The role of RAS oncogene in survival of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis

Glycemic status, insulin resistance, and mortality from lung cancer among individuals with and without diabetes

BACKGROUND

The effects of glycemic status and insulin resistance on lung cancer remain unclear. We investigated the associations between both glycemic status and insulin resistance, and lung cancer mortality, in a young and middle-aged population with and without diabetes.

METHODS

This cohort study involved individuals who participated in routine health examinations. Lung cancer mortality was identified using national death records. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for lung cancer mortality risk.

RESULTS

Among 666,888 individuals (mean age 39.9 ± 10.9 years) followed for 8.3 years (interquartile range, 4.6-12.7), 602 lung cancer deaths occurred. Among individuals without diabetes, the multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CI) for lung cancer mortality comparing hemoglobin A1c categories (5.7-5.9, 6.0-6.4, and ≥ 6.5% or 39-41, 42-46, and ≥ 48 mmol/mol, respectively) with the reference (< 5.7% or < 39 mmol/mol) were 1.39 (1.13-1.71), 1.72 (1.33-2.20), and 2.22 (1.56-3.17), respectively. Lung cancer mortality was associated with fasting blood glucose categories in a dose-response manner (P for trend = 0.001) and with previously diagnosed diabetes. Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR ≥ 2.5) in individuals without diabetes was also associated with lung cancer mortality (multivariable-adjusted HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.13-1.75). These associations remained after adjusting for changing status in glucose, hemoglobin A1c, insulin resistance, smoking status, and other confounders during follow-up as time-varying covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Glycemic status within both diabetes and prediabetes ranges and insulin resistance were independently associated with an increased risk of lung cancer mortality.

Current perspectives of KRAS in non-small cell lung cancer

NSCLC has a diverse genomic background with mutations in key proto-oncogenic drivers including Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Roughly 40% of adenocarcinoma harbor Kras activating mutations regardless of smoking history. Most KRAS mutations are located at G12, which include G12C (roughly 40%), G12V (roughly 20%), and G12D (roughly 15%). KRAS mutated NSCLC have higher tumor mutational burden and some have increased PD-1 expression, which has resulted in better responses to immunotherapy than other oncogenes. While initial treatment for metastatic NSCLC still relies on chemo-immunotherapy, directly targeting KRAS has proven to be efficacious in treating patients with KRAS mutated metastatic NSCLC. To date, two G12C inhibitors have been FDA-approved, namely sotorasib and adagrasib. In this review, we summarize the different drug combinations used to target KRAS G12c, upcoming G12D inhibitors and novel therapies targeting KRAS.

Garsorasib in patients with KRASG12C-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer in China: an open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Garsorasib (D-1553; InventisBio, Shangai, China), a potent KRASG12C inhibitor, has shown promising antitumour activity in patients with KRASG12C-mutated (ie, Gly12Cys) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase 1 study. We report results from a phase 2 study conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of garsorasib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC.

METHODS

This open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial enrolled adult patients with KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC who had previously been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors from 43 hospitals in China. Participants received 600 mg garsorasib orally twice per day. Tumour assessments were performed at baseline, at the end of every two cycles (of 21 days) for the first eight cycles, and at the end of every three cycles thereafter. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) following the guidelines in Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1. Efficacy and safety were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of garsorasib. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05383898, and is active but no longer recruiting.

FINDINGS

From June 17, 2022, to May 17, 2023, of 225 patients screened for eligibility, 123 patients were enrolled and treated with garsorasib. Of these 123 participants, the median age was 64 years (IQR 59-68), 108 (88%) were male and 15 (12%) were female. At data cutoff (Nov 17, 2023), the median follow-up duration was 7·9 months (IQR 6·3-10·4), and 82 (67%) of 123 patients had discontinued treatment. The IRC-confirmed ORR was 50% (61 of 123 patients; 95% CI 41-59). 117 (95%) of 123 patients reported treatment-related adverse events, with 61 (50%) experiencing grade 3 or higher events. The most common types of adverse events of grade 3 or higher associated with garsorasib were hepatic and gastrointestinal events, including increased liver enzymes, such as aspartate aminotransferase (21 [17%] of 123 participants), alanine aminotransferase (19 [15%] of 123 participants), and gamma-glutamyltransferase (28 [23%] of 123 participants); nausea (2 [2%] of 123 participants); and vomiting (2 [2%] of 123 participants). No new safety signals were identified, and most of the adverse events were well managed.

INTERPRETATION

The results show that garsorasib has a high response rate, long duration of response, and an acceptable and manageable safety profile in patients with previously treated KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC. Garsorasib potentially provides a promising treatment option for this patient population.

FUNDING

InventisBio.

Prognostic Value of KRAS Mutations in Relation to PDL1 Expression and Immunotherapy Treatment in Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: A Greek Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Factors that could predict which patients will benefit from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) are not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of KRAS biomarker in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in relation to clinical characteristics, treatment response and PDL1 expression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 100 patients with NSCLC who received immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy as 1st line treatment. In biopsy samples, the PDL1 biomarker expression rate and somatic mutations of KRAS gene were determined.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 67 ± 8 years. Patients were all male and 66% were found with adenocarcinoma whereas 34% with squamous cell carcinoma. The KRAS G12C mutation was found with the highest percentage (73%). In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, patients with PDL1 > 49% in combination with a negative KRAS result had a median overall survival of 40 months compared to patients with a positive KRAS result (9 months, p < 0.05). In addition, patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, PDL1 < 49% and negative KRAS result had a median overall survival of 39 months compared to patients with a positive result (28 months, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the presence of KRAS mutations in advanced NSCLC patients has a poor prognostic value, regardless of their PDL1 expression values, after receiving immunotherapy as first-line treatment.

Outcomes in patients treated with frontline immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) for advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutations and STK11/KEAP1 comutations across PD-L1 levels

INTRODUCTION

In patients with advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC), the impact of KRAS mutations (m) and comutations with STK11 and KEAP1 on outcomes across different PD-L1 levels remains incompletely understood. We aimed to investigate the frequency of KRAS mutations and comutations across PD-L1 levels, and the association between these mutations and survival, stratified by PD-L1 expression.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide cohort study of patients diagnosed with aNSCLC between 2016 and 2021 treated with frontline (chemo)immunotherapy, who underwent molecular genotyping including KRAS, STK11, and KEAP1. Real-world overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (rwPFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Cox multivariable regressions were used to evaluate the association between KRASm and survival across different PD-L1 strata, and to assess whether the association between KRASm and survival differed by PD-L1 level. Finally, within subgroups defined by PD-L1 expression, we used interaction terms to assess whether co-mutations with STK11 and KEAP1 moderated the association between KRAS mutation and survival.

RESULTS

Of our 2593-patient cohort, 982 (37.9 %) were KRASm and 1611 (62.1 %) KRASwt. KRASm were enriched in the PD-L1 ≥50 % cohort (334/743, 45 %), but within patients with KRASm, co-mutations with STK11 and KEAP1 were enriched in the PD-L1 0 % cohort. KRASm was associated with significantly worse OS in the PD-L1 0 % cohort compared to the PD-L1 ≥50 % cohort (P for interaction = 0.008). On adjusted analyses stratified by PD-L1, KRASm was associated with worse survival only in the PD-L1 0 % group (OS HR 1.46, p = 0.001). KEAP1 and STK11 comutations were most strongly associated with worse OS in the PD-L1 0 % subgroup; patients with triple KRASm/KEAPm/STK11m PD-L1 0 % NSCLC experienced the worst outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

KRASm are associated with worse overall survival in PD-L1 negative NSCLC; however, this association is largely driven by comutations with STK11 and KEAP1, which are enriched in PD-L1 negative tumors.

Clinical characteristics, outcomes and prognostic factors in KRAS mutant lung cancers: experience from a tertiary care cancer center in India

Objectives

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) mutations in lung cancers, long considered untargetable, have had a recent rise in interest due to promising data of agents targeting KRAS p.G12C. As Indian data are scarce, we sought to identify baseline clinical characteristics, prognostic factors and outcomes of lung cancer patients with KRAS mutations at our hospital.

Methods

Patients with KRAS mutant lung cancers treated at our institute from 2016 to 2022 were analysed.

