Combined motor- and somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring for spine and spinal cord surgery: correlation of clinical and neurophysiological data in 85 consecutive procedures. Spinal Cord. 2009;47:616-622. [PMID: 19223859 DOI: 10.1038/sc.2009.11]

Risk Predictive Score and Cord Morphology Classification for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Alerts in Kyphosis Surgery

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) alert is one of the worrying events of kyphosis corrective surgery, which can result in a postoperative neurological deficit. To our knowledge, there is no risk prediction score to predict such events in patients undergoing kyphosis surgery.

PURPOSE

To develop a new preoperative MRI-based cord morphology classification (CMC) and risk prediction score for predicting IONM alerts in patients with kyphotic deformity.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data PATIENT SAMPLE: 114 patients undergoing surgical correction for kyphotic deformity OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraoperative neuromonitoring alerts and postoperative neurological status using AIS grading.

METHODS

Kyphotic deformity patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion were retrospectively reviewed. Based on the morphology of the spinal cord and surrounding CSF in MRI, there are five types of cord. Type 1 (normal cord): circular cord with surrounding visible CSF between the cord and the apex, Type 2 (flattened cord): cord with < 50% distortion at the apex with obliteration of the anterior CSF; Type 3 (deformed cord): cord with > 50% distortion at the apex with complete obliteration of the surrounding CSF; Type 4 (stretched cord): the cord is stretched and atrophied over the apex of the curve. Type 5 (translated cord): horizontal translation of the cord at the apex with buckling collapse of the vertebral column. Preoperative radiographs were used to measure the preoperative sagittal cobbs angle, sagittal deformity angular ratio (S-DAR), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), apex of the curve, and type of kyphosis. Clinical data like the duration of symptoms, clinical signs of myelopathy, neurological status (AIS grade), grade of myelopathy using the mJOA score, and type of osteotomy were documented. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the risk factors for IONM alerts and the risk prediction score was developed which was validated with new cohort of 30 patients.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients met the inclusion criteria. IONM alerts were documented in 33 patients (28.9%), with full recovery of the signal in 25 patients and a postoperative deficit in 8 patients. Rate of IONM alerts was significantly higher in Type 5 (66%), followed by Type 4 (50%), Type 3 (21.1%), Type 2 (11.1%), and Type 1 (11.1%) (p-value < 0.001). Based on multiple logistic regression, seven factors, namely preoperative neurological status, mJOA score ≤ 6, presence of signs of myelopathy, apex of the curve above T5, preoperative sagittal cobbs, S-DAR, and MRI-based CMC, were identified as risk predictors. The value for the risk factors varies from 0 to 4, and the maximum total risk score was 13. The cut-off value of 6 had good sensitivity (84.9%) and specificity (77.8%) indicating a high risk for IONM alerts. The AUC of the predictive model was 0.92, indicating excellent discriminative ability.

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated a risk predictive score that identifies patients at risk of IONM alerts during kyphosis surgery. Identification of such high-risk patients (risk score ≥ 6) helps in proper evaluation and preoperative counselling and helps in providing a proper evidence-based reference for treatment strategies.

Accuracy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in the Diagnosis of Intraoperative Neurological Decline in the Setting of Spinal Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

In an effort to prevent intraoperative neurological injury during spine surgery, the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has increased significantly in recent years. Using IONM, spinal cord function can be evaluated intraoperatively by recording signals from specific nerve roots, motor tracts, and sensory tracts. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies to evaluate the efficacy of IONM among patients undergoing spine surgery for any indication.

METHODS

The current systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) and was registered on PROSPERO. A comprehensive search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS for all studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of neuromonitoring, including somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), motor evoked potential (MEP) and electromyography (EMG), either on their own or in combination (multimodal). Studies were included if they reported raw numbers for True Positives (TP), False Negatives (FN), False Positives (FP) and True Negative (TN) either in a 2 × 2 contingency table or in text, and if they used postoperative neurologic exam as a reference standard. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the overall efficacy of each modality type using a bivariate model adapted by Reitsma et al, for all spine surgeries and for individual disease groups and regions of spine. The risk of bias (ROB) of included studies was assessed using the quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2).

RESULTS

A total of 163 studies were included; 52 of these studies with 16,310 patients reported data for SSEP, 68 studies with 71,144 patients reported data for MEP, 16 studies with 7888 patients reported data for EMG and 69 studies with 17,968 patients reported data for multimodal monitoring. The overall sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC for SSEP were 71.4% (95% CI 54.8-83.7), 97.1% (95% CI 95.3-98.3), 41.9 (95% CI 24.1-73.1) and .899, respectively; for MEP, these were 90.2% (95% CI 86.2-93.1), 96% (95% CI 94.3-97.2), 103.25 (95% CI 69.98-152.34) and .927; for EMG, these were 48.3% (95% CI 31.4-65.6), 92.9% (95% CI 84.4-96.9), 11.2 (95% CI 4.84-25.97) and .773; for multimodal, these were found to be 83.5% (95% CI 81-85.7), 93.8% (95% CI 90.6-95.9), 60 (95% CI 35.6-101.3) and .895, respectively. Using the QUADAS-2 ROB analysis, of the 52 studies reporting on SSEP, 13 (25%) were high-risk, 10 (19.2%) had some concerns and 29 (55.8%) were low-risk; for MEP, 8 (11.7%) were high-risk, 21 had some concerns and 39 (57.3%) were low-risk; for EMG, 4 (25%) were high-risk, 3 (18.75%) had some concerns and 9 (56.25%) were low-risk; for multimodal, 14 (20.3%) were high-risk, 13 (18.8%) had some concerns and 42 (60.7%) were low-risk.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that all neuromonitoring modalities have diagnostic utility in successfully detecting impending or incident intraoperative neurologic injuries among patients undergoing spine surgery for any condition, although it is clear that the accuracy of each modality differs.PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023384158.

