Comparing the profile of child patients attending dental general anaesthesia and conscious sedation services

Providing sealants at the general anaesthetic assessment visit for children requiring caries-related dental extractions under general anaesthetic: a pilot randomised controlled trial

Introduction Children experiencing a caries-related dental general anaesthetic (GA) are at high risk of developing new caries. It is thus important to maximise opportunities for prevention.Aim To undertake a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial (RCT) to assess the feasibility of delivering and evaluating the effectiveness of sealing sound permanent molars at the pre-GA assessment appointment in children needing caries-related extractions under GA.Methods Children (5-15 years) scheduled for GA extractions at Birmingham Dental Hospital were randomised to control or sealant groups. At the pre-GA assessment appointment, sound permanent molars were sealed. Participants were followed up at two years.Results In total, 132 children were assessed for eligibility and 100 randomised (50 control, 50 sealant). Forty-nine children in the intervention group had sealants applied. At two years, 82 children returned for follow-up (43 control, 39 sealant). Sealants were retained on 93.5% (244/261) of surfaces sealed at baseline. Overall, 42% (n = 18) of control group participants had dentine caries in at least one permanent molar that was sound at baseline compared with none in the sealant group.Conclusion Following caries-related extractions under GA, children are at high risk of developing new caries in permanent molars that were sound at the time of the GA. Sealant placement during the pre-GA assessment visit is feasible and may reduce caries incidence in this vulnerable group. High-risk families were found to be reliable study participants.

A rapid review of variation in the use of dental general anaesthetics in children

Introduction The use of dental general anaesthetics (DGAs) remains a cause for concern due to additional strains placed on health services. There are numerous factors influencing the prevalence and use of DGAs, and understanding these is an important first step in addressing the issue.Aim Conduct a rapid review of current peer-reviewed and grey literature on the variation in the use of DGAs in children.Methods Electronic searching using Medline via Ovid covering DGA articles from 1998 onwards, written in English. Publication types included primary and secondary sources from peer-reviewed journals and reports, as well as grey literature.Results From 935 results, 171 articles were included in the final review. Themes emerging from the literature included discussions of DGA variation, variations in standards of service provision by health services, and the socio-demographic and geographical characteristics of children. Prominent socio-demographic and geographical characteristics included age, other health conditions, ethnic and cultural background, socioeconomic status and deprivation, and geographical location.Conclusions This review identified numerous variations in the patterns associated with DGA provision and uptake at both a health service and individual level. The findings demonstrate the complicated and multifaceted nature of DGA practices worldwide.

The impact of dental caries and its treatment under general anaesthetic on children and their families

Objective

To assess the impact of dental caries and treatment under general anaesthetic (GA) on the everyday lives of children and their families, using child-reported measures of quality of life (QoL) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).

Method

Participants, aged 5–16 years old having treatment for dental caries under GA, were recruited from new patient clinics at Charles Clifford Dental Hospital, Sheffield. OHRQoL was measured before and 3-months after treatment using the Caries Impacts and Experiences Questionnaire for Children (CARIES-QC). Overall QoL was measured using the Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D). Parents/caregivers completed the Family Impact Scale (FIS).

Results

Eighty five parent–child dyads completed the study. There was statistically significant improvement in OHRQoL (mean interval score difference in CARIES-QC = 4.43, p < 0.001) and QoL (mean score difference in CHU9D = 2.48, p < 0.001) following treatment, with moderate to large effect sizes. There was statistically significant improvement in FIS scores (mean score difference = 5.48, p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Treatment under GA was associated with improvement in QoL and OHRQoL as reported by children, and reduced impacts on the family. This work highlights the importance of GA services in reducing the caries-related impacts experienced by children. Further work is needed investigate the impact of clinical, environmental and individual factors.