Results

133 patients with KRAS mutant lung cancers were identified. Median age was 57 (interquartile range 28-78) years, and 58 (43.6%) were smokers. 17 (12.7%) had brain metastases. The commonest variant was p.G12C, seen in 53 (39.8%) patients. Six (4.5%) had programmed death ligand 1 (PDL-1) expression >50% by Ventana SP263 PDL-1 assay, and 13 (9.7%) had epidermal growth factor mutation. Of 92 patients with available treatment details, the majority received intravenous chemotherapy, nine (9.8%) received tyrosine kinase inhibitors and four (4.4%) received immunotherapy (pembrolizumab). Median progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line therapy was 6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-9.2) months and median overall survival (OS) was 12 (CI 9.2-14.8) months. The incidence of brain metastases was higher in patients with G12C mutations (p = 0.025). Brain metastases (HR: 3.57, p < 0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) ≥ 2 (HR: 2.13, p = 0.002) and G12C mutation (HR: 1.84, p = 0.011) were associated with inferior PFS, while brain metastases (HR: 4.6, p < 0.001), PS ≥ 2 (HR: 2.33, p = 0.001) and G12C mutation (HR: 1.93, p = 0.01) were associated with inferior OS.

Conclusion

This is the largest dataset of KRAS mutant lung cancers from India. Brain metastases were higher in patients with G12C mutations and associated with poorer PFS and OS. G12C mutation and PS ≥ 2 were also associated with inferior PFS and OS. Experience with targeted therapy for KRAS mutations remains an area of future exploration due to the unavailability of these agents in India.

Prognostic Role of KRAS G12C Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

KRAS G12C mutation (mKRAS G12C) is the most frequent KRAS point mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and has been proven to be a predictive biomarker for direct KRAS G12C inhibitors in advanced solid cancers. We sought to determine the prognostic significance of mKRAS G12C in patients with NSCLC using the meta-analytic approach. A protocol is registered at the International Prospective Register for systematic reviews (CRD42022345868). PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov.in were searched for prospective or retrospective studies reporting survival data for tumors with mKRAS G12C compared with either other KRAS mutations or wild-type KRAS (KRAS-WT). The hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) or Disease-free survival (DFS) of tumors were pooled according to fixed or random-effects models. Sixteen studies enrolling 10,153 participants were included in the final analysis. mKRAS G12C tumors had poor OS [HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.10-1.84, p = 0.007] but similar DFS [HR 2.36, 95% CI 0.64-8.16] compared to KRAS-WT tumors. Compared to other KRAS mutations, mKRAS G12C tumors had poor DFS [HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.07-2.09, p < 0.0001] but similar OS [HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.84-1.26]. Compared to other KRAS mutations, high PD-L1 expression (>50%) [OR 1.37 95% CI 1.11-1.70, p = 0.004] was associated with mKRAS G12C tumors. mKRAS G12C is a promising prognostic factor for patients with NSCLC, negatively impacting survival. Prevailing significant heterogeneity and selection bias might reduce the validity of these findings. Concomitant high PD-L1 expression in these tumors opens doors for exciting therapeutic potential.

D-1553 (Garsorasib), a Potent and Selective Inhibitor of KRASG12C in Patients With NSCLC: Phase 1 Study Results

INTRODUCTION

D-1553 (garsorasib) is a potent and selective oral KRASG12C inhibitor. We report results from a phase I dose-escalation and dose-expansion study of D-1553 in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC in multiple sites in the People's Republic of China.

METHODS

Patients with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC have administrated D-1553 600 mg orally once daily, 800 mg once daily, 1200 mg once daily, 400 mg twice a day, or 600 mg twice a day in dose escalation. In dose-expansion, all patients received 600 mg twice a day. The safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of D-1553 were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among a total of 79 treated patients, 75 patients (94.9%) reported treatment-related adverse events with 30 patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 events (38.0%). Most of the adverse events were manageable and the patients tolerated the study treatment well. Among 74 patients assessable for efficacy analysis, 30 patients had a partial response and 38 had stable disease with a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of 40.5% and 91.9%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 8.2 months, and the median duration of response was 7.1 months. Among 62 patients assessable for response at the recommended phase 2 dose, partial response occurred in 24 patients (ORR, 38.7%) and stable disease in 32 patients (DCR, 90.3%). The median progression-free survival and duration of response were 7.6 months and 6.9 months, respectively. In patients with brain metastasis, ORR and DCR were 17% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

D-1553 represents a promising therapeutic option for patients with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC with a well-tolerated safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity.

Molecular markers of metastatic disease in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Prior studies characterized the association of molecular alterations with treatment-specific outcomes in KRAS-mutant (KRASMUT) lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Less is known about the prognostic role of molecular alterations and their associations with metastatic disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed clinicogenomic data from 1817 patients with KRASMUT LUAD sequenced at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). Patients with metastatic (M1) and nonmetastatic (M0) disease were compared. Transcriptomic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were investigated to characterize the biology of differential associations with clinical outcomes. Organ-specific metastasis was associated with overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

KEAP1 (DFCI: OR = 2.3, q = 0.04; MSKCC: OR = 2.2, q = 0.00027) and SMARCA4 mutations (DFCI: OR = 2.5, q = 0.06; MSKCC: OR = 2.6, q = 0.0021) were enriched in M1 versus M0 tumors. On integrative modeling, NRF2 activation was the genomic feature most associated with OS. KEAP1 mutations were enriched in M1 versus M0 tumors independent of STK11 status (KEAP1MUT/STK11WT: DFCI OR = 3.0, P = 0.0064; MSKCC OR = 2.0, P = 0.041; KEAP1MUT/STK11MUT: DFCI OR = 2.3, P = 0.0063; MSKCC OR = 2.5, P = 3.6 × 10-05); STK11 mutations without KEAP1 loss were not associated with stage (KEAP1WT/STK11MUT: DFCI OR = 0.97, P = 1.0; MSKCC OR = 1.2, P = 0.33) or outcome. KEAP1/KRAS-mutated tumors with and without STK11 mutations exhibited high functional STK11 loss. The negative effects of KEAP1 were compounded in the presence of bone (HR = 2.3, P = 4.4 × 10-14) and negated in the presence of lymph node metastasis (HR = 1.0, P = 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Mutations in KEAP1 and SMARCA4, but not STK11, were associated with metastatic disease and poor OS. Functional STK11 loss, however, may contribute to poor outcomes in KEAP1MUT tumors. Integrating molecular data with clinical and metastatic-site annotations can more accurately risk stratify patients.

Efficacy and toxicity of drugs targeting KRASG12C mutation in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically analyze the efficacy and toxicity of drugs targeting KRASG12C mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The candidate studies were identified in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases up to 1 June 2023. Data on efficacy, prognosis, and adverse events (AEs) were extracted and calculated by meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Six eligible prospective studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 563 patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. For patients with NSCLC, the objective response rate (ORR) of drugs targeting KRASG12C mutation was 37% (95%CI 31-43), median duration of response (DOR) was 8.89 months (95%CI 7.96-9.83), and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.40 months (95%CI 5.86-6.93). The overall incidence of AEs was 88% (95%CI 79-96) and the incidence of grade ≥3 AEs was 44% (95%CI 24-64). The most common AEs were diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and vomiting. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were Alaninetransaminase (ALT) or Aspartatetransaminase (AST) increased and diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

Sotorasib, Adagrasib, and Garsorasib as the drugs of choice for patients with KRASG12C mutation NSCLC, have definite efficacy and acceptable safety, especially for patients with advanced or metastatic disease and within posterior line therapy.

A Critical Review of the Prognostic and Predictive Implications of KRAS and STK11 Mutations and Co-Mutations in Metastatic Non-Small Lung Cancer

The Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) and serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11) co-mutations are associated with the diverse phenotypic and heterogeneous oncogenic subtypes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Due to extensive mixed evidence, there needs to be a review of the recent KRAS and STK11 mutation literature to better understand the potential clinical applications of these genomic biomarkers in the current treatment landscape. This critical review highlights the clinical studies that have elucidated the potential prognostic and predictive implications of KRAS mutations, STK11 mutations, or KRAS/STK11 co-mutations when treating metastatic NSCLC across various types of treatments (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs]). Overall, KRAS mutations are associated with poor prognoses and have been determined to be a valid but weak prognostic biomarker among patients diagnosed with NSCLC. KRAS mutations in NSCLC have shown mixed results as a predictive clinical biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Overall, the studies in this review demonstrate that STK11 mutations are prognostic and show mixed results as predictive biomarkers for ICI therapy. However, KRAS/STK11 co-mutations may predict primary resistance to ICI. Prospective KRAS/STK11-biomarker-driven randomized trials are needed to assess the predictive effect of various treatments on the outcomes for patients with metastatic NSCLC, as the majority of the published KRAS analyses are retrospective and hypothesis-generating in nature.