Do Intraoperative Neurophysiological Changes During Decompressive Surgery for Cervical Myeloradiculopathy Affect Functional Outcome? A Prospective Study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) positive changes affect functional outcome after surgical intervention for myeloradiculopathy secondary to cervical compressive pathology (cervical compressive myelopathy).

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients who underwent cervical spine surgery with IONM for compressive myeloradiculopathy were enrolled. During surgery motor-evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) at baseline and before and after decompression were documented. A decrease in latency >10% or an increase in amplitude >50% was regarded as a "positive changes." Patients were divided into subgroups based on IONM changes: group A (those with positive changes) and group B (those with no change or deterioration). Nurick grade and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score were evaluated before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Nine patients (32.1%) showed improvement in MEP. The mean preoperative Nurick grade and mJOA score of group A and B were (2.55 ± 0.83 and 11.11 ± 1.65) and (2.47 ± 0.7 and 11.32 ± 1.24), respectively. The mean postoperative Nurick grade of groups A and B at 6 months was 1.55 ± 0.74 and 1.63 ± 0.46, respectively, and this difference was not significant. The mean postoperative mJOA score of groups A and B at 6 months was 14.3 ± 1.03 and 12.9 ± 0.98, respectively, and this difference was statistically significant (P = .011). Spearman correlation coefficient showed significant positive correlation between the IONM change and the mJOA score at 6 months postoperatively (r = 0.47; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that impact of positive changes in MEP during IONM reflect in functional improvement at 6 months postoperatively in cervical compressive myelopathy patients.

Effect of thoracic spinal cord injury on forelimb somatosensory evoked potential

In this paper, we investigate the forelimbs somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) signals, which are representative of the integrity of ascending sensory pathways and their stability as well as function, recorded from corresponding cortices, post thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI). We designed a series of distinctive transection SCI to investigate whether forelimbs SSEPs change after right T10 hemi-transection, T8 and T10 double hemi-transection and T8 complete transection in rat model of SCI. We used electrical stimuli to stimulate median nerves and recorded SSEPs from left and right somatosensory areas of both cortices. We monitored pre-injury baseline and verified changes in forelimbs SSEP signals on Days 4, 7, 14, and 21 post-injury. We previously characterized hindlimb SSEP changes for the abovementioned transection injuries. The focus of this article is to investigate the quality and quantity of changes that may occur in the forelimb somatosensory pathways post-thoracic transection SCI. It is important to test the stability of forelimb SSEPs following thoracic SCI because of their potential utility as a proxy baseline for the traumatic SCIs in clinical cases wherein there is no opportunity to gather baseline of the lower extremities. We observed that the forelimb SSEP amplitudes increased following thoracic SCI but gradually returned to the baseline. Despite changes found in the raw signals, statistical analysis found forelimb SSEP signals become stable relatively soon. In summary, though there are changes in value (with p >  0.05), they are not statistically significant. Therefore, the null hypothesis that the mean of the forelimb SSEP signals are the same across multiple days after injury onset cannot be rejected during the acute phase.

Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period

Background:

Presence of preoperative motor deficits in patients poses a distinct challenge in monitoring the integrity of corticospinal tracts during spinal surgeries. The inconsistency of the motor-evoked potentials is such patients, limits its clinical utility. D-wave is a robust but less utilized technique for corticospinal tract monitoring. The comparative clinical value of these two techniques has not been evaluated in the patients with preoperative deficits.

Objectives:

The objective of the study was to compare the predictive utility of myogenic Motor Evoked Potentials (m-MEP) and D-wave in terms of recordability and their sensitivity and specificity in predicting transient and permanent new motor deficits.

Materials and Methods:

Thirty-one patients with preoperative motor deficit scheduled to undergo spinal surgery were included in the study. Intraoperative m-MEP and D-wave changes were identified and correlated with postoperative neurology in the immediate postoperative period and at the time of discharge.

Results:

The mean preoperative motor power of the patient pool in left and right lower limb was 2.97 ± 1.56 and 3.32 ± 1.49, respectively. The recordability of m-MEPs and D-wave was observed to be 79.4% and 100%, respectively. The m-MEP predicted the motor deterioration in immediate postoperative period with 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity, while D-wave had 14% sensitivity and 100% specificity. At the time of discharge, m-MEPs' specificity reduced to 61%, while D-wave demonstrated 100% specificity.

