Outcome assessment in conservatively managed patients with cervical spine tuberculosis

Treatment response and complications during management of Pott's spine

The global incidence of TB in 2016 was 10.4 million and India accounts for a quarter of the global burden of TB. It is estimated that there are 2.79 million people with TB in India. About 10% of extra pulmonary TB involves bone and joints. Spinal TB accounts for half the cases of skeletal TB. The incidence of spinal TB is 1-4% of total TB cases, then it is estimated that only in India approximately 60,000 spinal TB cases exist. To report the pattern of recovery and predictors of outcome of Pott's spine. The intervention comprised of four drug antitubercular treatment, rest, immobilization, and ultrasonography or computerized tomography guided aspiration or biopsy as indicated outcome measures were six months Nurick grade, and mRS and complications like drug induced hepatitis (DIH) and paradoxical worsening. Seventy-three patients with Pott's spine, median age 36 (11-73) years, 32 (43.8%) females were included. The neurological signs were present in 44 (64.4%) patients. At six months, median Nurick grade improved from 4 to 2 and;and 70% patients had a good outcome as defined by mRS.The predictors of poor outcome were weight loss, non-ambulatory state on admission and paradoxical worsening. It is concluded that neurological involvement in Pott's spine was present in 64% patients, paradoxical worsening (deterioration in symptoms after one month of ATT) in 11% and DIH in 16%. Weight loss, non-ambulatory state on admission and paradoxical worsening predicted poor outcome.

Treatment for tuberculosis of the subaxial cervical spine: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes of patients with subaxial cervical spinal tuberculosis (SCS-TB) and evaluate the current evidence for surgical or nonsurgical treatment.

METHOD

A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. Studies published in English from January 2000 to December 2018 were included in the search. A reference lists search of relevant articles was also conducted for other potential references. The risk of bias was assessed with the 13-item criteria recommended by the Cochrane Back and Neck Group and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles were included with a total of 456 patients, of which only 1 study was randomized and fourteen were nonrandomized. The most common symptom reported was neck pain and stiffness, and the most common segment involved was C5. Of the 456 patients, 329 (72.1%) were treated surgically. Most experienced neurologic recovery after surgery. Instrumentation resulted in maintenance of the correction of alignment throughout the follow-up period. The use of radical debridement is still in debate.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-TB therapy is necessary for all SCS-TB patients, including those underwent surgical management. For patients with neurological dysfunction, the surgical method with decompression and instrumentation could provide better cervical spinal alignment and stability. For adult, the radical debridement remains in debate, while for children, radical debridement may cause the development of progressive kyphosis during growth. Larger randomized comparative studies with longer follow-up times are needed.

Cervical spine TB - Current concepts in management

OBJECTIVE

Cervical tubercular disease (CTB) is a rare pathology and constitutes 3-5% of all spinal TB. It includes atlantoaxial TB and sub-axial TB. As the literature evidence on this subject is scarce, majority of issues concerning CTB are still controversial. The current narrative review comprehensively discusses the various aspects related to CTB. Literature search: An elaborate search was made using keywords cervical tuberculosis, atlantoaxial tuberculosis, sub-axial tuberculosis, and cervico-thoracic tuberculosis, on pubmed and google (scholar.google.com) databases on 2 December 2020. We identified crucial questions regarding CTB and included relevant articles pertaining to them.

RESULTS

The initial search using keywords cervical tuberculosis, atlantoaxial tuberculosis, sub-axial tuberculosis, and cervico-thoracic tuberculosis yielded 4128, 76, 3 and 9 articles on 'pubmed' database, respectively. A similar search using the aforementioned keywords yielded 1,96,000, 2130, 117 and 728 articles on 'google scholar' database. The initial screening resulted in the identification of 178 articles. Full manuscripts were obtained for these articles and thoroughly scrutinised at the second stage. Review articles, randomised controlled trials and level 1 studies were given preference. Overall, 41 articles were included.

CONCLUSION

AATB and SACTB constitute 0.3 to 1% and 3% of spinal TB, respectively. The incidence of neuro-deficit in CTB is significantly more than other spinal TB. The general principles of management of CTB are similar to spinal TB elsewhere and medical therapy remains the cornerstone. Surgery is advocated in specific scenarios involving gross neuro-deficit, later stages of disease with significant bony/ligamentous disruptions, altered sagittal balance, drug resistance, and poor response to medications. The surgical approaches for AATB include anterior-alone, posterior-alone and combined approaches, although posterior access is the most preferred. Most of the studies on SACTB have supported the role of anterior approach. Additionally, posterior stabilisation may be necessary in specific scenarios. The overall long-term outcome in CTB is favourable.

