Weekly platinum chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer

Drug-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Current and Future Perspectives

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a complex disease with diverse histological subtypes, which, based on the aggressiveness and course of disease progression, have recently been broadly grouped into type I (low-grade serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous) and type II (high-grade serous, high-grade endometrioid, and undifferentiated carcinomas) categories. Despite substantial differences in pathogenesis, genetics, prognosis, and treatment response, clinical diagnosis and management of EOC remain similar across the subtypes. Debulking surgery combined with platinum-taxol-based chemotherapy serves as the initial treatment for High Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma (HGSOC), the most prevalent one, and for other subtypes, but most patients exhibit intrinsic or acquired resistance and recur in short duration. Targeted therapies, such as anti-angiogenics (e.g., bevacizumab) and PARP inhibitors (for BRCA-mutated cancers), offer some success, but therapy resistance, through various mechanisms, poses a significant challenge. This comprehensive chapter delves into emerging strategies to address these challenges, highlighting factors like aberrant miRNAs, metabolism, apoptosis evasion, cancer stem cells, and autophagy, which play pivotal roles in mediating resistance and disease relapse in EOC. Beyond standard treatments, the focus of this study extends to alternate targeted agents, including immunotherapies like checkpoint inhibitors, CAR T cells, and vaccines, as well as inhibitors targeting key oncogenic pathways in EOC. Additionally, this chapter covers disease classification, diagnosis, resistance pathways, standard treatments, and clinical data on various emerging approaches, and advocates for a nuanced and personalized approach tailored to individual subtypes and resistance mechanisms, aiming to enhance therapeutic outcomes across the spectrum of EOC subtypes.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of trabectedin and cisplatin in solid tumours

AIM OF THE STUDY

To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of trabectedin (T) and cisplatin (C) given on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks to adult patients with advanced solid tumours. Plasma pharmacokinetics at cycle 1 and a preliminary anti-tumour activity assessment in ovarian and non-small cell lung cancer (OC, NSCLC) were secondary objectives.

METHODS

In the dose finding part (DFP) of the study the dose of T given at each administration was escalated by 100 microg/m(2) increments from 300 microg/m(2) up to the MTD, with a fixed dose of C of 40 mg/m(2). The recommended dose (RD) was assessed in the previously treated and untreated OC and NSCLC patients in the expansion of the RD (ERD) part of the study. T was administered with corticosteroids pre-medication as 3-h infusion and C as 30-min infusion.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were treated in the DFP and 10 in the ERD. The MTD of T was 700 microg/m(2) due to dose-limiting neutropaenia and the RDs in the previously treated/untreated patients were 500 and 600 microg/m(2), respectively. Most common toxicities were nausea/vomiting (67%), asthenia/fatigue (55%) and reversible ASAT/ALAT elevation (51%). Time to recovery from myelosuppression was dose-dependent and treatment could be repeated after > or = 4 weeks in the majority of patients at 600 microg/m(2). Confirmed partial responses were observed in 4 of 13 evaluable OC patients and in 1 with uterine leiomyosarcoma. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed.

CONCLUSION

The administration of T and C on days 1 and 8 resulted in prolonged neutropaenia requiring treatment delay. The evaluation of a single every 3 week schedule is worthwhile because of the hints of anti-tumour activity observed in OC.

Serum PSA half-life as a predictor of survival for hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients: modelization using a standardized set of response criteria

OBJECTIVE

Changes of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) during chemotherapy have been validated as a marker of response for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients. We retrospectively established new response criteria to assess the risk of death.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty-six chemonaive HRPC patients treated with chemotherapy were included in the analysis. According to PSA half-life (HL) dynamics, three response categories were defined: responders (R), late-progressors (LP) and initial-progressors (IP), that were compared with Working Group (WG) criteria. PSA HL time to failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were estimated and compared between HT categories. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to isolate the impact on OS of these response categories. A new predictor of survival, delta-time PSA interval (DeltaT) was described.

RESULTS

PSA HL categories were strongly related with WG criteria (P = 0.0001). PSA HL TTF differed among PSA HL categories: 4.2, 2.3, and 0.9 months for R, LP, and IP patients, respectively, and their respective median OS were 27, 19.7, and 12.3 months (P = 0.0001). For DeltaT > or = 3 versus <3 months, median OS significantly differed: 24.9 months versus 13.2 months (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

PSA HL dynamics during chemotherapy were able to accurately predict survival, earlier than WG-defined progression criteria. This criterion should be prospectively evaluated in randomized trials for HRPC patients in order to better estimate the risk of death.