Satisfaction after the Malone antegrade continence enema procedure in patients with spina bifida

State of the Art Bowel Management for Pediatric Colorectal Problems: Spinal Anomalies

BACKGROUND

Patients with spinal abnormalities often struggle with fecal and/or urinary incontinence (up to 87 and 92%, respectively) and require a collaborative approach to bowel management in conjunction.

METHODS

To define existing approaches and propose state-of-the-art bowel management, a literature search was performed using Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases and focusing on the manuscripts published July 2013 and July 2023.

RESULTS

Patients with spinal anomalies have impaired innervation of the rectum and anal canal, decreasing the success rate from laxatives and rectal enemas. Thus, transanal irrigations and antegrade flushes are widely utilized in this group of patients. Based on spinal MRI, the potential for bowel control in these children depends on age, type, and lesion level. On referral for bowel management, a contrast study is performed to assess colonic motility and evacuation of stool, followed by a series of abdominal X-rays to define colonic emptying and adjust the regimen. The options for management include laxatives, rectal enemas, transanal irrigations, antegrade flushes, and the creation of a stoma. Approximately 22-71% of patients achieve social continence dependent on the type and level of the lesion.

CONCLUSION

Patients with spinal anomalies require a thorough assessment for continence potential and stool burden prior to initiation of bowel management. The optimal treatment option is defined according to the patient's age, anatomy, and mobility. The likelihood of independent bowel regimen administration should be discussed with the patients and their caregivers.

People with spina bifida use their MACE on long-term follow-up: A single institutional retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

While the Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) facilitates bowel movements in patients with spina bifida (SB) and neuropathic bowel, little is known about its long-term use. We aimed to assess long-term MACE use and potential risk factors for disuse.

METHODS

All patients with SB who underwent MACE procedures at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Main outcome was MACE disuse (no longer catheterizing the MACE for antegrade enemas) based on self-report on a clinic questionnaire, or medical record for patients last seen before introducing the questionnaire 5 years ago. Survival analysis used two timeframes: time after surgery (Analysis 1) and chronological age: accounting for older children reaching adulthood earlier (Analysis 2).

RESULTS

Overall, 411 patients (54% female, 78% shunted, 65% augmented) underwent a MACE procedure at median 7.9 years old (median follow-up: 8.4 years). Thirty-three (8%) patients no longer used their MACE. Most common reasons for doing so were channel/stomal stenosis (61%) and excision at colostomy or other abdominal surgery (12%). Bowel management afterwards included oral agents ± enemas (55%), Chait tube (30%), colostomy (12%). After correcting for differential follow-up, 90% of participants used their MACE at 10 years and 87% at 15 years after surgery. Based on chronological age, 97% used their MACE at 15 years old, 92% at 20 and 81% at 30 (Summary Figure). On multivariate analysis, umbilical MACEs were 2.4 times more likely to be disused than right lower quadrant MACEs (p = 0.04). Without correcting for chronological age (Analysis 1), patients undergoing MACE surgery at older ages were more likely to stop MACE use (p = 0.03). However, after accounting for chronological age (Analysis 2), patients undergoing a MACE procedure at older ages were no more likely to stop its use (p = 0.47, Figure). Gender, SB type, shunt status, mobility status, bladder augmentation or a urinary catheterizable channel were not associated with stopping MACE use (p ≥ 0.10).

COMMENT

Participants were regularly followed in multi-disciplinary SB clinics. We did not assess continence, satisfaction or long-term urinary channel use, making it premature to recommend optimal stomal locations.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with SB followed by a multi-disciplinary team continue using their MACE; 1% stopped MACE use annually, particularly after adolescence. This strongly suggests it is an effective bowel management method and transitioning to self-care plays a role in maintaining long-term MACE use. Umbilical MACEs may be at high risk of disuse, but all people with a MACE can benefit from support as they transition to adult care.