Sex- and Co-Mutation-Dependent Prognosis in Patients with SMARCA4-Mutated Malignancies

BACKGROUND

Whether sex and co-mutations impact prognosis of patients with SMARCA4-mutated (mutSMARCA4) malignancies is not clear.

METHODS

This cohort included patients from Northern California Kaiser Permanente with next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed from August 2020 to October 2022. We used Cox regression modeling to examine the association between sex and overall survival (OS), adjusting for demographics, performance status, Charlson comorbidity index, receipt of treatment, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and TP53, KRAS, CDKN2A, STK11, and Keap1 co-mutations.

RESULTS

Out of 9221 cases with NGS performed, 125 cases (1.4%) had a mutSMARCA4. The most common malignancies with a mutSMARCA4 were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 35.2%), esophageal and stomach adenocarcinoma (12.8%), and cancer of unknown primary (11.2%). The most common co-mutations were p53 (mutp53, 59.2%), KRAS (mutKRAS, 28.8%), CDKN2A (mutCDKN2A, 31.2%), STK11 (mutSTK11, 12.8%), and Keap1 (mutKeap1, 8.8%) mutations. Male patients had substantially worse OS than female patients both among the entire mutSMARCA4 cohort (HR = 1.71, [95% CI 0.92-3.18]) with a median OS of 3.0 versus 43.3 months (p < 0.001), and among the NSCLC subgroup (HR = 14.2, [95% CI 2.76-73.4]) with a median OS of 2.75 months versus un-estimable (p = 0.02). Among all patients with mutSMARCA4, mutp53 versus wtp53 (HR = 2.12, [95% CI 1.04-4.29]) and mutSTK11 versus wtSTK11 (HR = 2.59, [95% CI 0.87-7.73]) were associated with worse OS. Among the NSCLC subgroup, mutp53 versus wtp53 (HR = 0.35, [0.06-1.97]) and mutKRAS versus wtKRAS (HR = 0.04, [0.003-.45]) were associated with better OS, while mutCDKN2A versus wtCDKN2A (HR = 5.04, [1.12-22.32]), mutSTK11 versus wtSTK11 (HR = 13.10, [95% CI 1.16-148.26]), and mutKeap1 versus wtKeap1 (HR = 5.06, [95% CI 0.89-26.61}) were associated with worse OS.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort of patients with mutSMARCA4, males had substantially worse prognosis than females, while mutTP53, mutKRAS, mutCDKN2A, mutSTK11 and mutKeap1were differentially associated with prognosis among all patients and among the NSCLC subgroup. Our results, if confirmed, could suggest potentially unidentified mechanisms that underly this sex and co-mutation-dependent prognostic disparity among patients whose tumor bears a mutSMARCA4.

Case Report: Chemotherapy-free treatment with camrelizumab and anlotinib for elderly patients with KRAS and TP53 mutated advanced lung cancer

Background: Lung cancer is a major public health issue and an enormous burden on society in China. Most lung cancers occur in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and many factors limit their treatment options. Chemotherapy-free therapy can avoid psychological fear, treatment pain, and adverse reactions caused by chemotherapy. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer with tumour protein p53 (TP53) gene mutations or Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) gene mutations tend to be more sensitive to anlotinib or programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) drugs. However, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue is a proto-oncogene downstream of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene; therefore, if the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue gene has an activating mutation, EGFR-targeted drug resistance may occur. Further studies are needed to explore whether patients with dual Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue and tumour protein p53 mutations can be treated with targeted immunotherapy without chemotherapy. Case presentation: A 74-year-old man was referred to the Lanzhou University Second Hospital due to chest tightness, shortness of breath, and weight loss for 2 months and was diagnosed with moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Laboratory examinations showed increased alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen (CA)-125, and CA199 levels, and gene sequencing indicated mutations in Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue and tumour protein p53. Immunohistochemical analysis showed positive PD-L1 and PD-1 expression. Peripheral blood immune checkpoint test using flow cytometry indicated that the PD-1 + CD8 levels were positive. After multi-disciplinary treatment, therapy with a combination of anlotinib and camrelizumab was initiated. Camrelizumab 200 mg was administered intravenously once every 3 weeks. Anlotinib 12 mg was administered orally daily before breakfast for 2 weeks with a week of rest in every cycle of 21 days. A reduction in alpha-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA125, CA199, and CA724 levels was observed up to the first cycle, which decreased within the normal limits up to the second cycle and continued until the eighteenth cycle. The patient's chest tightness, shortness of breath, weight loss, and other symptoms significantly improved following treatment. Computed tomography imaging showed that the neoplastic lesion was dramatically reduced. The patient is currently being followed-up for more than 2 years to evaluate the duration of the response. Conclusion: Chemotherapy-free immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy is an effective treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue and tumour protein p53 mutations. Such therapies should be supported with further clinical studies with larger sample sizes.

Starring Role of Biomarkers and Anticancer Agents as a Major Driver in Precision Medicine of Cancer Therapy

Precision medicine is the most modern contemporary medicine approach today, based on great amount of data on people's health, individual characteristics, and life circumstances, and employs the most effective ways to prevent and cure diseases. Precision medicine in cancer is the most precise and viable treatment for every cancer patient based on the disease's genetic profile. Precision medicine changes the standard one size fits all medication model, which focuses on average responses to care. Consolidating modern methodologies for streamlining and checking anticancer drugs can have long-term effects on understanding the results. Precision medicine can help explicit anticancer treatments using various drugs and even in discovery, thus becoming the paradigm of future cancer medicine. Cancer biomarkers are significant in precision medicine, and findings of different biomarkers make this field more promising and challenging. Naturally, genetic instability and the collection of extra changes in malignant growth cells are ways cancer cells adapt and survive in a hostile environment, for example, one made by these treatment modalities. Precision medicine centers on recognizing the best treatment for individual patients, dependent on their malignant growth and genetic characterization. This new era of genomics progressively referred to as precision medicine, has ignited a new episode in the relationship between genomics and anticancer drug development.

Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer risk

Purpose

It remains unclear why individuals living in disadvantaged neighborhoods have shorter non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survival. It is possible that living in these deprived areas is linked with increased risk of developing aggressive NSCLC biology. Here, we explored the association of somatic KRAS mutations, which are associated with shorter survival in NSCLC patients, and 11 definitions of neighborhood disadvantage spanning socioeconomic and structural environmental elements.

Methods

We analyzed data from 429 NSCLC patients treated at a Comprehensive Cancer Center from 2015 to 2018. Data were abstracted from medical records and each patient’s home address was used to assign publicly available indices of neighborhood disadvantage. Prevalence Ratios (PRs) for the presence of somatic KRAS mutations were estimated using modified Poisson regression models adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, cancer stage, and histology.

Results

In the NSCLC cohort, 29% had KRAS mutation-positive tumors. We found that five deprivation indices of socioeconomic disadvantage were associated with KRAS mutation. A one decile increase in several of these socioeconomic disadvantage indices was associated with a 1.06 to 1.14 increased risk of KRAS mutation. Measures of built structural environment were not associated with KRAS mutation status.

Conclusion

Socioeconomic disadvantage at the neighborhood level is associated with higher risk of KRAS mutation while disadvantage related to built environmental structural measures was inversely associated. Our results indicate not only that neighborhood disadvantage may contribute to aggressive NSCLC biology, but the pathways linking biology to disadvantage are likely operating through socioeconomic-related stress.

A Long Overdue Targeted Treatment for KRAS Mutations in NSCLC: Spotlight on Adagrasib

KRASG12C is one of the most common oncogenes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is associated with a poor prognosis. Historically, KRAS mutations have been difficult to target due to lack of binding sites and exceptionally high affinity for guanosine triphosphate/guanosine diphosphate (GTP/GDP). Recently, KRASG12C selective inhibitors have shown promising results in Phase I/II studies. Here we discuss the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, efficacy, and tolerability of adagrasib (MRTX849).

