Reporting of occupational exposures to blood and body fluids in the primary dental care setting in Scotland: an evaluation of current practice and attitudes

Primary care dental professionals' experiences of sharp injuries in Qatar: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Very few studies assess sharp injuries solely among dental professionals globally. This study aims to understand the experiences of sharp injuries among primary care dental professionals in Qatar.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study where dental professionals working at the Primary Health Care Corporation (PHCC), a public sector healthcare organization and Qatar's largest primary care provider with 27 primary healthcare centers in Qatar, were invited to participate. An online questionnaire was administered to understand participants' experience of sharp injuries and access to occupational health services and training.

FINDINGS

A total of 114 dental professionals participated in this study. In total, 68.42% (N=78) of participants reported experiencing a sharp injury in the 12 months prior to the survey. Majority (N=58; 75.36%) of the reported causes of sharp injuries were related to dental explorers (N=31; 40.26%) and dental injection needles (N=27; 40.26%). Of those who had experienced a sharp injury, 84.47% (N=87) did not report them.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the results highlight that sharp injuries are common among primary care dental professionals, and despite having good access to occupational support services, most dental professionals did not report their injuries. Continuous education and training programs must be implemented to improve knowledge and raise awareness to reduce the burden of sharp injuries among dental professionals. More studies from other dental settings are needed to better understand dental professionals' experiences of sharp injuries in Qatar and elsewhere.

Occupational Safety and Hygiene of Dentists from Urban and Rural Areas in Terms of Sharp Injuries: Wound Structure, Causes of Injuries and Barriers to Reporting-Cross-Sectional Study, Poland

(1) Background: Frequent contact of the dentist with potentially infectious material (PIM) is undeniable. The aim of the study was to determine the frequency and type of injuries, as well as to identify barriers to reporting and barriers to the implementation of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) among dentists from urban and rural areas. (2) Methods: We surveyed 192 dentists using an anonymous questionnaire. (3) Results: During the 12 months preceding the survey, 63% of dentists from the village and 58.8% of dentists from the city suffered at least one superficial cut, and deep cuts 15.1% and 17.6% respectively. Contact with PIM through spitting on the conjunctiva was 58.9% and 52.1% (village vs. city). Needle stick injuries were 50.4% and fingers were affected in 48.8% cases. The causes of injuries were: inattention 54.7%, rush 27%, unpredictable behavior of the patient 19%, recapping 18.2%. Work in the countryside was associated with a 1.95-times greater chance of not reporting injuries. The distance from a hospital with antiretroviral treatment may be a barrier to the implementation of PEP. (4) Conclusion: The circumstances of the injuries and the reasons for not applying for antiretroviral treatment point to the areas of necessary dentist education in this topic.

The Prevalence and Underreporting of Needlestick Injuries among Dental Healthcare Workers in Pakistan: A Systematic Review

Needlestick injuries (NSIs) are a major occupational health problem among dental healthcare workers (HCWs) in Pakistan, which places them at a significant risk of acquiring blood-borne infections. However, not all NSIs are reported, leading to an underestimation of the actual prevalence. The harmful impacts of NSIs on the healthcare delivery necessitate an urgent need to measure its actual prevalence. Objectives. The aim of this study was to review literature to estimate the prevalence and reporting rates of NSIs among dental-HCWs in Pakistan. Methods. 713 potentially relevant citations were identified by electronic databases and hand searching of articles. Nine primary studies were subsequently identified to be included in the review. Results. The results of the included studies indicate that the prevalence of NSIs among Pakistani dental-HCWs was between 30% and 73%. The rate of reporting of NSIs was between 15% and 76%, and the most common reason was found to be the lack of awareness regarding the reporting system, or of the need to report NSIs. Conclusion. It is evident from the review of the included studies that there is a significantly high prevalence and a low rate of reporting of NSIs among dental-HCWs in Pakistan, suggesting the need to setup an occupational health department in dental settings, for preventing, managing, recording, and monitoring NSIs.

Occupational exposure to bodily fluids in oral and maxillofacial surgery: an evaluation of reporting practices and attitudes among staff at a major teaching hospital in the UK

Our aim was to evaluate experience, practice, and beliefs about reporting of occupational exposures to blood and other body fluids among a sample of 88 healthcare providers working in oral and maxillofacial surgery at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals. We used a cross-sectional survey to evaluate awareness of the Trust's policy for reporting occupational exposure, recent incidence of exposure, and current reporting practices. Beliefs were measured using questions derived from the theory of planned behaviour. Fifty-five people responded, 14 of whom had been exposed to bodily fluids in the previous 12 months. Of those, 10 did not report it. Fifty-three respondents were certain that the Trust had a protocol in place for reporting sharps injuries to staff. Most (n=51) said the Trust had a protocol for reporting mucocutaneous exposure to blood. Respondents placed equal importance on reporting exposures that affected both themselves and patients, but intention to report exposure of patients was significantly higher than for themselves (z score -3.18, p<0.0001). We conclude that OMFS healthcare workers generally think that occupational exposures should be reported, but there are shortcomings in practice.

Contamination of dental goggles and effectiveness of 3 disinfectants in a stomatology hospital

We investigated the contamination levels of dental goggles to assess the infection risk in a stomatology hospital and compared the effectiveness of 3 disinfectants, including Swashes (Swashes Enterprise, Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China), medical ethanol (75%), and chlorine-containing disinfectant (500 mg/L). The results showed that 87.41% of goggles had bacterial contamination. In total, 54% of cultures included gram-positive cocci, making them the major microbial group contaminating the goggles. All 3 disinfectants showed excellent performance in disinfection, and there were no significant differences among the eligibility rates of the 3 disinfectants (97.2% vs 100.0% vs 100.0%, respectively). The study highlights the fact that dental goggles are potential reservoirs of nosocomial pathogens. Disinfection of goggles could be an effective and practical infection control method for dental practice.