Antegrade Colonic Enema Channels in Pediatric Patients Using Appendix or Cecal Flap: A Comparative Robotic versus Open series

Introduction We present perioperative outcomes of a single center experience with robotic assisted ACE channel creation for the treatment of chronic constipation refractory to medical therapy and compare it to the traditional open surgical approach. We also demonstrate a step-by-step video presentation of the robotic approach for cecal flap ACE performed as part of a dual continence procedure in patients with short length of appendix. Methods A retrospective chart review of pediatric patients who underwent ACE channel creation between 2008-2020 was performed. We compared demographics, intraoperative, and postoperative variables of the open versus robotic approach. Results Among 28 patients, 15 were open and 13 robotic. In order to construct the ACE channel, a cecal flap was utilized in 36%, split appendix in 50%, full length appendix in 11%, and sigmoid colon in 3% of patients. Both approaches showed equivalent estimated blood loss (50 ml [IQR=20-100]), median length of hospital stay (7 vs. 8 days, p=0.7) and median time to return to regular diet (4 vs. 5 days, p=0.5) (table 1). Patients in the open group were more likely to have a history of prior abdominal surgeries than those in the robotic group (80% vs. 38.5%, p=0.02). The risk of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or more complications (40% vs. 23.1%, p=0.04) and the rate of ACE channel stenosis (46.7% vs. 7.7%, p=0.02) were significantly higher in the open approach. Channel stenosis was significantly higher in patients with an appendix ACE channel (87.5% vs. 12.5%, p<0.05) compared to those with cecal flap ACE. Conclusions Robotic assisted ACE channel creation is a safe and acceptable alternative with a significantly lower rate of channel stenosis and other Clavien grade 3 complications compared to the traditional open approach. Cecal flaps are also at a lower risk of stomal stenosis than appendix.

Troubleshooting problems with antegrade continent enema flushes: The Indiana university algorithm

INTRODUCTION

Antegrade continence enemas have transformed treatment and improved the quality of life in children with neuropathic bowel, refractory constipation and fecal incontinence. However, it can often be difficult to manage problems that arise with ACE flushes.

OBJECTIVE

We report the use of an online tool designed for nurses to help troubleshoot calls for problems associated with antegrade continence enema (ACE) flushes as well as update our algorithm for managing refractory constipation/fecal incontinence in a large single institution experience.

STUDY DESIGN

We developed an online tool based on our management protocol for managing refractory constipation/fecal incontinence (Summary Figure). Patient frequency and bother was assessed prior to the intervention and at one month after the intervention using 5- and 4-point Likert scales respectively. Patient demographics, MACE/Chait information, type of difficulty, volume of flush, and use of additives were recorded. Nurses were also interviewed prior to using the tool and 14 months after its development with regards to taking these phone calls and the helpfulness of the tool.

RESULTS

Over 14 months, the nurses received 22 patients calls via the nursing triage line regarding ACE flush problems and prospectively collected data. Half reported multiple episodes of fecal incontinence. Other complaints included no response to flush (8, 36.4%), occasional episodes of liquid fecal incontinence (2, 9.1%) and time of flush exceeding 60 min (1, 4.5%). While patients did not report decreased frequency of problems as a result of nurse troubleshooting using the ACE algorithm (2.5 vs. 2, p = 0.55), patients did report a significant improvement in their bother scores (4 vs. 2, p = 0.02). All but one patient reported that the recommendation was "some" or "a lot" helpful on follow up interview. The nurses all indicated that the tool helped "some" or "a lot."

DISCUSSION

The antegrade continence enema is valuable in managing neurogenic bowel, refractory constipation, and fecal incontinence, however, some patients experience problems with flushes that can often be difficult to manage.

CONCLUSION

Patients reported less bother with their bowel issues after using our algorithm for managing refractory constipation/fecal incontinence and nurses reported that the tool was helpful.