[Consensus on Postoperative Recurrence Prediction of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Molecular Markers]

Significant progress has been made in lung cancer screening, surgery, chemoradiation, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy recently. Surgical resection is the most important treatment for localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) so far, but there are still many patients who develop local recurrence or distant metastases within 5 years of surgery. Currently, the risk factors of recurrence in patients with NSCLC are mainly based on clinical and pathological features, which hardly identify patients at high risk of recurrence accurately. With the development of new detection technologies, a number of molecular markers that may have a predictive risk of recurrence in NSCLC have been discovered over the years. In order to summarize the molecular markers related to postoperative recurrence in NSCLC patients, we have formulated a consensus on the prediction of postoperative recurrence of NSCLC based on molecular markers. This consensus mainly focuses on the early stage NSCLC patients, discusses and summarizes the risk factors of disease recurrence from the molecular level. It is hoped that more and more valuable information can be provided for the management of patients, so as to provide more guidance for the perioperative management of the patients with early stage NSCLC in the future.
.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for post operative brain metastasic surgical cavities: a single institution experience

BACKGROUND

The standard therapy for brain metastasis was surgery combined with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). The latter is however, associated with important neurocognitive toxicity. To reduce this toxicity, postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a promising technique. We assessed the efficacy and the tolerance to postoperative Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GK) on the tumor bed after resection of brain metastases.

METHODS

Between February 2011 and December 2016, following macroscopic complete surgical resection, 64 patients and 65 surgical cavities were treated by GK in our institution. The indication for adjuvant radiosurgery was a multidisciplinary decision. The main assessment criteria considered in this study were local control, intracranial metastasis-free survival (ICMFS), overall survival and toxicity.

RESULTS

Median follow-up: 11.1 months. Median time between surgery and radiosurgery: 35 days. Median dose was 20 Gy prescribed to the 50% isodose line, for a median treated volume of 5.6 cc. Four patients (7%) suffered from local recurrence. Local recurrence-free, intracranial recurrence-free and overall survival at 1 year were 97.5%, 57.6% and 62.4% respectively. In total, 23 patients (41%) suffered from intracranial recurrence outside the tumor bed. In univariate analysis: concomitant GK treatment of multiple lesions and the tumor bed was associated with a decrease in ICMFS (HR = 1.16 [1.005-1.34] p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis: a non-lung primary tumor was significantly associated with a decrease in ICMFS (HR = 8.04 [1.82-35.4] p = 0.006). An increase in performance status (PS) and in the initial number of cerebral metastases significantly reduced overall survival (HR = 5.4 [1.11-26.3] p = 0.037, HR = 2.7 [1.004-7.36] p = 0.049, respectively) and One radiation necrosis histologically proven.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed that postoperative GK after resection of cerebral metastases is an efficient and well-tolerated technique, to treat volumes of all sizes (0.8 to 40 cc). Iterative SRS or salvage WBRT can be performed in cases of intracranial relapse, postponing WBRT with its potential side effects.

RAS oncogenic activity predicts response to chemotherapy and outcome in lung adenocarcinoma

Activating mutations in KRAS occur in 32% of lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD). Despite leading to aggressive disease and resistance to therapy in preclinical studies, the KRAS mutation does not predict patient outcome or response to treatment, presumably due to additional events modulating RAS pathways. To obtain a broader measure of RAS pathway activation, we developed RAS84, a transcriptional signature optimised to capture RAS oncogenic activity in LUAD. We report evidence of RAS pathway oncogenic activation in 84% of LUAD, including 65% KRAS wild-type tumours, falling into four groups characterised by coincident alteration of STK11/LKB1, TP53 or CDKN2A, suggesting that the classifications developed when considering only KRAS mutant tumours have significance in a broader cohort of patients. Critically, high RAS activity patient groups show adverse clinical outcome and reduced response to chemotherapy. Patient stratification using oncogenic RAS transcriptional activity instead of genetic alterations could ultimately assist in clinical decision-making.

Applications of CRISPR/Cas technology against drug-resistant lung cancers: an update

Out of all the cancer types, the most prevalent one is lung cancer. Multiple genes and signaling pathways play role in the progression of lung cancer. Considering the wider prevalence and fatality of lung cancer it has become the focus of current cancer research. Though currently used approaches have shown positive results against lung cancer but success against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) still looms as an enigma for the entire research fraternity. The development of resistance against inhibitors within a short span is one of the reasons responsible for the failure and relapse of lung cancer. Under these prevailing conditions genome/gene-editing technology using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) and CRISPR associated proteins (Cas), popularly known as CRISPR/Cas technology offers a convenient and flexible method for inducing precise changes within the lung cancer cell. Additionally, CRISPR-barcoding and CRISPR knockout screens at the genome-wide level can help in the functional investigation of specific mutations and identification of novel cancer drivers respectively. Several variants of the CRISPR/Cas system are being developed to limit off-targeting with enhanced precision. The present review article updates the usefulness of CRISPR/Cas technology against various types of lung cancers.

The Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors vs. Chemotherapy for KRAS-Mutant or EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancers: A Meta-Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective

To assess and compare the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors vs. chemotherapy for KRAS-mutant or EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancers.

Methods

Until February 19, 2022, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in NSCLC. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were used as outcome measures. The studies were conducted using the Cochrane methodology for meta-analyses, and all statistical analyses were made with Review Manager Software (RevMan version 5.4).

Results

Our meta-analysis included nine clinical trials including 5633 participants with NSCLC. Immune checkpoint drugs extended OS (hazard ratio (HR), 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60–0.76) and PFS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35-0.56) in patients with EGFR wild-type compared to chemotherapy alone, whereas programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy extended PFS in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.94). Meanwhile, immune checkpoint inhibitors vs. chemotherapy improved the OS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48–0.88) and PFS (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36–0.66) of NSCLC patients with KRAS mutation. NSCLCs with KRAS G12C mutation had a much better PFS with ICIs than with chemotherapy (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.21–0.71).

Conclusion

This research revealed that individuals with EGFR wild-type NSCLC or KRAS mutation may benefit from PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors and that PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy seem to be more successful than chemotherapy alone in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation.

Molecular Biology and Therapeutic Perspectives for K-Ras Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the most common alterations are identified in the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) gene, accounting for approximately 30% of cases in Caucasian patients. The majority of mutations are located in exon 2, with the c.34G > T (p.G12C) change being the most prevalent. The clinical relevance of KRAS mutations in NSCLC was not recognized until a few years ago. What is now emerging is a dual key role played by KRAS mutations in the management of NSCLC patients. First, recent data report that KRAS-mutant lung AC patients generally have poorer overall survival (OS). Second, a KRAS inhibitor specifically targeting the c.34G > T (p.G12C) variant, Sotorasib, has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by the European Medicines Agency. Another KRAS inhibitor targeting c.34G > T (p.G12C), Adagrasib, is currently being reviewed by the FDA for accelerated approval. From the description of the biology of KRAS-mutant NSCLC, the present review will focus on the clinical aspects of KRAS mutations in NSCLC, in particular on the emerging efficacy data of Sotorasib and other KRAS inhibitors, including mechanisms of resistance. Finally, the interaction between KRAS mutations and immune checkpoint inhibitors will be discussed.

Coexistence of two missense mutations in the KRAS gene in adenocarcinoma of the lung: a possible indicator of poor prognosis

Background

KRAS mutations are present in up to 30% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. The two most common KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are G12C (~40%) and G12V (~22%). We describe the case of a 63-year-old Asian male patient with a very aggressive lung adenocarcinoma harbouring two coexisting missense mutations in the same exon.

Methods

The patient presented with a 6 cm spiculated lung mass and bilateral mediastinal lymphadenopathy on imaging. A cytology sample was obtained from EBUS-TBNA of mediastinal lymph nodes, and mutation screening was performed by next-generation sequencing using the Ion Torrent Cancer Hotspot panel.

Results

Cytological examination and immunocytochemistry confirmed the presence of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. The molecular analysis revealed the coexistence of two missense mutations: c.34G > T; p.(Gly12Cys) and c.38G > T; A; p.(Gly13Asp) in exon 2 of the KRAS gene. The two independent variants were confirmed on Integrative Genomic Viewer (IGV), suggesting molecularly independent clones. The patient was treated with palliative care and died within two months of the diagnosis.

Conclusions

The present case showed aggressive clinical behaviour. It is questionable whether this aggressive course was due to the coexistence of multiple mutations or to a specific single mutation. Data in the literature regarding the outcome of polyclonal KRAS polyclonal lung adenocarcinomas are scarce, but some evidence seems to indicate that specific mutations may have prognostic value, possibly depending on the disease setting.

Association Between Diabetes Risk Reduction Diet and Lung Cancer Risk in 98,159 Participants: Results From a Prospective Study

Purpose

To evaluate the association between diabetes risk reduction diet (DRRD) score and the risk of lung cancer in a large population.

