Determination of normative values for 20 min exercise of wheelchair propulsion by spinal cord injury patients

Cultural adaptation and Turkish version of Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities in individuals with spinal cord injury: a reliability and validity study

PURPOSE

To translate the "Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD)" into Turkish, to make a cultural adaptation, and to examine the psychometric properties including validity and reliability.

METHODS

During the translation period cross-cultural adaptation design proposed by guideline was used. Patients completed the Turkish version of the PASIPD and it was applied again a week later. To determine the reliability and internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated. Test-retest reliability was determined by using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson's correlation analysis. Construct validity was examined with factor analysis. Convergent validity was examined by comparing PASIPD with Functional Independent Measurement (FIM), Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), and Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique Short (CHART-SF), and criterion validity was examined by comparing PASIPD with Manual wheelchair propulsion tests scores.

RESULTS

Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.725. The ICC coefficient for the test-retest reliability was 0.851. PASIPD was explained by three factors. The ratio of explaining the total variance of these 3 factors was determined as 51.66%. FIM (r = 0.307, p = 0.040) and CHART-SF were moderately positively correlated with PASIPD total score. The correlation between the total score of PASIPD and NHP was r = -0.443 (p = 0.002). 20 Meters Propulsion (r = -0.404, p = 0.005) and Slalom Tests (r = -0.305, p = 0.037) were highly negative and 6 min Push Propulsion (r = 0.456, p = 0.001) were moderately positive with PASIPD total score.

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of the PASIPD is a valid and reliable scale in patients with spinal cord injury. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Turkish and cross-culturally adapted version of PASIPD is a useful physical activity scale to evaluate the physical activity level of SCI.The Turkish version of the PASIPD is a valid and reliable scale and can be used in Turkish patients with SCI.PASIPD can be used to compare physical activity levels between disability types and groups with and without disabilities.PASIPD can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of attempts to increase physical activity in patients with SCI.

Neuromuscular efficiency of men with high and low spinal cord injury levels compared with non-disabled participants

BACKGROUND: The neuromuscular efficiency index (NME) is defined as the individual ability to generate force in relation to the muscle activation level and might be useful to the assessment of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and might elucidate the modifications in strength after an SCI compared to non-disabled subjects (CG). OBJECTIVE: Verify if the NME of fully and partially preserved muscles discriminate men with low and high levels of SCI and a matched non-disabled CG. METHODS: Fifty-four men with SCI were stratified into the high (HP), and low (LP) paraplegia groups and twenty-seven non-disabled individuals were selected (CG). All subjects performed maximum strength tests in the isokinetic dynamometer for shoulder abduction/adduction (isokinetic) and trunk flexion/extension (isometric). Surface electromyography was measured to calculate the NME, and discriminant analysis was carried out to identify which NME variables would be able to discriminate HP, LP, and CG. RESULTS: There were no NME significant differences between groups for the primary muscles of the shoulder abduction/adduction. All NME data failed at discriminant tolerance test to compare HP from LP. The latissimus dorsi NME during trunk extension discriminated CG from HP and LP. CONCLUSIONS: The latissimus dorsi NME during trunk extension might be used as an assessment tool to compare SCI individuals and the non-disabled-matched controls. The authors recommend using the NME index for the analysis or comparisons between the same SCI levels.

Are Body Composition, Strength, and Functional Independence Similarities Between Spinal Cord Injury Classifications? A Discriminant Analysis

CONTEXT

There seems to be no consensus on which aspects better distinguish the different levels of spinal cord injury regarding body composition, strength, and functional independence.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to determine which variables better differentiate tetraplegia (TP) from paraplegia and high paraplegia (HP) from low paraplegia (LP).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Rehabilitation hospital network.

PATIENTS

Forty-five men with spinal cord injury, n = 15 for each level (TP, HP, and LP) causing complete motor impairment (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale: A or B) were enrolled in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The 1-maximum repetition test, functional independence measure, spinal cord independence measure, and body composition (skinfold sum, body fat percentage, and body mass index) were assessed. Discriminant analysis was carried out using the Wilks lambda method to identify which strength and functional variables can significantly discriminate subjects for injury classification (TP, HP, and LP).

RESULTS

The discriminant variable for TP versus HP was body mass index and for TP versus LP was 1-maximum repetition (P ≤ .05). There were no variables that discriminated HP versus LP.

CONCLUSIONS

The discriminant variables for TP versus HP and TP versus LP were body mass index and 1-maximum repetition, respectively. The results showed that HP and LP are similar for strength and functional variables.

Differences of Relative and Absolute Strength of Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury From Able-Bodied Subjects: A Discriminant Analysis

CONTEXT

Strength training is one of the most common interventions employed to increase functional independence during rehabilitation of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, in the literature, different results have been reported in terms of strength modifications after a SCI compared with a control group (CG).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to verify whether discriminant analysis using relative and absolute strength is able to discriminate individuals with different levels of SCI from a CG and to compare strength values of men with different levels of SCI with a CG.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Rehabilitation hospital setting.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 36 individuals with SCI stratified in tetraplegia (TP; C6-C8), high paraplegia (HP; T1-T6), and low paraplegia (LP; T7-L2), and 12 matched control subjects were enrolled in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The subjects performed a maximum strength test of elbow extension/flexion and also shoulder abduction/adduction and flexion/extension in an isokinetic dynamometer. Discriminant analysis was carried out to identify which strength variables would be able to discriminate the TP, HP, or LP groups from the CG. A 1-way analysis of variance was performed to compare peak torque and agonist/antagonist ratio means.