[The paraplegic patient-Characteristics of diagnostics and treatment in visceral surgery]

BACKGROUND

Patients with paraplegia develop syndrome-specific complications relevant to visceral surgery, which occur in the context of the acute spinal shock or as a consequence of the progressive neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) with the formation of an elongated colon and/or megacolon. Moreover, acute abdominal emergencies, such as acute appendicitis, cholecystitis, diverticulitis and ileus images, pose particular challenges for the clinician when the clinical signs are atypical or even absent. The expansion of indications for obesity surgery to include patients with a paraplegic syndrome, whose independence and quality of life can be impaired due to the restricted mobility, especially by obesity, is becoming increasingly more important.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of the special requirements and aspects in the treatment of this special patient collective and to show the evidence of paraplegia-specific visceral surgery treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Targeted literature search in Medline and Cochrane library (German and English, 1985-2020).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The clinical treatment of paraplegic patients requires in-depth knowledge of the pathophysiological changes at the different height of the paraplegia (upper versus lower motor neuron) and the phase of the disease (spinal shock versus long-term course). Missing or atypical clinical symptoms of acute diseases delay a quick diagnosis and make early diagnosis essential. The evidence for surgical treatment of the acute and chronic consequences of NBD is based on small retrospective series and case reports, as is that for special indications such as obesity surgery.

[Guidelines: neurogenic bowel dysfunction in spinal cord injury (long version)]

Die Leitlinie (AWMF-Register-Nr.: 179-004) „Neurogene Darmfunktionsstörung bei Querschnittlähmung“ der Deutschsprachigen Medizinischen Gesellschaft für Paraplegiologie ist an alle Personen adressiert, die Menschen mit kongenitalen oder erworbenen Querschnittlähmungen mit neurogenen Darmfunktionsstörungen (NDFS) betreuen. Insbesondere werden Ärzte, Pflegende und Therapeuten angesprochen. Die multiprofessionell erstellte Leitlinie (beteiligt waren Neuro-Urologen, Viszeralchirurgen, Gastroenterologen sowie Gesundheits- und Krankenpflegekräfte und Ernährungsberater sowie assoziierte Fachgesellschaften im Review-Verfahren) stellt eine praxisorientierte Unterstützung für die Versorgung von Patienten mit NDFS dar. Es werden Definitionen und aktuelles Wissen zur Diagnostik von NDFS sowie zu dem notwendigen konservativen Darmmanagement vermittelt, um eine kompetente Behandlung von Patienten mit NDFS zu gewährleisten. Dabei wird das Konzept der neurogenen Darmfunktionsstörung sowie deren klinische Auswirkungen beschrieben. Medikamentöse Interventionen und operative Eingriffe werden in Kurzform erläutert und Empfehlungen abgegeben. Das Hauptziel der vorliegenden Leitlinie besteht darin, Komplikationen inklusive der Stuhlinkontinenz und der Obstipation zu verhindern und so die Lebensqualität der Betroffenen positiv zu beeinflussen. Hilfreiche Anhänge, die im Alltag genutzt werden können, runden die Leitlinie ab.

Pediatric Neurogenic Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction: Will My Child Ever Be out of Diapers?

CONTEXT

Managing patient and parent expectations regarding urinary and fecal continence is important with congenital conditions that produce neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction. Physicians need to be aware of common treatment algorithms and expected outcomes to best counsel these families.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate evidence regarding the utilization and success of various modalities in achieving continence, as well as related outcomes, in children with neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a systematic review of the literature in PubMed/Medline in August 2019. A total of 114 publications were included in the analysis, including 49 for bladder management and 65 for bowel management.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Children with neurogenic bladder conditions achieved urinary continence 50% of the time, including 44% of children treated with nonsurgical methods and 64% with surgical interventions. Patients with neurogenic bowel problems achieved fecal continence 75% of the time, including 78% of patients treated with nonsurgical methods and 73% with surgical treatment. Surgical complications and need for revisions were high in both categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of children with neurogenic bladder dysfunction will achieve urinary continence and about three-quarters of children with neurogenic bowel dysfunction will become fecally continent. Surgical intervention can be successful in patients refractory to nonsurgical management, but the high complication and revision rates support their use as second-line therapy. This is consistent with guidelines issued by the International Children's Continence Society.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Approximately half of children with neurogenic bladder dysfunction will achieve urinary continence, and about three-quarters of children with neurogenic bowel dysfunction will become fecally continent. Most children can be managed without surgery. Patients who do not achieve continence with nonsurgical methods frequently have success with operative procedures, but complications and requirements for additional procedures must be expected.

