Helical stability of the GnTV transmembrane domain impacts on SPPL3 dependent cleavage

In vitro cleavage of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) by Signal-Peptide-Peptidase-like 2b (SPPL2b) resembles mechanistic principles observed in the cellular context

Members of the Signal Peptide-Peptidase (SPP) and Signal Peptide-Peptidase-like (SPPL) family are intramembrane aspartyl-proteases like their well-studied homologs, the presenilins, which comprise the catalytically active subunit within the γ-secretase complex. The lack of in vitro cleavage assays for SPPL proteases limited their biochemical characterization as well as substrate identification and validation. So far, SPPL proteases have been analyzed exclusively in intact cells or membranes, restricting mechanistic analysis to co-expression of enzyme and substrate variants colocalizing in the same subcellular compartments. We describe the details of developing an in vitro cleavage assay for SPPL2b and its model substrate TNFα and analyzed the influence of phospholipids, detergent supplements, and cholesterol on the SPPL2b in vitro activity. SPPL2b in vitro activity resembles mechanistic principles that have been observed in a cellular context, such as cleavage sites and consecutive turnover of the TNFα transmembrane domain. The novel in vitro cleavage assay is functional with separately isolated protease and substrate and amenable to a high throughput plate-based readout overcoming previous limitations and providing the basis for studying enzyme kinetics, catalytic activity, substrate recognition, and the characteristics of small molecule inhibitors. As a proof of concept, we present the first biochemical in vitro characterization of the SPPL2a and SPPL2b specific small molecule inhibitor SPL-707.

Substrate Selection Criteria in Regulated Intramembrane Proteolysis

Alzheimer's disease is the most common form of dementia encountered in an aging population. Characteristic amyloid deposits of Aβ peptides in the brain are generated through cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by γ-secretase, an intramembrane protease. Cryo-EM structures of substrate γ-secretase complexes revealed details of the process, but how substrates are recognized and enter the catalytic site is still largely ignored. γ-Secretase cleaves a diverse range of substrate sequences without a common consensus sequence, but strikingly, single point mutations within the transmembrane domain (TMD) of specific substrates may greatly affect cleavage efficiencies. Previously, conformational flexibility was hypothesized to be the main criterion for substrate selection. Here we review the 3D structure and dynamics of several γ-secretase substrate TMDs and compare them with mutants shown to affect the cleavage efficiency. In addition, we present structural and dynamic data on ITGB1, a known nonsubstrate of γ-secretase. A comparison of biophysical details between these TMDs and changes generated by introducing crucial mutations allowed us to unravel common principles that differ between substrates and nonsubstrates. We identified three motifs in the investigated substrates: a highly flexible transmembrane domain, a destabilization of the cleavage region, and a basic signature at the end of the transmembrane helix. None of these appears to be exclusive. While conformational flexibility on its own may increase cleavage efficiency in well-known substrates like APP or Notch1, our data suggest that the three motifs seem to be rather variably combined to determine whether a transmembrane helix is efficiently recognized as a γ-secretase substrate.

Structure and function of SPP/SPPL proteases: insights from biochemical evidence and predictive modeling

More than 20 years ago, signal peptide peptidase (SPP) and its homologues, the signal peptide peptidase-like (SPPL) proteases have been identified based on their sequence similarity to presenilins, a related family of intramembrane aspartyl proteases. Other than those for the presenilins, no high-resolution structures for the SPP/SPPL proteases are available. Despite this limitation, over the years bioinformatical and biochemical data have accumulated, which altogether have provided a picture of the overall structure and topology of these proteases, their localization in the cell, the process of substrate recognition, their cleavage mechanism, and their function. Recently, the artificial intelligence-based structure prediction tool AlphaFold has added high-confidence models of the expected fold of SPP/SPPL proteases. In this review, we summarize known structural aspects of the SPP/SPPL family as well as their substrates. Of particular interest are the emerging substrate recognition and catalytic mechanisms that might lead to the prediction and identification of more potential substrates and deeper insight into physiological and pathophysiological roles of proteolysis.

Permissive Conformations of a Transmembrane Helix Allow Intramembrane Proteolysis by γ-Secretase

The intramembrane protease γ-secretase activates important signaling molecules, such as Notch receptors. It is still unclear, however, how different elements within the primary structure of substrate transmembrane domains (TMDs) contribute to their cleavability. Using a newly developed yeast-based cleavage assay, we identified three crucial regions within the TMDs of the paralogs Notch1 and Notch3 by mutational and gain-of-function approaches. The AAAA or AGAV motifs within the N-terminal half of the TMDs were found to confer strong conformational flexibility to these TMD helices, as determined by mutagenesis coupled to deuterium/hydrogen exchange. Crucial amino acids within the C-terminal half may support substrate docking into the catalytic cleft of presenilin, the enzymatic subunit of γ-secretase. Further, residues close to the C-termini of the TMDs may stabilize a tripartite β-sheet in the substrate/enzyme complex. NMR structures reveal different extents of helix bending as well as an ability to adopt widely differing conformational substates, depending on the sequence of the N-terminal half. The difference in cleavability between Notch1 and Notch3 TMDs is jointly determined by the conformational repertoires of the TMD helices and the sequences of the C-terminal half, as suggested by mutagenesis and building molecular models. In sum, cleavability of a γ-secretase substrate is enabled by different functions of cooperating TMD regions, which deepens our mechanistic understanding of substrate/non-substrate discrimination in intramembrane proteolysis.

Cooperation of N- and C-terminal substrate transmembrane domain segments in intramembrane proteolysis by γ-secretase

Intramembrane proteases play a pivotal role in biology and medicine, but how these proteases decode cleavability of a substrate transmembrane (TM) domain remains unclear. Here, we study the role of conformational flexibility of a TM domain, as determined by deuterium/hydrogen exchange, on substrate cleavability by γ-secretase in vitro and in cellulo. By comparing hybrid TMDs based on the natural amyloid precursor protein TM domain and an artificial poly-Leu non-substrate, we find that substrate cleavage requires conformational flexibility within the N-terminal half of the TMD helix (TM-N). Robust cleavability also requires the C-terminal TM sequence (TM-C) containing substrate cleavage sites. Since flexibility of TM-C does not correlate with cleavage efficiency, the role of the TM-C may be defined mainly by its ability to form a cleavage-competent state near the active site, together with parts of presenilin, the enzymatic component of γ-secretase. In sum, cleavability of a γ-secretase substrate appears to depend on cooperating TM domain segments, which deepens our mechanistic understanding of intramembrane proteolysis.