Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of maintenance therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Genetic polymorphisms and their association with methotrexate polyglutamates during maintenance treatment in Korean children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of genetic polymorphisms on methotrexate (MTX) metabolism in Korean children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, specifically focusing on MTX polyglutamates (MTX-PGs) in erythrocytes, which have been rarely studied. Korean children and young adult patients undergoing maintenance therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, who were receiving weekly oral MTX doses of 20 mg/m²/week, were prospectively included. We investigated erythrocyte MTX-PG (PG1 to PG5) levels, MTX-PG/MTX dose ratios, and 222 genetic polymorphisms spanning 78 genes and three intergenic areas related to MTX transport, folate cycle metabolism, purine/pyrimidine pathways, and non-pathway genes (including TPMT and NUDT15 genotypes) to explore their association with MTX metabolism. MTX-PG levels were associated with MTX dose (p < 0.05), and MTX-PG3 comprised the majority of the total MTX-PGs, with a median of 39.3 %. Various polymorphisms within the same gene demonstrated differing associations with each type of MTX-PG, underscoring the complexity of MTX pharmacogenetics. Among the polymorphisms examined, 14 across 13 genes showed significant associations with MTX-PG2-5 levels, even after adjusting for the false discovery rate (ABCC5, ATG16L1, CEP72, FSTL5, GMPS, HTR3A, IMPDH1, NT5C2, SLC28A3, SLCO1B3, SUCLA2, TPMT, and TYMS). This study enhances our understanding of genetic polymorphisms in MTX metabolism and therapeutic monitoring for MTX maintenance, promoting personalized medicine in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients.

Metronomic chemotherapy in hematology: Lessons from preclinical and clinical studies to build a solid rationale for future schedules

Metronomic chemotherapy (mCHEMO), based on frequent, regular administration of low, but pharmacologically active drug doses, optimizes antitumor efficacy by targeting multiple targets and reducing toxicity of antineoplastic drugs. This minireview will summarize preclinical and clinical studies on cytotoxic drugs given at weekly, daily, or at continuous metronomic schedules alone or in combination with novel targeted agents for hematological malignancies, including lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and leukemia. Most of the preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies have reported a significant benefit of both mCHEMO monotherapy and combinatorial regimens compared with chemotherapy at the maximum tolerated dose. However, the combination of mCHEMO with targeted drugs is still little explored in the hematologic clinical setting. Data obtained from preclinical studies on low dose metronomic chemotherapy in hematological malignancies clearly suggested the possibility to clinically investigate more tolerable and effective strategies for the treatment of patients with advanced hematological malignancies, or at least for those frail and elderly patients, who are not eligible or resistant to standard treatments.

Pediatric oncology drug development and dosage optimization

Oncology drug discovery and development has always been an area facing many challenges. Phase 1 oncology studies are typically small, open-label, sequential studies enrolling a small sample of adult patients (i.e., 3-6 patients/cohort) in dose escalation. Pediatric evaluations typically lag behind the adult development program. The pediatric starting dose is traditionally referenced on the recommended phase 2 dose in adults with the incorporation of body size scaling. The size of the study is also small and dependent upon the prevalence of the disease in the pediatric population. Similar to adult development, the dose is escalated or de-escalated until reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) that also provides desired biological activities or efficacy. The escalation steps and identification of MTD are often rule-based and do not incorporate all the available information, such as pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), tolerability and efficacy data. Therefore, it is doubtful if the MTD approach is optimal to determine the dosage. Hence, it is important to evaluate whether there is an optimal dosage below the MTD, especially considering the emerging complexity of combination therapies and the long-term tolerability and safety of the treatments. Identification of an optimal dosage is also vital not only for adult patients but for pediatric populations as well. Dosage-finding is much more challenging for pediatric populations due to the limited patient population and differences among the pediatric age range in terms of maturation and ontogeny that could impact PK. Many sponsors defer the pediatric strategy as they are often perplexed by the challenges presented by pediatric oncology drug development (model of action relevancy to pediatric population, budget, timeline and regulatory requirements). This leads to a limited number of approved drugs for pediatric oncology patients. This review article provides the current regulatory landscape, incentives and how they impact pediatric drug discovery and development. We also consider different pediatric cancers and potential clinical trial challenges/opportunities when designing pediatric clinical trials. An outline of how quantitative methods such as pharmacometrics/modelling & simulation can support the dosage-finding and justification is also included. Finally, we provide some reflections that we consider helpful to accelerate pediatric drug discovery and development.