Home-run trials for rare cancers: giving the right drug(s) to the right patients at the right time and in the right place

Toward Inclusive Oncology: Challenges in the Therapy of Pediatric Non-B Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

BACKGROUND/AIM

Non-B non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) represent over 30 T/NK lymphoma types. The majority of them are T-cell lymphoblastic lymphomas (TLL) and anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCL). Other rare non-B NHLs represent a diverse group of neoplasms, usually excluded from clinical trials. This study analyzed outcomes in pediatric patients with non-B NHL in a single oncology center with particular emphasis on patients with rare NHLs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients <18 years with newly diagnosed non-B NHL treated at the Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology in Bydgoszcz between 2002 and 2022. The probability of 5-year overall survival (pOS) and event-free survival (pEFS) were calculated for the entire cohort and patients with TLL and ALCL. The clinical course for patients with rare non-B NHL was described in detail.

RESULTS

Twenty-six children were eligible for analysis. Fourteen patients were diagnosed with ALCL, nine with TLL, and three with rare NHL types (subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma, extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma and hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoproliferative disease associated lymphoma). For the entire group, the 5-year pOS was 83.7% and the 5-year pEFS was 72.4%. For TLL and ALCL, the outcomes were comparable with those achieved in clinical trials. Patients with rare NHL were treated according to individualized therapy recommendations based on physicians' expertise and available case report descriptions.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of knowledge on optimal therapeutic strategies for rare NHLs. It is crucial to create trials dedicated to uncommon NHLs and establish therapy guidelines for these patients.

MUC1-C Dependence for the Progression of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Identifies a Druggable Target for the Treatment of This Rare Cancer

Patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) have limited access to effective targeted agents and invariably succumb to progressive disease. MUC1-C is a druggable oncogenic protein linked to driving pan-cancers. There is no known involvement of MUC1-C in pNET progression. The present work was performed to determine if MUC1-C represents a potential target for advancing pNET treatment. We demonstrate that the MUC1 gene is upregulated in primary pNETs that progress with metastatic disease. In pNET cells, MUC1-C drives E2F- and MYC-signaling pathways necessary for survival. Targeting MUC1-C genetically and pharmacologically also inhibits self-renewal capacity and tumorigenicity. Studies of primary pNET tissues further demonstrate that MUC1-C expression is associated with (i) an advanced NET grade and pathological stage, (ii) metastatic disease, and (iii) decreased disease-free survival. These findings demonstrate that MUC1-C is necessary for pNET progression and is a novel target for treating these rare cancers with anti-MUC1-C agents under clinical development.

Patients' selection and trial matching in early-phase oncology clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Early-phase clinical trials (EPCT) represent an important part of innovations in medical oncology and a valuable therapeutic option for patients with metastatic cancers, particularly in the era of precision medicine. Nevertheless, adult patients' participation in oncology clinical trials is low, ranging from 2% to 8% worldwide, with unequal access, and up to 40% risk of early discontinuation in EPCT, mostly due to cancer-related complications.

DESIGN

We review the tools and initiatives to increase patients' orientation and access to early phase cancer clinical trials, and to limit early discontinuation.

RESULTS

New approaches to optimize the early-phase clinical trial referring process in oncology include automatic trial matching, tools to facilitate the estimation of patients' prognostic and/or to better predict patients' eligibility to clinical trials. Classical and innovative approaches should be associated to double patient recruitment, improve clinical trial enrollment experience and reduce early discontinuation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas EPCT are essential for patients to access the latest medical innovations in oncology, offering the appropriate trial when it is relevant for patients should increase by organizational and technological innovations. The oncologic community will need to closely monitor their performance, portability and simplicity for implementation in daily clinical practice.