1
|
Azoulay LD, Kirchgesner J. Outpatient use of DMARDs in France, 2014-2022. Rev Med Interne 2024; 45:669-671. [PMID: 39341728 DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2024.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2024] [Revised: 09/12/2024] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Lévi-Dan Azoulay
- Laboratoire d'imagerie biomédicale, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale 1146, Centre national de la recherche scientifique 7371, Sorbonne université, 15, rue de l'École-de-Médecine, 75006 Paris, France.
| | - Julien Kirchgesner
- Department of Gastroenterology, Inserm, Institut Pierre-Louis d'épidémiologie et de santé publique, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bastard L, Claudepierre P, Penso L, Sbidian E, Pina Vegas L. Risk of serious infection associated with different classes of targeted therapies used in psoriatic arthritis: a nationwide cohort study from the French Health Insurance Database (SNDS). RMD Open 2024; 10:e003865. [PMID: 38485454 PMCID: PMC10941117 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the risk of serious infection associated with different targeted therapies for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in real-world settings. METHODS This nationwide cohort study used the administrative healthcare database of the French health insurance scheme linked to the hospital discharge database to identify all adults with PsA who were new users of targeted therapies (adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, certolizumab pegol, infliximab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, ustekinumab, and tofacitinib) from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2021. The primary outcome was a serious infection (ie, requiring hospitalisation), in a time-to-event analysis using propensity score-weighted Cox models, with adalimumab as the comparator, estimating weighted HRs (wHRs) and their 95% CIs. RESULTS A total of 12 071 patients were included (mean age 48.7±12.7 years; 6965 (57.7%) women). We identified 367 serious infections (3.0% of patients), with a crude incidence rate of 17.0 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 15.2 to 18.7). After inverse propensity score weighting and adjustment for time-dependent covariates and calendar year, risk of serious infection was significantly lower for new users of etanercept (wHR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.97) or ustekinumab (wHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.93) than adalimumab new users. This risk was not statistically modified with the other targeted therapies. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of serious infection was low for PsA patients who were new users of targeted therapies in real-world settings. Relative to adalimumab new users, this risk was lower among new users of etanercept and ustekinumab and unmodified for the other molecules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Léa Bastard
- Epidemiology in Dermatology and Evaluation of Therapeutics (EpiDermE), University Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne, Créteil, France
- Rheumatology, Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Pascal Claudepierre
- Epidemiology in Dermatology and Evaluation of Therapeutics (EpiDermE), University Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne, Créteil, France
- Rheumatology, Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Laetitia Penso
- Epidemiology in Dermatology and Evaluation of Therapeutics (EpiDermE), University Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne, Créteil, France
| | - Emilie Sbidian
- Epidemiology in Dermatology and Evaluation of Therapeutics (EpiDermE), University Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne, Créteil, France
- Dermatology, Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
- Clinical Investigation Center 1430, INSERM, Créteil, France
| | - Laura Pina Vegas
- Epidemiology in Dermatology and Evaluation of Therapeutics (EpiDermE), University Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne, Créteil, France
- Rheumatology, Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jourdain H, Hoisnard L, Sbidian E, Zureik M. Persistence and safety of anti-TNF biosimilars versus originators in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: an observational study on the French National Health Data System. RMD Open 2024; 10:e003531. [PMID: 38453213 PMCID: PMC10921511 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Biosimilar-originator equivalence has been demonstrated in phase 3 trials in a few indications of infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab. The objective of our study was to compare the persistence and safety of biosimilars versus originators in all the licensed indications of these molecules. METHODS We used data from the French National Health Data System (SNDS), covering 99% of the French population, to identify infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab initiators from biosimilar launch (January 2015, May 2016 and October 2018, respectively) to 30 June 2021. Patients were then followed for 1 year. Treatment persistence (duration without treatment discontinuation or modification) and safety (including