Primary placement of a skin-level Cecostomy Tube for Antegrade Colonic Enema Administration Using a Modification of the Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Cecostomy (LAPEC)

PURPOSE

Children failing medical management for severe constipation and/or fecal incontinence may undergo surgical intervention for antegrade enema administration. We present a modification of the laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy (LAPEC) procedure that allows primary placement of a skin-level device.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review was performed from 2009 to 2015. In the modified technique the colonoscope is advanced to the cecum, cecal suspension sutures are placed under laparoscopic visualization, and percutaneous needle puncture of the cecum is performed under direct laparoscopic and endoscopic visualization. A skin-level cecostomy tube is then placed over a guide wire. Patient characteristics and 30-day results were analyzed by Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients underwent attempted LAPEC. Successful LAPEC using both laparoscopic and endoscopic guidance was achieved in 46 (88.5%). A MIC-KEY device was placed in 38. Corflo PEG tube placement was necessary in 14 due to high BMI (mean 28.4). Colonoscopy failed to reach the cecum in 6 and laparoscopy alone was utilized to achieve successful tube placement. Cecostomy site infections occurred in 3 (5.8%), only in those undergoing PEG placement using a pull technique (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Primary placement of a skin-level device was successful in the majority of patients undergoing cecostomy tube placement for bowel management utilizing antegrade colonic enemas. This technique avoids a second anesthesia for tube conversion. Visualization via colonoscopy with the use of cecal suspension sutures is recommended. High BMI necessitates initial placement of a PEG tube and complications exclusively occurred in this group.

TYPE OF STUDY

Clinical.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV Case series study.

Bowel management in children with spina bifida

Spina bifida is a birth defect that commonly causes bowel and bladder dysfunction in children with a significant negative impact on quality of life and emotional wellbeing. Fecal continence improves satisfaction and the quality of life of both children and their caretakers. Bowel management in children with spina bifida is hampered by limited controlled studies and variable practice within different institutions and subspecialists. The goals of a successful bowel management program in children with spina bifida consist of predictable bowel movements, social continence, and eventual independence. Treatment options range from conservative interventions such as diets and oral laxatives that modify stool consistency and transit, to trans-anal irrigations and antegrade continence enemas that facilitate predictable recto-sigmoid emptying and provide a greater degree of independence. In children, the treatment approach should be implemented in the context of the child's developmental age in order to allow for optimum social integration with their age-appropriate peers. We present a review of a stepwise approach to bowel management in children with spina bifida and the challenges related to the proposed treatment options.

Long-term outcomes of a Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) for the treatment of fecal incontinence or constipation in adults

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to assess the long-term outcome of a Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) procedure for fecal incontinence or constipation in adults.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study assessed the long-term outcome and quality of life (QoL) of patients who underwent a MACE procedure between 2005 and 2014 at the Maastricht University Medical Centre. Success rate was quantified by using Malone's continence scale. Quality of life was assessed by validated questionnaires covering general quality of life (SF-36 and Karnofsky scale), current pain level (visual analog scale), fecal incontinence (Vaizey incontinence survey), or constipation (Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score).

RESULTS

Based on patients' records, 22 out of 30 patients (73%; 95% CI 54-87%) were still using their MACE. Mean follow-up was 43 months (SD 25.9) since time of surgery. According to the Malone continence scale, the overall success rate was 37% (95% CI 20.0-53.3). Nine patients developed a postoperative complication. Eighteen out of 22 patients (13 with constipation and 5 with fecal incontinence) returned the QoL questionnaires (82% response rate). Long-term quality of life of patients with a MACE did not differ from the general Dutch population.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort of patients with fecal incontinence or constipation, MACE resulted in a disappointed overall success rate of 37%. However, it may be indicated in patients who do not prefer more invasive surgical procedures or a definite stoma. The success and morbidity rate should be thoroughly discussed with the patients preoperatively.