Conclusions:

D-wave has a better recordability than m-MEPs in neurologically compromised patients. D-wave predicts development of long-term deficits with 100% specificity, while m-MEPs have a high sensitivity for transient neurological deficit. A combination of D-wave and m-MEP is recommended for monitoring the integrity of the corticospinal tract in patients with preoperative motor deficits.

Intraoperative evoked potentials in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament

Preoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (preSEPs) are used to evaluate the severity of myelopathy, and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is used to reduce iatrogenic damage during operations. However, the correlation between preSEPs and IONM on postoperative neurologic deterioration (PND) in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) has not been studied. Thus, under the hypothesis that the patients with deteriorated preSEPs would be more likely to have significant changes in intraoperative SEPs (ioSEPs), and that this would be correlated with PND, we investigated the prognostic value of preSEPs on IONM and PND. This retrospective study included 265 patients who underwent preSEPs and IONM between January 2015 and July 2019. Muscle strength, the sensory scale of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score examined within 3 days preoperatively, and at 48 h and 4 weeks postoperatively, was analysed. PreSEPs and intraoperative SEPs (ioSEPs) were recorded by stimulating the median and tibial nerves. Intraoperative motor evoked potentials (ioMEPs) were elicited by transcranial electrical stimulation over the motor cortex. PreSEPs latency prolongation of the median and tibial nerves showed significant correlations with ioSEPs. PMD at 48 h or 4 weeks after surgery correlated with ioSEPs and ioMEPs amplitudes. Postoperative sensory deterioration (PSD) at 48 h or 4 weeks after surgery correlated with latency prolongation of ioSEPs. There was a positive correlation between amount of blood loss and maximum percentage of ioSEPs latency prolongation and a negative correlation with PMD at 48 h and 4 weeks postoperatively. PreSEPs predict significant changes in ioSEPs. Furthermore, bleeding control is important to reduce PMD in OPLL.

Spinal meningiomas: Treatment outcome and long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Spinal intradural tumors can be classified as intradural extramedullary or intramedullary tumors. Spinal meningiomas are among the most frequent intradural, extramedullary tumors (IDEMs), representing 12 % of all meningiomas and 25-45 % of all intradural spinal tumors.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate postoperative outcome, defined by mortality, tumor recurrence and modified Rankin Scale in patients with spinal meningiomas. Furthermore, to identify factors related to these outcome measures and define possible prognosticators.

METHODS

A large single center retrospective analysis of 166 consecutive spinal meningioma patients during a 29-year period (1989-2018).

RESULTS

Female to male ratio was 5.15 to 1. Of all 166 resected tumors, 159 were WHO grade I and seven were WHO grade II. Histopathologically, the psammomatous type was most common (42.8 %). The thoracic region was the most frequent location (71.1 %), followed by cervical and lumbar locations. A complete resection (Simpson I-III) was achieved in 88.7 %. In 12 cases (7.2 %) recurrences of a spinal meningioma occurred after an interval of 0.70-13.78 years. Postoperative complications consisted of CSF leakage and wound healing problems. Three patients died of direct postoperative complications (1.8 %), nine patients died in follow-up due to unrelated causes. Post-operative complications were related to the overall outcome (p = 0.029). Clinical outcome showed improvement in 117 patients out of 148 (79.1 %) according to modified Rankin Scale; 24 patients remained stable and 7 patients deteriorated. Patients with pre-existing bladder/bowel problems and incomplete resections had higher chance of recurrences. Younger patients also had a higher recurrence rate. Follow-up ranged from 0 to 23 years, median of 0.77 years, most were discontinued after 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary treatment of spinal meningiomas remains surgery. Complete resection of spinal meningiomas is achieved in most of the cases, however preserving and improving neurological status has priority over complete tumor resection. Morbidity and mortality is relatively low. Longer follow-up periods are recommended, since recurrences can occur after 10-15 years.

Risk Factor Analysis of Change in Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring During Cervical Open Door Laminoplasty

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine the risk factors affecting intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) changes, when such changes take place, and clinical outcomes associated with IONM change during cervical open door laminoplasty (COL) for cervical compressive myelopathy.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2015, 79 patients who underwent COL with IONM recording were studied. Changes in motor evoked potentials or somatosensory evoked potentials over an alarm criterion were defined as IONM change. Patients with IONM change were assigned to the alarm group, and the others were classified as the control group. Baseline data and radiographic measurements were compared between the 2 groups. Radiologic parameters including maximal compression level (MCL), area and diameter of the spinal canal and ventral compressive lesion, stenosis grade, and occupying ratio of area (ORA) and length at the MCL were measured with magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were assigned to the alarm group and 66 patients were assigned to the control group. Multivariate analysis identified ORA at the MCL (odds ratio, 1.520; 95% confidence interval, 1.192-1.37; P = 0.001) as an independent risk factor for IONM change. Immediately after decompression, the IONM change occurred. One of 4 patients who did not fully recover from the IONM change had postoperative motor deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

IONM change during COL occurred immediately after decompression, and a risk factor of IONM change was ORA at the MCL. If the IONM change was not fully recovered, a new motor deficit occurred after COL.