Methods

Data of participants in this study were collected from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in the Cox proportional hazards regression model for the association of DRRD score and lung cancer incidence in all included participants. Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate whether the observed association was modified by age, sex, BMI, race/ethnicity, family history of lung cancer, smoking status and history of diabetes.

Results

A total of 98,159 participants were included in this study. The mean (SD) age of the study participants cohort at baseline was 65.5 (5.73) years old. The mean (SD) follow-up time was 8.83 (1.96) years. The mean (SD) score of DRRD was 26.82 (5.19), and ranged from 20.47 (2.3) to 33.65 (2.42) from the lowest quartile to the highest quartile of the DRRD score, inferring the possibility of highest through the lowest risk of type 2 diabetes. The calculated HRs showed there was a trend that higher quartile indicated lower risk of lung cancer after adjusted for covariates (HR_Q4vsQ1: 0.85; 95% CI:0.73,0.98; p for trend =0.036). The inverse trend between higher DRRD score and the risk of squamous cell carcinoma was more evident (HR_Q4vsQ1: 0.50; 95% CI:0.34,0.73; p for trend =0.002). The inverse association between DRRD score and the incidence of lung cancer was more pronounced in participants who had a clear family history of lung cancer (p for interaction=0.016).

Conclusion

A protective association between DRRD score and risk of lung cancer is obtained. People are encouraged to adhere to higher DRRD score in their daily diet. Further studies should be conducted to confirm the result and explore the mechanism.

Machine learning application in personalised lung cancer recurrence and survivability prediction

Machine learning is an important artificial intelligence technique that is widely applied in cancer diagnosis and detection. More recently, with the rise of personalised and precision medicine, there is a growing trend towards machine learning applications for prognosis prediction. However, to date, building reliable prediction models of cancer outcomes in everyday clinical practice is still a hurdle. In this work, we integrate genomic, clinical and demographic data of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and introduce copy number variation (CNV) and mutation information of 15 selected genes to generate predictive models for recurrence and survivability. We compare the accuracy and benefits of three well-established machine learning algorithms: decision tree methods, neural networks and support vector machines. Although the accuracy of predictive models using the decision tree method has no significant advantage, the tree models reveal the most important predictors among genomic information (e.g. KRAS, EGFR, TP53), clinical status (e.g. TNM stage and radiotherapy) and demographics (e.g. age and gender) and how they influence the prediction of recurrence and survivability for both early stage LUAD and LUSC. The machine learning models have the potential to help clinicians to make personalised decisions on aspects such as follow-up timeline and to assist with personalised planning of future social care needs.

Daily Practice Assessment of KRAS Status in NSCLC Patients: A New Challenge for the Thoracic Pathologist Is Right around the Corner

Simple Summary

RAS mutation is the most frequent oncogenic alteration in human cancers and KRAS is the most frequently mutated, notably in non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). Various attempts to inhibit KRAS in the past were unsuccessful in these latter tumors. However, recently, several small molecules (AMG510, MRTX849, JNJ-74699157, and LY3499446) have been developed to specifically target KRAS G12C-mutated tumors, which seems promising for patient treatment and should soon be administered in daily practice for non-squamous (NS)-NSCLC. In this context, it will be mandatory to systematically assess the KRAS status in routine clinical practice, at least in advanced NS-NSCLC, leading to new challenges for thoracic oncologists.

Abstract

KRAS mutations are among the most frequent genomic alterations identified in non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinomas (NS-NSCLC), notably in lung adenocarcinomas. In most cases, these mutations are mutually exclusive, with different genomic alterations currently known to be sensitive to therapies targeting EGFR, ALK, BRAF, ROS1, and NTRK. Recently, several promising clinical trials targeting KRAS mutations, particularly for KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC, have established new hope for better treatment of patients. In parallel, other studies have shown that NSCLC harboring co-mutations in KRAS and STK11 or KEAP1 have demonstrated primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Thus, the assessment of the KRAS status in advanced-stage NS-NSCLC has become essential to setting up an optimal therapeutic strategy in these patients. This stimulated the development of new algorithms for the management of NSCLC samples in pathology laboratories and conditioned reorganization of optimal health care of lung cancer patients by the thoracic pathologists. This review addresses the recent data concerning the detection of KRAS mutations in NSCLC and focuses on the new challenges facing pathologists in daily practice for KRAS status assessment.

Targeting KRAS Mutant in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Novel Insights Into Therapeutic Strategies

Although KRAS-activating mutations represent the most common oncogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), various attempts to inhibit KRAS failed in the past decade. KRAS mutations are associated with a poor prognosis and a poor response to standard therapeutic regimen. The recent development of new therapeutic agents (i.e., adagrasib, sotorasib) that target specifically KRAS G12C in its GDP-bound state has evidenced an unprecedented success in the treatment of this subgroup of patients. Despite providing pre-clinical and clinical efficacy, several mechanisms of acquired resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors have been reported. In this setting, combined therapeutic strategies including inhibition of either SHP2, SOS1 or downstream effectors of KRAS G12C seem particularly interesting to overcome acquired resistance. In this review, we will discuss the novel therapeutic strategies targeting KRAS G12C and promising approaches of combined therapy to overcome acquired resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors.

A prognostic classification based on the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer histologic grading and immunoscore in KRAS-mutant invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Tumor immune cell infiltration is important in the prognosis of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic classification based on the tumor immunoscore.

METHODS

Patients with KRAS-mutant invasive non-mucinous lung adenocarcinoma who underwent radical surgery were enrolled in the study. Histologic grading was assessed according to the recommendations of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and CD8 expression was detected using immunohistochemistry. The number of CD8⁺ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) per high-power field was assessed. A classification based on histological grade and CD8⁺ TIL level was established (Grading-Immunoscore type): low-to-medium grade with high or low infiltration (type A); high-grade, high-infiltration (type B); and high-grade, low-infiltration (type C).

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients participated. In the multivariable analysis, histological grading and level of CD8⁺ TILs were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively). Patients with type A tumors had the best OS and PFS, whereas those with type C tumors had the worst OS (89.6%, 65.0%, and 29.5% 5-year OS for types A, B, and C, respectively). PD-L1 positivity and high expression rate was highest in type B tumors (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥ 1%: 29.4%, 73.1%, and 42.9%; TPS ≥50%: 7.8%, 42.3%, and 17.1%, for types A, B, and C, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The Grading-Immunoscore classification refines the prognostic grouping of histological grading and might aid in the screening of potential candidates for immunotherapy in patients with KRAS-mutant adenocarcinoma.

Direct Targeting KRAS Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Focus on Resistance

Simple Summary

KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), with a frequency around 30%, and among them KRAS G12C mutation occurs in 11% of cases. KRAS mutations were for a long time considered to be non-targetable alterations or “undruggable”. Direct inhibition is actually developped with switch-II mutant selective covalent KRAS G12C inhibitors with small molecules such as sotorasib or adagrasib preventing conversion of the mutant protein to GTP-bound active state. Little is known about primary or acquired resistance. Acquired resistance does occur and could be related to genetic alterations in the nucleotide exchange function or adaptive mechanisms either in down-stream pathways or in newly expressed KRAS G12C mutation. Mechanisms of resistance could be classified as “on-target” mechanisms, involving KRAS G12C alterations, or “off-target” mechanisms, involving other gene alterations and/or phenotypic changes.

Abstract

KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), with a frequency of around 30%, and encoding a GTPAse that cycles between active form (GTP-bound) to inactive form (GDP-bound). The KRAS mutations favor the active form with inhibition of GTPAse activity. KRAS mutations are often with poor response of EGFR targeted therapies. KRAS mutations are good predictive factor for immunotherapy. The lack of success with direct targeting of KRAS proteins, downstream inhibition of KRAS effector pathways, and other strategies contributed to a focus on developing mutation-specific KRAS inhibitors. KRAS p.G12C mutation is one of the most frequent KRAS mutation in NSCLC, especially in current and former smokers (over 40%), which occurs among approximately 12–14% of NSCLC tumors. The mutated cysteine resides next to a pocket (P2) of the switch II region, and P2 is present only in the inactive GDP-bound KRAS. Small molecules such as sotorasib are now the first targeted drugs for KRAS G12C mutation, preventing conversion of the mutant protein to GTP-bound active state. Little is known about primary or acquired resistance. Acquired resistance does occur and may be due to genetic alterations in the nucleotide exchange function or adaptative mechanisms in either downstream pathways or in newly expressed KRAS G12C mutation.