severe infections, all-cause hospitalisation and death) were compared between originator and biosimilar users by Cox regressions weighting the populations on the inverse probability of treatment. Analyses were performed by molecule, by disease and by biosimilar product. RESULTS From January 2015 to June 2021, 86 776 patients were included in the study: 22 670, 24 442 and 39 664 patients had initiated infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab, respectively; 49 752 (53%) were biosimilar initiators. We did not find any risk of discontinuation (HRs were below or around 1, here all pathologies and products together: infliximab 0.88 (0.80-0.97), etanercept 0.85 (0.81-0.90) and adalimumab 0.96 (0.91-1.00)) or safety event (infection: infliximab 0.97 (0.78-1.21), etanercept 1.04 (0.81-1.33) and adalimumab 0.98 (0.83-1.16); hospitalisation: infliximab 1.08 (0.96-1.23), etanercept 0.99 (0.87-1.11) and adalimumab 0.91 (0.83-0.99)) associated with biosimilar versus originator use. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows reassuring results regarding the persistence and safety of biosimilar tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors compared with originators in all licensed indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo Jourdain
- EPI-PHARE, French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM) and French National Health Insurance (CNAM), Saint-Denis, France
| | - Léa Hoisnard
- Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire TRUE InnovaTive theRapy for immUne disordErs, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
- Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1430, INSERM, Créteil, France
- EpiDermE Epidemiology in Dermatology and Evaluation of Therapeutics, EA7379, Paris Est Créteil University UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Emilie Sbidian
- EPI-PHARE, French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM) and French National Health Insurance (CNAM), Saint-Denis, France
- Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire TRUE InnovaTive theRapy for immUne disordErs, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
- Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1430, INSERM, Créteil, France
- EpiDermE Epidemiology in Dermatology and Evaluation of Therapeutics, EA7379, Paris Est Créteil University UPEC, Créteil, France
- Department of Dermatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Mahmoud Zureik
- EPI-PHARE, French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM) and French National Health Insurance (CNAM), Saint-Denis, France
- Anti-Infective Evasion and Pharmacoepidemiology, CESP, University Paris-Saclay - UVSQ, Montigny le Bretonneux, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lakhmiri R, Cherrah Y, Serragui S. Tumor Necrosis Alpha (TNF-α) Antagonists Used in Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: Risks and their Minimization Measures. Curr Drug Saf 2024; 19:431-443. [PMID: 38204274 DOI: 10.2174/0115748863274863231222023853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF- α) inhibitors are widely employed for the management of chronic inflammatory rheumatism. However, their usage carries significant risks, including site and infusion reactions, serious infections, malignancy, heart failure autoimmune and demyelinating disorders. These risks are comprehensively outlined in risk management plans (RMPs) associated with these molecules. RMP provides information on the safety profile of a medicinal product as well as the measures that will be taken to minimize risks; these are known as risk minimization measures. These measures are divided into routine measures related to elements, such as the summary of product characteristics, labeling, pack size, package leaflet, or legal supply status of the product, while additional measures may include educational programs, including tools for healthcare providers and patients, controlled access or pregnancy prevention programs, among others. Additional measures can consist of one or more interventions that need to be implemented in a sustainable way in a defined target group, while respecting the timing and frequency of any intervention and procedures to reach the target population. An evaluation of the effectiveness of these measures is required to determine whether or not an intervention has been effective. This comprehensive review offers an in-depth exploration of the current treatment, uses, and associated risks of TNF-α inhibitors. Additionally, it provides a detailed account of risk minimization measures and risk management practices while shedding light on their real-world implementation and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rim Lakhmiri
- Pharmaco-Epidemiology and Pharmaco-Economics Research Team - Laboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology - Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy -Mohammed V University of Rabat, Morocco
| | - Yahia Cherrah
- Pharmaco-Epidemiology and Pharmaco-Economics Research Team - Laboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology - Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy -Mohammed V University of Rabat, Morocco
| | - Samira Serragui