Functional Outcomes in Spinal Tuberculosis: A Review of the Literature

Spinal tuberculosis often leads to neurological deficit and subsequent deterioration in functional outcomes. This review assesses the recent evidence on functional outcomes in spinal tuberculosis, highlighting functional recovery, assessment tools for functional measures, and associative factors for functional recovery. Using PubMed, a literature search was done using the terms “spinal tuberculosis,” “tuberculous spondylitis,” “tuberculous spondylodiscitis,” and “functional outcome” for original articles published between January 2010 and December 2019. A total of 191 search results were found. Detailed screening showed that 19 articles met the eligibility criteria: 13 of these focused on surgical methods, four on conservative management, and two on rehabilitation approaches. The outcome measures used for functional assessment were the Oswestry Disability Index (11 articles), Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (n=3), modified Barthel Index (n=2), Functional Independence Measure (n=2), and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (n=1). Functional outcome was mainly affected by pain, spinal cord compression, and inpatient rehabilitation. No significant difference in functional outcome was found between conservative management and surgery for cases with uncomplicated spinal tuberculosis. Most studies focused on surgery as the mode of treatment and used pain-related functional measures; however, these assessed functional limitations secondary to pain, and not neurological deficits. Further studies may consider examining functional outcomes in spinal tuberculosis by utilizing spinal cord-specific functional outcome measures, to evaluate outcome measures as a prognostic tool, and to measure functional outcomes from specific rehabilitation interventions.

Challenges and controversies in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis

Current guidelines regarding management of spinal TB are mostly extrapolated from trials on pulmonary disease. Since the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) trials in the 1970s, there are not many good quality studies that substantiate best practice guidelines for the management of this entity. Tuberculous infection of the spine behaves much differently from bacterial osteomyelitis and limited data leads to ambiguity in many cases. Although a few studies have been conducted in patients with spinal TB, most were in the era preceding short course chemotherapy and prior to current radiological and surgical advances. While spinal TB is primarily managed medically, surgical intervention may be needed in certain cases. We discuss areas of uncertainty and challenges that exist with regards to medical treatment, diagnosis, therapeutic endpoints, and a few surgical considerations. Substantial delay in diagnosis continues to be common with this disease even in the developed nations, leading to substantial morbidity. In light of limited evidence, there is an emerging recognition of the need to individualize various aspects of its treatment such as duration, frequency and acknowledging the limitations of various diagnostic and radiological modalities. We aim to consolidate potential areas of research in the diagnosis and management of spinal TB and to revisit the latest published evidence on its redressal.

Could Allograft Bones Combined with Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone Cages or Titanium Mesh Cages be an Alternative Grafting Method in the Management of Cervical Spinal Tuberculosis?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of allograft bones combined with poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cages or titanium mesh cages (TMCs) in the management of cervical spinal tuberculosis.

METHODS

A total of 16 patients with cervical spinal tuberculosis who underwent anterior debridement, reconstruction with allograft bones combined with PEEK cages or TMCs, and anterior plate fixation between 2013 and 2016 were retrospectively studied. Neck pain, neurologic status, operating time, intraoperative blood loss, cervical spine alignment, bony fusion, and self-reported clinical outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

Six patients underwent 1 level reconstruction using PEEK cages and 10 patients received TMCs reconstruction. Patients received a mean follow-up time of 45.9 ± 13.1 months. Neck pain was greatly relieved, as visual analog scale scores decreased from 4.6 ± 1.3 preoperatively to 0.7 ± 0.5 at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). Neurologic status was improved in all patients with neurologic deficits, with 9 patients improving by 1 grade and 1 patient by 2 grades. Kyphosis angle was corrected from 1.3 ± 12.0 degrees preoperatively to -5.4 ± 10.2 degrees postoperatively (P < 0.05) and remained at -3.6 ± 9.6 degrees at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). Bony fusion was achieved in all patients, with a mean time to the fusion of 3.8 ± 1.3 months. There was no implant failure or signs of cervical spinal tuberculosis recurrence. Excellent results, good results, and fair results were reported in 37.5%, 56.25%, and 6.25% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Allograft bone combined with PEEK cages and TMCs could bring about favorable clinical results in patients with cervical spinal tuberculosis. This method could be an alternative to autologous bone grafting method in the management of certain cases.

Evaluation and Management of Pyogenic and Tubercular Spine Infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the most current diagnostic tools and treatment options for pyogenic and tubercular spine infection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have focused on risk factors for failed nonoperative management in order to improve patient selection. Also, spine instrumentation and different grafting options have been safely utilized in the setting of an active infection without increasing the incidence of reoccurrence. However, the optimal surgical technique has yet to be established and instead should be patient specific. Spine infections include a broad spectrum of disorders including discitis, vertebral osteomyelitis, and spinal epidural abscess. It is paramount to recognized spine infections early due to the potential catastrophic consequences of paralysis and sepsis. The management of spine infections continues to evolve as newer diagnostic tools and surgical techniques become available. Magnetic resonance imaging with contrast is the imaging study of choice and computed tomography-guided biopsies are crucial for guiding antibiotic selection. Antibiotics are the mainstay of treatment and surgery is indicated in patients with neurological deficits, sepsis, spinal instability, and those who have failed nonoperative treatment.