Warning criteria for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intraoperative changes in somatosensory (SEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) may indicate potential injury to the spinal cord and will require timely intervention to prevent permanent damage. This review focuses on the validity of currently recommended warning criteria for intraoperative evoked potential monitoring.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current guideline recommends a decrease in SEP amplitude by 50% and MEP amplitude by 50-100% as warning signals for injury to the ascending sensory and descending motor pathway, respectively. On the basis of cohort studies, the diagnostic accuracy of SEP and MEP to predict postoperative neurologic deficits was variable. Importantly, 0.1-4.1% of monitored patients suffered postoperative neurologic deficit despite apparently normal SEP and MEP recordings (i.e. false negative events). These data suggested that the true warning criteria may be lower than previously acknowledged. A systematic review of studies that reported changes in SEP or MEP monitoring and postoperative neurological outcome showed an association between changes in monitoring signals and postoperative neurological deficits. However, the confidence intervals were wide and it is not possible to determine a threshold value in SEP or MEP amplitude beyond which may indicate neurologic deficit.

SUMMARY

Current recommendations for warning criteria during intraoperative evoked potential monitoring are empirically derived. Until a threshold that predicts spinal cord injury can be accurately determined, it remains difficult to define the clinical utility of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.

Utility of Intraoperative Monitoring in the Resection of Spinal Cord Tumors: An Analysis by Tumor Location and Anatomical Region

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of institutional data.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the utility of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) and transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials (MEP) in the resection of spine tumors and evaluate the ability of both single and multi-modal monitoring to predict postoperative neurological deficits.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although the utility of intraoperative monitoring (IOM) is well established in scoliosis and degenerative surgery, studies in spine tumor patients have been limited.

METHODS

A series of consecutive patients who underwent resection with the use of IOM at a single institution between August 2009 and March 2013 was identified. Demographic, clinical, and neuromonitoring data were collected preoperatively, during surgery, at the moment of discharge, and at a 6-month follow-up visit. Three cohorts were established based on the anatomical location of the tumor: intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, and extradural. Additional groupings were formed based on spinal region. Patients with significant changes in SSEPs or MEPs during surgery were identified and the rate of neurological deficits was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients were analyzed. A change in SSEPs or MEPs was detected in 11 (21.2%) cases whereas 14 patients (26.9%) developed permanent postoperative deficits. SSEPs predicted deficits in the resection of intramedullary tumors (P = 0.015) (area under cover, AUC = 0.83), and intradural extramedullary tumors (P = 0.048; AUC = 0.70). MEP monitoring did not predict postoperative deficits in the resection of intramedullary (P = 0.21; AUC = 0.69) or intradural extramedullary tumors (P = 0.31; AUC = 0.63). Neither SSEPs nor MEPs predicted deficits for extradural tumors.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of IOM in spine tumor resection is dependent on tumor location relative to the spinal cord and dura. The accuracy of SSEPs and their ability to predict postoperative deficits was greatest for intramedullary lesions. For this series, MEP and multi-modal monitoring did not confer a benefit in predicting permanent neurological deficits.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Proper Responding Strategies to Neuromonitoring Alerts During Correction Step in Posterior Vertebral Column Resection Patients With Severe Rigid Deformities Can Reduce Postoperative Neurologic Deficits

MINI: The neurological risks in posterior vertebral column resection can be resulted from spinal cord tension changes following correction maneuvers being performed. On the basis of intraoperative neuromonitoring alerts, to timely identify them as well to act prompt surgical interventions can decrease the risks.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM) changes in posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) for severe rigid deformity patients, and describe our stepwise responding strategies.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Obvious neurological deficit risk accompanied with PVCR correction has been emphasized repeatedly.

METHODS

The records of 46 patients who underwent PVCR achieved IOM were reviewed. IOM alerts triggered responding protocols: (1) exchange the convex corrective rod to concave stabilizing rod, (2) appropriate compression for spinal shortening, (3) reversed in situ rod bending, (4) translation technique and unisegmental derotation, (5) adjacent segmental resection.

RESULTS

The overall scoliotic correction rate was 65.4% (from 112 ± 28.6 to 39 ± 13.4) and segmental kyphotic correction rate was 64.2% (from 101 ± 37.3 to 36 ± 19.2). During correction step, somatosensory-evoked potential warning (3) and somatosensory-evoked potential/transcranial motor-evoked potential warning (8) were detected in 11 patients (23.9%). Probable cause identification including rule out IOM technical factors, residual impingement, and if there was unstable spinal column (1), spinal cord excessive tension on concave side (3), and the excessive opposite spinal displacement between two aspects of resected area (7). After rod change (1), compression (2), bending (3), derotation (3), and adjacent resection (2), all IOM changes went to under warning criteria. All 11 patients revealed neurologically intact postoperatively. There was no difference of correction rate between IOMs alert or not. However, adult, extremely severe or sharp angular curves tend to be more common in IOM alert patients.