Bowel management in children with spina bifida

Spina bifida is a birth defect that commonly causes bowel and bladder dysfunction in children with a significant negative impact on quality of life and emotional wellbeing. Fecal continence improves satisfaction and the quality of life of both children and their caretakers. Bowel management in children with spina bifida is hampered by limited controlled studies and variable practice within different institutions and subspecialists. The goals of a successful bowel management program in children with spina bifida consist of predictable bowel movements, social continence, and eventual independence. Treatment options range from conservative interventions such as diets and oral laxatives that modify stool consistency and transit, to trans-anal irrigations and antegrade continence enemas that facilitate predictable recto-sigmoid emptying and provide a greater degree of independence. In children, the treatment approach should be implemented in the context of the child's developmental age in order to allow for optimum social integration with their age-appropriate peers. We present a review of a stepwise approach to bowel management in children with spina bifida and the challenges related to the proposed treatment options.

Variation in surgical management of neurogenic bowel among centers participating in National Spina Bifida Patient Registry

PURPOSE

Optimal management of neurogenic bowel in patients with spina bifida (SB) remains controversial. Surgical interventions may be utilized to treat constipation and provide fecal continence, but their use may vary among SB treatment centers.

METHODS

We queried the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry (NSBPR) to identify patients who underwent surgical interventions for neurogenic bowel. We abstracted demographic characteristics, SB type, functional level, concurrent bladder surgery, mobility, and NSBPR clinics to determine whether any of these factors were associated with interventions for management of neurogenic bowel. Multivariable logistic regression with adjustment for selection bias was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 5,528 patients with SB enrolled in the 2009-14 NSBPR. Of these, 1,088 (19.7%) underwent procedures for neurogenic bowel, including 957 (17.3%) ACE/cecostomy tube and 155 (2.8%) ileostomy/colostomy patients. Procedures were more likely in patients who were older, white, non-ambulatory, with higher-level lesion, with myelomeningocele lesion, with private health insurance (all p< 0.001), and female (p= 0.006). On multivariable analysis, NSBPR clinic, older age (both p< 0.001), race (p= 0.002), mobility status (p= 0.011), higher lesion level (p< 0.001), private insurance (p= 0.002) and female sex (p= 0.015) were associated with increased odds of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant variation in rates of procedures to manage neurogenic bowel among NSBPR clinics. In addition to SB-related factors such as mobility status and lesion type/level, non-SB-related factors such as patient age, sex, race and treating center are also associated with the likelihood of undergoing neurogenic bowel intervention.

Analysis of Factors Associated with Patient or Caregiver Regret following Surgery for Fecal Incontinence

PURPOSE

Malone antegrade continence enema has been a successful and widely used procedure for achieving fecal continence in children. We present data on the previously uninvestigated issue of patient and caregiver regret following surgery for intractable constipation and fecal incontinence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed all patients undergoing antegrade continence enema or cecostomy creation at a single institution between 2006 and 2016. Patients and caregivers were assessed for decisional regret using the Decisional Regret Scale. Results were correlated with demographics, surgical outcomes and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 81 responses (49 caregivers and 32 patients) were obtained. Mean followup was 49 months. Decisional regret was noted in 43 subjects (53%), including mild regret in 38 (47%) and moderate to severe regret in 5 (6%). No statistical difference in regret was noted based on gender, complications or performance of concomitant procedures. On regression analysis incontinence was strongly associated with decisional regret (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.1-18.1, p <0.001) and regret increased as age at surgery increased, particularly when patients were operated on at age 13 to 15 years (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.0-6.4 for age 13 years; OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.8 for age 14 years; OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1-8.8 for age 15 years).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first known study describing decisional regret following surgery for fecal incontinence. Surgical factors aimed at achieving continence may be effective in decreasing postoperative regret. The finding of increased regret in teenage patients compared to younger children should be shared with families since it may impact the age at which surgery is pursued.