- Pharmaco-Epidemiology and Pharmaco-Economics Research Team - Laboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology - Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy -Mohammed V University of Rabat, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pauline O, Robert M, Bernardeau C, Hlavaty A, Fusaroli M, Roustit M, Cracowski JL, Khouri C. Assessment of Reported Adverse Events After Interchanging Between TNF-α Inhibitor Biosimilars in the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database. BioDrugs 2023; 37:699-707. [PMID: 37278971 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-023-00603-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Observational studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients interchanging between tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor biosimilars withdraws from the new treatment because of adverse effects. We aim to analyze adverse events related to interchanging from tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitor reference products to biosimilars and between biosimilars reported in the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database. METHODS We extracted all cases reporting the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities term "Product substitution issue (PT)" for TNF-α inhibitors. Then, we analyzed and categorized all adverse events reported in more than 1% of cases. We compared the adverse events reported according to reporter qualification, type of switch, and type of TNF-α inhibitor using Chi2 tests. We conducted a network analysis coupled with a clustering approach to identify syndromes of co-reported adverse events. RESULTS In the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database, 2543 cases and 6807 adverse events related to TNF-α inhibitor interchangeability have been reported up to October 2022. Injection-site reactions were the most reported adverse events with 940 cases (37.0%), followed by modifications in drug effect in 607 cases (23.9%). Musculoskeletal, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal disorders linked to the underlying disease were reported in 505 (20.0%), 145 (5.7%), and 207 (8.1%) cases, respectively. Adverse events non-related to the underlying disease were nonspecific (n = 458, 18.0%), neurologic (n = 224, 8.8%), respiratory (n = 132, 5.2%), and psychological disorders (n = 64, 2.5%). Injection-site reactions and infection-related symptoms (e.g., nasopharyngitis, urinary tract infection, lower respiratory tract infection) were more reported by non-healthcare professionals while adverse events related to reduced clinical efficacy (e.g., drug ineffective, arthralgia, psoriasis) were more reported by healthcare professionals. The proportions of injection-site reactions were higher when switching between biosimilars of the same reference product, but the proportions of adverse events related to reduced clinical efficacy (e.g., psoriasis, arthritis, psoriatic arthropathy) were more reported when switching from a reference product. The main differences in the proportions of reported cases between adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept were driven by symptoms related to the underlying targeted diseases, except for a higher reporting rate of injection-site pain with adalimumab. Adverse events evocative of hypersensitivity reactions were reported in 192 (7.6%) cases. Most of the network clusters concerned non-specific adverse events or were related to reduced clinical efficacy. CONCLUSIONS This analysis highlights the burden of patient-reported adverse events when interchanging between TNF-α inhibitor biosimilars, notably injection-site reactions, non-specific adverse events, and symptoms related to reduced clinical efficacy. Our study also highlights differences in reporting patterns between patients and healthcare professionals and depending on the type of switch. The results are limited by missing data, the lack of precision of the coded Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terms, and by the variability of reporting rate of adverse events. Thus, incidence rates of adverse events cannot be inferred from these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orhon Pauline
- Pharmacovigilance Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Marion Robert
- Pharmacovigilance Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Claire Bernardeau
- Pharmacovigilance Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Alex Hlavaty
- Pharmacovigilance Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Michele Fusaroli
- Pharmacology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matthieu Roustit
- Grenoble Alpes University, HP2 Laboratory, Inserm U1300, Grenoble, France
- Grenoble Alpes University, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, CIC1406, Grenoble, France
| | - Jean-Luc Cracowski
- Pharmacovigilance Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
- Grenoble Alpes University, HP2 Laboratory, Inserm U1300, Grenoble, France
| | - Charles Khouri
- Pharmacovigilance Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
- Grenoble Alpes University, HP2 Laboratory, Inserm U1300, Grenoble, France.
- Grenoble Alpes University, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, CIC1406, Grenoble, France.
| |
Collapse
|