CONCLUSION

As three-dimensional spinal column divided and relinked in PVCR, and the correction maneuvers were restricted on single dimension, inevitably resulted in spinal cord tension changes and spinal column opposite displacement. To timely identify them, prompt interventions should be performed, and even enlarge the resected area to reduce the abrupt turning tendency of the spinal cord.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

Comparative Study Between Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy (PSO) and Closing-Opening Wedge Osteotomy (Fish-Mouth PSO) for Sagittal Plane Deformity Correction

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of closing-opening wedge osteotomy (fish-mouth pedicle subtraction osteotomy [PSO]), for sagittal plane deformity correction and to compare the radiographical outcomes for patients undergoing conventional- and fish-mouth PSO.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The closing-opening wedge osteotomy has been developed to achieve a large magnitude of correction at a single level for patients with severe fixed sagittal imbalance.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and the radiographs of patients who underwent PSO by a single surgeon between June 2012 and December 2015. Forty patients were included and were divided into 2 groups according to surgical technique (fish-mouth- vs. conventional PSO group). Radiographical measurements included pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, global kyphosis (GK), sagittal vertical axis, osteotomized vertebra angle (OVA), and the height of the osteotomized vertebra (HOV).

RESULTS

The preoperative, immediate postoperative, ultimate follow-up and correction of thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, thoracolumbar junction, and sagittal vertical axis did not show significant differences between the groups. Preoperative GK and OVA were significantly larger in fish-mouth group (GK: 47.1° ± 28.8° vs. 23.7° ± 16.0°, P < 0.05 and OVA: 31.7° ± 14.5° vs. 9.0° ± 11.4°, P < 0.05). The correction of GK and OVA were significantly larger in fish-mouth PSO group (GK: 48.8° ± 24.5° vs. 34.8° ± 17.4°, P < 0.05 and OVA: 42.9° vs. 25.0°, P < 0.05). Preoperative HOV between the groups was not significantly different; however, postoperative HOV was significantly greater in fish-mouth PSO group (2.3 vs. 1.7 cm, P < 0.05). Postoperative transient paraparesis occurred in 3 (20%) and 6 (24%) patients of fish-mouth PSO and PSO group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Fish-mouth PSO can provide a larger magnitude of correction compared to classic PSO without compromising spinal cord function for fixed sagittal plane deformity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Retrospective Waveform Analysis of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) to Identify Early Predictors of Impending Motor Deficits in Spinal Surgeries

PURPOSE

Although there are guidelines analyzing transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEP) waveform criteria, they vary widely and are not applied universally during intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM). The objective is to generate hypotheses to identify early and reliable MEP waveform characteristics prior to complete loss of MEP to predict impending motor spinal cord injuries during spinal surgeries. The ultimate goal is to enhance real-time feedback to prevent injury or detect reversible spinal cord damage.

METHODS

Fifteen true positive cases of persistent intraoperative MEP loss and new postoperative motor deficits were retrospectively identified from 2011 to 2013. Waveform characteristics of latency, amplitude, duration, phases, and area-under-the-curve (AUC) were measured, and an intraoperative spinal cord index (ISCI) was calculated for 5 traces prior to complete MEP loss. ISCI = [amplitude x duration x (phases+1) x AUC]/latency.

RESULTS

Out of 22 muscles in 15 cases, latency increased in 2, duration decreased in 12, amplitude decreased in 13, AUC decreased in 13, and ISCI decreased in 14. In 11 out of 15 cases (73%), ISCI dropped > 40% in at least one muscle before MEP were completely lost. Thirteen cases had concurrent somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) changes, 9 out of 13 had > 50% decrease in SSEP: 2 out of 9 changed before MEP, 5 out of 9 simultaneously, and 2 out of 9 after.

CONCLUSIONS

In these cases of motor injury, smaller and simpler MEP waveforms preceded complete loss of signal. An ISCI 40% drop could be tested as a warning threshold for impending motor compromise in future prospective studies and lead to eventual standardization to predict irreversible postoperative deficits.

One-stage posterior focus debridement, interbody grafts, and posterior instrumentation and fusion in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis with kyphosis in children: a preliminary report

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and feasibility of surgical management of children with thoracolumbar spine tuberculosis with kyphosis by using one-stage posterior focus debridement, interbody grafts, and posterior instrumentation and fusion.

METHODS

From October 2010 to September 2013, 21 children with thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis accompanied by kyphosis were treated with one-stage posterior decompression, interbody grafts, and posterior instrumentation and fusion. There were 13 males and 8 females, aged from 7 to 13 years old (average age 9.9 years). The mean follow-up was 34 months (range26-48 months). Patients were evaluated before and after surgery in terms of ESR, neurologic status, pain, and kyphotic angle.

RESULTS

Spinal tuberculosis was completely cured, and the grafted bones were fused in all 21 patients. There was no recurrent tuberculous infection. ESR got normal within 3 months in all patients. The ASIA neurologic classification improved in all cases. Pain relief was obtained in all patients. The average preoperative kyphosis was 29.7° (range 12-42°) and decreased to 5.5° (range 2-10°), postoperatively. There was no significant loss of the correction at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that one-stage posterior decompression, interbody grafts, and posterior instrumentation and fusion were an effective treatment for children with thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis. It is characterized as minimum surgical trauma, good neurologic recovery, good correction of kyphosis, and prevention of progressive kyphosis.

Risk of Neurological Injuries in Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

Rate of neurological injuries is widely reported for spinal deformity surgery. However, few have included the influence of the subtypes and severity of the deformity, or anterior versus posterior corrections. The purpose of this study is to quantify these risks.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The risk of neurological injuries was examined in a single institution. Quantification of risk was made between operations, and for different subtypes of spinal deformity.