Managing fecal incontinence in patients with myelomeningocele in Sub-Saharan Africa: Role of antegrade continence enema (ACE)

BACKGROUND

Neural tube defects (NTDs) are among the major causes of sphincter dysfunctions. Fecal incontinence (FI) because of myelomeningocele (MMC) leads to problems with social acceptability and decreased quality of life (QOL), life satisfaction in addition to other morbidities. This is a report of experience with antegrade continence enema (ACE) in the management of FI in patients with MMC in an African set-up.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A retrospective review of 23 children and young adults with FI because of MMC managed with ACE from October 2008 to September 2015 from African Specialist Hospital. The clinical outcomes have been analyzed.

RESULTS

From October 2008 to September 2015, a total of thirty-two n=32 patients underwent ACE procedure after repair of MMC associated with FI. Available data of 23 (71.87%) patients were reviewed retrospectively. Mean age at which ACE was created was 6.43±3.83years, range (3.5-17.8) years, median 5years. Follow-up after ACE creation was (0.5-6.9) years, median 2.6years. There were full continence in 13 (56.52%), partial continence in 8 (34.78%) and failure in 2 (8.69%). There were 16 (69.56%) complications and 4 (17.39%) minor post ACE surgery revisions. Mean PedQOL⁽™⁾ score before ACE and then 5, 10, and 15months after ACE were 47.86±13.83, range (20.4-66.0) vs 88.34±7.11, range (77.9-98.6); p=0.000, 88.9±6.44 range (76.9-98.5); p=0.000, 89.01±6.50, range (76.9-98.88) p=0.000 respectively. Mean parental/caregiver satisfaction score for 15 (65.21%) patients aged 6years and below using modified visual analogue scale (VAS) 1 to 10 before ACE and after were 3.06±0.79, range (2-4), median 3 vs 8.0±1.30, range (5-10), median 8; (p=0.000) while 8 (34.78%) patients aged above 6years were able to assess their satisfactions score before and after ACE creation with mean of 1.75±0.70, range (1-3), median 2 vs 7.75±1.03, range (6-9) median 8; (p=0.000).

CONCLUSION

ACE has satisfactory outcomes in an African set-up in patients with MMC associated with FI. Multidisciplinary approach to neurogenic FI should be encouraged in such set-ups.

Ambulatory patients with spina bifida are 50% more likely to be fecally continent than non-ambulatory patients, particularly after a MACE procedure

INTRODUCTION

While fecal incontinence (FI) affects many patients with spina bifida (SB), it is unclear if it is associated with ambulatory status.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if ambulatory status is associated with FI, and a potential confounding variable, in patients with and without a Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE).

STUDY DESIGN

This study retrospectively reviewed of patients aged ≥8 years with SB who were enrolled in an international quality of life study at outpatient visits (January 2013 to September 2015). Patients reported FI over the last 4 weeks (strict criteria: any FI/accidents vs no FI). Patients unable to self-report FI due to developmental delay were excluded. Those who were ambulating outdoors with/without braces/crutches were considered community ambulators. Non-parametric tests and logistic regression were used for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients with a MACE and 57 without a MACE were similar in gender (P = 0.99), ventriculoperitoneal status (P = 0.15) and age (16.0 vs 15.4 years, P = 0.11). Median ages at MACE procedure and follow-up were 7.0 and 8.2 years, respectively, and all used the MACE ≥3x/week. They were less likely to be ambulators (54.8 vs 71.9%, P = 0.03). In patients with a MACE, 64 (55.7%) had total fecal continence, compared with 29 (50.9%) without a MACE (P = 0.62). In the MACE group, ambulators were more likely to be continent compared with non-ambulatory patients (65.1 vs 44.2%, P = 0.04) (Table). Although not statistically significant, a similar difference was observed in the non-MACE group (56.1 vs 37.5%, P = 0.25). In the MACE group, continent and incontinent patients, regardless of ambulatory status, had similar rates of MACE use, additive use and time for MACE completion (P ≥ 0.43). MACE ambulators were more likely to be continent than MACE non-ambulators on multivariate analysis (OR 3.26, P = 0.01).

