.

Hospital pharmacist interventions for the management of oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter, prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Oral mucositis is a severe adverse event in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy that may cause the termination of cancer treatment. In this study, we aimed to reveal the benefits of pharmacist interventions in oral health care for patients with HNC receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, prospective cohort study on 173 patients from September 2019 to August 2022. We evaluated the association between the occurrence of oral mucositis during CCRT and various factors in the absence or presence of direct medication instructions from hospital pharmacists.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients received medication instructions from pharmacists (the pharmacist intervention group), whereas 105 patients did not receive instructions (the control group). Logistic regression analysis showed that grade 2 (Gr 2) oral mucositis was significantly lower in patients receiving pharmacist interventions than in patients in the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.96; P = 0.04). The time to onset of Gr 2 oral mucositis was significantly longer in the pharmacist intervention group than in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.97; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Direct intervention, especially when provided by hospital pharmacists, can have a real effect in supporting patients with HNC experiencing severe side effects of treatments. Moreover, the integration of pharmacists into the oral healthcare team is becoming even more essential to reduce the severity of side effects.

Dysgeusia in Patients with Breast Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy-A Narrative Review

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer worldwide. Chemotherapy (CT) is essential for the treatment of BC, but is often accompanied by several side effects, including taste alterations, due to different mechanisms. Although dysgeusia is usually underestimated by clinicians, it is considered very worrying and disturbing by cancer patients undergoing CT, because it induces changes in dietary choices and social habits, affecting their physical and psychological health, with a profound impact on their quality of life. Several strategies and therapies have been proposed to prevent or alleviate CT-induced dysgeusia. This review aimed to evaluate the available evidence on prevalence, pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical consequences, and strategies for managing dysgeusia in BC patients receiving CT. We queried the National Library of Medicine, the Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica dataBASE, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature database, performing a search strategy using database-specific keywords. We found that the literature on this topic is scarce, methodologically limited, and highly heterogeneous in terms of study design and criteria for patient inclusion, making it difficult to obtain definitive results and make recommendations for clinical practice.