Reliability and discriminative ability of the spinal cord independence measure III (Thai version)

Reference Values and Cutoff Scores of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III to Determine Independence for Wheelchair Users and Ambulatory Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVE

To establish the reference values and optimal cutoff scores of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Version III (SCIM III) to indicate independence of wheelchair users (WU) and ambulatory (AM) individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Tertiary rehabilitation center and communities.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 309 (168 WU and 141 AM) participants with SCI.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

SCIM III scores.

RESULTS

Participants with greater levels of independence had significantly higher SCIM III scores, both total and subitem scores (P<.05). The SCIM III scores of ≥55 and ≥75 were optimal indicators of modified independence in WU and AM individuals, respectively (sensitivity and specificity >93%, AUC>.95). In addition, scores of 90 were proved to be excellent indicators for independence of AM individuals (sensitivity 94%, specificity 100%, AUC=.99).

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings provide the reference values of SCIM III scores covering WU and AM individuals with SCI at various levels of independence as well as optimal cutoff scores to indicate independence of these individuals. These data can be used as standard criteria for data comparison with patients' ability, and target functional values for individuals with SCI in clinical-, community-, and home-based settings.

Ability to detect history of falls among individuals with spinal cord injury using upper limb loading during a seated push-up test

BACKGROUND

A history of falls is an important risk factor for future falls, including for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) who often experience falls and subsequent injuries. This may be even more pronounced during the current COVID-19 pandemic because of the extreme shortage of hospital admission and restricted access to important services. Therefore, the ability of detecting a history of falls that can be applied to wheelchair users and ambulatory individuals with SCI in various settings are essential.

AIM

To investigate the discriminative ability of three clinical measures-the handgrip (HG) test, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III and Upper Limb Loading During a Seated Push-Up Test (ULL-SPUT)-in discriminating individuals with SCI with and without a history of falls over the past six months.

DESIGN

A 6-month retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Inpatient tertiary rehabilitation center.

POPULATION

One hundred and fourteen wheelchair users and ambulatory individuals with SCI.

METHODS

The participants were interviewed and assessed for their demographics, SCI characteristics and fall data over the past six months, with data confirmation from related events, their caregivers and medical records. Subsequently, they were assessed using the HG test, SCIM III, and ULL-SPUT.

RESULTS

In total, 29 participants (25%) fell during the past six months (with the number of falls ranging from 1-20, with minor consequences after the falls). Among the three clinical measures assessed in this study, the ULL-SPUT data of faller participants were significantly higher than those of non-fallers (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The limited rehabilitation length and increased staying home and social isolation prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic may have reduced the fall rates of the participants. The findings suggest a higher likelihood of falls among wheelchair users and ambulatory individuals with SCI who have good mobility as determined using ULL-SPUT data.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

Apart from being an important rehabilitation strategy, the present findings suggest an additional benefit of ULL-SPUT to identify individuals with SCI with a likelihood of future falls. The measurement can be done easily using digital bathroom scales placing over a flat and smooth surface. Therefore, it would enable the timely initiation of fall prevention strategies in various clinical, community, home and research settings; particularly in this COVID-19 pandemic of limited beds and hospital services for these individuals.

Reliability and concurrent validity of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III among rehabilitation professionals

Study design

A cross-sectional design.

Objectives

To investigate rater reliability of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure or SCIM III among rehabilitation professionals, along with the concurrent validity of the tool as compared to standard measures covering wheelchair users (WU) and ambulatory (AM) individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Setting

A tertiary rehabilitation center and communities.

Methods

Eighty-two participants with SCI (39 WU and 43 AM individuals) were assessed using SCIM III items. The data of first 30 participants were video recorded for rater reliability assessments by seven rehabilitation professionals, including nurses, occupational therapists, and physical therapists (one novice and one experienced rater for each professional). All participants were also assessed using standard measures to verify concurrent validity of SCIM III by an experienced rater.

Results

The SCIM III showed excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability among rehabilitation professionals when analyzed for overall items (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) >0.90) and separately for each subscale (kappa values >0.80). The total SCIM III of WU and the mobility scores of AM participants showed significant correlation with standard measures for muscle strength, limit of stability, balance control, functional endurance, and walking ability (r_s = 0.343–0.779; p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The present findings extend clinical benefit and confirm the use of SCIM III interchangeably among rehabilitation professionals after they have been adequately trained. The findings are important for community-based rehabilitation and home healthcare services, especially during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, when hospital beds and in-patient services are limited for individuals with SCI.

Test-retest reliability and validity of the Sitting Balance Measure-Korean in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-cultural reliability and validity.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate the Korean version of the Sitting Balance Measure (SBM-K) in Korean persons with incomplete spinal cord injury (ISCI).