METHODS

Prospectively entered neuromonitoring database between 2006 and 2012 was interrogated, including all deformity cases under 21 years of age. Tumor, fracture, infection, and revision cases were excluded. All major changes in monitoring ("red alerts") were identified and detailed examinations of the neuromonitoring records, clinical notes, and radiographs were made. Diagnosis, deformity severity, and operative details were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 2291 deformity operations, there were 2068 scoliosis (1636 idiopathic, 204 neuromuscular, 216 syndromic, 12 others), 89 kyphosis, 54 growing rod procedures, and 80 operations for hemivertebra. Six hundred ninety-six anterior and 1363 posterior operations were performed for scoliosis (nine not recorded), and 38 anterior and 51 posterior kyphosis corrections. Sixty-seven "red alerts" were identified (62 posterior, five anterior). Average Cobb angle was 88°. There were 14 transient and six permanent neurological injuries. One permanent injury was sustained during kyphosis correction and five during scoliosis correction. Common surgeon reactions after "red alerts" were surgical pause with anesthetic interventions (n = 39) and the Stagnara wake-up test (n = 22). Metalwork was partially removed in 20, revised in 12, and completely removed in nine. Thirteen procedures were abandoned.

CONCLUSION

The overall risk of permanent neurological injury was 0.2%. The highest risk groups were posterior corrections for kyphosis, and scoliosis associated with a syndrome. Four percent of all posterior deformity corrections had "red alerts," and 0.3% resulted in permanent injuries compared with 0.6% "red alerts" and 0.3% permanent injuries for anterior surgery. The overall risk for idiopathic scoliosis was 0.06%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Multimodal intraoperative monitoring during intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of this work is to evaluate the utility of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (IOM) during intramedullary spinal cord tumor (IMSCT) surgery in our institution, and to investigate which IOM events are likely to be encountered during critical surgical phases.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients who underwent IMSCT surgery with IOM were included in this study. Our multimodal IOM assessment included SSEP, mMEP, and fEMG monitoring. Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity were assessed 24 h and 1 month after surgery. The IOM events during three main surgical phases were also investigated. For mMEP assessment, two warning criteria (>50 % decrease in mMEP amplitude and all-or-none mMEP amplitude presence) were employed.

RESULTS

Long-term outcome prediction was better when the all-or-none criterion was applied than when the >50 % amplitude decrease criterion was applied. Based on the all-or-none criterion, the PPV, NPV, sensitivity, and specificity were 60, 100, 100, and 91 %. Frequent IOM events were observed during the three major main surgical phases. Seven (29 %) patients showed SSEP events during opening of the spinal cord. During tumor removal, 21 of 25 patients (84 %) had IOM events, and 13 of 18 (72 %) of the fEMG events occurred prior to the mMEP events.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the association of fEMG events with upcoming mMEP events during tumor removal, we recommend inclusion of fEMG monitoring in IOM. Multimodal IOM provides useful electrophysiological information during IMSCT surgery, especially during the main surgical phases.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgery

Recently, many surgeons have been using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) in spinal surgery to reduce the incidence of postoperative neurological complications, including level of the spinal cord, cauda equina and nerve root. Several established technologies are available and combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials are considered mandatory for practical and successful IOM. Spinal cord evoked potentials are elicited compound potentials recorded over the spinal cord. Electrical stimulation is provoked on the dorsal spinal cord from an epidural electrode. Somatosensory evoked potentials assess the functional integrity of sensory pathways from the peripheral nerve through the dorsal column and to the sensory cortex. For identification of the physiological midline, the dorsal column mapping technique can be used. It is helpful for reducing the postoperative morbidity associated with dorsal column dysfunction when distortion of the normal spinal cord anatomy caused by an intramedullary cord lesion results in confusion in localizing the midline for the myelotomy. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) consist of spinal, neurogenic and muscle MEPs. MEPs allow selective and specific assessment of the functional integrity of descending motor pathways, from the motor cortex to peripheral muscles. Spinal surgeons should understand the concept of the monitoring techniques and interpret monitoring records adequately to use IOM for the decision making during the surgery for safe surgery and a favorable surgical outcome.

Effect of posterior multilevel vertebral osteotomies on coronal and sagittal balance in fused scoliosis deformity caused by previous surgery: preliminary results

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective case series study.

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of posterior multilevel vertebral osteotomy (posterior crack osteotomy) on coronal and sagittal balance in patients with the fusion mass over the spine caused by previous surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Few studies have investigated revisional scoliosis surgery with the fusion mass using osteotomy.

METHODS

Among patients who had a history of prior surgery for scoliosis correction and posterior fusion, those showing progression of the curve postoperatively due to nonunion, implant failure, or adding-on phenomenon were enrolled. All patients were treated using posterior crack osteotomy. For clinical evaluation, the pre- and postoperative Gross Motor Function Classification System score for walking status and the Berg balanced scale were used. For radiological evaluation, pre- and postoperative Cobb angle, and coronal and sagittal balance factors were used.

