Fragment size and dynamics of EGFR-mutated tumor-derived DNA provide prognostic information regarding EGFR-TKI efficacy in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC

Genetic mutation profiling reveals biomarkers for targeted therapy efficacy and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction

The genetic heterogeneity of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations may affect clinical responses and outcomes to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). This study aims to investigate the genomic factors that influence the efficacy and clinical outcomes of first-line, second-line and third-line treatments in NSCLC and explore the heterogeneity of resistance mechanisms.

Materials and methods

This real-world study comprised 65 patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC. Molecular alterations were detected using a customized DNA panel before and after administering targeted therapy. The efficacy and prognosis of each treatment line were evaluated.

Results

In first-generation EGFR-TKIs treatment, gefitinib showed favorable efficacy compared to icotinib and erlotinib, particularly in patients with EGFR L858R mutations. The resistance mechanisms to first-generation EGFR-TKIs varied among different EGFR mutation cohorts and different first-generation EGFR-TKIs. In second-line EGFR-TKIs treatment, EPH receptor A3 (EPHA3), IKAROS family zinc finger 1 (IKZF1), p21 (RAC1) activated kinase 5 (PAK5), DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit (POLE), RAD21 cohesin complex component (RAD21) and RNA binding motif protein 10 (RBM10) mutations were markedly associated with poorer progression-free survival (PFS). Notably, EPHA3, IKZF1 and RBM10 were identified as independent predictors of PFS. The mechanisms of osimertinib resistance exhibited heterogeneity, with a higher proportion of non-EGFR-dependent resistant mutations. In third-line treatments, the combination of osimertinib and anlotinib demonstrated superior efficacy compared to other regimens. Glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 2A (GRIN2A) mutation was an independent risk indicator of shorter OS following third-line treatments.

Conclusions

Comprehending the tumor evolution in NSCLC is advantageous for assessing the efficacy and prognosis at each stage of treatment, providing valuable insights to guide personalized treatment decisions for patients.

Liquid biopsy for the management of NSCLC patients under osimertinib treatment

Therapeutic management of NSCLC patients is quite challenging as they are mainly diagnosed at a late stage of disease, and they present a high heterogeneous molecular profile. Osimertinib changed the paradigm shift in treatment of EGFR mutant NSCLC patients achieving significantly better clinical outcomes. To date, osimertinib is successfully administered not only as first- or second-line treatment, but also as adjuvant treatment while its efficacy is currently investigated during neoadjuvant treatment or in stage III, unresectable EGFR mutant NSCLC patients. However, resistance to osimertinib may occur due to clonal evolution, under the pressure of the targeted therapy. The utilization of liquid biopsy as a minimally invasive tool provides insight into molecular heterogeneity of tumor clonal evolution and potent resistance mechanisms which may help to develop more suitable therapeutic approaches. Longitudinal monitoring of NSCLC patients through ctDNA or CTC analysis could reveal valuable information about clinical outcomes during osimertinib treatment. Therefore, several guidelines suggest that liquid biopsy in addition to tissue biopsy should be considered as a standard of care in the advanced NSCLC setting. This practice could significantly increase the number of NSCLC patients that will eventually benefit from targeted therapies, such as EGFR TKIs.

Recent advance of next-generation sequencing in patients with lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Precision medicine based on the driver genes mutation status is the current systemic therapeutic paradigm in patients with lung cancer. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as a powerful platform for molecular diagnosis by virtue of high-throughput and massively parallel sequencing. Liquid biopsy also enabled the dynamic monitoring and comprehensive profiling of lung cancer in a noninvasive manner. However, challenges remain in the field of technology and clinical applications, especially in the era of immunotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we update the role of NGS in the context of lung cancer screening, molecular diagnosis, predictive and prognostic biomarkers, and guiding personalized treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

The NGS application for actable genomic alternation has greatly changed the therapeutic landscape in patients with lung cancer including perioperative setting and advanced stage. Meanwhile, emerging evidence has shown the potential of other applications such as early screening and detection, and MRD. However, challenges remain such as the lack of standardized protocols across different platforms and bioinformatics analysis pipelines, and the complexity of interpreting and leveraging numerous genomic mutation messages for therapy selection. Future research is needed to overcome these challenges and expand the applications of NGS to other aspects such as immunotherapy.

Endovascular image-guided sampling of tumor-draining veins provides an enriched source of oncological biomarkers

Introduction

Circulating tumor-derived biomarkers can potentially impact cancer management throughout the continuum of care. This small exploratory study aimed to assess the relative levels of such biomarkers in the tumor-draining vascular beds in patients with solid tumors compared to levels in their peripheral veins.

Methods

Using an endovascular image-guided approach, we obtained blood samples from peripheral veins and other vascular compartments–including the most proximal venous drainage from solid tumors–from a set of nine oncology patients with various primary and metastatic malignancies. We then interrogated these samples for a panel of oncological biomarkers, including circulating tumor cells (CTCs), exosome-derived microRNAs (miRNAs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutations, and certain cancer-related proteins/biochemical markers.

Results

We found substantially higher levels of CTCs, certain miRNAs, and specific ctDNA mutations in samples from vascular beds closer to the tumor compared with those from peripheral veins and also noted that some of these signals were altered by treatment procedures.

Discussion

Our results indicate that tumor-proximal venous samples are highly enriched for some oncological biomarkers and may allow for more robust molecular analysis than peripheral vein samples.

Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Oncogene-Driven NSCLC: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives

Simple Summary

Personalized medicine has significantly changed the clinical outcome of oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) due to the efficacy of molecular targeted therapies. Despite the advances in the management of this group of patients, the need for powerful biomarkers with the potential for a real-time assessment of the tumor genomic profile as well as for detecting and monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) remains unmet. The aim of this article is to present the current knowledge and the future perspectives regarding the prognostic value of ctDNA in NSCLC, focusing on the most common druggable driver mutations, including those in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1), rearranged during transfection (RET), kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS), B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF), and mesenchymal epithelial transition factor receptor (MET) genes.

Abstract

As we enter an unprecedented era of personalized medicine, molecular targeted therapies have the potential to induce improved survival outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a significant percentage of oncogene-driven NSCLC patients will relapse even after definitive treatment, whereas chronic and durable response to targeted therapies is a less common event in advanced-stage lung cancer. This phenomenon could be attributed to minimal residual disease (MRD), defined as a population of disseminated tumor cells that survive during the course or after treatment, eventually leading to recurrence and limiting patient survival. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a powerful biomarker for MRD detection and monitoring and is a non-invasive approach of treating cancer, and especially NSCLC, based on a real-time assessment of the tumor genomic landscape. In this review, we present the key findings of studies that have used ctDNA with regard to its prognostic value and in respect to the most common druggable driver mutations of genes in NSCLC, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1), rearranged during transfection (RET), Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS), B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF), and mesenchymal epithelial transition factor receptor (MET).