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

METHODS

Twenty-nine persons with ISCI were evaluated using SBM-K, which was validated using the kappa coefficient and intraclass coefficient (ICC). The correlation between SBM-K individual items and total score was analyzed using Spearman's correlation, and the internal consistency of test items was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Additionally, the standard error measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) were measured. For the clinical validity of SBM-K, the correlation of SBM-K with the modified Sitting Balance Scale (mSBS) and the Korean-Spinal Cord Independence Measure-III (KSCIM-III) was determined via Spearman's correlation. Linear regression was performed to determine whether SBM-K could predict KSCIM-III.

RESULTS

The weighted kappa score of the SBM-K individual items and ICC of SBM-K total score were 0.76-0.83 (good-very good) and 0.98 (0.95-0.99), respectively. The correlation between the SBM-K total score and individual items was notable (r = 0.78-0.98). Cronbach's alpha, SEM, and MDC of SBM-K were 0.98, 0.59, and 1.64, respectively. The clinical validity of SBM-K correlated with mSBS (r = 0.88) and KSCIM-III (r = 0.65-0.89). SBM-K accounted for 17-72% of the variance in predicting KSCIM-III.

CONCLUSIONS

SBM-K showed sufficient test-retest reliability, validity, and marginal measurement errors. SBM-K can serve as an optimal clinical assessment tool for Korean ISCI patients and may provide clinicians with reliable sitting balance assessment in Korean clinical settings.

An investigation into the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the validity and reliability of a Chinese version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) in individuals with spinal cord injury.

DESIGN

Study on psychometric properties.

SETTING

An inpatient rehabilitation facility in China.

SUBJECTS

102 participants with spinal cord injury. Mean (SD) age was 48.8 (15.6) years; tetraplegia/paraplegia ratio was 50/52; median time post injury was 2 months.

INTERVENTION

SCIM III was translated into Chinese. Chinese versions of Barthel Index and SCIM III were filled out for each participant by Rater 1. SCIM III was then administered by Rater 2 after 24 hours (n = 67) and 7 days (n = 65).

MAIN MEASURES

Validity, inter-rater/test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of the Chinese version of SCIM III.

RESULTS

The total scores between the two raters were similar (mean ± SD: 33.8 ± 25.8 vs 33.8 ± 25.5, P = 0.95). Total agreement between the raters in each item was >80%, with both Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients >0.97 (P < 0.01) for each subscale and total score. The Pearson correlation coefficients of the two independent assessments performed by Rater 2 were also >0.97 (P < 0.01) for each subscale and the total score. Cronbach α was >0.7 for each subscale and the total score for both raters. High consistency was found between Barthel Index and SCIM III total scores (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.88, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of SCIM III is valid and reliable for the functional assessment of patients with SCI.

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Thai version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III-Self Report

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional reliability and validation study.

OBJECTIVE

To translate and assess the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III-Self Report (TH-SCIM-SR) in Thai spinal cord injury (SCI) patients.

SETTING

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University.

METHODS

A cross-cultural forward and backward translation of the original Spinal Cord Independence Measure III-Self Report (SCIM-SR) was performed at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand, to create the TH-SCIM-SR. The inclusion criteria were Thai patients with SCI duration of ≥3 months. Patients were evaluated by a team of healthcare professionals using the Thai version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Version III (TH-SCIM III). Study patients subsequently completed the TH-SCIM-SR two times with a 3-day interval between evaluations. Cronbach's Alpha, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to examine internal consistency, concurrent validity, and reliability, respectively. Bland-Altman plot was used to compare scoring results between the TH-SCIM III and the TH-SCIM-SR.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included. Cronbach's alpha of total score, self-care subscale, respiration/sphincter management, and mobility subscale were 0.91, 0.94, 0.75, and 0.90, respectively. The reliability analysis showed good reliability. The test-retest ICC of total score, self-care subscale, respiration/sphincter management, and mobility subscale were 0.95, 0.95, 0.78, and 0.96, respectively. Regarding construct validity, the subscales of TH-SCIM-SR demonstrated a strong correlation with those of the TH-SCIM III (0.85-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

TH-SCIM-SR showed good reliability and validity for assessing functional independence in Thai patients with SCI.

Lack of knowledge and training are the major obstacles in application of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) in China

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the use of functional outcome measurements after spinal cord injury (SCI) in current clinical practice and to explore the knowledge about the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) among SCI physicians in China, and to find facilitators for a broader utilization of SCIM.

DESIGN

A survey-based study.

SETTING

SCI workshops at Peking University.