Causal reasoning over knowledge graphs leveraging drug-perturbed and disease-specific transcriptomic signatures for drug discovery

Network-based approaches are becoming increasingly popular for drug discovery as they provide a systems-level overview of the mechanisms underlying disease pathophysiology. They have demonstrated significant early promise over other methods of biological data representation, such as in target discovery, side effect prediction and drug repurposing. In parallel, an explosion of -omics data for the deep characterization of biological systems routinely uncovers molecular signatures of disease for similar applications. Here, we present RPath, a novel algorithm that prioritizes drugs for a given disease by reasoning over causal paths in a knowledge graph (KG), guided by both drug-perturbed as well as disease-specific transcriptomic signatures. First, our approach identifies the causal paths that connect a drug to a particular disease. Next, it reasons over these paths to identify those that correlate with the transcriptional signatures observed in a drug-perturbation experiment, and anti-correlate to signatures observed in the disease of interest. The paths which match this signature profile are then proposed to represent the mechanism of action of the drug. We demonstrate how RPath consistently prioritizes clinically investigated drug-disease pairs on multiple datasets and KGs, achieving better performance over other similar methodologies. Furthermore, we present two case studies showing how one can deconvolute the predictions made by RPath as well as predict novel targets.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Advanced KRAS-Mutated NSCLC: A Multicenter Collaboration in Asia (ATORG-005)

Introduction

Whereas interpatient heterogeneity in clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of NSCLC harboring a KRAS mutation is recognized, the characterization of these patients in Asia has been limited.

Methods

A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted in eight academic centers across Asia. Patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC harboring a KRAS mutation and who had received at least one line of anticancer therapy between January 2014 and December 2018 were included. Modified time to next treatment (TTNT) was adopted as a proxy for progression-free survival.

Results

A total of 216 patients were analyzed. The median age at diagnosis of advanced NSCLC was 63.3 years, 70.8% were men and 89.8% had adenocarcinoma. KRAS G12D was the most common subtype (25.5%), followed by G12C (24.5%), and G12V (19.4%) The proportion of current or former smokers was 65.7% in the overall population, with 86.8% in G12C and 58.9% in non-G12C subgroups. For all treatments combined for the total population, the first-line duration of therapy, modified TTNT, and TTNT were 4.5 (95% confidence interval: 3.4–5.9), 6.2 (4.9–8.8), and 9.5 (7.1–11.4) months, respectively. The median overall survival for the total population was 10.3 (6.9–12.4) months and was prolonged in patients ever treated with immunotherapy (14.6 [8.6–19.1] versus 7.0 [5.9–10.6] mo, hazard ratio = 0.54, p < 0.001), with left truncation to account for the time of KRAS testing.

Conclusions

Whereas treatment outcomes with conventional anticancer therapy are reasonable and immunotherapy looks promising, the unmet need remains high for patients with KRAS-mutated NSCLC in Asia, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic approaches.

The Renaissance of KRAS Targeting in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: New Opportunities Following Old Failures

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the perfect paradigm of ‘precision medicine’ due to its complex intratumoral heterogeneity. It is truly characterized by a range of molecular alterations that can deeply influence the natural history of this disease. Several molecular alterations have been found over time, paving the road to biomarker-driven therapy and radically changing the prognosis of ‘oncogene addicted’ NSCLC patients. Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutations are present in up to 30% of NSCLC (especially in adenocarcinoma histotype) and have been identified decades ago. Since its discovery, its molecular characteristics and its marked affinity to a specific substrate have led to define KRAS as an undruggable alteration. Despite that, many attempts have been made to develop drugs capable of targeting KRAS signaling but, until a few years ago, these efforts have been unsuccessful. Comprehensive genomic profiling and wide-spectrum analysis of genetic alterations have only recently allowed to identify different types of KRAS mutations. This tricky step has finally opened new frontiers in the treatment approach of KRAS-mutant patients and might hopefully increase their prognosis and quality of life. In this review, we aim to highlight the most interesting aspects of (epi)genetic KRAS features, hoping to light the way to the state of art of targeting KRAS in NSCLC.

KRAS Mutations in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Lung

KRAS is one of the most commonly mutated oncogenes in cancer, enabling tumor proliferation and maintenance. After various approaches to target KRAS have failed over the past decades, the first specific inhibitor of the p.G12C mutation of KRAS was recently approved by the FDA after showing promising results in adenocarcinomas of the lung and other solid tumors. Lung cancer, the most common cancer worldwide, is a promising use case for these new therapies, as adenocarcinomas in particular frequently harbor KRAS mutations. However, in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung, KRAS mutations are rare and their impact on clinical outcome is poorly understood. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge on the prevalence and prognostic and predictive significance of KRAS mutations in the context of SCC.

Calling Attention to the Role of Race-Driven Societal Determinants of Health on Aggressive Tumor Biology: A Focus on Black Americans

Blacks have the highest incidence and mortality from most cancers. The reasons for these disparities remain unclear. Blacks are exposed to adverse social determinants because of historic and contemporary racist polices; however, how these determinants affect the disparities that Blacks experience is understudied. As a result of discriminatory community policies, like redlining, Blacks have higher exposure to air pollution and neighborhood deprivation. Studies investigating how these factors affect tumor biology are emerging. We highlight the literature that connects racism-related community exposure to the tumor biology in breast, lung, prostate, and colorectal cancer. Further investigations that clarify the link between adverse social determinants that result from systemic racism and aggressive tumor biology are required if health equity is to be achieved. Without recognition that racism is a public health risk with carcinogenic impact, health care delivery and cancer care will never achieve excellence. In response, health systems ought to establish corrective actions to improve Black population health and bring medical justice to marginalized racialized groups.

Targeting Mutated KRAS Genes to Treat Solid Tumours

Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes in solid tumours. It encodes an important signalling pathway that drives cellular proliferation and growth. It is frequently mutated in aggressive advanced solid tumours, particularly colorectal, lung and pancreatic cancer. Since the first mutated KRAS was discovered in the 1980s, decades of research to develop targeted inhibitors of mutant KRAS have fallen short of the task, until recently. Multiple agents are now in clinical trials, including specific mutant KRAS inhibitors, pan-KRAS inhibitors, therapeutic vaccines and other targeted inhibitors. Mutant-specific KRAS G12C inhibitors are the most advanced, with two inhibitors, adagrasib and sotorasib, achieving approval in 2021 for the second-line treatment of patients with KRAS G12C mutant lung cancer. In this review, we summarise the importance of mutant KRAS in solid tumours, prior attempts at inhibiting mutant KRAS, and the current promising targeted agents being investigated in clinical trials, along with future challenges.

Targeted Long-Read Sequencing Decodes the Transcriptional Atlas of the Founding RAS Gene Family Members

The complicity of human RAS proteins in cancer is a well-documented fact, both due to the mutational hyperactivation of these GTPases and the overexpression of the genes encoding these proteins. Thus, it can be easily assumed that the study of RAS genes at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level is of the utmost importance. Although previous research has shed some light on the basic mechanisms by which GTPases are involved in tumorigenesis, limited information is known regarding the transcriptional profile of the genes encoding these proteins. The present study highlights for the first time the wide spectrum of the mRNAs generated by the three most significant RAS genes (KRAS, NRAS and HRAS), providing an in-depth analysis of the splicing events and exon/intron boundaries. The implementation of a versatile, targeted nanopore-sequencing approach led to the identification of 39 novel RAS mRNA transcript variants and to the elucidation of their expression profiles in a broad panel of human cell lines. Although the present work unveiled multiple hidden aspects of the RAS gene family, further study is required to unravel the biological function of all the novel alternative transcript variants, as well as the putative protein isoforms.