RESULTS

Ten patients (5 males and 5 females) were enrolled. The preoperative diagnosis was neuromuscular scoliosis (3 cases), syndromic scoliosis (1 case), congenital scoliosis (5 cases), and neurofibromatosis (1 case). Osteotomies were performed at 3.3±1.3 levels on average. Pre- and postoperative Cobb angles were 70.8°±30.0° and 28.1°±20.0° (P=0.002 (0.97)), respectively. In pre- and postoperative evaluation of coronal balance, the coronal balance, clavicle angle, and T1-tilt angle were 36.8±27.1 mm and 10.4±8.5 mm, 6.7°±8.0° and 3.3°±1.5°, and 7.8°±19.0° and 4.7°±2.1°, respectively (P=0.002, 0.002, 0.002). In pre- and postoperative evaluation of sagittal balance, the spinal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar alignments were 25.1±37.8 mm and 14.1±21.8 mm, 33.5°±51.1° and 29.7°±27.4°, and 45.7°±34.8° and 48.9°±23.1° (P=0.002, 0.169, 0.169). The walking and functional statuses did not change (P=0.317, 0.932). Although pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications were noted, the patients were discharged without complications.

CONCLUSION

Posterior crack osteotomy can be used effectively in revisional scoliosis surgery and the clinical and radiological results seem to be acceptable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Combined muscle motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intramedullary spinal cord tumour surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) with combined muscle motor evoked potentials (mMEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials is useful for more aggressive and safe resection in intramedullary spinal cord tumour (IMSCT) surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed data from consecutive patients who underwent surgery for IMSCT between 1998 and April 2012. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not IONM was applied. In the monitored group, the procedures were performed under IONM using 75% muscle amplitude decline weaning criteria. The control group was comprised of patients who underwent IMSCT surgery without IONM. The primary outcome was the rate of gross total excision of the tumour on magnetic resonance imaging at one week after surgery. The secondary outcome was the neurologic outcome based on the McCormick Grade scale.

RESULTS

The two groups had similar demographics. The total gross removal tended to increase when intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring was used, but this tendency did not reach statistical significance (76% versus 58%; univariate analysis, p=0.049; multivariate regression model, p=0.119). The serial McCormick scale score was similar between the two groups (based on repeated measure ANOVA).

CONCLUSION

Our study evaluated combined IONM of trans-cranial electrical (Tce)-mMEPs and SEPs for IMSCT. During IMSCT surgery, combined Tce-mMEPs and SEPs using 75% muscle amplitude weaning criteria did not result in significant improvement in the rate of gross total excision of the tumour or neurologic outcome.

Spinal pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients

In addressing spinal sagittal imbalance through a posterior approach, the surgeon now may choose from among a variety of osteotomy techniques. Posterior column osteotomies such as the facetectomy or Ponte or Smith-Petersen osteotomy provide the least correction, but can be used at multiple levels with minimal blood loss and a lower operative risk. Pedicle subtraction osteotomies provide nearly 3 times the per-level correction of Ponte/Smith-Petersen osteotomies; however, they carry increased technical demands, longer operative time, and greater blood loss and associated significant morbidity, including neurological injury. The literature focusing on pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients is reviewed. The long-term overall outcomes, surgical tips to reduce the complications and suggestions for their proper application are also provided.

Plasticity associated changes in cortical somatosensory evoked potentials following spinal cord injury in rats

Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes a number of physiological and neurological changes resulting in loss of sensorimotor function. Recent work has shown that the central nervous system is capable of plastic behaviors post-injury, including axonal regrowth and cortical remapping. Functional integrity of afferent sensory pathways can be quantified using cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) recorded upon peripheral limb stimulation. We implanted 15 rats with transcranial screw electrodes and recorded SSEPs from cortical regions corresponding to each limb before and after a mild or moderate contusion injury. We report a post-injury increase in the mean amplitude of cortical SSEPs upon forelimb stimulation. SSEP amplitudes for mild and moderate SCI groups increased by 183% ± 95% and 107% ± 38% over baseline, respectively, while hindlimb SSEPs decreased by 58% ± 14% and 79% ± 4%. In addition, we report increased SSEP amplitude measured from the anatomically adjacent hindlimb region upon forelimb stimulation (increase of 90% ± 19%). Our results show that previously allocated hindlimb cortical regions are now activated by forelimb stimulation, suggesting an expansion in the area of cortical forelimb representation into hindlimb regions after an injury. This result is indicative of adaptive plasticity in undamaged areas of the CNS following SCI.

