Effects of auxetic shoe on lumbar spine kinematics and kinetics during gait and drop vertical jump by a combined in vivo and modeling investigation

Auxetic Biomedical Metamaterials for Orthopedic Surgery Applications: A Comprehensive Review

Poisson's ratio in auxetic materials shifts from typically positive to negative, causing lateral expansion during axial tension. This scale-independent characteristic, originating from tailored architectures, exhibits specific physical properties, including energy adsorption, shear resistance, and fracture resistance. These metamaterials demonstrate exotic mechanical properties with potential applications in several engineering fields, but biomedical applications seem to be one of the most relevant, with an increasing number of articles published in recent years, which present opportunities ranging from cellular repair to organ reconstruction with outstanding mechanical performance, mechanical conduction, and biological activity compared with traditional biomedical metamaterials. Therefore, focusing on understanding the potential of these structures and promoting theoretical and experimental investigations into the benefits of their unique mechanical properties is necessary for achieving high-performance biomedical applications. Considering the demand for advanced biomaterial implants in surgical technology and the profound advancement of additive manufacturing technology that are particularly relevant to fabricating complex and customizable auxetic mechanical metamaterials, this review focuses on the fundamental geometric configuration and unique physical properties of negative Poisson's ratio materials, then categorizes and summarizes auxetic material applications across some surgical departments, revealing efficacy in joint surgery, spinal surgery, trauma surgery, and sports medicine contexts. Additionally, it emphasizes the substantial potential of auxetic materials as innovative biomedical solutions in orthopedics and demonstrates the significant potential for comprehensive surgical application in the future.

Evaluation of ground reaction forces and centers of pressure predicted by AnyBody Modeling System during load reaching/handling activities and effects of the prediction errors on model-estimated spinal loads

Full-body and lower-extremity human musculoskeletal models require feet ground reaction forces (GRFs) and centers of pressure (CoPs) as inputs to predict muscle forces and joint loads. GRFs/CoPs are traditionally measured via floor-mounted forceplates that are usually restricted to research laboratories thus limiting their applicability in real occupational and clinical setups. Alternatively, GRFs/CoPs can be estimated via inverse dynamic approaches as also implemented in the Anybody Modeling System (AnyBody Technology, Aalborg, Denmark). The accuracy of Anybody in estimating GRFs/CoPs during load-handling/reaching activities and the effect of its prediction errors on model-estimated spinal loads remain to be investigated. Twelve normal- and over-weight individuals performed total of 480 static load-handling/reaching activities while measuring (by forceplates) and predicting (by AnyBody) their GRFs/CoPs. Moreover, the effects of GRF/CoP prediction errors on the estimated spinal loads were evaluated by inputting measured or predicted GRFs/CoPs into subject-specific musculoskeletal models. Regardless of the subject groups (normal-weight or overweight) and tasks (load-reaching or load-handling), results indicated great agreements between the measured and predicted GRFs (normalized root-mean-squared error, nRMSEs < 14% and R2 > 0.90) and between their model-estimated spinal loads (nRMSEs < 14% and R2 > 0.83). These agreements were good but relatively less satisfactory for CoPs (nRMSEs < 17% and 0.57 < R2 < 0.68). The only exception, requiring a more throughout investigation, was the situation when the ground-foot contact was significantly reduced during the activity. It appears that occupational/clinical investigations performed in real workstation/clinical setups with no access to forceplates may benefit from the AnyBody GRF/CoP prediction tools for a wide range of load-reaching/handling activities.

Multi-task artificial neural networks and their extrapolation capabilities to predict full-body 3D human posture during one- and two-handed load-handling activities

Machine-learning based human posture-prediction tools can potentially be robust alternatives to motion capture measurements. Existing posture-prediction approaches are confined to two-handed load-handling activities performed at heights below 120 cm from the floor and to predicting a limited number of body-joint coordinates/angles. Moreover, the extrapolating power of these tools beyond the range of the input dataset they were trained for (e.g., for underweight, overweight, or left-handed individuals) has not been investigated. In this study, we trained/validated/tested two posture-prediction (for full-body joint coordinates and angles) artificial neural networks (ANNs) using both 70%/15%/15% random-hold-out and leave-one-subject-out methods, based on a comprehensive kinematic dataset of forty-one full-body skin markers collected from twenty right-handed normal-weight (BMI = 18-26 kg/m2) subjects. Subjects performed 204 one- and two-handed unloaded activities at different vertical (0 to 180 cm from the floor) and horizontal (up to 60 cm lateral and/or anterior) destinations. Subsequently, the extrapolation capability of the trained/validated/tested ANNs was evaluated using data collected from fifteen additional subjects (unseen by the ANNs); three individuals in five groups: underweight, overweight, obese, left-handed individuals, and subjects with a hand-load. Results indicated that the ANNs predicted body joint coordinates and angles during various activities with errors of ∼ 25 mm and ∼ 10°, respectively; considerable improvements when compared to previous posture-prediction ANNs. Extrapolation errors of our ANNs generally remained within the error range of existing ANNs with obesity and being left-handed having, respectively, the most and least compromising effects on their accuracy. These easy-to-use ANNs appear, therefore, to be robust alternatives to common posture-measurement approaches.