Computational investigation to identify potent inhibitors of the GTPase-Kirsten RAt sarcoma virus (K-Ras) mutants G12C and G12D

K-Ras mutations are frequent in various cancer types, and according to recent research, K-Ras possesses four-drug targeting sites. This increased our interest in finding potential small molecule inhibitors with anticancer activity to treat K-Ras-driven cancers. We utilized integrated bioinformatic strategies, such as XP docking, MM-GBSA, cell-line cytotoxicity prediction, ADMET, and molecular simulation, to discover potential inhibitors of G12C and G12D mutants compared to sotorasib, which is a recent FDA-approved inhibitor of G12C. We identified compounds, such as flupentixol, amlodipine, and fluvoxamine, for the G12C mutant and paroxetine, flupentixol, and zuclopenthixol for the G12D mutant with significant inhibitory functions. All five compounds bound to the H95 cryptic groove of mutant K-Ras with high efficiency and, like sotorasib, retained a novel binding mechanism with additional hydrophobic interactions at the molecular level. Furthermore, the simulation studies suggested that the binding of flupentixol and amlodipine to G12C stabilizes switch I and switch II. In contrast, paroxetine and flupentixol to G12D showed a similar trend compared to sotorasib complexes. Thus, despite the very dynamic functionality of K-Ras switches I and II, the binding of shortlisted compounds is highly stable. Therefore, the reported study provides potential drug candidates for K-Ras inhibition that can be further developed with in vitro and in vivo evidence for targeted therapy.

Prognostic Characteristics and Immunotherapy Response of Patients With Nonsquamous NSCLC With Kras Mutation in East Asian Populations: A Single-Center Cohort Study in Taiwan

Introduction

Kras mutation is the most common driver oncogene present in patients with NSCLC. Recently, the precision medicine for patients with Kras-mutated NSCLC has been under investigation, but the best treatment is still unknown. This study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response, and prognostic factors of patients with NSCLC with different Kras mutation subtypes.

Methods

From 2005 to 2018, we collected nonsquamous NSCLC tissue samples for Kras mutation analysis using direct Sanger sequencing or MassARRAY genotyping (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA) at the National Taiwan University Hospital. Clinical characteristics, ICI treatment effectiveness, time-to-tumor recurrence (TTR), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using multivariate Cox models, to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs).

Results

Among 5278 patients with nonsquamous NSCLC, 246 (4.7%) had Kras mutations. The major Kras mutation subtypes were G12C (32.9%), G12D (23.7%), and G12V (18.9%). Patients with Kras-G12C had a higher proportion of male individuals (p = 0.018) and smokers (p < 0.001). Among the 25 patients treated with ICIs, patients with Kras-G12C had a higher response rate (53.8% versus 8.3%, p = 0.030) and longer progression-free survival (4.8 mo versus 2.1 mo, p = 0.028) than those with Kras-non-G12C. For the 85 patients with early-stage NSCLC, those with G12C had shorter TTR (22.8 mo) than those with Kras-non-G12C (97.7 mo, p = 0.004). For the 143 patients with advanced-stage NSCLC, there was a significant difference in OS between patients with Kras-G12C and Kras-non-G12C (7.7 mo versus 6.0 mo, p = 0.018) and patients with Kras-G12V had the shortest OS (5.2 mo). Multivariate analysis revealed association of shorter OS with Kras-G12V (HR = 2.47, p = 0.002), stage IV disease status (HR = 2.69, p = 0.008), and NSCLC-not otherwise specified histology (HR = 3.12, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Kras-G12C was associated with favorable ICI treatment effectiveness in patients with NSCLC. Kras-G12C mutation was associated with shorter TTR in patients with early-stage NSCLC, and Kras-G12V mutation was associated with shorter OS in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC when comparing with Kras-G12C.

Outcomes and prognostic contributors in patients with KRAS mutated non-small cell pulmonary adenocarcinomas: a single institution experience

Background

KRAS is the most frequently encountered driver mutation in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With targeted therapy for the most common KRAS mutation p.G12C on the horizon, the aim of this study is to retrospectively report outcomes in patients with KRAS mutated NSCLC.

Methods

This was a retrospective chart review of 7 hospitals in Texas with reflex biomarker testing in all lung adenocarcinomas. Patients were included if they had pathologically diagnosed adenocarcinoma of any stage originating in the lung with molecularly confirmed KRAS driver mutation of any genotypic subtype. Twelve-month survival was assessed and compared between KRAS p.G12C and all other detected KRAS mutations. Other outcomes including impact of age, sex, smoking status, and pack years smoked were assessed to determine if they had prognostic significance on mortality in KRAS mutated patients.

Results

There were 58 patients diagnosed with KRAS mutated NSCLC, 63.8% were at an advanced stage at diagnosis, 55.8% of patients were female, and 82.8% were white. The median age was 72 [52–88] years, and 93.1% were either current or prior smokers. KRAS p.G12C was the most common KRAS mutation (44.8%). At diagnosis, patients with KRAS p.G12C had poorer performance statuses compared to other KRAS mutations. A total of 32 (55.2%) patients died, 26 with advanced disease. In this study, current smoking status (P=0.1652), pack years smoked (P=0.6597), age (P=0.5092), sex (P=0.4309), and underlying KRAS codon mutation controlling for stage (P=0.2287) did not impact survival. However, KRAS p.G12C had a numerically lower 12 months overall survival (OS) compared to all other KRAS mutations in both early stage (56.3% vs. 90.9%) and advanced stage (25.0% vs. 47.6%) disease. Of note, 16 (27.6%) patients had prior, concurrent, or second malignancies, but these did not significantly impact OS (P=0.7696).

Conclusions

This study did not find a prognostic difference with sex, smoking history, age, or p.G12C mutation. The patients in this cohort with KRAS p.G12C had a numerically lower 12-month overall survival in both early and advanced stage disease compared to other mutations, and over one-quarter had a notable history of previous and second primary malignancies.

PD-L1 expression, EGFR and KRAS mutations and survival among stage III unresected non-small cell lung cancer patients: a Danish cohort study

Programmed cell death receptor ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression, KRAS (KRASm) and EGFR (EGFRm) mutations may influence non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognosis. We aimed to evaluate PD-L1 expression, KRASm, and EGFRm and survival among stage III unresected NSCLC patients. Using Danish registries, we collected data on stage III unresected NSCLC patients diagnosed 2001–2012 and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue from pathology archives. We assessed PD-L1 expression in tumors and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (ICs) by immunohistochemistry (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\ge$$\end{document}≥ 1% threshold for PD-L1+). We genotyped KRAS and EGFR. Follow-up extended from 120 days post-diagnosis to death, emigration, or 31/12/2014. We computed median survival using Kaplan–Meier methods, and hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox regression associating the biomarkers with death, adjusting for confounders. Among 305 patients, 48% had adenocarcinoma; 38% squamous cell carcinoma. Forty-nine percent had PD-L1+ tumors—51% stage IIIA and 26% KRASm. Few (2%) patients had EGFRm. Median survival in months was 14.7 (95% CI = 11.8–17.9) and 13.4 (95% CI = 9.5–16.3) in PD-L1+ and PD-L1− tumors, respectively. KRASm was not associated with death (HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.74–1.51 versus wildtype). PD-L1+ tumors yielded a HR = 0.83 (95% CI = 0.63–1.10); PD-L1+ ICs a HR = 0.51 (95% CI = 0.39–0.68). Tumor expression of PD-L1 did not influence survival. PD-L1+ ICs may confer survival benefit in stage III unresected NSCLC patients.

ZNF768 links oncogenic RAS to cellular senescence

RAS proteins are GTPases that lie upstream of a signaling network impacting cell fate determination. How cells integrate RAS activity to balance proliferation and cellular senescence is still incompletely characterized. Here, we identify ZNF768 as a phosphoprotein destabilized upon RAS activation. We report that ZNF768 depletion impairs proliferation and induces senescence by modulating the expression of key cell cycle effectors and established p53 targets. ZNF768 levels decrease in response to replicative-, stress- and oncogene-induced senescence. Interestingly, ZNF768 overexpression contributes to bypass RAS-induced senescence by repressing the p53 pathway. Furthermore, we show that ZNF768 interacts with and represses p53 phosphorylation and activity. Cancer genomics and immunohistochemical analyses reveal that ZNF768 is often amplified and/or overexpressed in tumors, suggesting that cells could use ZNF768 to bypass senescence, sustain proliferation and promote malignant transformation. Thus, we identify ZNF768 as a protein linking oncogenic signaling to the control of cell fate decision and proliferation.

RAS-induced senescence is a safeguarding process against tumour development. Here, the authors show that RAS activation destabilises the transcription factor ZNF768, which blocks ZNF768- dependent repression of p53 activity and thus induces senescence.