A role for motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for patients without myelopathy: Analysis of 57 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

Although the usage of combined motor and sensory intraoperative monitoring has been shown to improve the surgical outcome of patients with cervical myelopathy, the role of transcranial electric motor evoked potentials (tceMEP) used in conjunction with somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) in patients presenting with radiculopathy but without myelopathy has been less clear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients (n = 57) with radiculopathy but without myelopathy, undergoing anterior cervical decompression and fusion at a single institution over the past 3 years, who had intraoperative monitoring with both tceMEPs and SSEPs.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven (100%) patients presented with radiculopathy, 53 (93.0%) with mechanical neck pain, 35 (61.4%) with motor dysfunction, and 29 (50.9%) with sensory deficits. Intraoperatively, 3 (5.3%) patients experienced decreases in SSEP signal amplitudes and 4 (6.9%) had tceMEP signal changes. There were three instances where a change in neuromonitoring signal required intraoperative alteration of the surgical procedure: these were deemed clinically significant events/true positives. SSEP monitoring showed two false positives and two false negatives, whereas tceMEP monitoring only had one false positive and no false negatives. Thus, tceMEP monitoring exhibited higher sensitivity (33.3% vs. 100%), specificity (95.6% vs. 98.1%), positive predictive value (33.3% vs. 75.0%), negative predictive value (97.7% vs. 100%), and efficiency (91.7% vs. 98.2%) compared to SSEP monitoring alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we present a retrospective series of 57 patients where tceMEP/SSEP monitoring likely prevented irreversible neurologic damage. Though further prospective studies are needed, there may be a role for combined tceMEP/SSEP monitoring for patients undergoing anterior cervical decompression without myelopathy.

False negative and positive motor evoked potentials in one patient: is single motor evoked potential monitoring reliable method? A case report and literature review

STUDY DESIGN

A case report and literature review.

OBJECTIVE

To report a false negative and delayed positive motor-evoked potential (MEP) in 1 patient.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

An unreliable MEP can result in fatal outcomes because surgeons have recently begun to depend on the MEP for intraoperative decision-making.

METHODS

We report a case of a false MEP during scoliosis surgery that showed false negative and positive MEPs during a series of operations.

RESULTS

A 23-year-old man with a history of spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia presented with severe kyphoscoliosis. The initial neurologic examination did not reveal any neurologic abnormalities. Surgical correction and fusion were performed with transcranial MEP monitoring. During the entire procedure, the MEP did not reveal any signs of cord injury. However, lower limb paralysis and paresthesia was observed when the patient awakened. After 2 additional surgical procedures to recover the neurologic deficit, the MEP did not show any signs of cord injury but the patient's neurologic status had recovered slightly. At postoperative day 8, the neurologic status recovered, and a third operation was performed to fix the long rods. However, there were abnormal amplitudes in both lower limbs but the patient's neurologic status was almost normal.

CONCLUSION

From our experience of false negative and positive MEP in 1 patient, it is concluded that undesirable events can occur with use of MEP in scoliosis or other spinal surgery. Therefore, we warn the surgeons too heavily rely on the MEP monitoring, and propose a further prospective study as well as use of alternative method that can improve the reliability of single MEP.

Human motor evoked potential responses following spinal cord transection: an in vivo study

Motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring has been used increasingly in conjunction with somatosensory evoked potential monitoring to monitor neurological changes during complex spinal operations. No published report has demonstrated the effects of segmental spinal cord transection on MEP monitoring.

The authors describe the case of an 11-year-old girl with lumbar myelomeningocele and worsening thoracolumbar scoliosis who underwent a T11–L5 fusion and spinal transection to prevent tethering. Intraoperative MEP and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring were performed, and the spinal cord was transected in 4 quadrants. The MEPs were lost unilaterally as each anterior quadrant was sectioned.

This is the first reported case that demonstrates the link between spinal cord transection and MEP signaling characteristics. Furthermore, it demonstrates the relatively minor input of the ipsilateral ventral corticospinal tract in MEP physiology at the thoracolumbar junction. Finally, this study further supports the use of MEPs as a specific intraoperative neuromonitoring tool.

Neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring in neurosurgery: aid or handicap?

Object

Neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring (IOM) is regarded as a useful tool to provide information about physiological changes during surgery in eloquent areas of the nervous system, to increase safety and reduce morbidity. Nevertheless, numerous older studies report that very few patients benefit from IOM, and that there are high rates of false-positive and false-negative changes of neurophysiological parameters during surgery. There is an ongoing discussion about the effectiveness of neurophysiological IOM. This questionnaire study was performed to evaluate the attitude of neurosurgeons toward neurophysiological IOM and the availability of this tool.

Methods

One hundred fifty neurosurgeons from 60 institutions in 16 countries were asked to answer anonymously a questionnaire with 11 questions. The questionnaire covered aspects of personal experience, the neurosurgical institution, and availability of neurophysiological IOM as well as asking the surgeon's opinion of the procedure.

Results

One hundred nine questionnaires were returned (73%). Seven questionnaires were excluded because of failure to complete the form correctly or completely, leaving 102 respondents from 44 institutions in 16 countries in the study; 79.5% of the included institutions provided neurophysiological IOM. Young neurosurgeons did not put more trust in IOM than experienced neurosurgeons. With growing IOM experience, surgeons seem to allow less influence of the findings on the course of their operation. At large institutions in which > 1500 operations per year are done, IOM is performed by the neurosurgeons themselves in most cases. In institutions with fewer operations, the IOM team consists mostly of nonneurosurgeons. Regardless of the availability of neurophysiological IOM, all surgeons stated that IOM is gaining increasing importance.

Conclusions

Neurophysiological IOM represents an established tool in neurosurgery. Although the importance of IOM is emphasized by the majority of neurosurgeons, the relevance of this tool to the course of the operation changes with increasing neurophysiological IOM experience.