PARTICIPANTS

125 Chinese SCI physicians attending annual workshops in two consecutive years.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

OUTCOME MEASURES

A questionnaire was administered. The following items were included: whether functional outcome measurement for SCI individuals was performed and with which assessment tool(s); what items should be included in the assessment; whether they knew about the SCIM, its latest version, the Chinese translation, and if so from what source; the possible reasons why SCIM was not implemented in clinical practice; and whether training before using the SCIM was needed, and the training method preferred.

RESULTS

Among these physicians, 84.8% performed functional outcome measurement for individuals with SCI, but only 29.6% of attendees were aware of the SCIM and 20.8% had used it. Lack of training was the major reason why SCIM was not used in clinical practice. Furthermore, 74.4% of the physicians felt they needed formal training before using the SCIM.

CONCLUSION

The use of SCIM is limited in clinical practice in China, which is mainly attributed to lack of knowledge and training. Formal training on the use of the SCIM is essential for its dissemination and will improve functional SCI outcome measurement in China.

Effects of the Computer Desk Level on the Musculoskeletal Discomfort of Neck and Upper Extremities and EMG Activities in Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries

Background

Computers are used as a means of social communication, for work and other purposes. However, patients with spinal cord injuries may have a higher risk than normal individuals with musculoskeletal problems when using computers owing to their inability to control respective postures due to problems in motor and sensory functioning.

Objectives

This study is aimed at identifying the effect of computer desk heights on musculoskeletal discomforts of the neck and upper extremities and EMG activities in patients with spinal cord (C6) and upper thoracic spinal cord injuries.

Methods

Participants of the present study were the patients diagnosed with ASIA A or B. The patients were divided into two groups according to their spinal cord injuries: C6 group and T2-T6 group. The level of the desk was set at 5 cm below the elbow, at the elbow level, and 5 cm above the elbow level. Electromyography was used to measure the duration of typing task EMG(%RVC) of the cervical erector spinae, upper trapezius, anterior deltoid, and wrist extensor. Subjective musculoskeletal discomfort (Borg-RPE) was measured at the end of the experiment.

Results

The two groups showed differences in terms of RPE corresponding to each level of the computer desk (p < .05). Postanalysis revealed the C6 group had decreased RPE as the level of computer desk increased, whereas the subjects in the T2-T6 group had decreased RPE values in accordance with the decreasing level of computer desk (p < .05). In EMG, both groups had no significant differences (p > .05). However, in terms of the interaction between the muscles and the level of computer desk in both groups, the differences in the interactions of the upper trapezius and wrist extensor with each level of the desk were found (p < .05).

Conclusion

This study is meaningful in that it confirms computer work posture and preference of spinal cord-injured individuals.

Despite limitations in content range, the SCIM-III is reproducible and a valid indicator of physical function in youths with spinal cord injury and dysfunction

STUDY DESIGN

Multi-center, repeated measures OBJECTIVES: Evaluate psychometric properties of the SCIM-III in children.

SETTING

Seven facilities in North America METHODS: One-hundred and twenty-seven youths, mean age of 10.8 years and chronic spinal cord injury/dysfunction completed two administrations of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure-III (SCIM-III). Mean, standard deviation, range values were calculated for SCIM-III total and subscales for the entire sample, four age groups and injury characteristics. Test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and floor and ceiling effects were examined.

RESULTS

Total SCIM-III and self-care (SC) subscale scores for the youngest age group were lower than those for the three older age groups. There were statistically significant differences in SC subscale scores between neurological level (NL) C5-T1 and T2 -T12; C5-T1 and L1-S4/5; and T2-T12 and L1-S4/5 and in in-room, and indoor/outdoor mobility subscale scores between C1-C4 and T2-T12; C1-C4 and L1-S4/5; C5-T1 and T2-T12; C5-T1 and L1-S4/5; and T2-T12 and L1-S4/5. All scores between motor complete and motor incomplete differed. Test-retest reliability was good (ICC values = > 0.84) and there was moderate to strong correlation between SCIM-III and the FIM® Instrument (r = 0.77-0.92). Ceiling effects were present in the SC subscale for the oldest age group (24%) and for NL L1-S4/5 (35.5%) and in in-room mobility subscale for 6-12 (45.7%), 13-15 (30.43%) and 16-17 (60%) ages, paraplegia (42.4%), tetraplegia (37.1%), incomplete injuries (50%), and T2-T12 (38%) and L1-S4/5 (100%) NL.

CONCLUSION

Despite limitations in content range, the SCIM-III is reproducible, and a valid indicator of physical functioning in youth with SCI/D 6 years of age and older.

SPONSORSHIP

The study was funded by the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, Spinal Cord Injury Research on the Translation Spectrum, Senior Research Award Grant #282592 (Mulcahey, PI).