Reference-based cell type matching of in situ image-based spatial transcriptomics data on primary visual cortex of mouse brain

Spatial transcriptomics in health and disease

The ability to localize hundreds of macromolecules to discrete locations, structures and cell types in a tissue is a powerful approach to understand the cellular and spatial organization of an organ. Spatially resolved transcriptomic technologies enable mapping of transcripts at single-cell or near single-cell resolution in a multiplex manner. The rapid development of spatial transcriptomic technologies has accelerated the pace of discovery in several fields, including nephrology. Its application to preclinical models and human samples has provided spatial information about new cell types discovered by single-cell sequencing and new insights into the cell-cell interactions within neighbourhoods, and has improved our understanding of the changes that occur in response to injury. Integration of spatial transcriptomic technologies with other omics methods, such as proteomics and spatial epigenetics, will further facilitate the generation of comprehensive molecular atlases, and provide insights into the dynamic relationships of molecular components in homeostasis and disease. This Review provides an overview of current and emerging spatial transcriptomic methods, their applications and remaining challenges for the field.

Challenges and best practices in omics benchmarking

Technological advances enabling massively parallel measurement of biological features - such as microarrays, high-throughput sequencing and mass spectrometry - have ushered in the omics era, now in its third decade. The resulting complex landscape of analytical methods has naturally fostered the growth of an omics benchmarking industry. Benchmarking refers to the process of objectively comparing and evaluating the performance of different computational or analytical techniques when processing and analysing large-scale biological data sets, such as transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics. With thousands of omics benchmarking studies published over the past 25 years, the field has matured to the point where the foundations of benchmarking have been established and well described. However, generating meaningful benchmarking data and properly evaluating performance in this complex domain remains challenging. In this Review, we highlight some common oversights and pitfalls in omics benchmarking. We also establish a methodology to bring the issues that can be addressed into focus and to be transparent about those that cannot: this takes the form of a spreadsheet template of guidelines for comprehensive reporting, intended to accompany publications. In addition, a survey of recent developments in benchmarking is provided as well as specific guidance for commonly encountered difficulties.