ZNF768 is phosphorylated and degraded upon RAS activation

ZNF768 depletion impairs proliferation and causes cellular senescence

ZNF768 binds and represses p53 and its overexpression suffices to bypass senescence

Elevated ZNF768 levels in human tumors may serve to avoid cellular senescence and support proliferation

New Scope of Targeted Therapies in Lung Carcinoma

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Recent research has also shown LC as a genomic disease, causing somatic mutations in patients. Tests related to mutational analysis and genome profiles have lately expanded significantly in the genetics/genomics field of LC. This review summarizes the current knowledge about different signalling pathways of LC based on the clinical impact of molecular targets. It describes the main molecular pathways and changes involved in the development, progression, and cellular breakdown of LC and the molecular changes. This review focuses on approved and targeted experimental therapies such as immunotherapy and clinical trials that examine the different targeted approaches to treating LC. We aimto clarify the differences in the extent of various genetic mutations in several areas for LC patients. Targeted molecular therapies for LC can be continued with advanced racial differences in genetic changes, which have a significant impact on the choice of drug treatment and our understanding of the profile of drug susceptibility/resistance. The most relevant genes described in this review are EGFR, KRAS, MET, BRAF, PIK3CA, STK11, ERBB3, PTEN, and RB1. Combined research efforts in this field are required to understand the genetic difference in LC outcomes in the future.

Prognostic value of Thyroid Transcription Factor-1 expression in lung adenocarcinoma in patients treated with anti PD-1/PD-L1

Anti-PD1/PD-L1-directed immune checkpoint inhibitors are game changers in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, but biomarkers are lacking. The aim of our study was to find clinically relevant biomarkers of the efficacy of ICI in non-squamous NSCLC. We conducted a retrospective study of patients receiving ICI for advanced non squamous NSCLC in two cohorts. For a subset of patients, RNAseq data were generated on tumor biopsy taken before ICI. The primary end point was progression-free survival under ICI. Secondary end point was overall survival from ICI initiation. In the cohort, we studied 231 patients. Clinico-pathological characteristics included KRAS mutant status (n = 88), TTF1-positive expression (n = 136), LIPI (Lung Immune Prognostic Index) score of 0 (n = 116). In our cohort, lack of TTF1 expression, LIPI score >0, line of treatment >1, and liver metastases were associated with poorer PFS. TTF1 and PD-L1 status could be used to stratify survival and improve the AUC for prediction of prognosis in comparison with the PD-L1 gold standard. Using an external cohort of 154 patients, we confirmed the independent prognostic role of TTF1. TTF1 expression and PD-L1 can be used to stratify risk and predict PFS and OS in patients treated with ICI for NS-NSCLC.

Targeting CDK4 overcomes EMT-mediated tumor heterogeneity and therapeutic resistance in KRAS mutant lung cancer

Lack of sustained response to therapeutic agents in patients with KRAS-mutant lung cancer poses a major challenge and arises partly due to intratumor heterogeneity that defines phenotypically distinct tumor subpopulations. To attain better therapeutic outcomes, it is important to understand the differential therapeutic sensitivities of tumor cell subsets. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition is a biological phenomenon that can alter the state of cells along a phenotypic spectrum and cause transcriptional rewiring to produce distinct tumor cell subpopulations. We utilized functional shRNA screens, in in vitro and in vivo models, to identify and validate an increased dependence of mesenchymal tumor cells on cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) for survival, as well as a mechanism of resistance to MEK inhibitors. High zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 levels in mesenchymal tumor cells repressed p21, leading to perturbed CDK4 pathway activity. Increased dependence on CDK4 rendered mesenchymal cancer cells particularly vulnerable to selective CDK4 inhibitors. Coadministration of CDK4 and MEK inhibitors in heterogeneous tumors effectively targeted different tumor subpopulations, subverting the resistance to either single-agent treatment.

Preclinical evidence of synergism between atovaquone and chemotherapy by AMPK-dependent mitochondrial dysfunction

Chemoresistance has been associated with increased reliance on mitochondrial functions in many cancers, including lung cancer. Atovaquone is an anti-malaria drug and mitochondrial inhibitor. In this work, we attempted to explore whether atovaquone can be repurposed for lung cancer treatment to overcome chemoresistance. We showed that atovaquone inhibited proliferation, colony formation and survival in non-small cell lung cancer cell (NSCLC) cells. Of note, the effective dose of atovaquone was clinically achievable. Combination index value indicated that atovaquone and carboplatin were synergistic in inhibiting NSCLC. The potent efficacy of atovaquone and its synergism with chemotherapeutic drug were also demonstrated in NSCLC xenograft mice model. Mechanism studies showed that the synergism between atovaquone and carboplatin was due to atovaquone's ability in disrupting mitochondrial functions via specifically inhibiting complex III induced oxygen consumption. Subsequently, atovaquone activated AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and inhibited mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. AMPK inhibition reversed the anti-NSCLC activity of atovaquone, suggesting that the action of atovaquone is also dependent on AMPK. Our work suggests that atovaquone is an attractive candidate for NSCLC treatment. Our findings emphasize that inhibition of mitochondrial function is a promising therapeutic strategy to enhance NSCLC chemosensitivity.

Identification of Novel MicroRNAs Targeting SARS-CoV-2 through the Regulation of TMPRSS2/PI3K/AKT/PTEN Alignment in Lung Cancer: An in Silico Analysis

In this study, we investigated the interactions between SARS-CoV-2 and miRNAs associated with lung cancer using bioinformatic approaches. A special focus was placed on TMPRSS2 and lung cancer progression pathways involving AKT/PI3K/PTEN genes.

Current therapy of KRAS-mutant lung cancer

KRAS mutations are the most frequent gain-of-function alterations in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) in the Western world. Although they have been identified decades ago, prior efforts to target KRAS signaling with single-agent therapeutic approaches such as farnesyl transferase inhibitors, prenylation inhibition, impairment of KRAS downstream signaling, and synthetic lethality screens have been unsuccessful. Moreover, the role of KRAS oncogene in LADC is still not fully understood, and its prognostic and predictive impact with regards to the standard of care therapy remains controversial. Of note, KRAS-related studies that included general non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) population instead of LADC patients should be very carefully evaluated. Recently, however, comprehensive genomic profiling and wide-spectrum analysis of other co-occurring genetic alterations have identified unique therapeutic vulnerabilities. Novel targeted agents such as the covalent KRAS G12C inhibitors or the recently proposed combinatory approaches are some examples which may allow a tailored treatment for LADC patients harboring KRAS mutations. This review summarizes the current knowledge about the therapeutic approaches of KRAS-mutated LADC and provides an update on the most recent advances in KRAS-targeted anti-cancer strategies, with a focus on potential clinical implications.

Targeting KRAS in non-small-cell lung cancer: recent progress and new approaches

Rat sarcoma (RAS) is the most frequently mutated oncogene in human cancer, with Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) being the most commonly mutated RAS isoform. Overall, KRAS accounts for 85% of RAS mutations observed in human cancers and is present in 35% of lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs). While the use of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) has drastically changed the treatment landscape of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years, historic attempts to target KRAS (both direct and indirect approaches) have had little success, and no KRAS-specific targeted therapies have been approved to date for patients in this molecular subset of NSCLC. With the discovery by Ostrem, Shokat, and colleagues of the switch II pocket on the surface of the active and inactive forms of KRAS, we now have an improved understanding of the complex interactions involved in the RAS family of signaling proteins which has led to the development of a number of promising direct KRAS^G12C inhibitors, such as sotorasib and adagrasib. In previously treated patients with KRAS^G12C-mutant NSCLC, clinical activity has been shown for both sotorasib and adagrasib monotherapy; these data suggest promising new treatment options are on the horizon. With the stage now set for a new era in the treatment of KRAS^G12C-mutated NSCLC, many questions remain to be answered in order to further elucidate the mechanisms of resistance, how best to use combination strategies, and if KRAS^G12C inhibitors will have suitable activity in earlier lines of therapy for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC.

Immunotherapy in oncogene addicted non-small cell lung cancer

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) has led to notable changes in treatment strategies for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and now forms a part of standard of care treatment in patients with advanced disease. However, most patients do not respond to ICI monotherapy, which may be explained by significant variations in efficacy according to different immune and molecular profiles in tumours. Improved response rates have been observed in smokers and are associated with tumors that have high mutation loads, with a higher tendency to form neoantigens. This premise itself defies the eventual significance of ICIs for oncogene-driven NSCLC, which in general are more common in never smokers and potentially have reduced capacity for neoantigen formation. Furthermore, pivotal trials investigating ICIs in advanced NSCLC have usually excluded patients with oncogenic drivers, hence the outcome of these agents in this population is poorly characterized. In this article, we aim to review the most current evidence, encompassing clinical and preclinical data focused on a wide range of oncogene-addicted NSCLCs.