Diagnostic features and management options for duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a retrospective, multi-centre study

Endoscopic versus surgical resection of duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms between 10 and 20 mm: A multi-centered retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Recommendations for resection technique of duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (D-NEN) with a size between 10 and 20 mm are lacking. The primary aim was to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after endoscopic resection (ER) with surgical resection (SR). The secondary aim was to assess the incidence and clinical variables correlated with OS.

METHODS

Data of patients with D-NENs between 2008 and 2018 were extracted from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank.

RESULTS

A total of 259 patients were identified, of which 138 were included: 98 (68 %) underwent ER and 44 patients (32 %) underwent SR. Of these, 38 patients had D-NENs sized between 10 and 20 mm. ER Patients were more frequently male and had a lower T-stage and tumour size than SR patients (all P < 0.05). Positive resection margins were observed more frequently after ER compared to SR (71 % vs 15 %, P < 0.005). No patients with tumours between 10 and 20 mm died after ER or SR (median follow-up 71.8 vs. 52.0 months). PFS rates were not significantly different after ER compared to SR (P = 0.672). Recurrence rates were 13 % for ER and 7 % for SR (P = 0.604).

CONCLUSION

Between 2008 and 2018, the incidence increased from 0.06 to 0.11 per 100,000 patients per year. OS after ER or SR did not differ for D-NEN between 10 and 20 mm. Recurrence and PFS rates were not significantly different. These results suggest that D-NENs sized between 10 and 20 mm could potentially be treated first with ER. Future studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

PCSK2 can be Useful in a Panel Approach to Distinguish Foregut and Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors

A number of immunohistochemical stains have been examined for utility in establishing the site of origin for metastatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). In the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, distinguishing metastatic duodenal NETs from jejunoileal and other GI NETs is important for clinical work-up, prognosis, and therapy. A recent study indicated that prohormone convertase 2 (PCSK2 or PC2) had broad expression in small intestine and appendiceal NETs. Because the study did not include duodenal NETs, we examined PCSK2 expression in duodenal and other GI NETs.

GI NETs (n = 69) and 13 corresponding lymph node metastases from stomach, duodenum, pancreas, ileum, appendix, and rectum were evaluated for the expression of PCSK2, along with ISL1, NKX2.2, CDX2, SATB2, and PAX8. Expression of each stain was evaluated using the H-score system, and differences in expression by site were evaluated by the chi square test.

PCSK2 was expressed at similar frequency in duodenal (50%), pancreatic (59%), and ileal NETs (40%). PCSK2 was infrequently expressed in stomach (0%), appendiceal (8%), and rectal (25%) NETs. However, incorporating PCSK2 into a panel including ISL1, NKX2.2, CDX2, and SATB2 allowed development of an algorithm which had 87% sensitivity and 93% specificity for classification of ileal NETs; and 68% sensitivity and 98% specificity for pancreaticoduodenal NETs.

In contrast to previous findings, PCSK2 does not show specificity for any particular GI site. An algorithmic approach incorporating the expression of PCSK2 with that of ISL1, NKX2.2, CDX2, and SATB2 is useful in discriminating pancreatic, duodenal, ileal, appendiceal, and rectal NETs.

A rare case of neuroendocrine cell tumor mixed with a mucinous component in the ampulla of Vater

BACKGROUND

A rare case of neuroendocrine cell tumor (NET) having both conventional and mucinous components was reported. Mucinous NET is rarely encountered in the pathological diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. Here we examined the mechanism for transformation of conventional NETs into mucinous NETs.

CASE PRESENTATION

Macroscopic examination revealed a tumor with ulceration in the ampulla of Vater that measured 1.7 cm in its largest diameter. Histologically, the tumor comprised two components: a tubular/ribbon-like feature and small nests floating in a mucinous lake. The tumor nests showed sheet, nest and ribbon-like structures of small cells having eosinophilic cytoplasm as well as small-sized nuclei with dense hyperchromatin. Immunohistochemical analysis showed tumor cells positive for pan-endocrine markers (synaptophysin, CD56, INSM1 and chromogranin). Based on the histological findings, the solid and mucinous components were diagnosed as conventional and mucinous NETs, respectively. Grading was NET G2 based on 12.8% and 13.2% Ki-67-positive cells in the solid and mucinous components, respectively. Immunohistochemically, the mucin phenotype of this tumor was gastric and intestinal. Only the mucinous NET component had cytoplasmic CD10 expression. Examination using a customized gene panel detected only a DPC4 mutation, which was limited to the mucinous component.

