Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw without osteolysis on computed tomography: a retrospective and observational study

Postoperative Recurrence of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Retrospective Study of 150 Patients Undergoing Surgery

Introduction Surgery is the recommended treatment for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). However, the disease may recur postoperatively. We reviewed imaging findings in patients undergoing three or more surgeries. Patients and methods One hundred fifty patients with MRONJ underwent surgery at our hospital. Here, we present the characteristics of 34 surgeries in nine patients (two men and seven women; mean age, 73.9 years) who underwent surgery at least three times. Results Three and six patients had maxillary and mandibular lesions, respectively. The primary disease was malignancy in eight patients, and denosumab was used in seven patients. All patients initially underwent either partial maxillectomy or marginal mandibulectomy, and segmental mandibulectomy was not performed. The number of surgeries ranged from three to six (average, 3.8). Healing was eventually achieved in seven cases, but not in two cases. Of the 27 unsuccessful surgeries, postoperative cone-beam computed tomography revealed no residual osteolysis, periosteal reaction, or osteosclerosis after seven surgeries and some residual lesions after 19 surgeries; imaging was not performed after one surgery. In contrast, among the seven successful surgeries, no residual osteolysis, periosteal reaction, or osteosclerosis was observed in all six cases in which postoperative computed tomography was performed. Conclusion Recurrence is more common in patients with residual areas of osteolysis, periosteal reactions, or mixed-type osteosclerosis, and including these areas in the resection is desirable.

Differences Between Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Caused by Bisphosphonates and Denosumab: Histological, Molecular Biological, and Clinical Studies

Purpose Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious side effect of antiresorptive agents such as bisphosphonates (BPs) and denosumab (DMB). We investigated whether a difference exists between BP- and DMB-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). Patients and methods Histological images of 30 patients with BP-related ONJ and 13 patients with DMB-related ONJ were observed using hematoxylin-eosin and cathepsin K staining. Moreover, bone metabolism markers in the blood and bone mineral density were measured in 18 patients with BP-related ONJ and five patients with DMB-related ONJ. Furthermore, we conducted a quantitative analysis of local bone metabolism-related genes using surgical specimens through real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Additionally, a retrospective study of 298 patients with MRONJ examined the differences in the characteristics of BP- and DMB-related ONJ and the factors associated with treatment outcomes. Results Histological examination revealed that patients treated with DMB had more severe osteoclast suppression than those treated with BP. No significant difference was observed in blood-bone metabolism markers between the two drugs; however, the suppression of local bone metabolism-related genes was stronger in patients treated with DMB. Clinical studies indicate that DMB-related ONJ is more frequently observed without osteolysis. Conclusion BP-associated ONJ and DMB-associated ONJ were shown to differ slightly. Clinical studies indicate that osteolysis is often unclear in DMB-related ONJ, and methods of bone resection during surgery need to be established.

Pathogenesis of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: Odontogenic Infection-Preceding Type and Osteonecrosis-Preceding Type

Introduction Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) develops from odontogenic infection. However, there are also some cases of MRONJ developing from sites with no teeth, no root canal lesions, or no periodontal disease. This study aimed to retrospectively review radiographic images of MRONJ cases and examine the differences in characteristics between MRONJ suspected to be related to dental infection (odontogenic MRONJ) and MRONJ that occurred without dental involvement or of unknown cause (non-odontogenic MRONJ). Materials and methods One hundred and forty-five patients were diagnosed with MRONJ at Kansai Medical University Hospital and Kansai Medical University Medical Center. The following variables were investigated: sex, age, primary disease, MRONJ site, body mass index, smoking habit, diabetes, corticosteroids, type of antiresorptive agent, administration period, CT findings (separation of sequestrum, osteolysis, periosteal reaction, and osteosclerosis), trigger, leukocytes, neutrocytes, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, serum albumin, and serum creatinine levels. Results In the univariate analysis, significant differences between odontogenic and non-odontogenic MRONJs were found in patients whose primary disease was malignancy, receiving denosumab (DMB), and with short administration period of antiresorptive agent, no osteolysis, periosteal reaction, and serum creatinine level. In multivariate analysis, non-odontogenic MRONJ was significantly more common in patients with no osteolysis and with periosteal reaction. Conclusion Non-odontogenic MRONJ tends to occur more frequently in patients treated with high-dose DMB, and there were significantly more cases of non-osteolytic MRONJ without radiographic evidence of osteolysis or with periosteal reactions.

Highlights on the Effects of Non-Coding RNAs in the Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

Osteonecrosis of the jaw is the progressive loss and destruction of bone affecting the maxilla or mandible in patients treated with antiresorptive and antiangiogenic agents without receiving prior radiation therapy. The pathogenesis involves the inflammatory pathway of receptor activator of nuclear factor NF-kB ligand and the macrophage colony-stimulating factor, essential for osteoclast precursors survival and proliferation and acting through its receptor c-Fms. Evidence has shown the role of non-coding RNAs in the pathogenesis of osteonecrosis of the jaw and this finding might be useful in diagnosis since these small RNAs could be considered as biomarkers of apoptotic activity in bone. Interestingly, it has been proved that miR-29 and miR-31-5p, acting on specific targets such as CALCR and RhoA, promote programmed-cell death and consequently the necrosis of bone tissue. Specific long non-coding RNAs, instead, have been detected both at reduced levels in patients with multiple myeloma and osteonecrosis, and associated with suppression of osteoblast differentiation, with consequences in the progression of mandible lesions. Among non-coding genic material, circular RNAs have the capability to modify the expression of specific mRNAs responsible for the inhibition of bisphosphonates activity on osteoclastogenesis.