1
|
Hosseini-Siyanaki M, Sagdic HS, Raviprasad AG, Munjerin SE, Prodigios JC, Anthony EY, Hochhegger B, Forghani R. Multi-Energy Evaluation of Image Quality in Spectral CT Pulmonary Angiography Using Different Strength Deep Learning Spectral Reconstructions. Acad Radiol 2024:S1076-6332(24)00894-8. [PMID: 39732618 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2024] [Revised: 11/07/2024] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 12/30/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate and compare image quality of different energy levels of virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) using standard versus strong deep learning spectral reconstruction (DLSR) on dual-energy CT pulmonary angiogram (DECT-PA). MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study was performed on 70 patients who underwent DECT-PA (15 PE present; 55 PE absent) scans. VMIs were reconstructed at different energy levels ranging from 35 to 200 keV using standard and strong levels with deep learning spectral reconstruction. Quantitative assessment was performed using region of interest (ROI) analysis of eleven different anatomical areas, measuring absolute attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). In addition, CNR of clot compared to normally opacified lumen was calculated in cases that were positive for PE. For qualitative analysis, four different keV levels (40-60-80-100) were evaluated. RESULTS The image noise was significantly lower, and the cardiovascular SNR (24.9 ± 5.85 vs. 21.98 ± 5.49) and CNR (23.72 ± 8.00 vs. 20.31 ± 6.44) were significantly higher, on strong Deep Learning Spectral reconstruction (DLSR) than standard DLSR (p < 0.0001). PE-specific CNR (8.58 ± 4.47 vs. 6.25 ± 3.19) was significantly higher on strong DLSR than standard (p < 0.0001). The subjective image quality scores were diagnostically acceptable at four different keV levels (40-60-80-100 keV) evaluated using both standard and strong DLSR, with no qualitative differences observed at those energies. CONCLUSION Strong DLSR improves image quality with an increase of the SNR and CNR in DECT-PA compared to standard DLSR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammadreza Hosseini-Siyanaki
- Radiomics and Augmented Intelligence Laboratory (RAIL), Department of Radiology and the Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., S.E.M., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.)
| | - Hakki Serdar Sagdic
- Radiomics and Augmented Intelligence Laboratory (RAIL), Department of Radiology and the Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., S.E.M., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.)
| | - Abheek G Raviprasad
- Radiomics and Augmented Intelligence Laboratory (RAIL), Department of Radiology and the Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., S.E.M., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.)
| | - Sefat E Munjerin
- Radiomics and Augmented Intelligence Laboratory (RAIL), Department of Radiology and the Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., S.E.M., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.)
| | - Joice C Prodigios
- Radiomics and Augmented Intelligence Laboratory (RAIL), Department of Radiology and the Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., S.E.M., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.)
| | - Evelyn Y Anthony
- Radiomics and Augmented Intelligence Laboratory (RAIL), Department of Radiology and the Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., S.E.M., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.)
| | - Bruno Hochhegger
- Radiomics and Augmented Intelligence Laboratory (RAIL), Department of Radiology and the Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., S.E.M., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.)
| | - Reza Forghani
- Radiomics and Augmented Intelligence Laboratory (RAIL), Department of Radiology and the Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., S.E.M., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.); Division of Medical Physics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (R.F.); Department of Neurology, Division of Movement Disorders, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (R.F.); Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (R.F.); Department of Radiology, AdventHealth Medical Group, Maitland, FL (R.F.).
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Klemenz AC, Manzke M, Meinel FG. [Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular radiology : Image acquisition, image reconstruction and workflow optimization]. RADIOLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 64:766-772. [PMID: 38913176 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-024-01335-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to fundamentally change radiology workflow. OBJECTIVES This review article provides an overview of AI applications in cardiovascular radiology with a focus on image acquisition, image reconstruction, and workflow optimization. MATERIALS AND METHODS First, established applications of AI are presented for cardiovascular computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Building on this, we describe the range of applications that are currently being developed and evaluated. The practical benefits, opportunities, and potential risks of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging are critically discussed. The presentation is based on the relevant specialist literature and our own clinical and scientific experience. RESULTS AI-based techniques for image reconstruction are already commercially available and enable dose reduction in cardiovascular CT and accelerated image acquisition in cardiac MRI. Postprocessing of cardiovascular CT and MRI examinations can already be considerably simplified using established AI-based segmentation algorithms. In contrast, the practical benefits of many AI applications aimed at the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases are less evident. Potential risks such as automation bias and considerations regarding cost efficiency should also be taken into account. CONCLUSIONS In a market characterized by great expectations and rapid technical development, it is important to realistically assess the practical benefits of AI applications for your own hospital or practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Christin Klemenz
- Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Kinder- und Neuroradiologie, Schillingallee 36, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland
| | - Mathias Manzke
- Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Kinder- und Neuroradiologie, Schillingallee 36, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland
| | - Felix G Meinel
- Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Kinder- und Neuroradiologie, Schillingallee 36, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abbasi S, Lan H, Choupan J, Sheikh-Bahaei N, Pandey G, Varghese B. Deep learning for the harmonization of structural MRI scans: a survey. Biomed Eng Online 2024; 23:90. [PMID: 39217355 PMCID: PMC11365220 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-024-01280-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Medical imaging datasets for research are frequently collected from multiple imaging centers using different scanners, protocols, and settings. These variations affect data consistency and compatibility across different sources. Image harmonization is a critical step to mitigate the effects of factors like inherent differences between various vendors, hardware upgrades, protocol changes, and scanner calibration drift, as well as to ensure consistent data for medical image processing techniques. Given the critical importance and widespread relevance of this issue, a vast array of image harmonization methodologies have emerged, with deep learning-based approaches driving substantial advancements in recent times. The goal of this review paper is to examine the latest deep learning techniques employed for image harmonization by analyzing cutting-edge architectural approaches in the field of medical image harmonization, evaluating both their strengths and limitations. This paper begins by providing a comprehensive fundamental overview of image harmonization strategies, covering three critical aspects: established imaging datasets, commonly used evaluation metrics, and characteristics of different scanners. Subsequently, this paper analyzes recent structural MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) harmonization techniques based on network architecture, network learning algorithm, network supervision strategy, and network output. The underlying architectures include U-Net, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), flow-based generative models, transformer-based approaches, as well as custom-designed network architectures. This paper investigates the effectiveness of Disentangled Representation Learning (DRL) as a pivotal learning algorithm in harmonization. Lastly, the review highlights the primary limitations in harmonization techniques, specifically the lack of comprehensive quantitative comparisons across different methods. The overall aim of this review is to serve as a guide for researchers and practitioners to select appropriate architectures based on their specific conditions and requirements. It also aims to foster discussions around ongoing challenges in the field and shed light on promising future research directions with the potential for significant advancements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soolmaz Abbasi
- Department of Computer Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
| | - Haoyu Lan
- Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeiran Choupan
- Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nasim Sheikh-Bahaei
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gaurav Pandey
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bino Varghese
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|