CONCLUSIONS

Coexistence of conventional and mucinous NETs could provide important insight into evaluating the NET subtype histogenesis. Moreover, molecular alterations including cytoplasmic expression of CD10 and the DPC4 mutation can contribute to interpretation of tumor pathogenesis.

Endoscopic management of gastric, duodenal and rectal NETs: Position paper from the Italian Association for Neuroendocrine Tumors (Itanet), Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE), Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SIED)

The present paper reflects the position of the Italian Association for Neuroendocrine Tumors (Itanet), the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE), and the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SIED) regarding the management of patients affected by gastric, duodenal, and rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) amenable to endoscopic treatment. The key questions discussed in this paper are summarized in Table 1. Data were extracted from the MEDLINE database through searches; expert opinions and recommendations are provided in accordance with the available scientific evidence and the authors' expertise. Recommendations are presented alongside a level of evidence and grade of recommendation based on the GRADE system. This paper specifically focuses on subgroups of NENs considered suitable for endoscopic management according to current international guidelines: i. well-differentiated gastric neuroendocrine tumors (gNET) type 1 < 2 cm and selected cases of type 3; ii. well-differentiated duodenal, non-functioning, non-ampullary NET with size < 2 cm; and well-differentiated rectal NET with size < 2 cm.

ASO Practice Guidelines Series: Surgical Management of Gastrointestinal (Midgut) Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal midgut neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of uncommon malignancies. For well-differentiated NENs, known as neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), surgery is a cornerstone of management in localized and metastatic disease. Because of heterogeneous tumor behaviour, association with endocrine syndrome, and prognosis, the management of NETs must be individualized to all these factors in addition to the primary site. With the fast pace of advancement in the field, both for therapies and understanding of tumoral etiology and behaviour, it is important for surgical oncologists to remain updated on guidelines recommendations and suggested treatment pathways. Those guidelines provide important guidance for management of NETs but are largely based on expert opinions and interpretation of retrospective evidence. This article reviews highlights of most recent practice guidelines for midgut (gastric, duodenal, small intestinal, and appendiceal) NETs.

Multimodal management of foregut neuroendocrine neoplasms

The foregut, which includes the esophagus, stomach and duodenum, represents one of the most common sites for neuroendocrine neoplasms. These are highly heterogenous with different risk of progression depending on location, cell-type of origin, size, grade and other factors. Various endoscopic and imaging modalities exist to inform therapeutic decision-making, which may be in the form of surgical or endoscopic resection and medical therapy depending on the extent of the disease after diagnostic evaluation. This narrative review aims to explore the literature on the multimodal management of such foregut neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Optimal surgical approach for digestive neuroendocrine neoplasia primaries: Oncological benefits versus short and long-term complications

The rising incidence and the accumulating prevalence of neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) in the population makes this a common, prevalent and a clinically relevant disease group. Surgical resection represents the only potentially curative treatment for digestive NENs. Thus, resection should in principle be considered for all patients with NEN, although taking the patients age, relevant comorbidity, and performance status into account for operability. Patients with insulinomas, NEN of the appendix and rectal NENs are usually cured by surgery alone. However, less than a third of patients are amendable to curative surgery alone at time of diagnosis. Furthermore, recurrence is common and may occur years after primary surgery, hence the long follow-up time recommended in most NENs (>10 years). As many patients with NENs present with locoregional or metastatic disease, there is considerable debate regarding the role of debulking surgery in these settings. However, good long-term survival can be achieved in a considerable proportion of patients, with 50-70% alive up to 10 years after surgery. Location and grade are the main determinants of long-term survival. Here we present considerations to surgery for primary neuroendocrine tumors in the digestive tract.