DISCUSSION

This study reported higher than typical FI rates since: (1) it used a stringent definition of total fecal continence; (2) patients without FI were perhaps less likely to participate; and (3) it relied on patient-reported rather than clinician-reported outcomes. This cross-sectional study should not be interpreted as "MACE procedure is ineffective;" this would require a longitudinal study. The present findings may not apply to young children or those with significant developmental delay (patients excluded from the study).

CONCLUSIONS

Ambulatory patients with SB are 50% more likely to have total fecal continence on long-term follow-up, particularly after a MACE procedure. Ambulatory status is a significant confounder of FI and should be considered in future analyses.

Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Patients with Neurogenic Bladder

Patients with primary neurologic conditions often experience urinary and bowel dysfunction due to loss of sensory and/or motor control. Neurogenic bowel dysfunction is frequently characterized by both constipation and fecal incontinence. In general, the management of neurogenic bowel dysfunction has been less well studied than bladder dysfunction despite their close association.. It is widely accepted that establishment of a multifaceted bowel regimen is the cornerstone of conservative management. Continuing assessment is necessary to determine need for more invasive interventions. In the clinical setting, the Urologist may be the principle provider addressing bowel concerns in addition to bladder dysfunction, and furthermore, treatment of one often impacts the other. Future directions should include development of follow up and management guidelines that address the comprehensive care of this patient population.

Assessment of pediatric Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) complications: Effects of variations in technique

OBJECTIVE

The Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) procedure is performed for patients with fecal incontinence and constipation who do not respond to medical therapy. The MACE procedure provides antegrade catheter access to the right colon and allows administration of enemas to help evacuate the bowel regularly. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for surgical complications in children who undergo the MACE procedure.

METHOD

Records from 97 pediatric patients who underwent MACE procedure were reviewed retrospectively. Data collected included age, sex, weight (obese/not obese), stomal location, presence of a permanent button/catheter in the stoma, open vs. laparoscopic surgery, and etiology of fecal incontinence/constipation. The complications reviewed included stomal stenosis, leakage, and stomal site infection. The relationships between the independent variables and complications were assessed using chi-square tests and Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Overall, 66 (68%) patients had at least one complication. Twenty-three (23.7%) patients developed stomal stenosis, and 27 (27.8%) patients had significant stomal leakage. Insertion of a stomal button/catheter device was associated with an increased risk of developing stomal leakage and stomal infection. The presence of a stomal button/catheter was also associated with a decreased risk of stomal stenosis (Figure). The non-intubated, imbricated sub-population, preteen patients (<12 years old) experienced more stomal leakage than teenage patients. In this subgroup, patients with umbilical stomas also experienced more leakage than patients with right lower quadrant (RLQ) stomas.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence rates of stomal complications in our study were consistent with previously reported series. In our study, however, stomal leakage had a higher prevalence in comparison with stomal stenosis. This seems to be related to the heterogeneity of the study group, which contained two variants of the MACE procedure; non-imbricated, intubated MACE and imbricated, non-intubated MACE. The use of stomal buttons in conjunction with MACE has previously been reported without changes in complication rates. We found the use of stomal buttons/catheters to be associated with changes in the prevalence of stomal complications. Stomal complications are common in the MACE procedure. The use of a permanent stomal button/catheter is associated with changes in the rates of stomal complications. While many find an umbilical stomal site is more cosmetically appealing, there is an increased risk of leakage with imbricated, non-intubated stomas. In the non-intubated, imbricated sub-population, the MACE procedure results in a higher risk of stomal leakage in preteen patients in comparison with teenage patients.

Absence of the appendix discovered during childhood

Absence of the appendix is rare. Isolated cases are usually discovered in adult patients or cadavers. We report the case of a 14 year old boy who was found to have no appendix on laparotomy for assumed acute appendicitis and use this opportunity to highlight the growing surgical uses of this vestigial structure.