RESULTS

Shoulder adduction, followed by elbow extension peak torque, was the best variable for discriminating the TP group from the CG (function coefficients: -0.056 and 0.051, respectively, Wilks Λ = 0.41, P ≤ .05). There were no significant differences between the HP group, LP group, and CG.

CONCLUSIONS

The strength similarity of the paraplegic groups and the CG should not be extrapolated for activities of daily living or sports. The TP group demonstrated lower peak torque for all movements than the CG.

The addition of three new items in the Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit improves the discrimination between different levels of spinal cord injury

Purpose: To determine whether the inclusion of three additional items improved the discriminative capacity of the Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit (AMWC). Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A total of 126 men (median age 28.9 years [percentiles 25 and 75: 23.7; 38.5 years]) with spinal cord injury were consecutively enrolled and divided into three subgroups: high paraplegia (HP), medium paraplegia (MP), and low paraplegia (LP). The participants performed the AMWC with three additional items. Ability score and total time of AMWC (AMWC_AS and AMWC_TT) and AMWC plus the three additional items (AMWC+3_AS and AMWC+3_TT), 3 min of overground wheeling test and performance score were evaluated. Results: AMWC was not able to discriminate HP from MP and LP (Wilks' lambda = 0.93; P= 0.07). In contrast, AMWC+3 was able to discriminate between the three subgroups (Wilks' lambda = 0.86; P≤ 0.05). AMWC+3_AS presented a better sensitivity compared to AMWC_AS (lower success rate for all subgroups, 38.5% vs. 82.1% for HP; 49.0% vs. 75.5% for MP; 78.9% vs. 94.7% for LP). The LP group presented a significant higher AMWC+3_AS compared to MP and HP (17.0 vs. 16.5 and 16.5, respectively, P≤ 0.05). AMWC+3_TT was significantly lower in LP compared to MP and HP (139.85 s vs. 242.52 s and 326.21 s, respectively, P≤ 0.05). Conclusion: The AMWC+3 outcomes were able to discriminate between HP, MP, and LP subgroups, and the addition of the three items enhanced the sensitivity of the wheelchair circuit. The performance of LP was more evident with significant differences compared to HP and MP for all AMWC+3 outcomes.

Cross-cultural validation of a Brazilian version of the adapted manual wheelchair circuit (AMWC-Brazil)

Purpose: To translate, culturally adapt and validate the Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit (AMWC) into Brazilian-Portuguese. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Sixty-six men (median age of 30.5 years [percentiles 25 and 75: 24.0; 38.3 years]) with traumatic spinal cord injury were consecutively enrolled and divided into two groups: tetraplegia (TP) and paraplegia (PP). The participants performed the AMWC-Brazil and were evaluated by the Spinal Cord Injury Measure version III (SCIM-III). Translation, translation synthesis, back-translation, committee review and construct validity were adopted for the cross-cultural adaptation. Construct validity was performed by testing whether the test scores were significantly correlated (Spearman's correlation coefficient) to the subjects' injury level, age, time since injury, body mass index (BMI) and SCIM-III scale. Results: All the AMWC-Brazil's outcomes were significantly correlated with SCIM-III total score and subscales (P ≤ 0.01). However, when the analyses were stratified over injury level, only the TP showed a high correlation between the AMWC-Brazil's outcomes and the SCIM-III. For construct validity, 4 of 5 hypotheses were confirmed. Only BMI was not a significant predictor of the AMWC-Brazil outcomes. Conclusion: The AMWC was successfully translated to the Brazilian-Portuguese (AMWC-Brazil) and presented high and satisfactory construct validity.

Influence of Relative Strength on Functional Independence of Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of strength values and fat mass on functional independence of men with different spinal cord injury (SCI) levels.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Hospital network.

PARTICIPANTS

Men with SCI (N=45).

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects were assessed in functional independence scales, a 1 repetition maximum (1RM) test, and body composition to detect absolute and relative strength: 1RM divided by body mass (BM) and lean body mass (LBM), respectively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to verify the influence of predictors on functional independence (FIM and Spinal Cord Independence Measure [SCIM] scale and subscales). Receiver operating characteristic curves were created to identify cutoff points of strength for functional independence.

RESULTS

The best models for FIM total, FIM mobility, and SCIM total used 1RM as the best predictor (adjusted R²=.75, .67, and .65, respectively; P<.05). Relative strength (1RM/LBM) was the best predictor for SCIM mobility (adjusted R²=.62, P<.05). A FIM score of 69 has a 1RM cutoff point of 50.1kg, and a FIM score of 76 has cutoff points of .73 for 1RM/BM and .91 for 1RM/LBM. A SCIM score of 68 has cutoff points for 1RM, 1RM/BM, and 1RM/LBM of 50.1kg, .77, and .92, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cutoff points of relative strength should be used as determinant variables for independence, health, or sports performance. This study may contribute to more adequate guidance of physical activity during a rehabilitation program and after discharge.