The clinical outcomes and surgical strategy for cervical spine tuberculosis: A retrospective study in 78 cases

Literature on the treatment of cervical spinal tuberculosis (CSTB) is uncommon, the surgical approaches to cervical spinal tuberculosis were controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of 3 surgical techniques in CSTB patients, and to determine the most appropriate approach for CSTB patients. Between April 2006 and June 2012, we performed a retrospective review of clinical and radiographic data that were collected from 850 consecutive spinal tubercular patients, including 87 patients who were diagnosed and treated for CSTB in our hospital. Apart from 9 patients being treated conservatively, the remainder (78 cases) underwent surgery by anterior debridement, interbody fusion and instrumentation (A group), posterior instrumentation and anterior debridement, fusion and instrumentation in a single or two-stage operation (AP group), or posterior debridement, fusion and posterior instrumentation (P group). The patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively on the basis of hematologic, radiographic examinations, and neurologic function. The 78 patients were followed up for a mean duration of 41.2 ± 7.2 months (range, 24-65 months). Postoperatively, the preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) value returned to normal within 3 to 6 months in all patients, and solid bone fusion was achieved in 3 to 8 months. The patients exhibited significant improvement in deformity and neurological deficit postoperatively, while the visual analog scale for pain showed significant improvement in all patients at the last follow up visit. The follow-up outcomes demonstrated that all 3 surgical methods were viable management options for CSTB. Individualized therapeutic strategies should be selected according to the patient's general condition, focal characteristics, and the surgeon's experience.

Atlantoaxial TB with paralysis: posterior-only cervical approach with good results

Early posterior cervical approach is an effective strategy for patients with cervical tuberculosis in the appropriate circumstances.

25-Hydroxy Vitamin D, Vitamin D Receptor and Toll-like Receptor 2 Polymorphisms in Spinal Tuberculosis: A Case-Control Study

Vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene abnormalities confer susceptibility to tuberculosis. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), such asTLR-2, are also important mediators of inflammatory response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We evaluated serum vitamin D, and VDR and TLR-2 gene polymorphisms in patients with spinal tuberculosis.This study comprised of 3 groups: spinal tuberculosis, pulmonary tuberculosis, and controls (each with 106 subjects). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure vitamin D levels, and polymerase chain reaction-sequencing method was used to analyze VDR and TLR-2 gene polymorphisms. Patients were followed up for 6 months.Vitamin D deficiency was significantly more prevalent in patients with spinal tuberculosis (P < 0.001) and pulmonary tuberculosis (P = 0.011), versus controls. The heterozygous and mutant genotypes of VDR TaqI gene were significantly associated with spinal tuberculosis (P < 0.001; odds ratio [OR] 4.74 [2.45-9.18]) and pulmonary tuberculosis (P < 0.001; OR 3.52 [1.80-6.88]) when compared with controls. The heterozygous and mutant variants of VDR ApaI gene were significantly more common in patients with spinal tuberculosis in comparison with patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (P < 0.001; OR 2.90 [1.65-5.10]) and controls (P < 0.001; OR 6.56 [3.41-12.61]). We did not observe any significantly different results for TLR-2 gene polymorphisms. Vitamin D deficiency, VDR, and TLR-2 polymorphisms did not affect the 6-month disability.Vitamin D deficiency and VDR gene polymorphisms are significantly more prevalent in people with pulmonary and spinal tuberculosis. They may, in isolation or collectively, confer susceptibility to pulmonary and spinal tuberculosis.

Clinical characteristics and neurologic recovery of patients with cervical spinal tuberculosis: should conservative treatment be preferred? A retrospective follow-up study of 115 cases

OBJECTIVE

To present the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of neurologic recovery in patients with cervical spinal tuberculosis (CST).

METHODS

General description and multivariate analysis were used to detect possible predictors of the outcome of patients with neurologic deficit. Follow-up data were used to generate a Kaplan-Meier curve of neurologic recovery.

RESULTS

Protective factors in neurologic recovery included less involved vertebrae, surgery, and higher Japanese Orthopaedic Association score before treatment; not shorter symptom duration was not a protective factor. Normal neurologic function was present in 30% of patients 6 months after treatment, in 56% of patients 12 months after treatment, and in 93% of patients 28 months after treatment. The cumulative complete neurologic recovery rates at 6 months, 12 months, and 28 months were 44%, 68%, and 91.7% in the surgery group and 16.7%, 38.8%, and 94.4% in the nonsurgery group.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery and Japanese Orthopaedic Association score before treatment are important predictors of neurologic recovery in patients with CST. A neurologic recovery curve could predict neurologic recovery in patients with CST and indicate in patients with neurologic deficit how long it will take to achieve complete neurologic recovery. The effect of surgery is quick, and the effect of conservative treatment is slower, but no difference in neurologic recovery was found in the long-term. Conservative treatment should be tried in every patient with CST with no obvious indication for surgery. In contrast to patients with tuberculosis without cervical spine involvement but with more complications, comprehensive conservative therapy should be preferred for patients with neurologic deficit to avoid unnecessary surgery and overtreatment and to conserve medical resources. Indications for surgical intervention for CST should be carefully selected.